[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN/U.S. said in a statement that
“Lou has now decided to carry the banner of advocacy journalism
elsewhere.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33868717...mes/?gt1=43001

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN/U.S. said in a statement that
“Lou has now decided to carry the banner of advocacy journalism
elsewhere.”

I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Shhhh! said:

Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN/U.S. said in a statement that
“Lou has now decided to carry the banner of advocacy journalism
elsewhere.”

I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

According to SackyLogic, that opinion makes you a "socialist". Nothing is
allowed to take precedence over the adoration of profits, you see.

Next up: Dobbs and Cramer co-host a new yak show called "Rebuilding the
American Dream". Within the first two episodes, they will proclaim their
objective of getting Obama impeached on "socialism" charges. They will call
for an amendment to the Constitution that expands the three ideals in the
preamble to four: "life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the primacy
of profits over all other government activities".

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Jenn said:

I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

According to SackyLogic, that opinion makes you a "socialist". Nothing is
allowed to take precedence over the adoration of profits, you see.

Next up: Dobbs and Cramer co-host a new yak show called "Rebuilding the
American Dream". Within the first two episodes, they will proclaim their
objective of getting Obama impeached on "socialism" charges. They will call
for an amendment to the Constitution that expands the three ideals in the
preamble to four: "life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the primacy
of profits over all other government activities".

I can see Palin getting Dobb's spot on CNN, youbetcha.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

According to SackyLogic, that opinion makes you a "socialist". Nothing is
allowed to take precedence over the adoration of profits, you see.

Next up: Dobbs and Cramer co-host a new yak show called "Rebuilding the
American Dream". Within the first two episodes, they will proclaim their
objective of getting Obama impeached on "socialism" charges. They will call
for an amendment to the Constitution that expands the three ideals in the
preamble to four: "life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the primacy
of profits over all other government activities".

I can see Palin getting Dobb's spot on CNN, youbetcha.

They already promoted somebody else. Besides, in all seriousness, even craven
panderers like CNN know that Pailin' is a flake. Dobbs may be a jingoist and
a smug, selfish reactionary, but at least he has some journalism chops.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 12, 9:11*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Jenn said:





I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

According to SackyLogic, that opinion makes you a "socialist". Nothing is
allowed to take precedence over the adoration of profits, you see.

Next up: Dobbs and Cramer co-host a new yak show called "Rebuilding the
American Dream". Within the first two episodes, they will proclaim their
objective of getting Obama impeached on "socialism" charges. They will call
for an amendment to the Constitution that expands the three ideals in the
preamble to four: "life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the primacy
of profits over all other government activities".

I can see Palin getting Dobb's spot on CNN, youbetcha.

They already promoted somebody else. Besides, in all seriousness, even craven
panderers like CNN know that Pailin' is a flake. Dobbs may be a jingoist and
a smug, selfish reactionary, but at least he has some journalism chops.

It's funny that both Palin and Dobbs are being mentioned together like
this. Haven't they both left their posts to pursue "bigger" things? I
think their motives are very similar.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

They already promoted somebody else. Besides, in all seriousness, even craven
panderers like CNN know that Pailin' is a flake. Dobbs may be a jingoist and
a smug, selfish reactionary, but at least he has some journalism chops.

It's funny that both Palin and Dobbs are being mentioned together like
this. Haven't they both left their posts to pursue "bigger" things? I
think their motives are very similar.

You think Dobbs was hounded out of CNN because of dirty dealing? That's why
Pailin' cut and ran.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 12, 11:08*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Boon said:

They already promoted somebody else. Besides, in all seriousness, even craven
panderers like CNN know that Pailin' is a flake. Dobbs may be a jingoist and
a smug, selfish reactionary, but at least he has some journalism chops.

It's funny that both Palin and Dobbs are being mentioned together like
this. Haven't they both left their posts to pursue "bigger" things? I
think their motives are very similar.

You think Dobbs was hounded out of CNN because of dirty dealing? That's why
Pailin' cut and ran.

I'm almost tempted to read her book to see her version of what
happened. I'm sure it's painfully inaccurate and one-sided.

By listening to Dobbs' comments about his meeting with the CNN chief,
it sounds like he wanted to express even more extreme views, but the
network said no. Palin was also frustrated over being controlled by
McCain's aides. Dobbs probably wants to "go rogue" just like she's
doing.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
Boon wrote:

On Nov 12, 11:08*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Boon said:

They already promoted somebody else. Besides, in all seriousness, even
craven
panderers like CNN know that Pailin' is a flake. Dobbs may be a
jingoist and
a smug, selfish reactionary, but at least he has some journalism chops.

It's funny that both Palin and Dobbs are being mentioned together like
this. Haven't they both left their posts to pursue "bigger" things? I
think their motives are very similar.

