[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Scottie, your kindred spirits are churning in the House. Some cracker
congressman from S. Carolina couldn't contain his race-hatred during
President Obama's speech.

Rep. Joe Wilson shouts 'you lie' at Obama

A Republican House member shouted "You lie" during
President Obama's health care speech to Congress on
Wednesday, and members of both parties condemned
the heckling.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/10/obama.heckled.speech/index.html


You've made your disgust with California quite clear, Witless. Now is the
time to relocate so you can be with your own kind. The Palmetto State beckons
to you and your pups. (Leave Mrs. Witless behind.)

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 12, 4:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 12 Set, 12:55, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

even if he is who who says he is, he is in violation.
An officer cannot publicly call the CIC a liar.-

Perhaps that is why he posts anonymously, and why we shouldn't make
such a big deal about it. Duh.-

Duh!!! That is why he is a coward-

It's not cowardice to protect your job and livelihood from a bunch of
anonymous Internet crackpots

what hw has done is clearly illegal..

Um, dum-dum?

Wilson ("You lie!") is a retired Colonel.

What should we do with someone in Congress who has done something
"clearly illegal"? LOL!

He doesn't want to go to jail

And he won't. I'll tell you what: you want to know who I am, and if I
am what I say I am? You call a military Adjutant General. Have them
prepare UCMJ charges against Rep. Wilson under Article 88. As soon as
his court martial starts, you post my worst "illegal" behavior here.
I'll post my contact information so that you can have UCMJ charges
proferred against me.

If you aren't willing to do that, why...

he is a coward.-

No, you will be. LOL!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 11, 12:48*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 11, 12:19*am, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky falls into the shallow end of the pool and bonks his head.

as a militqry officer, you are not allowed to do waht you do here on
RAO.

Where the $(*&% do you get this nonsense?

no, a military officer can't publicly call his CIC a liar

Clyde, you are like 2pid in many ways including this one. You have
sunk your teeth into something you don't know or understand and
delare, absolutely, that your position is correct. NEWSFLASH! As is
always trhe case with 2pid, it isn't.

As well-versed as you are in military law, I'm sure that you're aware
that only 1 (*one*) Article 88 case has been brought to a court
martial since the UCMJ was implemented. *None* have ever been brought
about against a retiree. Zero.

Watch as Rep. Joe Wilson, who uttered the *exact* words you say that I
did, does not get court-martialed. As I pointed out before, Wilson is
a retired Colonel. And his venue was a little larger than the
backwaters of the Usenet.

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 13, 1:45*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 12, 4:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 12 Set, 12:55, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
even if he is who who says he is, he is in violation.
An officer cannot publicly call the CIC a liar.-

Perhaps that is why he posts anonymously, and why we shouldn't make
such a big deal about it. Duh.-

Duh!!! That is why he is a coward-

It's not cowardice to protect your job and livelihood from a bunch of
anonymous Internet crackpots

what hw has done is clearly illegal..

Um, dum-dum?

Wilson ("You lie!") is a retired Colonel.

What should we do with someone in Congress who has done something
"clearly illegal"? LOL!

He doesn't want to go to jail

And he won't. I'll tell you what: you want to know who I am, and if I
am what I say I am? You call a military Adjutant General. Have them
prepare UCMJ charges against Rep. Wilson under Article 88. As soon as
his court martial starts, you post my worst "illegal" behavior here.
I'll post my contact information so that you can have UCMJ charges
proferred against me.

If you aren't willing to do that, why...

he is a coward.-

No, you will be. LOL!

you are self described as active

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 1:43*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know *for a fact that I am. LOL!


Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.


Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.


And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 14, 6:56�am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 1:43�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know �for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.





Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
�those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 6:47*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 13, 1:45*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On Sep 12, 4:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On 12 Set, 12:55, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
even if he is who who says he is, he is in violation.
An officer cannot publicly call the CIC a liar.-

Perhaps that is why he posts anonymously, and why we shouldn't make
such a big deal about it. Duh.-

Duh!!! That is why he is a coward-

It's not cowardice to protect your job and livelihood from a bunch of
anonymous Internet crackpots

what hw has done is clearly illegal..

Um, dum-dum?

Wilson ("You lie!") is a retired Colonel.

What should we do with someone in Congress who has done something
"clearly illegal"? LOL!

He doesn't want to go to jail

And he won't. I'll tell you what: you want to know who I am, and if I
am what I say I am? You call a military Adjutant General. Have them
prepare UCMJ charges against Rep. Wilson under Article 88. As soon as
his court martial starts, you post my worst "illegal" behavior here.
I'll post my contact information so that you can have UCMJ charges
proferred against me.

