Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out.
Is there another source for 63/37? |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/4/2011 3:54 PM, mcp6453 wrote:
The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Actually, it appears to be readily available from multiple sources. Even Amazon is carrying it. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
In article ,
mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Sure, Digi-Key or Mouser, but you'll pay list price. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/4/2011 4:29 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Sure, Digi-Key or Mouser, but you'll pay list price. That's not new. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/4/2011 10:39 PM, mcp6453 wrote:
Sure, Digi-Key or Mouser, but you'll pay list price. That's not new. A lot of old things now cost more than their new replacements that you can't or don't want to use. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"mcp6453" wrote in message ... The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/21-1185 they have a lot of 60/40, also |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/5/2011 3:00 PM, MG wrote:
"mcp6453" wrote in message ... The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/21-1185 they have a lot of 60/40, also At one point, the solder I bought had some silver in it. The two pieces of rolls that I have don't have the labels, so I don't know if I used those roles up. I measured the diameter of the rolls I have, and it's .036. Now I wonder if that's really .032 or .040 nominal. It's not a lot of difference either way for soldering XLRs. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
mcp6453 wrote:
At one point, the solder I bought had some silver in it. The two pieces of rolls that I have don't have the labels, so I don't know if I used those roles up. That would be 2% silver-bearing solder. It's not eutectic, so it's harder to make good joints with. On the other hand, it also doesn't flow as well as 60/40. BUT, you have to use it on silver-plated contacts otherwise you will wind up with a little ring of base metal exposed around the joint which can corrode. I measured the diameter of the rolls I have, and it's .036. Now I wonder if that's really .032 or .040 nominal. It's not a lot of difference either way for soldering XLRs. I'd pick something larger than that for XLRs, but that's a personal preference. It's faster to work with 18 ga for XLRs, but for doing IC sockets you might prefer 26 ga. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Scott Dorsey wrote:
That would be 2% silver-bearing solder. It's not eutectic, so it's harder to make good joints with. Sn62Pb36Ag2 solder (aka Sn62 & Pb36A) is eutectic. It has a distinct melting point of 179 degrees Celsius, according to Electronic materials and processes handbook: http://books.google.com/books?id=CQG...page&q&f=false |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Stuart Richards wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: That would be 2% silver-bearing solder. It's not eutectic, so it's harder to make good joints with. Sn62Pb36Ag2 solder (aka Sn62 & Pb36A) is eutectic. It has a distinct melting point of 179 degrees Celsius, according to Electronic materials and processes handbook: http://books.google.com/books?id=CQG...page&q&f=false Wow! I always thought it had a plastic region because it crystallizes on me if I so much as breathe on it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/5/2011 7:53 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Stuart Richards wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: That would be 2% silver-bearing solder. It's not eutectic, so it's harder to make good joints with. Sn62Pb36Ag2 solder (aka Sn62 & Pb36A) is eutectic. It has a distinct melting point of 179 degrees Celsius, according to Electronic materials and processes handbook: http://books.google.com/books?id=CQG...page&q&f=false Wow! I always thought it had a plastic region because it crystallizes on me if I so much as breathe on it. --scott I built a DTMF decoder kit tonight, and I had a heck of a time getting the flux off the board. Even the PCB cleaner that I've had for 15 years didn't work well. It looks like I may have to run it through the dishwasher. That's never happened before. The board and components came from Europe, so they're fully RoHS. I wonder if my old solder doesn't like RoHS. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/5/2011 11:03 PM, mcp6453 wrote:
I built a DTMF decoder kit tonight, and I had a heck of a time getting the flux off the board. Even the PCB cleaner that I've had for 15 years didn't work well. It looks like I may have to run it through the dishwasher. You might. Many of the fluxes these days are water-soluble, but that doesn't mean they don't need some elbow grease too. Commercially built PC boards go through what's essentially a dishwasher after they're soldered. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Mike Rivers wrote:
On 3/5/2011 11:03 PM, mcp6453 wrote: I built a DTMF decoder kit tonight, and I had a heck of a time getting the flux off the board. Even the PCB cleaner that I've had for 15 years didn't work well. It looks like I may have to run it through the dishwasher. You might. Many of the fluxes these days are water-soluble, but that doesn't mean they don't need some elbow grease too. Commercially built PC boards go through what's essentially a dishwasher after they're soldered. And most of those fancy washable fluxes are also corrosive, so you HAVE to wash them off. I think you're better off just using plain old rosin flux. You can remove it with alcohol and some elbow grease if you want or need to, but most of the time you can just leave it on and it won't hurt anything. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
mcp6453 wrote:
The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? Cheers ian |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"Ian Bell" wrote in message
mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Ian Bell wrote:
mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? Yes. It doesn't flow as well as 60/40, but it has no plastic range as it cools so it's much easier to make a good joint especially if there is any vibration. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Ian Bell" wrote in message mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? geoff |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/9/2011 2:29 PM, geoff wrote:
Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? No need to get too analytical. How about "crummy joints?" -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"geoff" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: "Ian Bell" wrote in message mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? I've also heard of that usage, but far less often. UK? If you think that "Cold solder joint" is an error or somehow something I made up, Google is your friend. ;-) |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Arny Krueger wrote:
"geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Ian Bell" wrote in message mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? I've also heard of that usage, but far less often. UK? If you think that "Cold solder joint" is an error or somehow something I made up, Google is your friend. ;-) It seems to be a cross-Atlantic divide. I call 'em dry joints, as do all the electronics people I've worked with here in the UK, while Americans seem to prefer cold joints. Either way, they're not a Good Thing(tm). -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Arny Krueger wrote:
"geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Ian Bell" wrote in message mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? I've also heard of that usage, but far less often. UK? If you think that "Cold solder joint" is an error or somehow something I made up, Google is your friend. ;-) Always been 'dry joints' here. Cold solder was some crappy conductive glue IIRC. But I guess usage varies. Hell in some countries they can't even tell the difference between an ass and an arse ! (_)*(_) geoff There was a young girl from Madras, Had a truely magnificent ass. Not rounded and pink, as you possibly think, But was gray, had long ears, and ate grass. |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"geoff" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: "geoff" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Ian Bell" wrote in message mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? I've also heard of that usage, but far less often. UK? If you think that "Cold solder joint" is an error or somehow something I made up, Google is your friend. ;-) Always been 'dry joints' here. Cold solder was some crappy conductive glue IIRC. But I guess usage varies. Hell in some countries they can't even tell the difference between an ass and an arse ! Thinking about it, "dry joint" seems to be more descriptive of the appearance of this kind of a bad solder joint. It looks dry and sandy instead of smooth and liquid-like. The cold joint terminology seems inverted, since the way you get them is to move things while they are still too hot. Hey, I didn't make American English up - I just live here so that is what I speak! ;-) |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/10/2011 2:30 PM, Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Ian wrote in message mcp6453 wrote: The 63/37 solder that All Electronics had for $23 that Scott mentioned sold out. Is there another source for 63/37? Is this significantly different to 60/40? The magic of 63/37 is that its eutectic. IOW, it does not go through a plastic stage while cooling, but goes directly from liquid to solid. This reduces the possibilty of cold joints. Don't you mean 'dry joints' ? I've also heard of that usage, but far less often. UK? If you think that "Cold solder joint" is an error or somehow something I made up, Google is your friend. ;-) Always been 'dry joints' here. Cold solder was some crappy conductive glue IIRC. But I guess usage varies. Hell in some countries they can't even tell the difference between an ass and an arse ! Thinking about it, "dry joint" seems to be more descriptive of the appearance of this kind of a bad solder joint. It looks dry and sandy instead of smooth and liquid-like. The cold joint terminology seems inverted, since the way you get them is to move things while they are still too hot. Hey, I didn't make American English up - I just live here so that is what I speak! ;-) One way that I think of a "cold solder joint" is a joint where there is a nice, shiny ball of solder on a component lead, but the solder never made contact with the copper pad below (or the lug of the terminal strip). Someone did not properly heat the pad (or lug), probably not the component lead either. They just managed to get a ball of solder to attach to the lead. Shiny ball, but useless. The solder got hot enough, but the rest of the joint did not. I made my share of cold solder joints in the early days, and still pay close attention to avoid doing it again. I wave-solder everything in my mic preamps except the four voltage regulators in the power supply for the highest consistency and reliability. The regulators need to be hand-soldered due to alignment problems with the heat sinks, chassis, etc. I hand-solder them very carefully, to avoid cold solder joints. John Hardy |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"Cold" and "dry" imply pretty much the same thing -- the solder and the
