wrote :

wrote:

Although at times it is difficult to follow, reading all of your posts
has proven at least one answer to your question:
"has anyone ever actually proved ANYTHING to me?"

Yes, I know that, brainfart. The answer was "no". The proof is my
recent thread here about fuses - or rather, the complete lack of proof
after 325 posts is in that thread. I'm sorry that my posts are
difficult to follow for you and the clueless ****wits who's asses you
kiss all day long. I try to dumb it all down for you ****ing imbeciles
knowing how you need things to be dumbed down, but I can't help it if
you retards have the attention span of a 5 year old on Ritalin, and get
confused when you feel forced to follow anything greater than witless
2-line quips.

Question is, why the **** are you reading all my posts, you
ankle-biting little fleabag? You have nothing better to do while
waiting for your welfare check?


Why post this if French wasn't germane:

At what point did I say French was or wasn't germane, you ****ing
delusional imbecile? Like your friend Krueger, you wouldn't recognize a
grain of truth if it ****ed all over your face, you ignorant clod.

http://groups.google.com/group/mtl.v...56203 7142c8c


Thank you for proving my point about you, you worthless piece of ****.
The last time you told me that you're not stalking me, yet you're
actually spending your time researching every old post I have made. And
it isn't even the FIRST time that you or your technophool loser friends
have spent their time combing through archives doing background
research on me. And don't give me that **** about how little time it
took you to spend your "precious time" stalking me and rummaging
through all of my old posts. The fact that you would do something like
that at all proves what a useless loser you are in life, and how these
newsgroup ARE your life. I've never had a successful audio engineer, or
successful ANYTHING, go through my entire posting history. I don't know
if I should be flattered to have a "real-life" net kook stalker on my
ass, or if I should get the number of your psychiatrist and tell him
you've had another relapse.

Furthermore, you just admitted reading ALL my posts, and even after I
ignored you for most of my last thread, you still kept clinging to my
ass, in the hopes that I would recognize your worthless presence, and
validate your existence, apparently. Congratulations on proving to the
world what a loser your are, westpussy. That's actually the only thing
you've ever managed to prove after I stuck around for 325 posts,
waiting for a shred of proof about anything. Now MOVE ON already, you
lowlife douchebag. You and your technophool friends no longer have any
entertainment value for me. How long can you make fun of a bunch of
****ing intellectually impaired ****wits anyhow, who are as stupid as
they think they are brilliant, before it starts to get tragically
boring?

I march poorly, being rhythmically challenged
in spite of my ethnic heritage.

You think poorly too, as a result of being intellectually challenged.

Mr.T (the "T" stands for "Tinkerbell") wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

Mr.T (the "T" stands for Twit)

You are the one who wasted your time typing a page of total bull****, not
me.

First of all, I didn't type a page of "total bull****" but total truth;
deal with it. I wouldn't even know where to start writing "total
bull****". Oh perhaps, I suppose. I could just copy any one of your
posts, since you never write anything but worthless bull****.

Second of all, I know you think highly of yourself, all trolls and
losers like you do. Well I'm sorry to break your delusions of grandeur,
but I didn't write anything for YOU, you stupid ****wad.

I would never waste that much of my time on a troll like you!

Let's try that again, with some truth this time. Correction no. 1
you're the troll, as you're "trying" to troll me (as if that were even
possible...). Correction no. 2: all you've been doing is wasting time
biting my ankles, ever since I started ****ing all over your stupid
little newsgroup of beanie headed fools.

****sss! Have another golden shower, Tinkerbell.

Cyrus wrote :

In article .com,
wrote:

blahblah snipped

Its easy to skim the posts with no numbers of any measurement anywhere.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*

I'm sorry, I'm sure we can correct that. I just measured the size of
your brain, but I'm having a hard time quantifying it, because I've
never seen a number that small. At least not since you had the size of
your dick measured.

mc a wrote :

More simply:

How many audiophiles does it take to change a lightbulb?

2,001.

One to change the bulb and two thousand to argue about how it sounds.

You paste-eating technofools are so ****ing lame and brain-dead, you
even have to copy the jokes I make about you. Why should I be
surprised? In over 325 posts in my original thread, and now 130 in this
one, I've never seen a single example of brilliant wit or original
thought from ANY ONE of you fools here.

And what the **** do you consider yourself exactly, if you are busy
mocking audiophiles? What the hell are you doing on an audio group, you
****ing moron?

Harry Lavo wrote :

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


Once again, Arny snips the remainder of a post that he
cannot refute, without indicating the snip.

A minor transgression Harry, compared to your wholesale misappropriation
of ideas from the PCABX web site.


It may be minor in your eyes, Arny, but it is a major breach of internet
etiquet and honesty. It shows a disregard for both. You have done it often
in the past...I've "called" you on it before just in the few months I've
been monitoring RAO, and several times in the past on RAHE.

And you'll be "calling" KKKrueger on it for the rest of your natural
life. You've been debating him for what? FIVE YEARS?!! And you're STILL
not aware that KKKrueger is usenet's biggest troll, largest liar, and
all around fattest asshole in general? How long does it take you on
average to get a clue, exactly? His goal is not to be the most
truthful, but to "appear" to win whatever argument he's wandered his
fat ass into.

This is a man who's entire being rests upon his "perceived performance"
on audio newsgroups. A man who was busy lying and battling people just
like you, while they were busy burying his son, and his grandmother.
That's how dedicated he is to his usenet lies and battles. He's a
raging neurotic, addicted to usenet, who's personal pain is much
greater than your sense of "netiquette" or any sense of honesty. After
all, look at his record to see where he's been every day of his life
for the last 10 years. If he's lied to himself for 10 years, what makes
you think he'll stop at lying to you, or to hapless innocents about his
tired old ABX gimmick?

And what the hell are you talking about ("compared to your wholesale
misappropriation of ideas from the PCABX web site")?
I've visited there twice, and the only thing I ever posted from it (and
paraphrased, not copied) were some of the rules for ABX testing outlined by
an industry standards body (the ITU I believe, but can't recall for sure)
that you posted there. And I paraphrased them with attribution.

It'll only start to make sense when you STOP making the STUPID
assumption that you're debating a sane, rational, and honest
individual. He only provides that delusion for the truly ignorant.
Everyone else already knows what a worthless lying sack of **** that
Krueger is. Your best bet is to ignore the troll altogether, because as
soon as you say something that contradicts one of his lies, you're an
instant enemy, ready to be stalked for life.

In article .com,
wrote:

Cyrus wrote :

In article .com,
wrote:

blahblah snipped

Its easy to skim the posts with no numbers of any measurement anywhere.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*

I'm sorry, I'm sure we can correct that. I just measured the size of
your brain, but I'm having a hard time quantifying it, because I've
never seen a number that small. At least not since you had the size of
your dick measured.


Ok, I must need to clarify. I have seen no measurements whatsoever about
fuses or otherwise that you've provided. Do you have any? A simple no
would suffice.

Its kinda saddening seeing that you're so hostile, its only audio
afterall.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*

Cyrus wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Cyrus wrote :

In article .com,
wrote:

blahblah snipped

Its easy to skim the posts with no numbers of any measurement anywhere.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*

I'm sorry, I'm sure we can correct that. I just measured the size of
your brain, but I'm having a hard time quantifying it, because I've
never seen a number that small. At least not since you had the size of
your dick measured.


Ok, I must need to clarify. I have seen no measurements whatsoever about
fuses or otherwise that you've provided. Do you have any? A simple no
would suffice.

Its kinda saddening seeing that you're so hostile, its only audio
afterall.

--
Cyrus

*coughcasaucedoprodigynetcough*

JMHO, one could almost get the impression that he equates his posting
with the sound level of the 16 year old kid 5 cars behind me
with 2 bass bins in the back seat, and 4 more 12" mounted
on a plywood panel in the trunk.
Everytime my coffee shakes when it hits D 2 octaves below middle C
he's sharing his incredibly superior audio knowlege with me.

