[BretLudwig]

US Media Coup Detat
By Lee John Barnes ‹… June 4, 2008



"The victory of Barack Obama is final confirmation that the death grip
the media hold on our democracies is complete. It was not until a tiny
cabal of White liberal and liberal Jewish New York journalists working on
the New York Post decided to promote Obama as a candidate that Obama even
figured on the radar of the democratic leadership candidates. But the
ground for his rise to power had also been prepared for Obama by
Hollywood. For decades the ultimate white liberal dream has been a black
president.

What mattered most to the white liberals in the media was not that the
candidate would be a good president, just a black president. Regardless of
their policies, or lack of it, the ultimate proof of the power of the media
would be to elect a black president solely on the grounds he was black.
Obama was their €˜project, and proof of their grotesque and bloated
power over American society and politics.

The US media have been conditioning the US public to vote for a black
president via the programmes they produce and transmit for decades. From
the €˜heroic figure of Presidential Candidate David Palmer in 24, the
constant propaganda of the €˜black father figure dispensing wisdom to
idiotic whites as encapsulated by Morgan Freeman or the heroic black cop /
firefighter / soldier such as Denzil Washington or Cuba Gooding Jr saving
idiotic whites from nasty Russians or blonde fascist whites usually with a
British accent, the ground for Obama was prepared by the propaganda of the
media and hollywood.

The sickening sight of watching young brainwashed whites voting for Obama
because the media told them too simply because he was black, was a sign of
a deep sickness both in American society and its white youth. White
American youth have become so traumatised by the endless attacks on White
culture, white identity and white history by the media and the educational
system that they have developed the same sort of pathological racial self
loathing for themselves and their white society as the German people have.
Like the US, the German people have been bombarded for decades by
propaganda designating them as uniquely evil in the history of humanity.
This has led to a deep pathological self loathing and the utter perversity
of some sections of the German people, such as self hate, sexual
perversity, alcoholism, drug abuse and support for the immigration
invasion of their own homeland.

Obama is policy light. No-one knows what he stands for and what he wants
to do with America. By all accounts his vision for the US is the same sort
of retarded semi-socialist nonsense that is promulgated by the New Labour
party. He was not supported though because of his policies. In most of
the interviews I have seen with his young white supporters when asked what
policies they support as espoused by Obama, they start blinking, laugh
nervously then open their mouths a few times and then just start shouting
€˜Obama - Yeah - WOO €˜. This is because they are voting for him simply
due to the conditioning of the media, not because they want too. They do
not even know what he stands for. They do not know why they support Obama,
they just know they should support Obama and so they do.

Just as the masses in all consumer societies are conditioned to buy
commodities and rubbish they dont need, this process of conditoning now
works with politics. They will vote for any idiot, as long as they are
told to vote for the idiot.

There is though good news as a result of Obamas victory. The first is that
the issue of race has once again become a matter of debate in the US. The
idea that blacks can now carry on perpetuating their mythic
€˜victimhood status and culture of blame is undermined when a black
man can work hard and get to become the nominated presidential candidate.
From now on whites in America who have been subjected to the endless
€˜blame whitey propaganda of idiot blacks like Al Sharpton and Jesse
Jackson can now point at Obama and say €˜if you dont succeed in our
society it is because you are responsible for your own failings, and not
because of whitey making you fail. This will finally begin to end the
racial greivances industry and its endless extortion of cash from the
white community who subsidise the welfarism and blame culture of American
blacks with their taxes.

The other good news is that many people in the US will now be realising
that the media has far too much power, and that it needs to be curbed. The
media is just another service industry, but it has been allowed to develop
to the point that the people, the political process and society merely
serve the interests of the media. The media must be cut back to the point
that its role is simply to report the news and advertise commodities. The
media must be banned from political campaigning.

But the best news of all is that an Obama victory virtually guarantees a
Republican President and John McCain in the Whitehouse at the next
election. Though I would prefer to see Ron Paul elected, McCain is
preferrable to a token president voted into power simply because he is
black.

If the great nation that is America has come so low that it is now run by
the media, hollywood and lobby groups instead of for the benefit of the
American people then that nation has become a sad, pathetic joke. Whilst
its military forces are ordered to police the planet and fight terrorism,
at home it has surrendered its democracy to the enemy within."

