Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.car
|
|||
|
|||
Clarification....
Now that's a new approach to this mystery. Whenever I have thought of
gravity, I have always imagined objects being DRAWN together, whether by a warping of space time or an emitting of an always-attractive-graviton creating a gravitational wave. I have never approached the subject from the perspective of objects being "pushed" together, again, I always imagine objects being attracted to one another. Wow, that's thinking out of the box. Perhaps the warping of spacetime creates a condition where all objects are being pushed towards all other objects. But as I said before, accelerated motion is the key. Eample: if I were to build a rocket ship ala 2001 that was circular and spun to create artificial gravity, the artificial gravity created would follow ALL of Newton's laws perfectly (as long as it was spnning at exactly the right speed to emulate the same gravity effects we feel on earth). THIS IS SIGNIFICANT. I can't emphasize this point enough. I know it may seem basic (the "duh" factor), but ALL his mathamatical equations regarding gravity would hold true on just such a ship. This is an ENORMOUS clue regarding the nature of gravity. Why is this so significant IMHO? If gravity is created by gravitational fields, by creating gravity in a COMPLETLY different way, we would expect to see at least some subtle variations on gravities effects. But we don't. Gravity PERFECTLY mimics accelerated motion in space. Accelerated motion is the key to this riddle, I really believe it is. As I said before, you, myself and the earth all create a warping of spacetime in the fourth dimension and this warping creates this accelerated motion effect. We don't percieve this accelerated motion because we don't percieve the fourth dimension (space/time). But we do perceive the results which are, of cource, gravity. Again, it is tough to get your head around this and so a more tangible explanation has been sought for over 80 years now. It would be MUCH easier to understand gravity if it were a wave or particle that all matter emitted and was always attractive. Again, I know physists teaching at Caltech RIGHT NOW who still believe in the graviton theory. For a physist, this is a much more attractive theory as it is A) easier to understand and B) there is a hope that we may someday detect the graviton. MOSFET "GregS" wrote in message ... In article , "MOSFET" wrote: It's true, Einstein originally postulated via his Unified Field Theory that gravity SHOULD be a form of electromagnatism. But as stated in my previous post, no connection has yet been found. However, in his Special Theory of Relativity he postulated that gravity could be a warping of space/time. Obviously, this was a VERY difficult concept for other physists to grasp or perform experiments on. A more "simple" explanation (i.e. gravitational waves or the graviton) was sought that could be more easily understood and, more importantly, DETECTED. Again, there are physists teaching RIGHT NOW at Calteach who still believe in the Graviton or gravitational wave theory. Experiments in space are still being conducted in an effort to detect gravitational waves. I was just thinking about magnetism. Back on track, its usually explained being attracted to large objects, but could very well be, being pushed toward. Maybe its backwards ? We are pushed into a black hole. Maybe there is a test for this thats been allready been done.. greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(no subject) | Tech | |||
No Subject | Pro Audio | |||
(no subject) | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Still no subject ! | Audio Opinions |