Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rectifier question
1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave
rectifier with double the current capacity? 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Thanks in advance, Jon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jon Yaeger" wrote in message
... 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Thanks in advance, Jon Hi Jon, I would like to attempt to answer one of those questions. There are many more Rodents who are better able to answer the rest. No matter how many tube rectifiers you use, it is primarily the wire size in the transformer that will ultimately determine the current capability. Cordially, west |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:51:53 -0400, Jon Yaeger
wrote: 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? Sure. It's good practice to include small series resistors to equalize plate currents. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? Perzactly. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Somewhat less, but more than half. For typical devices, maybe 15 volts, but somewhere in that range. 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? For common oxide cathode bottles with 10 or 15 watt heaters/ filaments equalizing resistors might be in the 20 to 50 ohm range, something like that. Good fortune, Chris Hornbeck |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... Jon scribbled; 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Thanks in advance, Jon Using two rectifier tubes was very comon in A lot of theatre amps, The Altec 256 A used a pair of 5R4s in this 75 W amp. My Dear old dad used A pair of WE 421 ?? in his 75 W amp......if you are concerned about voltage drop , why not use SS ?? ...............GC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Jon Yaeger" 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? ** Yep. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? ** Yep. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? ** Situation #2 is not described adequately. 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? ** If one tube stops working, or goes missing - trouble. The remaining tube cops a big overload and may fail. Since the supply is then half wave, the PT's iron core will saturate and cause a high primary current flow. Too much heat in the primary will make the smoke come out. .......... Phil |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Phil Allison wrote: "Jon Yaeger" 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? ** Yep. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? ** Yep. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? ** Situation #2 is not described adequately. 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? ** If one tube stops working, or goes missing - trouble. The remaining tube cops a big overload and may fail. Since the supply is then half wave, the PT's iron core will saturate and cause a high primary current flow. Too much heat in the primary will make the smoke come out. For perhaps this reason it was common practice to parallel rectifier tubes by using one plate on each tube for one winding and the other for the other. But it's simpler today to avoid use of rectifier tubes unless you are building for nuclear war. Rectifier tubes DO NOT constitute a delayed warm up system. And theories of better sound due to lack of transient pulses have been largely disproved, at least in competently designed equipment. Proper layout and bypassing of electrolytics combined with judicious use of RF chokes are radically superior. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Accessory Section 8" Phil Allison wrote: ** If one tube stops working, or goes missing - trouble. The remaining tube cops a big overload and may fail. Since the supply is then half wave, the PT's iron core will saturate and cause a high primary current flow. Too much heat in the primary will make the smoke come out. For perhaps this reason it was common practice to parallel rectifier tubes by using one plate on each tube for one winding and the other for the other. ** It would seem to be the safer option. But it's simpler today to avoid use of rectifier tubes unless you are building for nuclear war. Rectifier tubes DO NOT constitute a delayed warm up system. ** Huh ???? If SS diodes are used, then electros can be overvoltaged at switch on - no so with a tube rectifier. Plus, the internals can be at dangerously high voltages even with all tubes pulled out - something that might bother some home constructors and novices. ............ Phil |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article , west at wrote on 9/17/05 6:54 PM: "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Thanks in advance, Jon Hi Jon, I would like to attempt to answer one of those questions. There are many more Rodents who are better able to answer the rest. No matter how many tube rectifiers you use, it is primarily the wire size in the transformer that will ultimately determine the current capability. Cordially, west Thanks, West. Yes and no. Everything "downstream" from the rectifier depends upon its current rating. If your tranny windings are rated at 200 ma and you have a 100 ma rectifier, but your circuit draws 150 ma, you've got a problem. Of course Jon. That's why I didn't want to get into the load because of the many issues to consider there and I simply do not have that much expertise with tube loads. I didn't see at the time any answers to your query so I thought, lets give it a crack. west |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:27:09 -0400, Jon Yaeger
