Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
|
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
wrote:
I have a Sony camcorder which has a 3.5mm socket labelled "external mic, plug in power". I'm a keen musician and have a good quality condenser microphone which has an XLR output. I want to connect the two to give me better quality sound on the camcorder. The internal mic in the camcorder is stereo, so I can only assume that the external input is made for a stereo mic. My condenser mic is mono. I was hoping that someone could advise me on how to construct a lead to connect the mic to the camcorder. I have a couple of old XLR leads that I'm happy to chop up, and I've got a spare 3.5mm stereo jack for the other end. It is one of my most popular web pages... http://www.rcrowley.com/CamAdapt.htm Also, what does "plug in power" mean? It means the 3-5v that consumer devices (camcorders, MD recorders, computer sound cards, etc.) provide to power the FET impedance converter transistor in electret condenser microphone capsules. It is very very roughly the consumer equivalent of 48v phantom power, but a much lower voltage, and single-ended (contrasted with balanced pro microphones). I usually use 48v phantom power with my condenser mic, but it has the facility to put in a 1.5v battery if I need to. There are adapter devices which provide balanced mic inputs and even P48 power for stereo mini-phone consumer equipment. For example... http://www.beachtek.com/dxa6.html |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
Eeyore wrote:
wrote: I have a Sony camcorder which has a 3.5mm socket labelled "external mic, plug in power". I'm a keen musician and have a good quality condenser microphone which has an XLR output. I want to connect the two to give me better quality sound on the camcorder. It's a C-1000 isn't it? Please tell me it's not a C-3000. The internal mic in the camcorder is stereo, so I can only assume that the external input is made for a stereo mic. My condenser mic is mono. Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. But, if you absolutely HAVE to do it, tie tip and ring together and connect through a 10 MFD film capacitor to one end of the secondary of a 1:1 transformer. The other end goes to the sleeve. The primary of the transformer goes to pins 2 and 3 of the XLR from the mike, with pin 1 on the XLR tied to the chassis of the box and to the sleeve of the 3.5mm plug. Also, what does "plug in power" mean? I usually use 48v phantom power with my condenser mic, but it has the facility to put in a 1.5v battery if I need to. Plug-In-Power is a really boneheaded idea. Sony puts some DC on the input, and since it's a crappy unbalanced line they can't do the usual phantom power trick, so it's differential between signal and ground. This screws up dynamic mikes and transformers plugged in there, unless you have a DC blocking cap to keep it out. This is just another reason why all of these consumer camcorders have no business running single system audio. If you care about audio, record it on an audio recorder and synch them up in post. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... If you care about audio, record it on an audio recorder and synch them up in post. This is always my recommendation too. The camera audio can be used simply as a reference to sync to. MrT. |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Mr.T" wrote: "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message If you care about audio, record it on an audio recorder and synch them up in post. This is always my recommendation too. The camera audio can be used simply as a reference to sync to. With modern crystal based sound recorders - 'wild sound' presents no problems. Graham |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
Scott Dorsey wrote:
The internal mic in the camcorder is stereo, so I can only assume that the external input is made for a stereo mic. My condenser mic is mono. Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. Quite a lot people hack the OS on their Sony Camcorders, for enabling DV-In, Zebra patterns and disabling AGC. If you do that, you have a consumer-quality line-in with level meter on that thing. For a start, look at: http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/acti...tarticle/1464/ It takes some research to find tables on the net with all the register setting for a particular camera model, but the new features you can activate with that are worth it. Been there, done that. With these modifications you can use any mobile mic2line preamp to hook up your mic to the camcorder. You can't use the preamp built into the camera, because it can't be used without the AGC. This is true for the consumer camcorders without a touch screen. All the best Boris -- http://www.borislau.de - computer science, music, photos |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Scott Dorsey" kludge@ Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. Seeing your username as "cludge" I just thought of a possible kludge that would be interesting to try regarding AGC. Thinking If we were to inject a sub-sonic or super-sonic "sidetone" to the camera mixed with the actual audio we want, we could set the "sidetone" level such that the AGC would operate "much less, if at all." The sidetone, if recorded successfully, could be filtered in post. I would imagine the AGC will react to a signal outside the audio passband "if sent high enough" to get (forced) through any possible filters." I wonder if this would add "unacceptable" artefacts? /thinking Rv! |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Rv!" wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" kludge@ Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. Seeing your username as "cludge" I just thought of a possible kludge that would be interesting to try regarding AGC. Thinking If we were to inject a sub-sonic or super-sonic "sidetone" to the camera mixed with the actual audio we want, we could set the "sidetone" level such that the AGC would operate "much less, if at all." The sidetone, if recorded successfully, could be filtered in post. I would imagine the AGC will react to a signal outside the audio passband "if sent high enough" to get (forced) through any possible filters." I wonder if this would add "unacceptable" artefacts? /thinking Rv! I would expect the "wanted sound" to bounce the AGC anyway, to the extent it adds to the "force tone" when present. -- ~ Roy "If you notice the sound, it's wrong!" |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
I would expect the "wanted sound" to bounce the AGC anyway, to the extent it adds to the "force tone" when present. Nice to see you've still got your original name Roy... I was thinking of running the sidetone as a high enough level to push the AGC down a "fair amount" so the normal level audio would be recorded lower than usual. Only on hard audio peaks would the AGC kick in further. If that worked I could see the AGC working more like a "high-level" compressor. Just a thought, but an interesting one I might just try from the scrap-box. Rv! |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
In sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tec h, On 21 Nov 2006
23:07:15 GMT, Roy W. Rising wrote: "Rv!" wrote: "Scott Dorsey" kludge@ Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. Seeing your username as "cludge" I just thought of a possible kludge that would be interesting to try regarding AGC. Thinking If we were to inject a sub-sonic or super-sonic "sidetone" to the camera mixed with the actual audio we want, we could set the "sidetone" level such that the AGC would operate "much less, if at all." The sidetone, if recorded successfully, could be filtered in post. I would imagine the AGC will react to a signal outside the audio passband "if sent high enough" to get (forced) through any possible filters." I wonder if this would add "unacceptable" artefacts? This is definitely a kludge but it could indeed be an improvement. An ultrasonic signal should indeed activate the AGC, yet be filtered out by an anti-aliasing filter in front of an ADC (or equivantly, be filtered out digitally in a "1-bit" ADC). But with anything less than an excellent filter, the ultrasonic tone may be aliased to an annoyingly audible frequency in the recording. I suppose it's worth trying. If it were my camera I'd open it up and see if I could disable the AGC (presuming it's still done with analog components) and add a potentiometer with the shaft coming out a hole drilled in the case for a gain control. I did that very thing to a Radio Shack cassette recorder about 30 years ago, but back then everything was thru-hole and (relative to now) big components. Surface mount makes such mods more challenging, especially with middle-age eyesight, but "we have the technology..." /thinking Rv! I would expect the "wanted sound" to bounce the AGC anyway, to the extent it adds to the "force tone" when present. Perhaps so, but it could still be a great improvement over what the AGC does to straight audio. |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Rv!" wrote in message
k "Scott Dorsey" kludge@ Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. Seeing your username as "cludge" I just thought of a possible kludge that would be interesting to try regarding AGC. Thinking If we were to inject a sub-sonic or super-sonic "sidetone" to the camera mixed with the actual audio we want, we could set the "sidetone" level such that the AGC would operate "much less, if at all." The sidetone, if recorded successfully, could be filtered in post. I would imagine the AGC will react to a signal outside the audio passband "if sent high enough" to get (forced) through any possible filters." I wonder if this would add "unacceptable" artefacts? /thinking It appears that the AGC on some consumer cameras can be turned off by fiddling with their firmware. |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Rv!" wrote: "Scott Dorsey" kludge@ Right, and it's got some godawful AGC on it to begin with. You really, really don't want to use the input on a consumer camcorder if there is ANY possible way around it. Seeing your username as "cludge" I just thought of a possible kludge that would be interesting to try regarding AGC. Thinking If we were to inject a sub-sonic or super-sonic "sidetone" to the camera mixed with the actual audio we want, we could set the "sidetone" level such that the AGC would operate "much less, if at all." The sidetone, if recorded successfully, could be filtered in post. I would imagine the AGC will react to a signal outside the audio passband "if sent high enough" to get (forced) through any possible filters." I wonder if this would add "unacceptable" artefacts? /thinking That ought to work. I'd got for a subsonic tone myself. Graham |
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
"Rv!" wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" kludge@ Seeing your username as "cludge" I just thought of a possible kludge that would be interesting to try regarding AGC. The first fix to attempt is to lengthen the release time if the pcb and/or circuit design allows the required cap and/or resistor replacement. Peter Larsen |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.design,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
AGC Thoughts, Was: XLR to stereo 3.5mm cable?
Eeyore wrote:
If we were to inject a sub-sonic or super-sonic "sidetone" That ought to work. This AGC issue is yet another example of loss of audio knowhow at the manufacturers, Sony did an excellent overmodulation protection circuit on their 510 portable r2r and then promptly forgot all about it. I'd got for a subsonic tone myself. A firmware hack is described on a web site linked to somewhere in the thread, the minimum required change might however be just to lengthen the release time. Graham Peter Larsen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Audio Cables & Adapter Cables | Pro Audio | |||
STEREO: Scam of the Century? | Tech | |||
Stereo: Scam of the Century? | Audio Opinions | |||
Looking for single wire stereo cable | Pro Audio |