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=4835

((Additional comment :

From a reader: Final Popular Vote Numbers
Hillary Clinton: 17,785,009
Barack Obama: 17,479,990

Hillary Clinton won over 300,000 more votes than Obama. Two other facts
come into play: Obama earned approximately 90% of the black vote, a fact
that dilutes his overall appeal to white Democrats. And Hillary won in the
key "swing states" (states which might go in either direction come
November) of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. The only thing in the Dem's
corner, apart from the media hype mentioned by Barnes is the fact that
their opponent is the odious creature John McCain. Not only does McCain
absolutely refuse to tackle Obama's racial extremism (McCain won't "go
negtative" except against his own white supporters), but he alienates blue
collar people by openly praising free trade and is an open borders fanatic.
To top it all off, McCain is so deeply committed to the Zionist lobby that
he tells his own working class base, whose children will have to pay the
price, that the US should stay in Iraq pretty much forever. The 2008
election, with Obama as his opponent, is McCain's to lose...something he
works hard at achieving.

))

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

[Eeyore]

BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

Graham

[Eeyore]

ScottW wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 5, 1:53*pm, Eeyore
wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Eeyore" *wrote
BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

Before you get upset, 2pid, I'm sure he meant "**** RELIGION (except
for christianity)"

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 5, 1:53*pm, Eeyore
wrote:

Just how stupid can you be ?

BTW, since this concerns Bratzi (and now 2pid, too) I hope this was
rhetorical.

[Eeyore]

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote
BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

Before you get upset, 2pid, I'm sure he meant "**** RELIGION (except
for christianity)"

NO I DID NOT !

Which ****ing version of Christianity anyway ?

Graham

[Eeyore]

ScottW wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote
BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

Well said, dhimmi.

**** YOU TOO

Ever heard about ducking witches ? Would YOU float (be a witch) or sink and drown (be pure).

Graham

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Poofie, please be advised that Scottie Witlessmongrel has an unbreakable
grip on "RAO's Champion Stupidhead". You will never dethrone him no matter
how much inane babble you deposit here.

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

Before you get upset, 2pid, I'm sure he meant "**** RELIGION (except
for christianity)"

NO I DID NOT !

Look -- a baby-doll groupie is on the prowl for a fat, greasy, middle-aged
putz. Go for it, Poofster!

[Eeyore]

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Poofie, please be advised that Scottie Witlessmongrel has an unbreakable
grip on "RAO's Champion Stupidhead". You will never dethrone him no matter
how much inane babble you deposit here.

Go fuxck yourself. I believe there are mechanical attachments that will assist you in that task.

Graham

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 5, 2:36*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Jun 5, 12:32*pm, Eeyore
wrote:





"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Eeyore" *wrote
BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

Before you get upset, 2pid, I'm sure he meant "**** RELIGION (except
for christianity)"

NO I DID NOT !

Which ****ing version of Christianity anyway ?

This one.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24009286/

Now Graham wants to be a "christian".

I'm glad to know that you've finally disavowed any relation to
christianity, 2pid.

What other revelations are forthcoming? That your homohobia has its
roots in secret carnal desires? That would explain why you stalk
George.

[Eeyore]

ScottW wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
ScottW wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote
BretLudwig wrote:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/06/us-media-coup-detat/

You're taking the British National Party as your source of British opinion now
are you ?

Just how stupid can you be ?

You better get to church.

**** RELIGION ! The cause of more wars and human misery than any other plague on earth.

Before you get upset, 2pid, I'm sure he meant "**** RELIGION (except
for christianity)"

NO I DID NOT !

Which ****ing version of Christianity anyway ?

This one.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24009286/

Polygamous Christianity ?

Is there no end to the debased perverted fetishes that shelter themselves under the general scope
of RELIGION ?


Now Graham wants to be a "christian".

I've had no trouble pulling more than one girl without religion thanks.

You know how it works ... ? You're nice ... They LIKE you. Girls are super like that. Don't try to
obsessively show off, just be nice and honest, chat about stuff that's mutually interesting, treat
them like friends and respect their views and next thing .. well you may find the clothes on the
floor in the morning.

Graham

[BretLudwig]

The smartest and most independent thinking Britons are members of the BNP,
as their German counterparts are in the NPD. Both groups, though differing
naturally and correctly by the differing national characteristics of each
nation, have a common goal: keeping what is theirs theirs. I applaud them
both.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 5, 4:13*pm, "BretLudwig" wrote:
*The smartest and most independent thinking Britons are members of the BNP,
as their German counterparts are in the NPD. Both groups, though differing
naturally and correctly by the differing national characteristics of each
nation, have a common goal: keeping what is theirs theirs. I applaud them
both.

BNP:

The British National Party exists to secure a future for the
indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have
been our homeland for millennia. We use the term indigenous to
describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here
after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the
historic migrations from mainland Europe.The migrations of the Celts,
Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norse and closely related kindred peoples have
been, over the past few thousands years, instrumental in defining the
character of our family of nations.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/02/mission-statement-2/

Hint: That isn't you or 2pid if you apply these "smart" policies here
in the US.

NPD:

The National Democratic Party of Germany (German:
Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands, NPD) is a German
nationalist political party. The party, founded on 28 November 1964,
is a successor to the German Reich Party (German: Deutsche
Reichspartei, DRP). Udo Voigt has led the party since 1996.

An ARD-led poll states that the majority of the population in Germany
considers the NPD to be undemocratic and damaging to the image of the
country. [1] The NPD is viewed by its opponents and the mainstream
media as a de facto neo-Nazi organization. The party opposes the
increasing number of non-whites, Jews, and Muslims living in Germany,
and Voigt has held meetings with various white nationalist ideologues,
such as the American David Duke, a former member of the Louisiana
House of Representatives and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

The German federal intelligence agency Verfassungsschutz classifies
the NPD as a "threat to the constitutional order" because of its
platform and philosophy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...rty_of_Germany

Hm. I wonder why Bratzi likes these guys. Let's see:

"The party opposes the increasing number of non-whites, Jews, and
Muslims living in Germany, and Voigt has held meetings with various
white nationalist ideologues, such as the American David Duke..."

That answers that.

[Eeyore]

BretLudwig wrote:

The smartest and most independent thinking Britons are members of the BNP

Oh dear.

Your gullibility has just plumbed new depths.

Graham

[BretLudwig]

Signal says:

"
Signal
View profile
"BretLudwig" wrote: The smartest and most
independent thinking Britons are members of the BNP An organisation with a
history of holocaust denial, anti-semitism, racial discrimination,
violence, incitement to racial hatred, etc etc. "Smart" is not the
prevailing opinion of such people. Try "scum".
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...m&btnG=Search&...
-- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
More options Jun 5, 6:00 pm
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
From: Signal
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:23 +0100
Local: Thurs, Jun 5 2008 6:00 pm
Subject: British view of BH Obama......interesting....
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This
message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Jun 12, 6:00 pm).


"BretLudwig" wrote:
The smartest and most independent thinking Britons are members of the
BNP

An organisation with a history of holocaust denial, anti-semitism,
racial discrimination, violence, incitement to racial hatred, etc etc.

"Smart" is not the prevailing opinion of such people.

Try "scum".

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...m&btnG=Search&...

--
S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t "

I did.

The second link therefrom brings this up:


http://fairvotewatch.blogspot.com/2005/07/bnp-scum.html
"Armin,

The only thing I find disgusting about that picture, is that fact that it
actually exists, ie, the fact that the bombings actually happened.

Fair play you have your opinions, and by the sounds of it you will never
agree with a word Mr. Griffin comes out with, however, what you (and many
others like you) need to understand are the following;

1) The minute you refer to the BNP as 'scum', you are instantly calling
the 800,000+ people who voted for them in 2004 'scum'. And that the minute
you call someone 'scum' for their opinion, you are acting in a manner which
is undemocratic, and therefore alien to our political traditions. You
therefore lose the right to label the BNP as 'fascist', or any of the
other incorrect terms which they are labelled with, because you are the
one that is acting in an autocratic style.

2) By suggesting that the BNP shouldn't be allowed to use the image of the
bus, you are practically saying that we should, as a society, deny that the
7/7 London Massacre happened at all. I think we need to accept that it has
happened and that the people to blame (aside from the fundamentalists
themselves) are the Government.

3) You can call the BNP 'scum', but you can't argue with the following
fact: If this country had a BNP Government before the July 7th Massacre,
the massacre wouldn't have happened, because the people who did it
wouldn't have been in the country, for the simple reason that they have
been to Pakistan for 'training' and therefore could well be dangerous to
our society (just like the other 3,000+ living in our land who have had
similar training).


The one thing that I notice whenever I read content about the BNP, is that
anti-BNP posts always tend to be very authoritarian, ie, 'this is how it is
- they are scum. End of' sort of attitude. But, whenever I read pro-BNP
posts, the comments are always open to suggestion.

The conclusion I deduct from this is that BNP supporters are (on the
whole) willing to engage in political debate - which is healthy for us all
- whereas the people who try to tell everyone that the BNP are 'scum' and
will never be heard are (on the whole) what I define as 'liberal fascists'
who are actually proving themselves wrong by offering no real explanation
for their thought, because surely if the BNP's ideas were so unpopular as
your lot seems to make out, then there is no harm in engaging with them.
But in reality, you know that their policies are popular, so you enter
into a morbid attempt to put them in bad light with, in all honesty, is a
poorly drafted article which is one sided and therefore offers no scope
for political debate or question.

Being a British nationalist myself, I can assure you that I am not 'scum',
and would love to engage in polite political debate, although I won't hold
my breath - what usually happens now is someone will post something mildly
offensive and then sod off. I would love you to prove me wrong though.

Regards,
Chris
# posted by Blogger Chris @ 20:12


ps - my apologies, only just noticed it wasn't Armin who used the
terminology 'scum', but the blog owner. My mistake.
# posted by Blogger Chris @ 20:16 "


A pretty good response IMO.



--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

[BretLudwig]

"BNP:

The British National Party exists to secure a future for the
indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have
been our homeland for millennia. We use the term indigenous to
describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here
after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the
historic migrations from mainland Europe.The migrations of the Celts,
Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norse and closely related kindred peoples have
been, over the past few thousands years, instrumental in defining the
character of our family of nations.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/02/mission-statement-2/

Hint: That isn't you or 2pid if you apply these "smart" policies here
in the US."

Yes, but I don't claim to be an indigenous Briton. I claim to be a White
American of European, mostly Germanic descent and therefore of the peoples
who conquered North America for its own benefit and best use, and I believe
we should keep it.

We kicked the Plains Indians out, yes. The peoples in the British Isles
kicked others out too, and those peoples kicked someone else out, back all
the way to Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons and all that. Either we keep it or
let someone else kick us out. I say we fight like hell and let the best
team win-not the team some third party prefers.

The only morality I claim is that it's better to be the lead dog, else
the scenery never changes. If you like looking at other dogs' asses,
balls, or ****s and smelling their anal secretions all day move to
Pakistan or Bangladesh or El Salvador and enjoy all you want.

As a bonus, if we win, our species goes into space. Theirs will live like
they always have, eating forage, ****ing, fighting, and ****ting on the
ground. Do we want the universe or a mud hut?

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

[Bill[_16_]]

In article ,
says...
"BretLudwig" wrote:

The smartest and most independent thinking Britons are members of the BNP

An organisation with a history of holocaust denial, anti-semitism,
racial discrimination, violence, incitement to racial hatred, etc etc.

If I were to guess, that's exactly what Bratzi meant by "smartest and
most independent thinking".

--
Bill

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Bill said:

An organisation with a history of holocaust denial, anti-semitism,
racial discrimination, violence, incitement to racial hatred, etc etc.

If I were to guess, that's exactly what Bratzi meant by "smartest and
most independent thinking".

Either that, or "most in touch with their inner haters".

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Poofie brayed:

Oh dear.
Your gullibility

Hnawk! HEE-hawwwww! eeyAWWWW!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 5, 6:06*pm, "BretLudwig" wrote:
"BNP:

The British National Party exists to secure a future for the
indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have
been our homeland for millennia. We use the term indigenous to
describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here
after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the
historic migrations from mainland Europe.The migrations of the Celts,
Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norse and closely related kindred peoples have
been, over the past few thousands years, instrumental in defining the
character of our family of nations.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008/02/mission-statement-2/

Hint: That isn't you or 2pid if you apply these "smart" policies here
in the US."

*Yes, but I don't claim to be an indigenous Briton. I claim to be a White
American of European, mostly Germanic descent and therefore of the peoples
who conquered North America for its own benefit and best use, and I believe
we should keep it.

*We kicked the Plains Indians out, yes. The peoples in the British Isles
kicked others out too, and those peoples kicked someone else out, back all
the way to Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons and all that. Either we keep it or
let someone else kick us out. I say we fight like hell and let the best
team win-not the team some third party prefers. *

So the 'smart' policies only apply if they apply to white Europeans.

It appears that you'd need to amend their 'smart' mission statement.
Here, perhaps this would do:

The Bratzi White Nationalist Party exists to secure a future for the
white people of European descent in the United States.
The US has been our homeland for almost 2-1/2 centuries. We want
the people whose ancestors I approve of to have a home here at all costs.
Any white settlers after 1600s and their descendants are welcome as long
as they are christian.

How long has your family been here, Bratzi? Who was the first Bratzi
to land here?

[Andy Evans]

Now now, children.............