You think Dobbs was hounded out of CNN because of dirty dealing? That's why
Pailin' cut and ran.

I'm almost tempted to read her book to see her version of what
happened. I'm sure it's painfully inaccurate and one-sided.

By listening to Dobbs' comments about his meeting with the CNN chief,
it sounds like he wanted to express even more extreme views, but the
network said no. Palin was also frustrated over being controlled by
McCain's aides. Dobbs probably wants to "go rogue" just like she's
doing.

"Media is biased, McCain's people bad, I love America, blah, blah, blah"

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

Dobbs probably wants to "go rogue" just like she's doing.

"Media is biased, McCain's people bad, I love America, blah, blah, blah"

Tsk. Somebody's being intolerant of a 'differing POV'.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Jenn said:

Dobbs probably wants to "go rogue" just like she's doing.

"Media is biased, McCain's people bad, I love America, blah, blah, blah"

Tsk. Somebody's being intolerant of a 'differing POV'.

Actually, we share those points of view: I think the media is biased, I
think that McCain's people were incompetent, and I love America.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

"Media is biased, McCain's people bad, I love America, blah, blah, blah"

Tsk. Somebody's being intolerant of a 'differing POV'.

Actually, we share those points of view: I think the media is biased, I
think that McCain's people were incompetent, and I love America.

I'll bet the main reason you say they're incompetent is because they let him
put Pailin' on the ticket.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Jenn said:

"Media is biased, McCain's people bad, I love America, blah, blah, blah"

Tsk. Somebody's being intolerant of a 'differing POV'.

Actually, we share those points of view: I think the media is biased, I
think that McCain's people were incompetent, and I love America.

I'll bet the main reason you say they're incompetent is because they let him
put Pailin' on the ticket.

You betcha (wink)

[pyjamarama]

On Nov 12, 5:04*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article ,
*George M. Middius wrote:

Shhhh! said:

Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN/U.S. said in a statement that
“Lou has now decided to carry the banner of advocacy journalism
elsewhere.”

I've given up on CNN for actual news. All they offer is a bunch of nimrods
who react like a flock of twittering birds. They seem to have given up
completely on actual reporting of news.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

I'm no fan of today's news media but your comment implies that it used
to be better, maybe even much better...

When was this so-called "golden age?'

The days of yellow journalism? The Imperial Era of Hearst et al? The
age in which NYT reporters won Pulitzer prizes for knowingly white-
washing Stalin's crimes against humanity? The age of the all-powerful
network anchor?

Sure, Woodward and Bernstein seem romantic but within a handful of
years their brand of celebrity muckracking degenerated into the likes
Janet Cooke and "Jimmy's World"...

Let's face it -- it's been all downhill since Thomas Paine.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.

I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

[Jenn[_3_]]

On Nov 13, 10:24*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I don't recognize the name. Does he post under another?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I don't recognize the name. Does he post under another?

Not that I know of.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Jenn said:

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I don't recognize the name. Does he post under another?

Not that I know of.

How do you know that he hates me? Just curious.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I don't recognize the name. Does he post under another?

Not that I know of.

How do you know that he hates me? Just curious.

They all do. Krooger, Scottie, "James", vladborg -- they hate and fear all
women. pajamaborg is just like the rest of Them.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

Jenn said:

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our
democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr.
jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I don't recognize the name. Does he post under another?

Not that I know of.

How do you know that he hates me? Just curious.

They all do. Krooger, Scottie, "James", vladborg -- they hate and fear all
women. pajamaborg is just like the rest of Them.

OK

Hey, did you hear that O'Reilly and Beck are going out on tour together?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Jenn said:

How do you know that he hates me? Just curious.

They all do. Krooger, Scottie, "James", vladborg -- they hate and fear all
women. pajamaborg is just like the rest of Them.

Hey, did you hear that O'Reilly and Beck are going out on tour together?

Are we doing a two-person act? Sorry but I don't have the punchline.

[John Atkinson[_2_]]

On Nov 12, 8:04*pm, Jenn wrote:
The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our
democratic republic, IMO.

It has come to a pretty pass when the only "news" program
to correctly point out that Fox News had faked footage of
the GOP rally in DC was "The Daily Show" and comedian
Jon Stewart.

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

John Atkinson said:

It has come to a pretty pass when the only "news" program
to correctly point out that Fox News had faked footage of
the GOP rally in DC was "The Daily Show" and comedian
Jon Stewart.

That fact might also be testimony to the intellectual acumen of Fox's
viewership in general.

[pyjamarama]

On Nov 13, 10:24*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I think you just pegged the irony meter again, Middius...

Your decade-long Krueger obsession has destroyed what once was a
perfectly mediocre mind.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

pajamaborg flagellates his kneecaps.

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I think you just pegged the irony meter again, Middius...

ding!

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

[pyjamarama]

On Nov 14, 7:06*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
pajamaborg flagellates his kneecaps.

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies..
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I think you just pegged the irony meter again, Middius...

ding!

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

Quite the contrary, giggles, it's spot-on. As was my dissection of
your grade-school, decade-long obsession with Krueger.

As for your incomprehensible babble regarding a 'borg mind' (???)
you'll simply have to crawl back out of your own ass and speak
english.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

pyjamaborg intoned:

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

Quite the contrary, giggles, it's spot-on.

You remind me of a tattered bow screeching across out-of-tune strings on a
cheap fiddle.

Don't plug the hole in your heart. The incessant bleeding for the Krooborg is
the only thing you've got going for you.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 15, 9:25*am, pyjamarama wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:06*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:





pajamaborg flagellates his kneecaps.

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I think you just pegged the irony meter again, Middius...

ding!

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

Quite the contrary, giggles, it's spot-on. *As was my dissection of
your grade-school, decade-long obsession with Krueger.

As for your incomprehensible babble regarding a 'borg mind' (???)
you'll simply have to crawl back out of your own ass and speak
english.-

No, you don't know what irony is. You misused it as well. Just saying
it's spot-on [sic] doesn't mean ****.

[pyjamarama]

On Nov 15, 10:03*am, George M. Middius
wrote:
pyjamaborg intoned:

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

Quite the contrary, giggles, it's spot-on.

You remind me of a tattered bow screeching across out-of-tune strings on a
cheap fiddle.

Don't plug the hole in your heart. The incessant bleeding for the Krooborg is
the only thing you've got going for you.

Now completely incapable of cogent thought or posting without a
reference to his obsession Krueger, Middius mewled:

"The incessant bleeding for the Krooborg"

Thanks for proving my point, Middius...

You're insane.

[pyjamarama]

On Nov 15, 10:12*am, Boon wrote:
On Nov 15, 9:25*am, pyjamarama wrote:



On Nov 14, 7:06*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

pajamaborg flagellates his kneecaps.

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I think you just pegged the irony meter again, Middius...

ding!

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

Quite the contrary, giggles, it's spot-on. *As was my dissection of
your grade-school, decade-long obsession with Krueger.

As for your incomprehensible babble regarding a 'borg mind' (???)
you'll simply have to crawl back out of your own ass and speak
english.-

No, you don't know what irony is. You misused it as well. Just saying
it's spot-on [sic] doesn't mean ****.

Noting the irony of Middius accusing me of "lunging for their throat"
while simultaneously lunging for my throat is the textbook definition
thereof, chuckles.

It's really not that complicated.

Perhaps you two should step away from RAO for a while and get a breath
of fresh air (not to mention getting actual lives).

It seems everyone else has.

snicker

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

pyjamaborg stamps his little 'borg feet in frustration.

No, you don't know what irony is. You misused it as well. Just saying
it's spot-on [sic] doesn't mean ****.

Noting the irony of Middius accusing me of "lunging for their throat"
while simultaneously lunging for my throat is the textbook definition

snicker

Now you're channeling Stynchblob. But don't worry about what irony means to
Normals. Your pinhead understanding of the word is no less ****ed than your
perception of who's attacking whom.

chuckles.

Too bad Shhh isn't here. You could call him 'titters' to round out your set.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 15, 12:38*pm, pyjamarama wrote:
On Nov 15, 10:12*am, Boon wrote:





On Nov 15, 9:25*am, pyjamarama wrote:

On Nov 14, 7:06*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

pajamaborg flagellates his kneecaps.

pyjamaborg lurches out from the darkness of the Hive.

The decline of the news media is the greatest threat to our democratic
republic, IMO.
I'm no fan

Jenn, let me caution you on trying to exchange views with mr. jammies.
He hates you and will lunge for your throat at the first opportunity.

I think you just pegged the irony meter again, Middius...

ding!

The hallmark of the 'borg 'mind' is the inability to use the word "irony"
correctly. Krooger kouldn't do it, Witless can't do it, and now mr. jammies
demonstrates the same ineptitude.

Quite the contrary, giggles, it's spot-on. *As was my dissection of
your grade-school, decade-long obsession with Krueger.

As for your incomprehensible babble regarding a 'borg mind' (???)
you'll simply have to crawl back out of your own ass and speak
english.-

No, you don't know what irony is. You misused it as well. Just saying
it's spot-on [sic] doesn't mean ****.

Noting the irony of Middius accusing me of "lunging for their throat"
while simultaneously lunging for my throat is the textbook definition
thereof, chuckles.

It's really not that complicated.

Perhaps you two should step away from RAO for a while and get a breath
of fresh air (not to mention getting actual lives).

It seems everyone else has.

snicker

All you had to do was look in the dictionary to see what irony really
meant. Instead, you had to be the typical Internet geek and go off on
some strange tangent and avoid being accountable for what you said.

Your male ancestors are rolling in their graves. You couldn't spend
one day in their shoes.

snicker

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Nov 15, 12:50*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
pyjamaborg stamps his little 'borg feet in frustration.

No, you don't know what irony is. You misused it as well. Just saying
it's spot-on [sic] doesn't mean ****.

Noting the irony of Middius accusing me of "lunging for their throat"
while simultaneously lunging for my throat is the textbook definition

snicker

Now you're channeling Stynchblob. But don't worry about what irony means to
Normals. Your pinhead understanding of the word is no less ****ed than your
perception of who's attacking whom.

chuckles.

Too bad Shhh isn't here. You could call him 'titters' to round out your set.

Has Sugar faked another ID to circumvent killfiles?

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 16, 12:01*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Nov 15, 12:50*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:





pyjamaborg stamps his little 'borg feet in frustration.

No, you don't know what irony is. You misused it as well. Just saying
it's spot-on [sic] doesn't mean ****.

Noting the irony of Middius accusing me of "lunging for their throat"
while simultaneously lunging for my throat is the textbook definition

snicker

Now you're channeling Stynchblob. But don't worry about what irony means to
Normals. Your pinhead understanding of the word is no less ****ed than your
perception of who's attacking whom.

chuckles.

Too bad Shhh isn't here. You could call him 'titters' to round out your set.

Has Sugar faked another ID to circumvent killfiles?

I noticed similarities as well. But to tell you the truth, these sad
anonymous Usenet geeks are all starting to sound the same anyway.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

chuckles.

Too bad Shhh isn't here. You could call him 'titters' to round out your set.

Has Sugar faked another ID to circumvent killfiles?

I noticed similarities as well. But to tell you the truth, these sad
anonymous Usenet geeks are all starting to sound the same anyway.

The biggest thrill the nerds get is knowing their anonymity is intact. They
can receive boatloads of abuse and ridicule, but as long as the Normals don't
know their real names, they "win".

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 16, 1:08*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Boon said:

chuckles.

Too bad Shhh isn't here. You could call him 'titters' to round out your set.

Has Sugar faked another ID to circumvent killfiles?

I noticed similarities as well. But to tell you the truth, these sad
anonymous Usenet geeks are all starting to sound the same anyway.

The biggest thrill the nerds get is knowing their anonymity is intact. They
can receive boatloads of abuse and ridicule, but as long as the Normals don't
know their real names, they "win".

I hate to keep beating a dead horse, but that does fit a specific
psychological profile. If you have a happy, fulfilling life, you don't
engage in this sort of behavior.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Boon said:

I noticed similarities as well. But to tell you the truth, these sad
anonymous Usenet geeks are all starting to sound the same anyway.

The biggest thrill the nerds get is knowing their anonymity is intact. They
can receive boatloads of abuse and ridicule, but as long as the Normals don't
know their real names, they "win".

I hate to keep beating a dead horse,

If you really mean that, you could switch to flogging a sick dog. I know
where you can find one.

but that does fit a specific
psychological profile. If you have a happy, fulfilling life, you don't
engage in this sort of behavior.

Don't leave us hanging. What's the proper term for that profile? "Blame it on
the 'Net" is almost a cliche.

[GeoSynch]

Pudge the Gimp minced:

The biggest thrill ... is knowing their anonymity is intact.

Are you referring to Jilly's alter-ego, Shhhtard! the ****R, there, 'lil
Georgie?

****R ... what an apropos acronym for one relegated to latrine duty. LoL!

... as long as the Normals

Still equating your abominative degeneracy as akin to 'Normal'? ;-)

[Boon[_2_]]

On Nov 16, 2:19*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Boon said:

I noticed similarities as well. But to tell you the truth, these sad
anonymous Usenet geeks are all starting to sound the same anyway.

The biggest thrill the nerds get is knowing their anonymity is intact.. They
can receive boatloads of abuse and ridicule, but as long as the Normals don't
know their real names, they "win".

I hate to keep beating a dead horse,

If you really mean that, you could switch to flogging a sick dog. I know
where you can find one.

but that does fit a specific
psychological profile. If you have a happy, fulfilling life, you don't
engage in this sort of behavior.

Don't leave us hanging. What's the proper term for that profile? "Blame it on
the 'Net" is almost a cliche.

I'm sure it's a matter of time before there is an official name.
Question is, who should we name it after? There are quite a number of
possibilities.