Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Date Code On Ampex Tape?
I have several reels of Ampex 456 and 499 lying around. I think you are
supposed to be able to tell the date of manufacture from the sticker on the spine. Does anyone know how to decifer the code? For example, one says "91281" -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"91" The Year "281" day of the year
-- Steven Sena XS Sound Recording www.xssound.com "EricK" wrote in message ... I have several reels of Ampex 456 and 499 lying around. I think you are supposed to be able to tell the date of manufacture from the sticker on the spine. Does anyone know how to decifer the code? For example, one says "91281" -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Steven Sena wrote:
"91" The Year "281" day of the year Am I safe to use 15 year old 456 if it is still sealed in the factory plastic. Or is there a chance it is junk? -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Well, the rule-of-thumb around here has always been not to record on tape
that's over one year old... We always felt that sound quality starts to suffer after a year or so... But these days I think anything goes... Try it on your machine it should work, I mean you will not hurt anything. If it sheds or sticks, clean you recorder and dump the reel... Good Luck. -- Steven Sena XS Sound Recording www.xssound.com "EricK" wrote in message ... Steven Sena wrote: "91" The Year "281" day of the year Am I safe to use 15 year old 456 if it is still sealed in the factory plastic. Or is there a chance it is junk? -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rivers wrote:
It's never junk, but check it first, and if it's sticky (as it's likely to be) bake it first. Contrary to the seemingly obvious, it can get sticky even when sealed in its original wrapper. It's a chemical breakdown process, not a "gets damp and turns to glue" process. Thanks Mike. I don't think I would want to bake it in order to record onto it. That seems counter-productive to me. But you're saying it can go sticky even if it's still factory sealed. That's good to know. I guess the only way to know will be to try it. -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rivers wrote:
What's counter-productive about making the tape good as new again? Haven't you been reading about how difficult it is to buy new audio recording tape these days? Mike, I have been talking about new old stock tape still in factory sealed plastic. I am not going to bake tape so I can record on it. We've learned a few things about the chemistry of tape binders since the early days of the discovery of the sticky shed syndrome. There are a number of articles on the web (including one of mine) that haven't been updated and are based on the initial theory that the binder becomes like a sponge and absorbs water from the air, making the tape sticky. Baking drives out the water and then it will be OK long enough to recover the recording (but no longer). Right, I know. Again, we are talking about recording onto NOS tape. I am sure I could bake tape so that I can record onto it. But then, it wouldn't be long before I'd have to bake it again to play it back. That is what I am saying is counter-productive. -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rivers wrote:
According to Bill Lund, formerly of 3M and one who has probably done more research on this than anyone else (as well as testing), it would be long before you'd have to bake it again, like maybe ten years. Ten years, I had no idea it would be good for that long. I was always under the impression it would fix the tape for a few weeks, or something like that. Thanks Mike. -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Steven Sena" wrote: Well, the rule-of-thumb around here has always been not to record on tape that's over one year old... We always felt that sound quality starts to suffer after a year or so... But these days I think anything goes... Try it on your machine it should work, I mean you will not hurt anything. If it sheds or sticks, clean you recorder and dump the reel... Good Luck. Where on Earth did you come up with the 1 year concept??? News to me after 35 some years. If the binder is intact, tape should have no noticeable shelf life issues.... Test for shed and record away. db -- David 'db' Butler, Consultant Acoustics by db "...all the rest are just brokers" now on the web at http://www.db-engineering.com Boston, Mass Phone 617 969-0585 Fax 617 964-1590 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
well, since I haven't been able to find any 1" 456, I tried baking and
rerecording. Not one problem. In fact, I rerecorded on a 14 year old tape (just to try it)- not a single dropout. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Techmeister wrote:
In article , "Steven Sena" wrote: Well, the rule-of-thumb around here has always been not to record on tape that's over one year old... We always felt that sound quality starts to suffer after a year or so... But these days I think anything goes... Try it on your machine it should work, I mean you will not hurt anything. If it sheds or sticks, clean you recorder and dump the reel... Good Luck. Where on Earth did you come up with the 1 year concept??? News to me after 35 some years. If the binder is intact, tape should have no noticeable shelf life issues.... Test for shed and record away. db David Butler, huh? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question FAQ: rec.audio.* Recording 2/99 (part 7 of 13) | Pro Audio | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |