Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201   Report Post  
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Cain"

Phil Allison wrote:

** Kindly stop breathing - others need the air vermin like you are
stealing.


Stop posting to usenet.



** ROTFLMAO - the brainless goose is stuck in a groove !!






............... Phil





  #202   Report Post  
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Cain"

Phil Allison wrote:

** Kindly stop breathing - others need the air vermin like you are
stealing.


Stop posting to usenet.



** ROTFLMAO - the brainless goose is stuck in a groove !!






............... Phil





  #203   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:
** Sickening pommy smartarses like you Dave are even more widespread.


That's what comes of being the master race.

--
*A fool and his money are soon partying *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #204   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:
** Sickening pommy smartarses like you Dave are even more widespread.


That's what comes of being the master race.

--
*A fool and his money are soon partying *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #205   Report Post  
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Plowman (News)"

Phil Allison

** Sickening pommy smartarses like you Dave are even more widespread.


That's what comes of being the master race.



** You missed out a word - Dave.

Should read " ...... the master baiter race" .





............. Phil




  #206   Report Post  
Phil Allison
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Plowman (News)"

Phil Allison

** Sickening pommy smartarses like you Dave are even more widespread.


That's what comes of being the master race.



** You missed out a word - Dave.

Should read " ...... the master baiter race" .





............. Phil


  #207   Report Post  
William Sommerwerck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One truly final comment on dynamic versus electrostatic...

If anyone out there thinks that electrostatic (and the better true-planar)
speakers are not inherently superior to conventional dynamic speakers, I urge
them to compare the best dynamic headphones (such as Sennheisers) with good
electrostatics (such as Stax). Decide for yourself which reproduces the
recording most-accurately.

  #208   Report Post  
William Sommerwerck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

One truly final comment on dynamic versus electrostatic...

If anyone out there thinks that electrostatic (and the better true-planar)
speakers are not inherently superior to conventional dynamic speakers, I urge
them to compare the best dynamic headphones (such as Sennheisers) with good
electrostatics (such as Stax). Decide for yourself which reproduces the
recording most-accurately.

  #209   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:
That's what comes of being the master race.



** You missed out a word - Dave.


The dash standing for magnificent?

Should read " ...... the master baiter race" .


Well, you certainly accepted the bait. Hook line and sinker.

--
*If a thing is worth doing, wouldn't it have been done already?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #210   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Phil Allison wrote:
That's what comes of being the master race.



** You missed out a word - Dave.


The dash standing for magnificent?

Should read " ...... the master baiter race" .


Well, you certainly accepted the bait. Hook line and sinker.

--
*If a thing is worth doing, wouldn't it have been done already?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.


  #211   Report Post  
Stewart Pinkerton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:25:41 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote:

One truly final comment on dynamic versus electrostatic...

If anyone out there thinks that electrostatic (and the better true-planar)
speakers are not inherently superior to conventional dynamic speakers, I urge
them to compare the best dynamic headphones (such as Sennheisers) with good
electrostatics (such as Stax). Decide for yourself which reproduces the
recording most-accurately.


Irrelevant, whichever you prefer, since speakers and headphones are
*miles* apart in necessary engineering compromises.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
  #212   Report Post  
Stewart Pinkerton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:25:41 -0800, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote:

One truly final comment on dynamic versus electrostatic...

If anyone out there thinks that electrostatic (and the better true-planar)
speakers are not inherently superior to conventional dynamic speakers, I urge
them to compare the best dynamic headphones (such as Sennheisers) with good
electrostatics (such as Stax). Decide for yourself which reproduces the
recording most-accurately.


Irrelevant, whichever you prefer, since speakers and headphones are
*miles* apart in necessary engineering compromises.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering
  #213   Report Post  
Sander deWaal
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"William Sommerwerck" said:

One truly final comment on dynamic versus electrostatic...

If anyone out there thinks that electrostatic (and the better true-planar)
speakers are not inherently superior to conventional dynamic speakers, I urge
them to compare the best dynamic headphones (such as Sennheisers) with good
electrostatics (such as Stax). Decide for yourself which reproduces the
recording most-accurately.


The acoustical environments of speakers and headphones are not
comparable.
The room is the most important factor here.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "
  #214   Report Post  
Sander deWaal
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"William Sommerwerck" said:

One truly final comment on dynamic versus electrostatic...

If anyone out there thinks that electrostatic (and the better true-planar)
speakers are not inherently superior to conventional dynamic speakers, I urge
them to compare the best dynamic headphones (such as Sennheisers) with good
electrostatics (such as Stax). Decide for yourself which reproduces the
recording most-accurately.


The acoustical environments of speakers and headphones are not
comparable.
The room is the most important factor here.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "
  #215   Report Post  
Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
Ignorant ****.

**** off, you hypocritical ignorant ****.
Ignorant ****. The 57 is an entirely different design to the 63, and
an anechoic chamber. Now **** off, you ignorant ****.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering


Hmmm...looks like Pinkerton has contracted the Ferstler disease...

Cheers,

MvBB





  #216   Report Post  
Margaret von Busenhalter-Butt
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
Ignorant ****.

**** off, you hypocritical ignorant ****.
Ignorant ****. The 57 is an entirely different design to the 63, and
an anechoic chamber. Now **** off, you ignorant ****.
--
Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering


Hmmm...looks like Pinkerton has contracted the Ferstler disease...

Cheers,

MvBB



Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! Peter Larsen Pro Audio 125 July 9th 08 06:16 PM
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk xy Pro Audio 385 December 29th 04 12:00 AM
Artists cut out the record biz [email protected] Pro Audio 64 July 9th 04 10:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:40 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"