Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Bret L Bret L is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,145
Default Perspectives on preamps

We often forget that except for the phono section, the real function
of a preamp is not amplification per se. Any correctly designed tuner,
tape deck, DAC, CD player, or what have you has plenty of signal to
directly drive a power amplifier. Instead it is to serve as a
switching nexus and a level control, plus those functions so necessary
but derided by purists like tone control.

This leads us to the "passive preamp". This is in basic concept a
great idea. It fails because it is in the middle of a bunch of cables
that otherwise need to be as short and direct as possible. Even so
under the right circumstances it works pretty well.

The real solution is a change in thinking. Each unit of signal (a
"component" is a resistor, a capacitor or something like that) should
possess its own volume control and perhaps some type of switch
architecture. Alternatively, there is the "integrated amplifier" which
is no more than a power amplifier with a volume control (which many
"power amplifiers" have anyway, cf.McIntosh ) and a selector switch
for multiple inputs.

This change in thinking is occurring at a nonexistent pace, i.e, not
at all.
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 265
Default Perspectives on preamps

On Jun 16, 6:47*pm, Bret L wrote:
*We


You.
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Gary Eickmeier Gary Eickmeier is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,449
Default Perspectives on preamps


"Bret L" wrote in message
...
We often forget that except for the phono section, the real function
of a preamp is not amplification per se. Any correctly designed tuner,
tape deck, DAC, CD player, or what have you has plenty of signal to
directly drive a power amplifier. Instead it is to serve as a
switching nexus and a level control, plus those functions so necessary
but derided by purists like tone control.

This leads us to the "passive preamp". This is in basic concept a
great idea. It fails because it is in the middle of a bunch of cables
that otherwise need to be as short and direct as possible. Even so
under the right circumstances it works pretty well.

The real solution is a change in thinking. Each unit of signal (a
"component" is a resistor, a capacitor or something like that) should
possess its own volume control and perhaps some type of switch
architecture. Alternatively, there is the "integrated amplifier" which
is no more than a power amplifier with a volume control (which many
"power amplifiers" have anyway, cf.McIntosh ) and a selector switch
for multiple inputs.

This change in thinking is occurring at a nonexistent pace, i.e, not
at all.


Most of us do not use "preamps" any more, but either receivers or control
amps, which are for switching and processing signals to be sent to all
channels.

It was frustrating for me for a while when they dropped the Tape Head input
on preamps and receivers. Most of them still have Phono inputs, but that
will probably be dropped soon. Just get a USB turntable and convert your
record collection to digital. I've got hundreds of LPs, so that would be
ridiculous, but I don't listen to them any more anyway. After CD, it was
difficult to force myself to go thru the ritual again (clean the record,
clean the stylus, carefully set it down in the lead-in groove or between
tracks, try and ignore the whoosh, spitting, hiss, and pucketa pucketa at
the end. Screw it.

Gary Eickmeier


  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Clyde Slick Clyde Slick is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,545
Default Perspectives on preamps

On Jun 16, 10:25*pm, "Gary Eickmeier"
wrote:
"Bret L" wrote in message

...



We often forget that except for the phono section, the real function
of a preamp is not amplification per se. Any correctly designed tuner,
tape deck, DAC, CD player, or *what have you has plenty of signal to
directly drive a power amplifier. Instead it is to serve as a
switching nexus and a level control, plus those functions so necessary
but derided by purists like tone control.


This leads us to the "passive preamp". This is in basic concept a
great idea. It fails because it is in the middle of a bunch of cables
that otherwise need to be as short and direct as possible. Even so
under the right circumstances it works pretty well.


The real solution is a change in thinking. Each unit of signal (a
"component" is a resistor, a capacitor or something like that) should
possess its own volume control and perhaps some type of switch
architecture. Alternatively, there is the "integrated amplifier" which
is no more than a power amplifier with a volume control (which many
"power amplifiers" have anyway, cf.McIntosh ) and a selector switch
for multiple inputs.


This change in thinking is occurring at a nonexistent pace, i.e, not
at all.


Most of us do not use "preamps" any more, but either receivers or control
amps, which are for switching and processing signals to be sent to all
channels.

It was frustrating for me for a while when they dropped the Tape Head input
on preamps and receivers. Most of them still have Phono inputs, but that
will probably be dropped soon. Just get a USB turntable and convert your
record collection to digital. I've got hundreds of LPs, so that would be
ridiculous, but I don't listen to them any more anyway. After CD, it was
difficult to force myself to go thru the ritual again (clean the record,
clean the stylus, carefully set it down in the lead-in groove or between
tracks, try and ignore the whoosh, spitting, hiss, and pucketa pucketa at
the end. Screw it.

Gary Eickmeier


Besides all that, the scratches upset the birds living in your speaker
boxes.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
it can turn aesthetic perspectives in touch with the brown rolling ladder, whilst Mustapha round services them too William K. Stanczyk Car Audio 0 November 14th 07 08:32 AM
Yankee Audiophile Seeking Pen Pal for UK/EU Perspectives Ron High End Audio 0 October 14th 06 05:14 PM
Earthworks ZDT preamps vs. Millennia HV3 preamps [email protected] Pro Audio 4 June 4th 05 10:36 PM
Mackie 1642-VLZ preamps vs Aardvark Q10 preamps? other suggestions? sam Pro Audio 1 October 19th 04 01:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"