surfaces haven't gotten hot enough for the solder to flow freely and make a proper bond, both mechanical and chemical. |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Cold" and "dry" imply pretty much the same thing -- the solder and the surfaces haven't gotten hot enough for the solder to flow freely and make a proper bond, both mechanical and chemical. A dry joint has flowed fine, but moved while setting and become crystaline (or something like that). A good joint can also become 'dry' with extended vibration over years. geoff |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Cold" and "dry" imply pretty much the same thing -- the solder and the surfaces haven't gotten hot enough for the solder to flow freely and make a proper bond, both mechanical and chemical. I would have thought that "dry" referenced a lack of flux rather than a lack of heat. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On Mar 11, 7:21*am, "geoff" wrote:
A dry joint has flowed fine, but moved while setting and become crystaline (or something like that). A good joint can also become *'dry' with extended vibration over years. geoff Those we call cold. |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Peter Larsen wrote:
William Sommerwerck wrote: "Cold" and "dry" imply pretty much the same thing -- the solder and the surfaces haven't gotten hot enough for the solder to flow freely and make a proper bond, both mechanical and chemical. I would have thought that "dry" referenced a lack of flux rather than a lack of heat. I was taught to call 'em dry joints, as against a good solder joint which has a shiny, wet-looking surface. The cause may be bad temperature control of the soldering station, a lack of flux, or movement during the setting phase. Close examination of the joint will tell you which is the actual cause. The cure is the same in all cases, though. Remove the bad solder, and remake the joint, paying attention to cleanliness, temperature, and movement while cooling. To call them cold joints doesn't make sense to me, as that implies there's only one cause. Especially as one cause of a "cold" joint can be a soldering iron that's too hot. As I've said elsewhere, though, it seems to be that in the UK, we call them dry joints, and in the USA, you call them cold joints. Both refer to a solder joint where the solder hasn't wetted the adjoining surfaces sufficiently, causing a mechanically weak joint with dubious conductivity. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/11/2011 1:21 AM, geoff wrote:
A dry joint has flowed fine, but moved while setting and become crystaline (or something like that). Here in The Colonies, that's called a "cold" joint because it was moved while the molten solder was cooling but not yet fully solidified. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"John Hardy" wrote in message
One way that I think of a "cold solder joint" is a joint where there is a nice, shiny ball of solder on a component lead, but the solder never made contact with the copper pad below (or the lug of the terminal strip). Someone did not properly heat the pad (or lug), probably not the component lead either. They just managed to get a ball of solder to attach to the lead. Shiny ball, but useless. The solder got hot enough, but the rest of the joint did not. The inverse is also possible. There can be a nice shiny ball of solder on the copper pad, but the lead remains dry. I made my share of cold solder joints in the early days, and still pay close attention to avoid doing it again. I wave-solder everything in my mic preamps except the four voltage regulators in the power supply for the highest consistency and reliability. The regulators need to be hand-soldered due to alignment problems with the heat sinks, chassis, etc. I hand-solder them very carefully, to avoid cold solder joints. I don't think that anybody solders well enough to be able to bypass the inspection step. |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
The cure is the same in all cases. Remove the bad solder...
This is critical. Just adding fresh solder isn't always enough. |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
... On 3/11/2011 1:21 AM, geoff wrote: A dry joint has flowed fine, but moved while setting and become crystaline (or something like that). Here in The Colonies, that's called a "cold" joint because it was moved while the molten solder was cooling but not yet fully solidified. However the terms came into common use like so much jargon neither accurately describes the condition, but we all know what we're talking about and what to do about it. Steve King |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Arny Krueger wrote:
"John Hardy" wrote in message One way that I think of a "cold solder joint" is a joint where there is a nice, shiny ball of solder on a component lead, but the solder never made contact with the copper pad below (or the lug of the terminal strip). Someone did not properly heat the pad (or lug), probably not the component lead either. They just managed to get a ball of solder to attach to the lead. Shiny ball, but useless. The solder got hot enough, but the rest of the joint did not. The inverse is also possible. There can be a nice shiny ball of solder on the copper pad, but the lead remains dry. I made my share of cold solder joints in the early days, and still pay close attention to avoid doing it again. I wave-solder everything in my mic preamps except the four voltage regulators in the power supply for the highest consistency and reliability. The regulators need to be hand-soldered due to alignment problems with the heat sinks, chassis, etc. I hand-solder them very carefully, to avoid cold solder joints. I don't think that anybody solders well enough to be able to bypass the inspection step. In my experience, cold joints come from heating the solder to the liquid state, but not the joint being soldered. If you heat the work until it melts the solder, you won't have the problem. |
#34
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
In my experience, cold joints come from heating the solder
to the liquid state, but not the joint being soldered. If you heat the work until it melts the solder, you won't have the problem. Hardly anyone solders that way. I usually touch the solder to the iron, and let it run all over the place. I'm afraid of overheating whatever component is being soldered. |
#35
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
William Sommerwerck wrote:
In my experience, cold joints come from heating the solder to the liquid state, but not the joint being soldered. If you heat the work until it melts the solder, you won't have the problem. Hardly anyone solders that way. I usually touch the solder to the iron, and let it run all over the place. I'm afraid of overheating whatever component is being soldered. In the Army they taught us to heat the work, never the solder. You need to put enough solder on to wet the tip and get good contact with the work, but the whole point is to heat the work and then the solder flows cleanly and evenly onto it. You overheat components by doing the opposite, because it takes longer to get a good joint. The whole key is to dump a huge amount of heat into the work, flow the solder, and then get out as quickly as possible. Overheating is caused by too little heat or too little heat transfer, not by too much. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#36
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
William Sommerwerck wrote:
In my experience, cold joints come from heating the solder to the liquid state, but not the joint being soldered. If you heat the work until it melts the solder, you won't have the problem. Hardly anyone solders that way. I usually touch the solder to the iron, and let it run all over the place. I'm afraid of overheating whatever component is being soldered. I touch the solder to the iron in order to facilitate heat transfer to the work. Then, I heat the work until it melts the solder applied to the opposite side. But I don't have much experience with nodern solid state components, so it is entirely possible that I might damage some of them with too much heat as you suggest. In this respect, common sense comes into play.... |
#37
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
On 3/11/2011 10:03 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In the Army they taught us to heat the work, never the solder. You need to put enough solder on to wet the tip and get good contact with the work, but the whole point is to heat the work and then the solder flows cleanly and evenly onto it. Back then you could heat up the terminal lug and lead on a terminal strip or tube socket without damage. It takes a different interpretation of "heat the work" when the lug equivalent is a pad on a circuit board. A dab of fresh solder and flux on the tip of the iron helps the heat to flow to the work, and then you add more solder to do the work. That's not the same as transferring a blob of hot conductive glue to where you want the joint to be. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#38
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
In the Army they taught us to heat the work, never the solder.
You need to put enough solder on to wet the tip and get good contact with the work, but the whole point is to heat the work and then the solder flows cleanly and evenly onto it. Back then you could heat up the terminal lug and lead on a terminal strip or tube socket without damage. It takes a different interpretation of "heat the work" when the lug equivalent is a pad on a circuit board. A dab of fresh solder and flux on the tip of the iron helps the heat to flow to the work, and then you add more solder to do the work. That's not the same as transferring a blob of hot conductive glue to where you want the joint to be. That's a good description of how many, if not most of us, do it. |
#39
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
Scott Dorsey wrote:
William Sommerwerck wrote: In my experience, cold joints come from heating the solder to the liquid state, but not the joint being soldered. If you heat the work until it melts the solder, you won't have the problem. Hardly anyone solders that way. I usually touch the solder to the iron, and let it run all over the place. I'm afraid of overheating whatever component is being soldered. In the Army they taught us to heat the work, never the solder. You need to put enough solder on to wet the tip and get good contact with the work, but the whole point is to heat the work and then the solder flows cleanly and evenly onto it. You overheat components by doing the opposite, because it takes longer to get a good joint. The whole key is to dump a huge amount of heat into the work, flow the solder, and then get out as quickly as possible. Overheating is caused by too little heat or too little heat transfer, not by too much. --scott I recently met some Neutrik knock-offs that are identical in every way, except quality. Attempting to heat the work melted the body slug of the female XLR's. Had to put the females into males as heat sinks just to be able to heat the work slighlty and then heat the solder and the wire. Ruined one slug and replaced it with one from a Neutrik clipped from the church's old snake. Perfect fit. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#40
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
63/37 Solder
I recently met some Neutrik knock-offs that are identical in every way,
except quality. Attempting to heat the work melted the body slug of the female XLR's. Had to put the females into males as heat sinks just to be able to heat the work slighlty and then heat the solder and the wire. Ruined one slug and replaced it with one from a Neutrik clipped from the church's old snake. Perfect fit. Which only goes to prove... You can't teach a cheap plug Neutriks. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lead in Solder | Pro Audio | |||
Lead in Solder | Tech | |||
Lead in Solder | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FA: Vintage Solder | Marketplace | |||
Better to solder or crimp? | Car Audio |