Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Pre-amp dual triode microphonics vs. physical size?
Are larger GT tubes (in mass sampling) less microphonic than 9 pin
tubes used in preamp and phase inverter stages? Specifically I'd like to know if 6SL7GT (or a 6SN7GT), both large GT tubes, would over a large sampling, be less microphonic than 12AX7 (or 12A?7 family) used for the same purpose? My knowledge of this is only from a small sampling using a handful of amps, tap tests, and spare tubes. But I'm hearing my handful of 6S?7GT tubes to be less prone to microphonics than my handful of 12A?7 tubes. Is this true? Are the internals generally more physically stable in 6S?7GT than 12A?7 ? Will GT dual triodes, becuse of their greater parts mass, be less prone to microphonics than smaller dual triodes? Anyone ever notice this? (Of course I just might have some bad 12A?7's here and some really good 6S?7's.) |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Pre-amp dual triode microphonics vs. physical size?
RickH wrote: Are larger GT tubes (in mass sampling) less microphonic than 9 pin tubes used in preamp and phase inverter stages? All other things being equal, yes. Bad Octals vs. Very Good 9-pin miniatures are exceptions, of course. Very good of both will be near-equal. But the greater mass and greater internal clearances of the larger tubes are a significant advantage against microphonics. Choose your tube for its operating characteristics and suitabilty for your purpose, then screen until you get good ones. Pure and simple tendencies towards microphonics is no reason to reject one tube or choose another. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Pre-amp dual triode microphonics vs. physical size?
Peter Wieck wrote: Choose your tube for its operating characteristics and suitabilty for your purpose, then screen until you get good ones. Pure and simple tendencies towards microphonics is no reason to reject one tube or choose another. True, and suitability to purpose might include a bass combo amp, where there would be significant vibration going on that might give the GT the nod over a mini. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Pre-amp dual triode microphonics vs. physical size?
"RickH" wrote in message ups.com... Peter Wieck wrote: Choose your tube for its operating characteristics and suitabilty for your purpose, then screen until you get good ones. Pure and simple tendencies towards microphonics is no reason to reject one tube or choose another. True, and suitability to purpose might include a bass combo amp, where there would be significant vibration going on that might give the GT the nod over a mini. I think it depends upon the gain of the stage. Both types can be potentially problematic in mic and RIAA stages but be fine in say a mu-follower. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dual Classics Website Evolves | Tech | |||
FS: Audio Cables & Adapter Cables | Pro Audio | |||
help wiring dual bandpass (Dual XB210D)to amp (Dual XAF460) | Car Audio | |||
Tannoy System 10 Dual Concentric Studio Monitors | Pro Audio |