Bob's,I can call you Bob can't I, since we are on such amicable terms,
hostility index has actually reached what we refer to as
"circus potential" or "perpetual sideshow"
A good show always draws a crowd.

wrote:
wrote :

wrote:

Although at times it is difficult to follow, reading all of your posts
has proven at least one answer to your question:
"has anyone ever actually proved ANYTHING to me?"

Yes, I know that, brainfart. The answer was "no". The proof is my
recent thread here about fuses - or rather, the complete lack of proof
after 325 posts is in that thread. I'm sorry that my posts are
difficult to follow for you and the clueless ****wits who's asses you
kiss all day long. I try to dumb it all down for you ****ing imbeciles
knowing how you need things to be dumbed down, but I can't help it if
you retards have the attention span of a 5 year old on Ritalin, and get
confused when you feel forced to follow anything greater than witless
2-line quips.

Question is, why the **** are you reading all my posts, you
ankle-biting little fleabag? You have nothing better to do while
waiting for your welfare check?


Why post this if French wasn't germane:

At what point did I say French was or wasn't germane, you ****ing
delusional imbecile? Like your friend Krueger, you wouldn't recognize a
grain of truth if it ****ed all over your face, you ignorant clod.

http://groups.google.com/group/mtl.v...56203 7142c8c


Thank you for proving my point about you, you worthless piece of ****.
The last time you told me that you're not stalking me, yet you're
actually spending your time researching every old post I have made. And
it isn't even the FIRST time that you or your technophool loser friends
have spent their time combing through archives doing background
research on me. And don't give me that **** about how little time it
took you to spend your "precious time" stalking me and rummaging
through all of my old posts. The fact that you would do something like
that at all proves what a useless loser you are in life, and how these
newsgroup ARE your life. I've never had a successful audio engineer, or
successful ANYTHING, go through my entire posting history. I don't know
if I should be flattered to have a "real-life" net kook stalker on my
ass, or if I should get the number of your psychiatrist and tell him
you've had another relapse.

Furthermore, you just admitted reading ALL my posts, and even after I
ignored you for most of my last thread, you still kept clinging to my
ass, in the hopes that I would recognize your worthless presence, and
validate your existence, apparently. Congratulations on proving to the
world what a loser your are, westpussy. That's actually the only thing
you've ever managed to prove after I stuck around for 325 posts,
waiting for a shred of proof about anything. Now MOVE ON already, you
lowlife douchebag. You and your technophool friends no longer have any
entertainment value for me. How long can you make fun of a bunch of
****ing intellectually impaired ****wits anyhow, who are as stupid as
they think they are brilliant, before it starts to get tragically
boring?

I march poorly, being rhythmically challenged
in spite of my ethnic heritage.

You think poorly too, as a result of being intellectually challenged.

You are really giving yourself too much credit.
There is a link called find messages by this author in the options
menu.
What prompted me to look was the phrase " a écrit :" which accompanies
some of your posts in this and previous topics.
I thought perhaps I could be wrong about your audio credentials and in
another
posted topic your knowledge base would reveal itself.
I would then have offered you an apology.
So far that is not the case, the findings were baseless.
If I were to actually "netstalk" you, I would pay to find your credit
history,
your criminal history, your evictions from dwellings, your driving
record, etc.
I'd rather donate the money to Habitat for Humanity, than give your
paranoia a basis in fact.

The only proof so far is the vacuum your premise of audible fuse data
exists in.
Back it up with more than just your subjectivist assertion.
My internet volume is at maximum and I still can't hear it.

wrote in message
ps.com...

Harry Lavo wrote :

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message


Once again, Arny snips the remainder of a post that he
cannot refute, without indicating the snip.

A minor transgression Harry, compared to your wholesale
misappropriation
of ideas from the PCABX web site.


It may be minor in your eyes, Arny, but it is a major breach of internet
etiquet and honesty. It shows a disregard for both. You have done it
often
in the past...I've "called" you on it before just in the few months I've
been monitoring RAO, and several times in the past on RAHE.

And you'll be "calling" KKKrueger on it for the rest of your natural
life. You've been debating him for what? FIVE YEARS?!! And you're STILL
not aware that KKKrueger is usenet's biggest troll, largest liar, and
all around fattest asshole in general? How long does it take you on
average to get a clue, exactly? His goal is not to be the most
truthful, but to "appear" to win whatever argument he's wandered his
fat ass into.

This is a man who's entire being rests upon his "perceived performance"
on audio newsgroups. A man who was busy lying and battling people just
like you, while they were busy burying his son, and his grandmother.
That's how dedicated he is to his usenet lies and battles. He's a
raging neurotic, addicted to usenet, who's personal pain is much
greater than your sense of "netiquette" or any sense of honesty. After
all, look at his record to see where he's been every day of his life
for the last 10 years. If he's lied to himself for 10 years, what makes
you think he'll stop at lying to you, or to hapless innocents about his
tired old ABX gimmick?

And what the hell are you talking about ("compared to your wholesale
misappropriation of ideas from the PCABX web site")?
I've visited there twice, and the only thing I ever posted from it (and
paraphrased, not copied) were some of the rules for ABX testing outlined
by
an industry standards body (the ITU I believe, but can't recall for sure)
that you posted there. And I paraphrased them with attribution.

It'll only start to make sense when you STOP making the STUPID
assumption that you're debating a sane, rational, and honest
individual. He only provides that delusion for the truly ignorant.
Everyone else already knows what a worthless lying sack of **** that
Krueger is. Your best bet is to ignore the troll altogether, because as
soon as you say something that contradicts one of his lies, you're an
instant enemy, ready to be stalked for life.


Most of my time debating Arny was on RAHE where he had to live within some
boundries. Spoiled me, I guess.

wrote in message
oups.com...
more drivel as usual

I'm still laughing at why you would spend so much time typing such crap.
Even TV would be better surely?

MrT.

"Mr.T" MrT@home wrote in message
u
wrote in message
oups.com...
more drivel as usual

I'm still laughing at why you would spend so much time
typing such crap. Even TV would be better surely?

Some of the PBS programs related to logic and critical thinking would be
waaay better for him than what's he's been beating off on his keyboard.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
Some of the PBS programs related to logic and critical thinking would be
waaay better for him than what's he's been beating off on his keyboard.

No, he would not be able to understand them. He could probably learn
something from Sesame Street though.

MrT.

[Peter McKenzie]

I have a whole selection of articles (withdrawn from the web) proving that
vinyl pressings were very far from the original mastertape. Huge
manipulations by the cutting engineers were required. This is NOT
anti-analogue but I have compared a high end vinyl system with CD and could
not find an LP that reproduced piano adequately. My piano tuner tunes for
recordings, broadcasts etc. Before CD he could not tell what piano was being
used on vinyl. However, for all its faults, he could identify the pianos he
had worked on on their CD version.

Personally, analogue would be my method of choice but vinyl has pitch
instability and distortion which defeats ther advantages of a more
'pleasant' sound. SACD, when well recorded is as near to analogue as I have
heard. I do live recordings for professional musicians, and to my
astonishment, minidisc (I refused to even try it at first) is very good
indeed, better than CD. Before MD, I used analogue exclusively but the
equipment failed - I dropped it!

McKenz


"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
...
On 16 Feb 2006 19:07:14 -0800, wrote:

If you think vinyl sounds better than CD, fine.

There's no "think" about it. It's a FACT that LPs are more accurate to
the sound of music, than CDs ever were. Those who know anything about
audio, know that already, and have good turntable setups. You no doubt
have **** on stick for a CD player, and that's all. You've no doubt
never actually HEARD a decent turntable in your life. My $50 turntable
could outperform the best cd player you,ve ever owned.

My $1500 vinyl rig, carefully tuned and tweaked to its maximum
performance, fails to sound more realistic than any CD player I have
owned. Same goes for the $75,000 Rockport Sirius III, set up by Andy
Payor himself.

Please take your braindead and baseless assertions to some religious
forum rather than an audio newgroup.
--

Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering