Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
Modern Reviewing Practices In Audio Rags Have Become Useless
"Audio_Empire" wrote in message
... On Monday, August 5, 2013 4:34:24 PM UTC-7, Arny Krueger wrote: "Audio_Empire" wrote in message ... On Sunday, August 4, 2013 12:40:30 PM UTC-7, Scott wrote: You can say it but it isn't true. I have many pop/rock albums that offer stunningly vivid imaging with sound stages that extend well past the speakers and offer loads of depth as well as width and give the instruments a tremendous sense of size and palpability. So you CAN hear that with the right pop/rock recordings. So you are saying that these recordings were recorded stereophonically? No, It is possible to position instruments well past the speakers from multitrack recordings. Add some of the track to the opposite channel with the phase inverted, and voila, you've got a track that sounds like it is coming from the outside of the space between the speakers. I wasn't questioning the width, I know that can be artificially introduced one of several ways. It was the depth from multitrack that I was questioning. Depth can also be artifically introduced by several means including adding delays and spectral shaping. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Industry rags | Pro Audio | |||
"Are Modern Recording Practices Damaging Music?" | Pro Audio | |||
Do we need science in subjective audio "reviewing"? | High End Audio | |||
Do we need science in subjective audio "reviewing"? | High End Audio | |||
Testing audio latency of modern operating systems | Pro Audio |