[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Scottie, have you noticed the epidemic of crippling stupidity among your
fellow travelers in the past couple of weeks? It all boiled up when a mob of
marching morons descended on D.C. to complain about "all that change".
Apparently, many of your fellow sheep believe that the U.S. is going to keep
ownership of G.M. and Chrysler in order to promote some "socialist agenda".
Can you imagine? They actually believe that! And they also believe that
President Obama WANTS to keep the banks as government property just so he
can cap the fatcats' salaries. I suppose you'll say they don't really
believe that, but you'd be wrong.

What would have been different if Cranky John McCain had won the Presidency
instead of Obama (note ambiguous syntax, please)? Auto company bailouts? No
difference. Bank bailouts? No difference. Health care reform? Big
difference. BTW, do you realize that McCain is going to be eligible for
Medicare soon? I hope you know that Medicare, the largest socialist endeavor
ever undertaken by this country, is doing pretty well by citizens. The only
complaints are about insufficient coverage. Nobody gets dropped because
they're no longer profitable, unlike with for-profit insurance companies.

So now the herds of "conservative" sheep are screeching about everything
changing. The reality is that health care reform is the only big change
being pushed by Obama. We're still mired in two wars in the Middle East, one
that is righteous and one that is not. McCain said he wasn't interested in
forming exit strategies until the missions are completed. Obama knows that
we can't occupy either Afghanistan or Iraq indefinitely. Big change there!

Scottie, can you explain why your gang are so damned stupid? Please try.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 14, 11:00*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Scottie, can you explain why your gang are so damned stupid? Please try.

The GOP Has Become a Party of Nihilists

[The Dems] don't retail outright lies. Hyperbole and distortion
certainly exist on the left, but they are a minor chord in the
Democratic Party.

It is a very different story among Republicans... ...The
philosophically supple party that existed as recently as George H.W.
Bush's presidency has been obliterated. The party's putative
intellectuals — people like the Weekly Standard's William Kristol —
are prosaic tacticians who make precious few substantive arguments but
oppose health-care reform mostly because passage would help Barack
Obama's political prospects. In 1993, when the Clintons tried health-
care reform, the Republican John Chafee offered a creative (in fact,
superior) alternative — which Kristol quashed with his famous "Don't
Help Clinton" fax to the troops. There is no Republican health-care
alternative in 2009. The same people who rail against a government
takeover of health care tried to enforce a government takeover of
Terri Schiavo's end-of-life decisions. And when Palin floated the
"death panel" canard, the number of prominent Republicans who rose up
to call her out could be counted on one hand.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...917525,00.html

This theory fits nicely with Clyde's recent claims that because he
personally doesn't know a thing it is a lie.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

This theory fits nicely with Clyde's recent claims that because he
personally doesn't know a thing it is a lie.

If you don't want Witless to know your identity, I advise you not to reveal
it to Clyde no matter what promises he makes.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 15, 12:00*am, George M. Middius
wrote:


What would have been different if Cranky John McCain had won the Presidency
instead of Obama (note ambiguous syntax, please)?

LOL!!
So, Obama is McCain's booby prize

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 15, 1:06*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:


This theory fits nicely with Clyde's recent claims that because he
personally doesn't know a thing it is a lie.


I haven't monitored Arny's mailbox
every day, but Arny lied when he
claimed to have received kp emails from
posters to this group.
Or are you saying that Arny didn't lie about that?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 15, 12:38*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:06*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

This theory fits nicely with Clyde's recent claims that because he
personally doesn't know a thing it is a lie.

I haven't monitored Arny's mailbox
every day, but Arny lied when he
claimed to have received kp emails from
posters to this group.
Or are you saying that Arny didn't lie about that?

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

But then again you're a lying stripper so we have RAO's equivalent of
Epimenides.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 15, 1:58*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38*am, Clyde Slick wrote:



So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.



the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 15, 6:19�am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:58�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38�am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Sep 15, 7:57*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 15, 6:19 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:58 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

He figures he can goad you into spilling the beans.

Clyde is clearly suffering from excess drinking. There is no evidence
this is not the case.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 15, 8:50�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 15, 7:57�am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:





On Sep 15, 6:19 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:58 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

He figures he can goad you into spilling the beans.

I thought everyone knew you were General Petraeus. Oops.


Clyde is clearly suffering from excess drinking. There is no evidence
this is not the case.

Same with pole dancing. There is no evidence this is not the case as
well.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 15, 8:57*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 15, 6:19 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:58 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

you are such a silly boy!
"At least" you are having fun

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 15, 9:50*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 15, 7:57*am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:



On Sep 15, 6:19 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:58 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

He figures he can goad you into spilling the beans.

Clyde is clearly suffering from excess drinking. There is no evidence
this is not the case.

one can't spill beans one does not have.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Sacky misses the point.

the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?
It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

He figures he can goad you into spilling the beans.
Clyde is clearly suffering from excess drinking. There is no evidence
this is not the case.

one can't spill beans one does not have.

Maybe not, but Scottie will eat anything off the floor, including "beans".

[vinyl anachronist]

On Sep 15, 4:45�pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Sep 15, 9:50�am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On Sep 15, 7:57�am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 15, 6:19 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:58 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

He figures he can goad you into spilling the beans.

Clyde is clearly suffering from excess drinking. There is no evidence
this is not the case.

one can't spill beans one does not have.

So you don't want me to tell you who Shhh! is. Good.

[Clyde Slick]

On Sep 15, 10:16*pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:45 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Sep 15, 9:50 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 7:57 am, vinyl anachronist
wrote:

On Sep 15, 6:19 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:58 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38 am, Clyde Slick wrote:

So to you either everybody lies or nobody does.

the qusetion is whether or not a statement is a lie.
the statement in question is Boon's, whether he has
known you for at least 10 years.
I believe his statement is a lie,

Why would I lie about such a thing? What do I stand to gain?

It's just kind of silly when you think about it.

He figures he can goad you into spilling the beans.

Clyde is clearly suffering from excess drinking. There is no evidence
this is not the case.

one can't spill beans one does not have.

So you don't want me to tell you who Shhh! is. Good.

no, I don't want you to tell me.
nor do i expect that you would dishonor
a confidence he has bestowed on you, if any.