If you aren't willing to do that, why...

he is a coward.-

No, you will be. LOL!

you are self described as active-

When did that occur, Clyde? Wasn't that, oh, say, in July?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 8:33*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:





On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Sorry, I choose not to. Thanks for asking though.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

You and 2pid have very interesting ideas about what constitutes
'bravery' and 'cowardice'.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

I'd go easy on Clyde and 2pid, Boon. After all you're dealing with
children.

I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 9:33*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims
mi

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky parades down the runway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Watch out for the bells on your hat. You wouldn't want to injure your eye
over such a foolish argument.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 5:23*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky parades down the runway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Watch out for the bells on your hat. You wouldn't want to injure your eye
over such a foolish argument.

What do you expect? He got the argument from 2pid.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 5:20*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:33*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Hm. My "claims" seem to be consistently backed up by senior military
leadership.

They must be lying too.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 14, 5:20�pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:33�am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 12:28*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

You might as well be telling me that you are an astronaut.
You would expect me to believe that one, too.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 6:23*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky parades down the runway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Watch out for the bells on your hat. You wouldn't want to injure your eye
over such a foolish argument.

maybe he's an astronaut.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 6:38*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 14, 5:20*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 14, 9:33*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Hm. My "claims" seem to be consistently backed up by senior military
leadership.

They must be lying too.

i haven't heard them telling us that you are a military officer!

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 7:07*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky gazes at the bright night sky.

I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

You might as well be telling me that you are an astronaut.
You would expect me to believe that one, too.

When did you realize Homer Simpson was your perfect avatar?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky sticks out his tongue at the mean kids.

Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

No, you don't. Nyaah-nyaah!

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 14, 7:35�pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 12:28�pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

You might as well be telling me that you are an astronaut.
You would expect me to believe that one, too.

It's just an issue of whether or not you think I'm a lying scumbag or
not. You know me...it's up to you to decide whether or not you trust
me. But I'm telling you that there are plenty of people here who know
the truth, and you're not exactly wowing them by clinging to this
argument.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 14, 7:41�pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 7:07�pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 14, 8:05�pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 7:41 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:





On Sep 14, 7:07 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am.. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

I'll make you a deal...I'll tell you who Shhh! is if you get me the
name and address for CISG.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 7:35*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 12:28*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

You might as well be telling me that you are an astronaut.

Why would I do that? It isn't true.

You would expect me to believe that one, too.

No, I wouldn't.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 8:47*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky sticks out his tongue at the mean kids.

Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

No, you don't. Nyaah-nyaah!

Boon keeps telling me i do

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 8:04*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 7:35 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 12:28 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

You might as well be telling me that you are an astronaut.
You would expect me to believe that one, too.

It's just an issue of whether or not you think I'm a lying scumbag or
not. You know me...it's up to you to decide whether or not you trust
me. But I'm telling you that there are plenty of people here who know
the truth, and you're not exactly wowing them by clinging to this
argument.

As opposed to wowing them by clinging to their other arguments?

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 9:05*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 7:41 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 14, 7:07 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am.. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

he hasn't been here for a decade.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 7:39*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 6:38*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On Sep 14, 5:20*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Hm. My "claims" seem to be consistently backed up by senior military
leadership.

They must be lying too.

i haven't heard them telling us that you are a military officer!

The point, dum-dum, is that even if I wasn't it wouldn't matter, The
arguments and points made concerning the military stand on their own.

Duh.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 9:33*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 8:47*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky sticks out his tongue at the mean kids.

Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

No, you don't. Nyaah-nyaah!

Boon keeps telling me i do

Boon keeps telling you that does.

You keep calling Boon a liar.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 7:38*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 6:23*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky parades down the runway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

Watch out for the bells on your hat. You wouldn't want to injure your eye
over such a foolish argument.

maybe he's an astronaut.

Maybe.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 9:37*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:05*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 14, 7:41 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 7:07 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

he hasn't been here for a decade.

20 questions, dum-dum?

I'm animal, vegetable or mineral.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 14, 9:37�pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:05�pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 14, 7:41 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 7:07 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

he hasn't been here for a decade.-

There's two ways I can answer that:

1. As far as you know.
2. Why would RAO define the limits of my knowledge of him?

See the big holes in your reasoning yet?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky MaGoo needs a hearing exam.

Sacky sticks out his tongue at the mean kids.

Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

No, you don't. Nyaah-nyaah!

Boon keeps telling me i do

Alzheimer's much?

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 9:10*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 8:05 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:



On Sep 14, 7:41 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 7:07 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy.
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society.

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

I'll make you a deal...I'll tell you who Shhh! is if you get me the
name and address for CISG.

I haven't known him for
at least a decade!
BTW, what does CISG translate to?

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 9:04*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 14, 7:35 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 12:28 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

I like it when they challenge what I say based only on what they don't
know about me. I find it amusing.

You might as well be telling me that you are an astronaut.
You would expect me to believe that one, too.

It's just an issue of whether or not you think I'm a lying scumbag or
not. You know me...it's up to you to decide whether or not you trust
me. But I'm telling you that there are plenty of people here who know
the truth, and you're not exactly wowing them by clinging to this
argument.

the supposed repositories of
'the truth' are not wowing me.

and let me make it clear that you are not a scumbag.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 10:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:37*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 14, 9:05*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 7:41 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 7:07 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 5:20 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 9:33 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:56 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 1:43 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

So, Clyde, you can claim that I am not what I say I am. The funny
thing is there are several here who know for a fact that I am. LOL!

Simple solution---
provide thaqt same verification to me.

Here's another area you and 2pid are exactly alike. 2pid feels he can
dismiss whatever I say regarding the military because *he* doesn't
know my background for a fact. (This, of course, begs the question of
whether what I say is *right* or not (amazingly, there's always
affirmation by senior military leaders that my position is indeed
correct), and also (in 2pid's 'mind') this 'proves' that his
'differing POV' is 'equally valid'. It isn't. LOL!!!!!!!!!!)

So, dear Clyde, I can indeed say that bushie and cheney were the worst
presidents we've ever had. That does not mean that I am not a military
officer. And it does not mean that I am a coward. I simply choose to
insolate myself and my real life from Usenet kooks, idealogues and
vindictive whackos.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you and 2pid don't fall into
those categories.

And what there isn't evidence of is that you don't fall into
those categories. Yet I allow you to know my real identitiy..
You hide yours, you are a coward.

This reminds me of when Arny and CISG tried to say that I didn't work
for an audio magazine. When it was shown that I did, did they
apologize or say that they were wrong? Of course not. That's because
they're pieces of **** living in the margins of society. I didn't want
them to know about my job because I didn't want them to do what Arny
wound up doing anyway.

You're in the same situation here. Shhh! doesn't want you to know who
he is, and he has every right to preserve that condition. Don't be
another Usenet piece of **** living in the margins of society..

that's different. we know who you are.
Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't-

I've known him for at least a decade.

he hasn't been here for a decade.

20 questions, dum-dum?

I'm animal, vegetable or mineral.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

neither, you are just a distant voice in the wind.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 14, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:33*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 14, 8:47*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Sacky sticks out his tongue at the mean kids.

Shh has every right to preserve his anonyimity
and i have every right believe he is lying about any and
all of his claims

You do, but you'd be wrong. Most people don't aim for that objective.

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

No, you don't. Nyaah-nyaah!

Boon keeps telling me i do

Boon keeps telling you that does.

You keep calling Boon a liar.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

he can make any stupid claim he feels like making
That does not mean i am going to believe him.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky retracts his dainty little claws.

It's just an issue of whether or not you think I'm a lying scumbag or
not. You know me...it's up to you to decide whether or not you trust
me. But I'm telling you that there are plenty of people here who know
the truth, and you're not exactly wowing them by clinging to this
argument.

the supposed repositories of
'the truth' are not wowing me.

and let me make it clear that you are not a scumbag.

I'm a scumbag though, right?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 11:01*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
Sacky retracts his dainty little claws.

the supposed repositories of
'the truth' are not wowing me.

and let me make it clear that you are not a scumbag.

I'm a scumbag though, right?

Let him stew in his stupidity along with his pal 2pid.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 10:50*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:33*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 14, 8:47*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

how would you know who shhh is.
you don't

No, you don't. Nyaah-nyaah!

Boon keeps telling me i do

Boon keeps telling you that does.

You keep calling Boon a liar.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

he can make any stupid claim he feels like making
That does not mean i am going to believe him.

Since you have no way of REALLY knowing if man actually landed on the
moon or not you can believe the moon is made of green cheese for all I
care.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 10:47*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 14, 10:52*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 14, 9:37*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

he hasn't been here for a decade.

20 questions, dum-dum?

I'm animal, vegetable or mineral.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

neither, you are just a distant voice in the wind.

No, I am an astronaut made of green cheese.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!