Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Good CDR for archive use
Overall indication if there are brands to choose over others, i.e. the
best buys performance wise; name brand / manufacturer wise and best online source. thanks |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Good CDR for archive use
"thanks" wrote...
Overall indication if there are brands to choose over others, i.e. the best buys performance wise; name brand / manufacturer wise http://www.digitalfaq.com/media/dvdmedia.htm and best online source. http://www.digitalfaq.com/dvdguides/...s/buymedia.htm |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Good CDR for archive use
thanks wrote:
Overall indication if there are brands to choose over others, i.e. the best buys performance wise; name brand / manufacturer wise and best online source. "best" ... it is a large planet. You may however find that Feurio's online shop is quite informative. thanks Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ******************************************* * My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk * ******************************************* |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Good CDR for archive use
thanks wrote: Overall indication if there are brands to choose over others, i.e. the best buys performance wise; name brand / manufacturer wise and best online source. thanks No CDR can be considered archival in the strictest use of the word. plastic CDs are not either. You have to go to an actual glass pressed CD. ONe that you can replate if you want to read it a thousand years from today. --Dale |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Good CDR for archive use
Dale Farmer wrote:
thanks wrote: Overall indication if there are brands to choose over others, i.e. the best buys performance wise; name brand / manufacturer wise and best online source. thanks No CDR can be considered archival in the strictest use of the word. plastic CDs are not either. You have to go to an actual glass pressed CD. ONe that you can replate if you want to read it a thousand years from today. --Dale Isn't that the same thing with plastic CDRs? I mean, the main reason plastic CDRs fail is due to the plastic layer being scratched. The data is probably intact. You would then simply take the danaged CDR to one of those machines which shaves a bit of the plastic layer off, RIP the data to the computer again and make another CDR. CD |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Good CDR for archive use
"Codifus" wrote in message news:NRYqf.7624 No CDR can be considered archival in the strictest use of the word. plastic CDs are not either. You have to go to an actual glass pressed CD. ONe that you can replate if you want to read it a thousand years from today. --Dale Isn't that the same thing with plastic CDRs? I mean, the main reason plastic CDRs fail is due to the plastic layer being scratched. The data is probably intact. You would then simply take the danaged CDR to one of those machines which shaves a bit of the plastic layer off, RIP the data to the computer again and make another CDR. No. The archival quality depends largely on the dye layer lasting properties. Scratches on the front are not such a big deal, but scratches on the back (though to the dye layer) can be fatal. geoff |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Need to know
Geoff@homewrote:
"Codifus" codifus@optonline. I really need to know more about this... school project. Can you PM me some more ideas? |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Need to know
"Holly57" wrote in message ... Geoff@homewrote: "Codifus" codifus@optonline. I really need to know more about this... school project. Can you PM me some more ideas? www.cdfreaks.com www.cdrinfo.com have a lot of articles archived on CD longevity, handling, etc. geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |