Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 &
MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 14, 1:40*am, "West" wrote:
Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? Before that question may be answered with any degree of accuracy, you would have to define the reasons for such a trade. a) The existing Dynaco transformers are perfectly adequate for the intended use assuming that the unit is properly maintained, the tubes are good and the filter and board capacitors are good. A 45 year track record supports this statement. b) Very minor modifications to the main power-suppy will change that "adequate" to "rugged and bullet-proof" for the power-transformer. This at the cost of derating the amp by about 5 watts or so. c) Various modifications or outright replacement of the circuit board will overcome several other perceived deficiencies of these amps - at a significantly lower cost than new iron. Patrick Turner has a "complete" rebuild on his website that takes this option pretty much to its logical conclusion. d) If one wishes to replace the iron as suggested, it would be far more useful to simply build a "New" amp around the "New" iron vs. a simple substitution. In point-of-fact a simple substitution will only continue many of the same perceived deficiencies only with new iron - the only direct advantage being with the power transformer - and that of questionable utility assuming a) and/or b) above. So, if the question is to replace for the sake of reliability - No. Any advantage achieved would be marginal at best. For the sake of better sound - No, or not until any-of-several other more productive modifications were already completed and tested. Because one is curious - Perhaps. But that assumes that one has both the ears to appreciate tiny increments and subtle results, and the skills to effect the changes. Both are questionable in this case. As part of a total rebuild - sure. But then it ain't nohow a Dynaco any more unless one repeats the same inadequacies and limitations. And if one does not, why call it a Dynaco? With a complete change-of-iron, really one is left only with the chassis and the choke in both these cases. Dynaco used the cheapest bulk parts they could find from sockets to boards to point-to-point wire to switches and pots. With a massive rebuild such as is anticipated, all of those items would normally be changed - new wine in an old skin. That was a questionable option 2000 years ago, and is questionable today. This very question, by the way, has been discussed nearly ad-nauseum in this and various other venues in the past - with the OP's participation it seems in several cases. So, one does wonder why this question was posted other than for attention. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
in article YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04, West at wrote on
2/14/08 1:40 AM: Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west I would never trade Dynaco output iron for Hammond. But I think you should. Jon |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:40:56 GMT, "West" wrote:
Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? When I was working with Williamson Ultralinear circuits that had burned out Dynaco transformers (tar everywhere), I found the newer Hammond parts to function perfectly well. For repairing a brand-name product, though, I'd try to stick to original parts, where practical. I recovered the Dynaco laminations for use elsewhere. RL |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
West wrote:
Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west The Dynaco ST-70 audio transformers are highly regarded but the original power transformer was not as they were to small for the amp and get pretty hot after a few hours. Just my opinion, Sal |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 14, 8:46*am, legg wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:40:56 GMT, "West" wrote: Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? When I was working with Williamson Ultralinear circuits that had burned out Dynaco transformers (tar everywhere), I found the newer Hammond parts to *function perfectly well. For repairing a brand-name product, though, I'd try to stick to original parts, where practical. I recovered the Dynaco laminations for use elsewhere. RL Dynaco-branded transformers were never potted. Althought the same/very similar iron was used by Acrosound and was potted. Are you sure it was "tar"? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
there goes peter again stating facts when he has none.
i know its hard but maybe sometimes peter you should just keep your know it all mouth shut as not to overload your arse. mit "Peter Wieck" wrote in message ... On Feb 14, 8:46 am, legg wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:40:56 GMT, "West" wrote: Dynaco-branded transformers were never potted. Althought the same/very similar iron was used by Acrosound and was potted. Are you sure it was "tar"? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 14, 10:16*am, "ElectroJunk" wrote:
there goes peter again stating facts when he has none. i know its hard but maybe sometimes peter you should just keep your know it all mouth shut as not to overload your arse. Please point to a potted Dynaco transformer - more-so, in the units under discussion. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
Got your panties in a twist ? Again?
"ElectroJunk" wrote in message ... there goes peter again stating facts when he has none. i know its hard but maybe sometimes peter you should just keep your know it all mouth shut as not to overload your arse. mit "Peter Wieck" wrote in message ... On Feb 14, 8:46 am, legg wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:40:56 GMT, "West" wrote: Dynaco-branded transformers were never potted. Althought the same/very similar iron was used by Acrosound and was potted. Are you sure it was "tar"? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
|
#12
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 14, 2:22*pm, Jon Yaeger wrote:
On 2/14/08 11:25 AM, in article , "Peter Wieck" wrote: On Feb 14, 10:16*am, "ElectroJunk" wrote: there goes peter again stating facts when he has none. i know its hard but maybe sometimes peter you should just keep your know it all mouth shut as not to overload your arse. Please point to a potted Dynaco transformer - more-so, in the units under discussion. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA None of the OEM transformers in my Dynaco ST-70 are potted. *However, I do have some Dynaco A-420 transformers which are definitely potted. Many older trannies used tar and fish paper between the windings and the bells, but they were not "potted" in the traditional sense. Jon Yeah, and thanks! Henry pointed me to the actual sales literature from Dynaco. They were separate units, not part of anything they sold as an assembled module. Learn something new every day - I hope. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
In article
, Peter Wieck wrote: On Feb 14, 2:22*pm, Jon Yaeger wrote: On 2/14/08 11:25 AM, in article , "Peter Wieck" wrote: On Feb 14, 10:16*am, "ElectroJunk" wrote: there goes peter again stating facts when he has none. i know its hard but maybe sometimes peter you should just keep your know it all mouth shut as not to overload your arse. Please point to a potted Dynaco transformer - more-so, in the units under discussion. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA None of the OEM transformers in my Dynaco ST-70 are potted. *However, I do have some Dynaco A-420 transformers which are definitely potted. Many older trannies used tar and fish paper between the windings and the bells, but they were not "potted" in the traditional sense. Jon Yeah, and thanks! Henry pointed me to the actual sales literature from Dynaco. They were separate units, not part of anything they sold as an assembled module. Are you sure some of the early mono Dynaco kits didn't use OPTs in a can? I vaguely remember Dynaco amps of this description, but don't know what was in the "can", if what was inside was "potted" or not. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
|
#15
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
West wrote:
Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west You mean cloth insulation on the leads? If that looks to be in poor shape, use some heat shrink or change the leads to fix that. The cloth is not used in the windings themselves. |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message ... Hammond's output transformers are usually considered guitar/utility grade, although specific ones may be suited to hi-fi use. Dyna specifies their transformers 20-20K Hz while Hammond is 30-30K Hz. Dyna's alternate rating of 30-15K Hz is specified at twice the 20-20K power. So, you can't really compare a 60w Hammond 1650N to a Dyna 431. Use the Hammonds at 1/2 their rated power, then, not too bad. Regards, Mark The Dyna output transformers in ST70s are suited to hi-fi use but are not terrifically good, they are not as good as what is found in Fishers and Scotts sometimes and definitely not up to the quality of the top Acro, Peerless or UTC units. Freed and others made some great ones too. The ST70's power transformer is perfectly good except for being undersized. Replacement with an appropriate Hammond, Schumacher or any other PT having the required voltages and current capacities fixes in a satisfactory manner one of the main problems with the ST70. With the stock output transformer the ST70 can be a fairly good amplifier. |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 14, 4:43*pm, John Byrns wrote:
In article , *Peter Wieck wrote: On Feb 14, 2:22*pm, Jon Yaeger wrote: On 2/14/08 11:25 AM, in article , "Peter Wieck" wrote: On Feb 14, 10:16*am, "ElectroJunk" wrote: there goes peter again stating facts when he has none. i know its hard but maybe sometimes peter you should just keep your know it all mouth shut as not to overload your arse. Please point to a potted Dynaco transformer - more-so, in the units under discussion. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA None of the OEM transformers in my Dynaco ST-70 are potted. *However, I do have some Dynaco A-420 transformers which are definitely potted. Many older trannies used tar and fish paper between the windings and the bells, but they were not "potted" in the traditional sense. Jon Yeah, and thanks! Henry pointed me to the actual sales literature from Dynaco. They were separate units, not part of anything they sold as an assembled module. Are you sure some of the early mono Dynaco kits didn't use OPTs in a can? *I vaguely remember Dynaco amps of this description, but don't know what was in the "can", if what was inside was "potted" or not. Regards, John Byrns -- Surf my web pages at, *http://fmamradios.com/- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Turns out that Dynaco did put out potted transformers under their label. But they did not install them in any amps of which I am familiar. That would include the MK-II, III, IV, ST-70, 35, SCA-35. I am unaware of any actual MK-I made for purchase - I expect there was one at some point. There was also the FMA2 at least as a schematic, but that was half-a-ST35, so unlikely to be potted. Hafler was a cheap SOB, I can see him rebadging some leftover potted Acrosonic OPTs as Dynaco (Per my pointer (thank you!) from Henry, the A420), but I cannot see him investing in potting transformers in his production (yeah, right) items. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions.
Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 15, 5:41*pm, "West" wrote:
Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? *They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in messagenews:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04.... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west - Show quoted text - The Hammond 1650R is one of its flyers. excellent, and beefy. I'd take it ahead of any of the Mk.ii/iii outputs. The smaller A470 from the St. 70 and Mk.iv are better than the A430/431 but I'd still take the big Hammond. It sounds quite good. cheers, Douglas |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of
yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article 7yotj.30$k_4.4@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/15/08 5:41 PM: Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west Pest, Using a bare minimum of effort and imagination, go visit: http://store.triodestore.com/dytr.html There you will see: 1. Original specs for Dynaco Transformers! http://www.triodeel.com/images/dynaxfmr.pdf 2. A comparison test among Hammond, Magnequest, Dynaco & Handwound XFMRs for the ST35 application. Granted, the ST35 is not the ST70 or MKIII, but you get the idea! http://triodeel.com/pdf/xfmrshootout.pdf Do you REALLY want to know even MORE about these XMFRS? Then ask Ned Carlson of Triode. Now, there's your answers, but you won't be happy, because once again the Garage Trader has told you where to go!!! Jon |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Dynaco vs. Hammond Xfs
On Feb 18, 7:58*pm, "West" wrote:
I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! Pillock: We are waiting with 'bated breath your 'breadboard' results. Since none are forthcoming, complete with schematic and pictures! Otherwise it is to be assumed that your question with reference to "Sudden B+" was another troll for attention. Inasmuch as you have asked the question several times before, for RATs to even hope that something might actually come of it is rather futile... please prove me wrong! Given that Jon (and others) have given you sound, apt and on-point advice on this thread, perhaps you should accept some of it. Yes, you may have resistance in taking advice from those who have actually "done" things with tubes - but after all, that is the point of all this, isn't it? Don't feel compelled to shoot the messenger because he happens not to like the recipient of the message. That would strongly suggest that you are ignorant. And you would not want that, would you? Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
I'm a fool because I waste time giving you useful information and you don't
have the wherewithal to grasp it. In light of your obvious deficiencies, may I recommend some courses to augment your ignorance? To wit: 1. Google for Idiots. How to make the most out of internet searches. 2. Intro to Buddhism. Will give you really great ideas for your incessant quest for attention, with questions such as: e.g. "What is the sound of one hand clapping? "What did your face look like before you were born." etc. 3. Remedial grammar and composition. For obvious reasons. 4. Morality & ethics. An intro. 5. Epistemology and Logic, aka Philosophy 101 6. And of course, Manners, which I fear is no longer taught anywhere. ES&D. Jon in article FQpuj.10681$k_4.8040@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/18/08 7:58 PM: I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article 7yotj.30$k_4.4@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/15/08 5:41 PM: Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west Pest, Using a bare minimum of effort and imagination, go visit: http://store.triodestore.com/dytr.html There you will see: 1. Original specs for Dynaco Transformers! http://www.triodeel.com/images/dynaxfmr.pdf 2. A comparison test among Hammond, Magnequest, Dynaco & Handwound XFMRs for the ST35 application. Granted, the ST35 is not the ST70 or MKIII, but you get the idea! http://triodeel.com/pdf/xfmrshootout.pdf Do you REALLY want to know even MORE about these XMFRS? Then ask Ned Carlson of Triode. Now, there's your answers, but you won't be happy, because once again the Garage Trader has told you where to go!!! Jon |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
You really make me chuckle because you think that your so witty. You call me
names and want me to take a course in manners. Oh, again I repeat my assertion ... everywhere that the Narcissist Wiecked went, Jon Lamb was sure to go.. Check all the archives, especially the nasty diatribes it's Wiecked followed by the little lamb, jon. Remember Jon, the only reason your mad at me is that I exposed your dishonest practices on ebay. Ouch! that must really hurt. I like attention and could always count on getting it from my 2 ankle nippers. Thanks for the laughs, west "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... I'm a fool because I waste time giving you useful information and you don't have the wherewithal to grasp it. In light of your obvious deficiencies, may I recommend some courses to augment your ignorance? To wit: 1. Google for Idiots. How to make the most out of internet searches. 2. Intro to Buddhism. Will give you really great ideas for your incessant quest for attention, with questions such as: e.g. "What is the sound of one hand clapping? "What did your face look like before you were born." etc. 3. Remedial grammar and composition. For obvious reasons. 4. Morality & ethics. An intro. 5. Epistemology and Logic, aka Philosophy 101 6. And of course, Manners, which I fear is no longer taught anywhere. ES&D. Jon in article FQpuj.10681$k_4.8040@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/18/08 7:58 PM: I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article 7yotj.30$k_4.4@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/15/08 5:41 PM: Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west Pest, Using a bare minimum of effort and imagination, go visit: http://store.triodestore.com/dytr.html There you will see: 1. Original specs for Dynaco Transformers! http://www.triodeel.com/images/dynaxfmr.pdf 2. A comparison test among Hammond, Magnequest, Dynaco & Handwound XFMRs for the ST35 application. Granted, the ST35 is not the ST70 or MKIII, but you get the idea! http://triodeel.com/pdf/xfmrshootout.pdf Do you REALLY want to know even MORE about these XMFRS? Then ask Ned Carlson of Triode. Now, there's your answers, but you won't be happy, because once again the Garage Trader has told you where to go!!! Jon |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
Ah West, you lying sack of ****.
You never exposed any dishonesty or other malfeasance. I asked you several times to give credible evidence but the fact is that YOU CAN'T. My eBay and Audiogon ratings speak for themselves. All you have managed to do is libel and slander. And even that you do poorly. Didn't Jute teach you better? Jon in article D2uuj.37357$we5.31575@trnddc02, West at wrote on 2/19/08 12:46 AM: You really make me chuckle because you think that your so witty. You call me names and want me to take a course in manners. Oh, again I repeat my assertion ... everywhere that the Narcissist Wiecked went, Jon Lamb was sure to go.. Check all the archives, especially the nasty diatribes it's Wiecked followed by the little lamb, jon. Remember Jon, the only reason your mad at me is that I exposed your dishonest practices on ebay. Ouch! that must really hurt. I like attention and could always count on getting it from my 2 ankle nippers. Thanks for the laughs, west "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... I'm a fool because I waste time giving you useful information and you don't have the wherewithal to grasp it. In light of your obvious deficiencies, may I recommend some courses to augment your ignorance? To wit: 1. Google for Idiots. How to make the most out of internet searches. 2. Intro to Buddhism. Will give you really great ideas for your incessant quest for attention, with questions such as: e.g. "What is the sound of one hand clapping? "What did your face look like before you were born." etc. 3. Remedial grammar and composition. For obvious reasons. 4. Morality & ethics. An intro. 5. Epistemology and Logic, aka Philosophy 101 6. And of course, Manners, which I fear is no longer taught anywhere. ES&D. Jon in article FQpuj.10681$k_4.8040@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/18/08 7:58 PM: I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article 7yotj.30$k_4.4@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/15/08 5:41 PM: Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west Pest, Using a bare minimum of effort and imagination, go visit: http://store.triodestore.com/dytr.html There you will see: 1. Original specs for Dynaco Transformers! http://www.triodeel.com/images/dynaxfmr.pdf 2. A comparison test among Hammond, Magnequest, Dynaco & Handwound XFMRs for the ST35 application. Granted, the ST35 is not the ST70 or MKIII, but you get the idea! http://triodeel.com/pdf/xfmrshootout.pdf Do you REALLY want to know even MORE about these XMFRS? Then ask Ned Carlson of Triode. Now, there's your answers, but you won't be happy, because once again the Garage Trader has told you where to go!!! Jon |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
I and several others have exposed your dishonest practices many times. Most
informed ppl know that those ratings don't mean a thing...but if you must use those ratings for proof of your honesty ...then that is most certainly pathetic. You have been exposed Jon Yaeger. Keep a low profile and perhaps after a few years people will forget. If you don't want to take my word for it then take a poll on this NG regarding your honesty. I know you will never do it. CASE CLOSED! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... Ah West, you lying sack of ****. You never exposed any dishonesty or other malfeasance. I asked you several times to give credible evidence but the fact is that YOU CAN'T. My eBay and Audiogon ratings speak for themselves. All you have managed to do is libel and slander. And even that you do poorly. Didn't Jute teach you better? Jon in article D2uuj.37357$we5.31575@trnddc02, West at wrote on 2/19/08 12:46 AM: You really make me chuckle because you think that your so witty. You call me names and want me to take a course in manners. Oh, again I repeat my assertion ... everywhere that the Narcissist Wiecked went, Jon Lamb was sure to go.. Check all the archives, especially the nasty diatribes it's Wiecked followed by the little lamb, jon. Remember Jon, the only reason your mad at me is that I exposed your dishonest practices on ebay. Ouch! that must really hurt. I like attention and could always count on getting it from my 2 ankle nippers. Thanks for the laughs, west "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... I'm a fool because I waste time giving you useful information and you don't have the wherewithal to grasp it. In light of your obvious deficiencies, may I recommend some courses to augment your ignorance? To wit: 1. Google for Idiots. How to make the most out of internet searches. 2. Intro to Buddhism. Will give you really great ideas for your incessant quest for attention, with questions such as: e.g. "What is the sound of one hand clapping? "What did your face look like before you were born." etc. 3. Remedial grammar and composition. For obvious reasons. 4. Morality & ethics. An intro. 5. Epistemology and Logic, aka Philosophy 101 6. And of course, Manners, which I fear is no longer taught anywhere. ES&D. Jon in article FQpuj.10681$k_4.8040@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/18/08 7:58 PM: I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article 7yotj.30$k_4.4@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/15/08 5:41 PM: Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west Pest, Using a bare minimum of effort and imagination, go visit: http://store.triodestore.com/dytr.html There you will see: 1. Original specs for Dynaco Transformers! http://www.triodeel.com/images/dynaxfmr.pdf 2. A comparison test among Hammond, Magnequest, Dynaco & Handwound XFMRs for the ST35 application. Granted, the ST35 is not the ST70 or MKIII, but you get the idea! http://triodeel.com/pdf/xfmrshootout.pdf Do you REALLY want to know even MORE about these XMFRS? Then ask Ned Carlson of Triode. Now, there's your answers, but you won't be happy, because once again the Garage Trader has told you where to go!!! Jon |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
You CLAIM you have, but NEVER submitted ANY real examples. There is nothing
to expose except your bull****. Prove me wrong. Take a poll if you want to -- you are too lazy and incompetent to make it happen . . . If you can't or won't provide actual examples, then shut the **** up. Jon in article oZLuj.2326$kI4.45@trnddc05, West at wrote on 2/19/08 9:09 PM: I and several others have exposed your dishonest practices many times. Most informed ppl know that those ratings don't mean a thing...but if you must use those ratings for proof of your honesty ...then that is most certainly pathetic. You have been exposed Jon Yaeger. Keep a low profile and perhaps after a few years people will forget. If you don't want to take my word for it then take a poll on this NG regarding your honesty. I know you will never do it. CASE CLOSED! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... Ah West, you lying sack of ****. You never exposed any dishonesty or other malfeasance. I asked you several times to give credible evidence but the fact is that YOU CAN'T. My eBay and Audiogon ratings speak for themselves. All you have managed to do is libel and slander. And even that you do poorly. Didn't Jute teach you better? Jon in article D2uuj.37357$we5.31575@trnddc02, West at wrote on 2/19/08 12:46 AM: You really make me chuckle because you think that your so witty. You call me names and want me to take a course in manners. Oh, again I repeat my assertion ... everywhere that the Narcissist Wiecked went, Jon Lamb was sure to go.. Check all the archives, especially the nasty diatribes it's Wiecked followed by the little lamb, jon. Remember Jon, the only reason your mad at me is that I exposed your dishonest practices on ebay. Ouch! that must really hurt. I like attention and could always count on getting it from my 2 ankle nippers. Thanks for the laughs, west "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... I'm a fool because I waste time giving you useful information and you don't have the wherewithal to grasp it. In light of your obvious deficiencies, may I recommend some courses to augment your ignorance? To wit: 1. Google for Idiots. How to make the most out of internet searches. 2. Intro to Buddhism. Will give you really great ideas for your incessant quest for attention, with questions such as: e.g. "What is the sound of one hand clapping? "What did your face look like before you were born." etc. 3. Remedial grammar and composition. For obvious reasons. 4. Morality & ethics. An intro. 5. Epistemology and Logic, aka Philosophy 101 6. And of course, Manners, which I fear is no longer taught anywhere. ES&D. Jon in article FQpuj.10681$k_4.8040@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/18/08 7:58 PM: I feel sorry for you. Don't you realize what a fool your making out of yourself? Are you not too old to "sound down" someone? You're only displaying immaturity and ignorance. Grow up dude! "Jon Yaeger" wrote in message ... in article 7yotj.30$k_4.4@trnddc04, West at wrote on 2/15/08 5:41 PM: Thanks for all the responses. They will help me to make some decisions. Can we now discuss the merits of the Dynaco MKIII Xfrs? They are considerably larger, run cooler and I believe, have better specs. Very little is mentioned about the MKIII. Any comments? Thanks in advance. west "West" wrote in message news:YnRsj.579$Cs.403@trnddc04... Would you trade old Dynaco (cloth) Xfrs, Power & OPT for both ST-70 & MKIIIs, for new Hammond ones? Which would you keep or does it make much difference? west Pest, Using a bare minimum of effort and imagination, go visit: http://store.triodestore.com/dytr.html There you will see: 1. Original specs for Dynaco Transformers! http://www.triodeel.com/images/dynaxfmr.pdf 2. A comparison test among Hammond, Magnequest, Dynaco & Handwound XFMRs for the ST35 application. Granted, the ST35 is not the ST70 or MKIII, but you get the idea! http://triodeel.com/pdf/xfmrshootout.pdf Do you REALLY want to know even MORE about these XMFRS? Then ask Ned Carlson of Triode. Now, there's your answers, but you won't be happy, because once again the Garage Trader has told you where to go!!! Jon |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
On Feb 19, 9:09*pm, "West" wrote:
Remember Jon, the only reason your mad at me is that I exposed your dishonest practices on ebay. Pillock: All you have done is exposed yourself for an ignorant, pretentious liar, but for all that a mere shadow of the pretense and lies of your "boss". However, as you are in the mood, why not actually prove your blather with some actual, specific, examples that are verifiable by an independent third party - citing eBay feedback ought to be enough. Or, of course, we could compare your direct lies when listing a hybrid pre-amp as "All Tube"... and in another venue as "hybrid"... There are lies and there are damned lies. You manage both with equal facility. That is one helluva legacy. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Curriculum recommendations for West the Pest
ROTFL....and the jon Lamb was sure to go.(wish I knew the ascii character
for a musical note). "Peter Wieck" wrote in message ... On Feb 19, 9:09 pm, "West" wrote: Remember Jon, the only reason your mad at me is that I exposed your dishonest practices on ebay. Pillock: All you have done is exposed yourself for an ignorant, pretentious liar, but for all that a mere shadow of the pretense and lies of your "boss". However, as you are in the mood, why not actually prove your blather with some actual, specific, examples that are verifiable by an independent third party - citing eBay feedback ought to be enough. Or, of course, we could compare your direct lies when listing a hybrid pre-amp as "All Tube"... and in another venue as "hybrid"... There are lies and there are damned lies. You manage both with equal facility. That is one helluva legacy. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hammond c3 for sale | Pro Audio | |||
hammond in the cold | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FA: Hammond PR-40 Tone Cab. Amp - for B3 | Marketplace | |||
Hammond A100- another hammond question | Pro Audio | |||
New Hammond B-3 ? | Pro Audio |