Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
More or less blasphemy
Hi RATs!
OK, old DIY kits are interesting puzzles to attempt to decipher what the previous listeners/victims did to make it shake their treehouses. I have several 1956 Heathkit A7 units to draw from. No two are alike. Some common themes: the 12V filaments are wired in series parallel, two wires from transformer to first tube, two wires to second tube, etc. Some used fibre (cloth) covered wire, some plastic. All used the same physical layout. Twisting the pairs is universal, but, varies from two or three turns to twenty or so. Soldering is all "large lump", although the style of physical connection underneath varies from tight pinched u-hook to loose straight needle through the hole. Considerable variation appears in implementation of the circuit diagram. All attempted the feedback loop, but, even though all used the supplied 6.8K resistor, most went to the 16 ohm tap, one to 0 ohms, that one reversed the 12SN7 (to 12A6) signal splitter connections to resolve the phasing issues Several had substituted the 12A6 pair with 12V6 pair. One changed the bias resistor (adding 300 ohms), two did not. The one I am still trying to modify showed three (3!) routes to ground from the cathodes of the tied together 12A6 pair. While I attempt to pick one, I took the amp out of service and substituted my old Consonnance 9.9C, a 300B SE I got as a shipping damaged tubeless wonder from eBay for less than $70. some years back. Plus shipping ... The A7-C (no phono stage) with dual output cathode bias R-C mod and the 9.9C, with added 100K pot on the input, make a pleasant pair. My anxiety about not completing the mods to the second A7 has dissipated. The A7-C was about $15. as a new kit, with tubes, The 9.9C was about $3K, with tubes. The 200X price differential says much about retail marketing over the intervening forty odd years, the technology is similar: less than ten watts and perhaps a bit better than your average Home Theater installation I will continue to attempt Alan "Flower-Power' Blumlein's garter circuit .. no hint as to test start date 8^P I am not sure when I fell in love with the sound of tubes. It wasn't today, but, it continues Happy Ears! Al |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
More or less blasphemy
Bret Ludwig wrote: SOP among true pros, when required to make Heathkits work, is to slather all soldered connections with RMA flux and suck everything off with a Pace tool. Save of course for those connections too far gone, which are summarily diked out. Hi RATs! Us phoney-baloney post-pros just do what we find needed to get the unit to function. Any larger engineering changes are just for grins I like to get something working with as little 'improvement' as possible to hear what it sounds like. I don't pretend to remember what things sounded like, but, it gives me something to consider when I go go into Mad Scientist mode and start changing the circuits. I even build DIY stuff as drawn. OK, I try, OK? - before I get creative and or crazy. An example is filament wiring. It works OK to string them together. I prefer to run a simple pair from transformer, or filter, to each tube. It may not make the Music sound much better, but, it keeps a lid on my imagination Being old and crazy is not recommended for Audio, but, it is considered wise to just be whatever you are at the moment and just let others argue about Heaven and Hell Listening to junk I got to work is great. It does make me wish I could do more, but, apparently The Force wants me to actually listen, too. I take it as it comes Happy Ears! Al |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pre-Production Planning - song structure, instrumentation... | Pro Audio |