Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#281
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Jenn - the queen of RAO - the idiot liar's heaven.
On Jan 29, 2:43*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
Cosmic scores on you, Jenn like the one I just made when you were so upset you were at a loss for words to type and just pulled up my post, read it, and reflexively hit the Send button. And again, what a loser. LMAO! |
#282
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Jenn - the queen of RAO - the idiot liar's heaven.
On Jan 29, 2:43*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message On Jan 29, 11:53 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Jenn I get the charm that RAO has for you and the rest of the Middiot posse. It's a place where your fellow trolls and liars will agree with you, no matter what kind of lies, libel or other kind of weirdness you try to pull off. I've never lied to you and I've never libeled you. Of ocurse not. LOL! You can't get that in any other audio group on Usenet, so this is pretty much where you post exclusively. In short, RAO is a sort of idiot's heaven. Led by the Chief Idiot, Arny. Sorry Jenn, but the Middiot laid out the facts yesterday. He is the leader of RAO. Just stop lying, Arny. *What do you hope to gain from your lies? Cosmic scores on you, Jenn like the one I just made when you were so upset you were at a loss for words to type and just pulled up my post, read it, and reflexively hit the Send button. |
#283
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 29, 6:23�pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in On Jan 29, 3:54 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Harry Lavo" wrote in message �Given the outcome of that "debate" I suppose I can understanding you for wanting to forget about it. Why should I want to forget having such a wonderful time at John's expense? My expense? It was at the then-owner of Stereophile, Primedia's expense, Mr. Krueger. And as I said before, your appearance was worth every cent of the fee we paid you �:-) Seems like it was a win-win situation for both of us. I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Bull****. You mention the debate every chance you get. It was the highlight of your life. Boon |
#284
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 29, 8:23*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Here's a whopper of a lie. GOIA is a liar! GOIA has brought up his 'victory' of having Stereophile pay his expenses to NYC at least dozens of time this past year. Using GOIA's own 'logic', this proves that he has not moved on and is in fact still living in that long distant moment.. After all, my lone single mention of famous people I've met in my life 'proved' to GOIA that I am awestruck by personalities. |
#285
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Jenn - the queen of RAO - the idiot liar's heaven.
In article
, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Jan 29, 2:43*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message On Jan 29, 11:53 am, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Jenn I get the charm that RAO has for you and the rest of the Middiot posse. It's a place where your fellow trolls and liars will agree with you, no matter what kind of lies, libel or other kind of weirdness you try to pull off. I've never lied to you and I've never libeled you. Of ocurse not. LOL! You can't get that in any other audio group on Usenet, so this is pretty much where you post exclusively. In short, RAO is a sort of idiot's heaven. Led by the Chief Idiot, Arny. Sorry Jenn, but the Middiot laid out the facts yesterday. He is the leader of RAO. Just stop lying, Arny. *What do you hope to gain from your lies? Cosmic scores on you, Jenn like the one I just made when you were so upset you were at a loss for words to type and just pulled up my post, read it, and reflexively hit the Send button. ;-) |
#286
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message On Jan 29, 3:54 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Harry Lavo" wrote in message Given the outcome of that "debate" I suppose I can understanding you for wanting to forget about it. Why should I want to forget having such a wonderful time at John's expense? My expense? It was at the then-owner of Stereophile, Primedia's expense, Mr. Krueger. And as I said before, your appearance was worth every cent of the fee we paid you :-) Seems like it was a win-win situation for both of us. I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Yeah, it's a loop with a three-year latency, since this is about the first time since shortly after the debate that I've talked about it. |
#287
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On 29 Ian, 19:38, John Atkinson wrote:
On Jan 29, 3:54 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Harry Lavo" wrote in message *Given the outcome of that "debate" I suppose I can understanding you for wanting to forget about it. Why should I want to forget having such a wonderful time at John's expense? My expense? It was at the then-owner of Stereophile, Primedia's expense, Mr. Krueger. And as I said before, your appearance was worth every cent of the fee we paid you *:-) John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile you are lucky the hotel didn't hit you for the ensuing roto-rooter bill. |
#288
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Jenn" wrote in message In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "George M. Middiot" wrote in message news Jenn said: I've never lied here, Arny. So say all the RAO trolls, even Marc and the Middiot himself. You should stop your asinine, baseless accusations, AKA lies. What lies have I told, Jenn? You lies about me lying. There aren't any. I've caught you lying on numerous occasions, and you tried to lie your way out of them. No, you haven't. Not once. Of course that is a lie, but what's new? Liar. As anyone here can see, this is your usual tactic of claiming that you have done so, and never providing any evidence. I provided the evidence, you lied about it and dismissed it, and that is business as usual for you, Jenn. Liar. Do you really think that there is even ONE reader here who agrees with you on this? I think only about 8-10 people in the whole world bother to read RAO any more, its such a disreputable place because of all the lying that goes on. This 'He said, she said" stuff is of course completely useless. You didn't answer the question. Of course I did. You're lying again, Jenn. Do you believe that there is ONE person who agrees with you on this? Oh I get it Jenn. In your altenative universe, the truth is up for a vote by RAO trolls and liars. Interesting but stupid! Can you find one single person, Mr.Krueger, both on or off Usenet (given of course that they know the details) What about your pastor? ´He could read your sickening posts from say the past twelve months, and then give you a character reference? LOL. If so, please offer a name. Stop lying, you deplorable dung heap of immorality. You nauseate me. Jenn, flattery will get you nowhere! ;-) |
#289
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Iain Churches" wrote in message
i.fi Oh I get it Jenn. In your alternative universe, the truth is up for a vote by RAO trolls and liars. Interesting but stupid! Can you find one single person, Mr.Krueger, both on or off Usenet (given of course that they know the details) Why would I want to direct a person I know to this cesspool, Iain? Heck, they might even read some of your sickeningly childish posts. What about your pastor? He has a life. He could read your sickening posts from say the past twelve months, and then give you a character reference? LOL. The posts attacking me are by far the most sickening. Note Marc's obsession with child pornography and your obsession with imaginary recordings. RAO has reduced its audience to near zero because of them. |
#290
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote in message On Jan 29, 8:23 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Here's a whopper of a lie. GOIA is a liar! GOIA has brought up his 'victory' of having Stereophile pay his expenses to NYC at least dozens of time this past year. Dozens. That means 13 or more, right? Prove it. Oh I forgot about your little problem, ****R. You can't count to 13 because you only have 10 fingers. Or is it 11? |
#291
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
Yeah, it's a loop with a three-year latency, since this is about the first time since shortly after the debate that I've talked about it. You mean this misrepresentation? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...3b35fc83ea931d Your behavior at the debate was boorish and obsessive Harry. I can see why you want to forget it. |
#292
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On 30 Ian, 08:12, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
What about your pastor? He has a life. he has the impossible task of herding you into heaven. |
#293
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 29, 9:59 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Jan 29, 8:23 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Here's a whopper of a lie. GOIA is a liar! GOIA has brought up his 'victory' of having Stereophile pay his expenses to NYC at least dozens of time this past year. And does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#294
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message On Jan 29, 9:59 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Jan 29, 8:23 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Here's a whopper of a lie. GOIA is a liar! GOIA has brought up his 'victory' of having Stereophile pay his expenses to NYC at least dozens of time this past year. And does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that, but far be it from you John to properly report that fact. |
#295
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 30, 12:47 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in message does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that... No, there was one posting by Steven Sullivan that I found on r.a.h-e that said you won the debate, Mr. Krueger. But the vast majority of Usenet postings retrievable on groups.google.com that declare you the winner, Mr. Krueger, were indeed written by _you_. As I said: odd. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#296
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 30, 10:06�am, John Atkinson wrote:
On Jan 30, 12:47 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that... No, there was one posting by Steven Sullivan that I found on r.a.h-e that said you won the debate, Mr. Krueger. But the vast majority of Usenet postings retrievable on groups.google.com that declare you the winner, Mr. Krueger, were indeed written by _you_. As I said: odd. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile Well, Steven Sullivan appeared here a few months ago and had his ass handed to him. Turns out he's a well-known Internet troll who loves to attack high-end audio. You can check out his juvenile behavior at www.stereocentral.tv, where he posts as Krabapple. Boon |
#297
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message On Jan 30, 12:47 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that... No, there was one posting by Steven Sullivan that I found on r.a.h-e that said you won the debate, Mr. Krueger. But the vast majority of Usenet postings retrievable on groups.google.com that declare you the winner, Mr. Krueger, were indeed written by _you_. So what, John? Even your own writer compared me to Schwartznegger subduing one of his opponents. ;-) |
#298
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 30, 4:27 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in message On Jan 30, 12:47 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that... No, there was one posting by Steven Sullivan that I found on r.a.h-e that said you won the debate, Mr. Krueger. But the vast majority of Usenet postings retrievable on groups.google.com that declare you the winner, Mr. Krueger, were indeed written by _you_. So what, John? As you were one of the protagonists in the debate, you can't pretend you were an impartial judge of who "won," Mr. Krueger. Thus the 1000s of messages you posted to Usenet declaring yourself the winner don't count toward any kind of score. It is also pathetic that you feel compelled to declare yourself the winner so often. Feel insecure much, eh? Even your own writer compared me to Schwartznegger subduing one of his opponents. ;-) The exact quote from Jason Serinus' on-line report at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ was "By the end of the hour, if you had been a recent arrival from another planet and had oriented yourself to life in the USA by watching action flicks and video games, you would have been certain that Arnold B. Krueger was God and John Atkinson was a pathetic girly man. Time for a reality check." I guess Jason's use of sarcasm sailed over your head, Mr. Krueger. :-) John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#299
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Harry Lavo" wrote in message Yeah, it's a loop with a three-year latency, since this is about the first time since shortly after the debate that I've talked about it. You mean this misrepresentation? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...3b35fc83ea931d Your behavior at the debate was boorish and obsessive Harry. I can see why you want to forget it. May 18, 2005 vs Jan 30, 2009 = 3 yrs. Your point is???? |
#300
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message On Jan 29, 9:59 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Jan 29, 8:23 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Here's a whopper of a lie. GOIA is a liar! GOIA has brought up his 'victory' of having Stereophile pay his expenses to NYC at least dozens of time this past year. And does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that, but far be it from you John to properly report that fact. You are the only one I can recall, Arny? How about naming the others, and perhaps a reference? |
#301
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"John Atkinson" wrote in message ... On Jan 30, 12:47 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that... No, there was one posting by Steven Sullivan that I found on r.a.h-e that said you won the debate, Mr. Krueger. But the vast majority of Usenet postings retrievable on groups.google.com that declare you the winner, Mr. Krueger, were indeed written by _you_. As I said: odd. John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile Not only that, but if Steven is not Arny's sockpuppet, he sure could be... |
#302
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
Harry Lavo said: Not only that, but if [Stupey] is not Arny's sockpuppet, he sure could be... Stupey Sillybot is considerably more articulate than the Krooborg. Only a 'borg would have any difficulty distinguishing them. |
#303
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message On Jan 30, 4:27 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message On Jan 30, 12:47 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that... No, there was one posting by Steven Sullivan that I found on r.a.h-e that said you won the debate, Mr. Krueger. But the vast majority of Usenet postings retrievable on groups.google.com that declare you the winner, Mr. Krueger, were indeed written by _you_. So what, John? As you were one of the protagonists in the debate, you can't pretend you were an impartial judge of who "won," Mr. Krueger. Thus the 1000s of messages you posted to Usenet declaring yourself the winner don't count toward any kind of score. It is also pathetic that you feel compelled to declare yourself the winner so often. Feel insecure much, eh? Even your own writer compared me to Schwartznegger subduing one of his opponents. ;-) The exact quote from Jason Serinus' on-line report at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ was "By the end of the hour, if you had been a recent arrival from another planet and had oriented yourself to life in the USA by watching action flicks and video games, you would have been certain that Arnold B. Krueger was God and John Atkinson was a pathetic girly man. Time for a reality check." I guess Jason's use of sarcasm sailed over your head, Mr. Krueger. :-) Not at all. There was plenty of sarcasm clearly present in Jason's so-called "reality check". I mean, you aren't going to tell me that an intelligent person would believe all that anti-scientific caterwallering that made up jos so-called "reality check", now will you? |
#304
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
Not only that, but if Steven is not Arny's sockpuppet, he sure could be... If you had been mentally competent when you were at the HE2005 debate Harry, you would have seen us standing side by side, and there would be none of this foolishment about him being my sockpuppet. |
#305
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Harry Lavo" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message On Jan 29, 9:59 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Jan 29, 8:23 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: I moved on about 3 years ago, about the time I walked out of the Hilton on my way back to LaGuardia. It appears that Harry is still locked in a loop way back then. Here's a whopper of a lie. GOIA is a liar! GOIA has brought up his 'victory' of having Stereophile pay his expenses to NYC at least dozens of time this past year. And does anyone else find it a touch odd that the person who has publicly declared Arny Krueger the "winner" of the HE2005 debate, whom Mr. Krueger has referred to on many occasions, was Mr. Krueger himself? :-) Of course I'm not the only person to do that, but far be it from you John to properly report that fact. You are the only one I can recall, Arny? How about naming the others, and perhaps a reference? It seems like John did my legwork for me. Of course he missed the RAP posts of a similar nature in the same time frame. |
#306
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Harry Lavo" wrote in message Not only that, but if Steven is not Arny's sockpuppet, he sure could be... If you had been mentally competent when you were at the HE2005 debate Harry, you would have seen us standing side by side, and there would be none of this foolishment about him being my sockpuppet. Did he have his birth certificate pinned on him? Prove that was not just a stand-in! How do I know you are not lying once again? :-) |
#307
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On 30 Ian, 23:09, "Harry Lavo" wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Harry Lavo" wrote in message Not only that, but if Steven is not Arny's sockpuppet, he sure could be... If you had been mentally competent when you were at the HE2005 debate Harry, you would have seen us standing side by side, and there would be none of this foolishment about him being my sockpuppet. Did he have his birth certificate pinned on him? Prove that was not just a stand-in! *How do I know you are not lying once again? *:-) http://tinyurl.com/cbm5vj |
#308
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 30, 10:24 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in On Jan 30, 4:27 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message As you were one of the protagonists in the debate, you can't pretend you were an impartial judge of who "won," Mr. Krueger. Thus the 1000s of messages you posted to Usenet declaring yourself the winner don't count toward any kind of score. It is also pathetic that you feel compelled to declare yourself the winner so often. Feel insecure much, eh? Even your own writer compared me to Schwartznegger subduing one of his opponents. ;-) The exact quote from Jason Serinus' on-line report at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ was "By the end of the hour, if you had been a recent arrival from another planet and had oriented yourself to life in the USA by watching action flicks and video games, you would have been certain that Arnold B. Krueger was God and John Atkinson was a pathetic girly man. Time for a reality check." I guess Jason's use of sarcasm sailed over your head, Mr. Krueger. :-) Not at all. There was plenty of sarcasm clearly present in Jason's so-called "reality check". There wasn't any sarcasm in that section of the article, Mr. Krueger. Which means that Jason has been poking fun at you in that on-line article since it was published 3.5 years ago, yet all that time you have been recommending it to others as an example of support for your positions. And people ask me why I end my postings to you with a smiley :-) John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#309
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"John Atkinson" wrote in
message On Jan 30, 10:24 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in On Jan 30, 4:27 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message As you were one of the protagonists in the debate, you can't pretend you were an impartial judge of who "won," Mr. Krueger. Thus the 1000s of messages you posted to Usenet declaring yourself the winner don't count toward any kind of score. It is also pathetic that you feel compelled to declare yourself the winner so often. Feel insecure much, eh? Even your own writer compared me to Schwartznegger subduing one of his opponents. ;-) The exact quote from Jason Serinus' on-line report at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ was "By the end of the hour, if you had been a recent arrival from another planet and had oriented yourself to life in the USA by watching action flicks and video games, you would have been certain that Arnold B. Krueger was God and John Atkinson was a pathetic girly man. Time for a reality check." I guess Jason's use of sarcasm sailed over your head, Mr. Krueger. :-) Not at all. There was plenty of sarcasm clearly present in Jason's so-called "reality check". There wasn't any sarcasm in that section of the article, Mr. Krueger. Well that is tragic, because otherwise it would make no sense, except in the fantasy land of high end audio. Which means that Jason has been poking fun at you in that on-line article since it was published 3.5 years ago, yet all that time you have been recommending it to others as an example of support for your positions. Really? |
#310
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Jan 31, 10:57�am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"John Atkinson" wrote in On Jan 30, 10:24 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in On Jan 30, 4:27 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message As you were one of the protagonists in the debate, you can't pretend you were an impartial judge of who "won," Mr. Krueger. Thus the 1000s of messages you posted to Usenet declaring yourself the winner don't count toward any kind of score. It is also pathetic that you feel compelled to declare yourself the winner so often. Feel insecure much, eh? Even your own writer compared me to Schwartznegger subduing one of his opponents. ;-) The exact quote from Jason Serinus' on-line report at http://www.stereophile.com/news/050905debate/ was "By the end of the hour, if you had been a recent arrival from another planet and had oriented yourself to life in the USA by watching action flicks and video games, you would have been certain that Arnold B. Krueger was God and John Atkinson was a pathetic girly man. Time for a reality check." I guess Jason's use of sarcasm sailed over your head, Mr. Krueger. :-) Not at all. There was plenty of sarcasm clearly present in Jason's so-called "reality check". There wasn't any sarcasm in that section of the article, Mr. Krueger. Well that is tragic, because otherwise it would make no sense, except in the fantasy land of high end audio. Which means that Jason has been poking fun at you in that on-line article since it was published 3.5 years ago, yet all that time you have been recommending it to others as an example of support for your positions. Really? Really. You're a clown. You amuse us. We poke at you with a stick and you implode. It's been going on for 11 years. You're the only person who doesn't see it. That's what makes it so funny. Boon |
#311
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
"Boon" wrote in message ... Really? Really. You're a clown. You amuse us. We poke at you with a stick and you implode. It's been going on for 11 years. You're the only person who doesn't see it. That's what makes it so funny. Boon Perhaps we should explain to Arny the difference between "people laughing with Arny" and "people laughing at Arny"? All this bozo hears is the laughter and entirely misses the point -again! Here's some research for Arny to do. "yanking your chain", "rattling your cage", "stirring you up", "taking the Mickey", "taking the ****". But I'm afraid with his cranium that far imbedded in his Alimentary Canal there is little hope for this 61yo loser ;-) Cheers TT |
#312
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:59:01 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote: In article , George M. Middius wrote: MiNe 109 said: You should quit while you're behind. Seriously. Oh, dear. OTOH, 'talent' is strictly a cultural construct, if that ethnomusicology prof was on the right track back in my grad school days. I knew this guy some years ago who believed that Shakespeare achieved what he did by dint of hard work and nothing else. He also had the advantage of living in Shakespearean times. Which, of course, is how he got the name. Herbert |
#313
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
YOU be the judge.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:25:00 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote: In article , George M. Middius wrote: MiNe 109 said: Oh, dear. OTOH, 'talent' is strictly a cultural construct, if that ethnomusicology prof was on the right track back in my grad school days. I knew this guy some years ago who believed that Shakespeare achieved what he did by dint of hard work and nothing else. He also had the advantage of living in Shakespearean times. Does that mean we live in Kroogerian times? Sadly, yes. In a different age, he'd be perched on a fence haranguing visitors to the village. In a better age, he'd be doing that from the stocks. Herbert Stephen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
trolls | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Ode to the trolls | Audio Opinions | |||
Trolls | Vacuum Tubes | |||
trolls again | Vacuum Tubes | |||
trolls | Vacuum Tubes |