wrote: I plan to use indirectly heated cathodes (e.g. 6AX5GT). Would that change the resistor requirements? Well, it's just a matter of conservative engineering, and is independent of the devices. You'd want to make the same provisions paralleling *any* devices, and in any application. My only (poorly) expressed exception might be for exotic valve rectifiers, like thoriated-tungsten filaments and such. The trouble with Usenet is the inability to properly weight "footnote" comments. Anyhoo, fear not. 'S all good. And, FWIW, in conservative useage, the equalizing resistors are often skipped. Not that big a biggie. IIRC, the cost-more-than-my-house Ongaku didn't bother. Good fortune, Chris Hornbeck |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Jon Yaeger wrote: 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? Yes. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? Yes you may. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Less voltage drop. 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Cheaper to use some silicon, and some series R to limit charge currents into the C1 of the PS. Patrick Turner. Thanks in advance, Jon |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Phil Allison wrote: "Accessory Section 8" Phil Allison wrote: ** If one tube stops working, or goes missing - trouble. The remaining tube cops a big overload and may fail. Since the supply is then half wave, the PT's iron core will saturate and cause a high primary current flow. Too much heat in the primary will make the smoke come out. For perhaps this reason it was common practice to parallel rectifier tubes by using one plate on each tube for one winding and the other for the other. ** It would seem to be the safer option. But it's simpler today to avoid use of rectifier tubes unless you are building for nuclear war. Rectifier tubes DO NOT constitute a delayed warm up system. ** Huh ???? If SS diodes are used, then electros can be overvoltaged at switch on - no so with a tube rectifier. Nearly all well made tube radios and amplifiers are made using capacitors able to take a high surge voltage or a voltage equal to the unloaded B+ for some considerable time because they don't want the elcaps to blow if an output tube or two go open thus allowing the B+ to soar to a higher than usual value. In a recent rebuild of a pair of Quad II I used silicon rectifiers each with current limiting R in series, then 100uFx 450VW rated, then 100 ohms, then the GZ32 was used as a slow turn on diode-resistor equal to about 80 ohms with both halves in parallel, then a 470uF cap also rated for 450VW and to anchor the CT. The usual ripple voltage at the CT in the original rubbishy PS that QuadII had was about 17Vrms, but with my arrangement there is around 100mV, so the PS caused IMD is far less than the THD from the tubes at all levels to clipping. ( The original amps have about as much IMD in the N&D character as the THD even in class A.) There is actually no need to retain the use of the tube rectifier at all and a simple resistor in place of what i did will work just as well since the slow turn on really conveys no real useful delay, especially when the KT66 age and they take longer to come on. But for appearances i retained the GZ32 this time, but where people don't mind the missing tube, then the rectifier socket can be removed and the 470uF cap can be placed on the chassis top to replace the tube and there is more room under the chassis for the rest of the mods. The amp will run cooler this way. In practice, at turn on, even indirectly heated rectifiers come on faster than output tubes, so some voltage soaring occurs anyway. In many amps the tube rectifiers are directly heated and the B+ soars to the same voltage as with SS rectifiers in about 4 seconds, before sagging back due to the combined effects of the power tranny winding resistances, diode resistances, and choke/resistor drops. Plus, the internals can be at dangerously high voltages even with all tubes pulled out - something that might bother some home constructors and novices. Traps do exist for the unwary who never assume there will be issues which will trip them up due to an incomplete knowledge of their activities...... Patrick Turner. ........... Phil |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Jon Yaeger wrote:
1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? No. Not unless it also has _two cathodes_ to put in parallel. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? No but you could put the two full-wave devices in parallel. Small resistors in the anodes to equalise current are advisable. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Same. best Andy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Andy Cowley at wrote
on 9/21/05 11:32 AM: Jon Yaeger wrote: 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? No. Not unless it also has _two cathodes_ to put in parallel. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? No but you could put the two full-wave devices in parallel. Small resistors in the anodes to equalise current are advisable. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Same. best Andy Andy, Thanks for your reply. I've received about 3 yes answers to your no. Why couldn't I parallel the anodes in a single tube?? Would would be a typical value (including wattage) of an equalizing resistor, say, for a 5AR4? Thanks in advance, Jon |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" Why couldn't I parallel the anodes in a single tube?? I imagine he's thinking of the peak cathode current that would need to double with the anodes in parallel and, so, then being on the same phase ** Which popular rectifier tube has two anodes and only one common) cathode ? ............ Phil |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:32:15 GMT, Andy Cowley
wrote: 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? No. Not unless it also has _two cathodes_ to put in parallel. It would be difficult and very inefficient to make one *without* two cathodes. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? No but you could put the two full-wave devices in parallel. Small resistors in the anodes to equalise current are advisable. BZZT. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Same. BZZT. Thanks for playing, Chris Hornbeck |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" It would be difficult and very inefficient to make one *without* two cathodes. GE 6X5-GT ** Each plate structure of a 6X5 "sees" only half the cathode. So it *effectively* has two. Paralleling the plates will double the current capacity - peak and average. .............. Phil |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" "Phil Allison" ** Which popular rectifier tube has two anodes and only one common) cathode ? What the heck does 'popularity' have to do with it? ** Obscure types are simply not relevant to the the issue here. ............. Phil |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" "Phil Allison" It would be difficult and very inefficient to make one *without* two cathodes. GE 6X5-GT ** Each plate structure of a 6X5 "sees" only half the cathode. If you say so. ** It does, whether I say it or not. So it *effectively* has two. Perhaps, but that wasn't the question. ** It is completely germane to the *issue*. Paralleling the plates will double the current capacity - peak and average. ......... Phil |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" "Phil Allison" ** Which popular rectifier tube has two anodes and only one common) cathode ? What the heck does 'popularity' have to do with it? ** Obscure types are simply not relevant to the the issue here. Nonsense. ** Go **** yourself - **** brain. ............. Phil |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Jon Yaeger wrote:
in article , Andy Cowley at wrote on 9/21/05 11:32 AM: Jon Yaeger wrote: 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? No. Not unless it also has _two cathodes_ to put in parallel. 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? No but you could put the two full-wave devices in parallel. Small resistors in the anodes to equalise current are advisable. 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Same. best Andy Andy, Thanks for your reply. I've received about 3 yes answers to your no. Why couldn't I parallel the anodes in a single tube?? Would would be a typical value (including wattage) of an equalizing resistor, say, for a 5AR4? Thanks in advance, There is a single cathode in most full-wave rectifiers (there are a few exceptions - e.g. 5690) so if you parallel the anodes you will double the current in the cathode. In normal full wave operation the current is flowing alternately to the anodes and the cathode current is usually pretty close to the real limit. You will be exceeding the cathode max current rating in most cases even though on average there will be no excess current through the tube as it gets a half cycle rest during each cycle. In the case of a 5AR4 you will still be within the absolute max. cathode current but I would expect the tube to wear out and loose emision _much_ more quickly. You can parallel the tubes by using each as a full wave rectifier, both tubes will be conducting on every half cycle and the peak cathode current will be halved compared to using each tube as a half wave rectifier. The resistor value you need will depend on the dynamic impedance of the tube at the operating point. That is the slope of the current vs. tube voltage drop curve. I'd guess around 100 ohms (the recommended protective resistance at 400 V RMS in) would be good. Dissipation will be close to a watt so 2W components should be fine. best Andy |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Andy Cowley" There is a single cathode in most full-wave rectifiers... ** What mind bending drugs are you on - ****wit ?? The direct, bloody opposite is true. ( snip mucho absolute crap) In the case of a 5AR4 you will still be within the absolute max. ** The 5AR4 has TWO CATHODES !!!!!!!!!!!!! What drugs are you on - ****wit ??? You can parallel the tubes by using each as a full wave rectifier, both tubes will be conducting on every half cycle and the peak cathode current will be halved compared to using each tube as a half wave rectifier. ** Based on this same pommy idiot's previous whacko assertions. ( snip even worse verbal diarrhoea. ) **** off - you PITA limey bloody idiot !!!! ........... Phil |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"flipper" wrote in message ... : On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:47:39 +1000, "Phil Allison" : wrote: : : : "flipper" : "Phil Allison" : : : ** Which popular rectifier tube has two anodes and only one common) : cathode ? : : What the heck does 'popularity' have to do with it? : : : : ** Obscure types are simply not relevant to the the issue here. : : Nonsense. : : ** Go **** yourself - **** brain. : : : My, my, my, but you do fall all to pieces when your little 'gotcha' : games don't work. : Ok, *here* i can agree with you R. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Jon Yaeger wrote:
1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Will not be 1/2 of 25 volts since the conduction depends on the '3/2' power law. Probably something like 18 volts. Where is my HP67 when I need it? 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Thanks in advance, Jon Here is what Terman has to say. "Parallel Operation of Rectifiers- High Vacuum Rectifiers may be operated in parallel without any particular precautions other then ensuring that the units in parallel are reasonably similar in characteristics" For a bit of a margin of safety I would derate to perhaps 80% of rated capacity in order to account for dis-similarity in the tubes used. Cheers, John Stewart |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
John Stewart wrote:
Jon Yaeger wrote: 1. Could I parallel the plates of a full-wave rectifier to make a half-wave rectifier with double the current capacity? 2. Could I then not put two such half-wave devices in a full-wave configuration, and thus double the original current capacity of a single rectifier tube? 3. If the nominal voltage drop was 25V through a single full-wave rectifier, what would be the voltage drop across situation #2 above? Will not be 1/2 of 25 volts since the conduction depends on the '3/2' power law. Probably something like 18 volts. Where is my HP67 when I need it? Found it. The HP67, that is. If the rectifiers are identical the drop will be 15.7 volts when connected as in your example. JLS BTW, there is a large set of rectifier static drops given on page 1171 of RDH4. Unfortunately, the 6AX5 is not included. 4. What are the restrictions and caveats? Thanks in advance, Jon Here is what Terman has to say. "Parallel Operation of Rectifiers- High Vacuum Rectifiers may be operated in parallel without any particular precautions other then ensuring that the units in parallel are reasonably similar in characteristics" For a bit of a margin of safety I would derate to perhaps 80% of rated capacity in order to account for dis-similarity in the tubes used. Cheers, John Stewart |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
Question regarding Phantom Power | Pro Audio | |||
newbie question - aardvark q10 + external mixer? | Pro Audio | |||
RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio |