Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Codifus" wrote It depends on the bitrate. 320k MP3 seems to be generally accepted as CD quality, 128K is about the equivalent of FM radio. I record FM broadcasts and make them into 192 MP3s simply because I think the lower bitrates take too much life out of the music. I don't even bother with 320K, I just keep my files in WAV or AIFF in that case. Takes up lots of space, I know, but CD-Rs are cheap Agree entirely (a WAV from the vinyl sounds satisfyingly close to the original, DACced and Vacced) but there are two problems here - hard disk space is not yet that cheap or plentiful (I could fill my new 200 Gig HDD with WAVs in a couple of days) and CDs have got to be the most 'imminently obsolete' technology on the planet atm..... |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Codifus" wrote It depends on the bitrate. 320k MP3 seems to be generally accepted as CD quality, 128K is about the equivalent of FM radio. I record FM broadcasts and make them into 192 MP3s simply because I think the lower bitrates take too much life out of the music. I don't even bother with 320K, I just keep my files in WAV or AIFF in that case. Takes up lots of space, I know, but CD-Rs are cheap Agree entirely (a WAV from the vinyl sounds satisfyingly close to the original, DACced and Vacced) but there are two problems here - hard disk space is not yet that cheap or plentiful (I could fill my new 200 Gig HDD with WAVs in a couple of days) and CDs have got to be the most 'imminently obsolete' technology on the planet atm..... |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Codifus" wrote It depends on the bitrate. 320k MP3 seems to be generally accepted as CD quality, 128K is about the equivalent of FM radio. I record FM broadcasts and make them into 192 MP3s simply because I think the lower bitrates take too much life out of the music. I don't even bother with 320K, I just keep my files in WAV or AIFF in that case. Takes up lots of space, I know, but CD-Rs are cheap Agree entirely (a WAV from the vinyl sounds satisfyingly close to the original, DACced and Vacced) but there are two problems here - hard disk space is not yet that cheap or plentiful (I could fill my new 200 Gig HDD with WAVs in a couple of days) and CDs have got to be the most 'imminently obsolete' technology on the planet atm..... |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Codifus" wrote It depends on the bitrate. 320k MP3 seems to be generally accepted as CD quality, 128K is about the equivalent of FM radio. I record FM broadcasts and make them into 192 MP3s simply because I think the lower bitrates take too much life out of the music. I don't even bother with 320K, I just keep my files in WAV or AIFF in that case. Takes up lots of space, I know, but CD-Rs are cheap Agree entirely (a WAV from the vinyl sounds satisfyingly close to the original, DACced and Vacced) but there are two problems here - hard disk space is not yet that cheap or plentiful (I could fill my new 200 Gig HDD with WAVs in a couple of days) and CDs have got to be the most 'imminently obsolete' technology on the planet atm..... |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"vibrations" wrote in message om... just my 2cents worth but vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' Agreed entirely. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"vibrations" wrote in message om... just my 2cents worth but vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' Agreed entirely. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"vibrations" wrote in message om... just my 2cents worth but vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' Agreed entirely. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"vibrations" wrote in message om... just my 2cents worth but vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' Agreed entirely. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
In article , Keith G
writes "tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ No that was the proper better quality digital age i.e. PCM used by the BBC to improve sound links!.... Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... Eventually!..... -- Tony Sayer |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
In article , Keith G
writes "tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ No that was the proper better quality digital age i.e. PCM used by the BBC to improve sound links!.... Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... Eventually!..... -- Tony Sayer |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
In article , Keith G
writes "tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ No that was the proper better quality digital age i.e. PCM used by the BBC to improve sound links!.... Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... Eventually!..... -- Tony Sayer |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
In article , Keith G
writes "tony sayer" wrote Yep that's it!, lower the rates till they notice. Lets never, ever, promote better quality sound 'tho, no that would never do!. The new digital age dawns. Er, no, it did that 30 years ago........ No that was the proper better quality digital age i.e. PCM used by the BBC to improve sound links!.... Never was so much promised and so little delivered!..... Agreed, but perhaps we judge too soon/harshly - there may be time yet! The fact that the 'engineers' have only managed to make 'digital recorded music' sound *worse* so far is probably only some sort of 'glitch' - give a million chimps a wordprocessor each for a million years and one of them will turn out the Complete Works Of Shakespeare, eventually (they say)....... Eventually!..... -- Tony Sayer |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "vibrations" wrote in message om... vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... Agreed, it's best not to mention those things and vinyl in the same breath! i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. Sure, there a lot more things going on than just the vinyl Vs digital source. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... Agreed, many prefer new crap. mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' True, nothing like the bounce from a tone arm when the turntable is knocked! TonyP. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "vibrations" wrote in message om... vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... Agreed, it's best not to mention those things and vinyl in the same breath! i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. Sure, there a lot more things going on than just the vinyl Vs digital source. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... Agreed, many prefer new crap. mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' True, nothing like the bounce from a tone arm when the turntable is knocked! TonyP. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "vibrations" wrote in message om... vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... Agreed, it's best not to mention those things and vinyl in the same breath! i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. Sure, there a lot more things going on than just the vinyl Vs digital source. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... Agreed, many prefer new crap. mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' True, nothing like the bounce from a tone arm when the turntable is knocked! TonyP. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"Keith G" wrote in message ... "vibrations" wrote in message om... vinyl still offers the best sound in a club environment, in terms of impact and depth. Not just in clubs and not to mention texture, tone, detail, depth and imaging....... Agreed, it's best not to mention those things and vinyl in the same breath! i've seen mp3 dudes drop sets after vinyl ones, and seen the atmosphere vanish and people leave the floor. Sure, there a lot more things going on than just the vinyl Vs digital source. You can flog Joe Public any old crap but you can't make him listen to it....... Agreed, many prefer new crap. mp3 sounds a little thin for big club tracks - just because something has the same SPL doesn't mean it has the same 'bounce' True, nothing like the bounce from a tone arm when the turntable is knocked! TonyP. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
I agree, the acoustics of a club change dramaticlly when there are 200+
people jumping, screaming, talking, dancing, stripping, and everything else that goes on. I have a few tracks that sound like crap when the room is empty, but when I play them at night I can only hear the difference in my headphones, no one on the floor notices. Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. "citronzx" wrote in message news "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
I agree, the acoustics of a club change dramaticlly when there are 200+
people jumping, screaming, talking, dancing, stripping, and everything else that goes on. I have a few tracks that sound like crap when the room is empty, but when I play them at night I can only hear the difference in my headphones, no one on the floor notices. Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. "citronzx" wrote in message news "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
I agree, the acoustics of a club change dramaticlly when there are 200+
people jumping, screaming, talking, dancing, stripping, and everything else that goes on. I have a few tracks that sound like crap when the room is empty, but when I play them at night I can only hear the difference in my headphones, no one on the floor notices. Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. "citronzx" wrote in message news "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
I agree, the acoustics of a club change dramaticlly when there are 200+
people jumping, screaming, talking, dancing, stripping, and everything else that goes on. I have a few tracks that sound like crap when the room is empty, but when I play them at night I can only hear the difference in my headphones, no one on the floor notices. Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. "citronzx" wrote in message news "Alex Rodriguez" wrote in message ... In article et, says... You all must go to pretty fancy clubs where everyone is quiet and the music is played softly enough that you can even understand what the singer is singing. The acoustics in most clubs combined with the ambient noise makes for such a poor listening experience to begin with that I doubt anyone would notice the difference between an MP3 and a CD. You might notice a loss of bass with some tracks though. You must go to clubs that have crappy gear. Loud distortion sounds like loud distortion. You can hear it, just louder. Most of the clubs I have been to have sound systems that play clean and loud. So unless you are really drunk, you can hear the lousy sound. ------------- Alex That was pretty much my point, the music's always sounds crappy in a packed club. I'm talking about a place where everyone is talking and many are dancing. Even it the sound system sounds terrific with the place empty, the guests will not be able to tell over the ambient noise in a full club. You can feel the bass, so you can dance, and you can make out words (if any) if you already know the music but that's it. I'm talking about dance music like: Top 20, R&B, Techno, and maybe some 80's. No one goes to a club for the quality of the reproduction of the music, you just have to be able to dance to it. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"sk8erteck" wrote in message
... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"sk8erteck" wrote in message
... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"sk8erteck" wrote in message
... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
"sk8erteck" wrote in message
... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't
know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. "Ricky W. Hunt" wrote in message news:szDXb.314480$xy6.1537924@attbi_s02... "sk8erteck" wrote in message ... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't
know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. "Ricky W. Hunt" wrote in message news:szDXb.314480$xy6.1537924@attbi_s02... "sk8erteck" wrote in message ... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't
know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. "Ricky W. Hunt" wrote in message news:szDXb.314480$xy6.1537924@attbi_s02... "sk8erteck" wrote in message ... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't
know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. "Ricky W. Hunt" wrote in message news:szDXb.314480$xy6.1537924@attbi_s02... "sk8erteck" wrote in message ... Clean music and a good system are always helpful but useless if you dont work the crowd. None of them are audiophiles, they wont care if your version of milkshake is 128kbps or CD, as long as they can dance to it. You said a mouthful. |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Dutch wrote:
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. You must have a crap sound system. And EQ cannot fix anything. |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Dutch wrote:
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. You must have a crap sound system. And EQ cannot fix anything. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
192kbps MP3s on a big sound system?
Dutch wrote:
Every MP3 I have is 128kbps. No one even the DJs that come to my shows don't know the difference. If you EQ it right and setup the computer right no one will notice the difference at all. Besides most of the professional drinkers are so drunk by 9PM that they wouldn't notice if their seat was on fire let alone a minor musical fluctuation. You must have a crap sound system. And EQ cannot fix anything. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Steely Dan The Absolute Sound | High End Audio | |||
Opinions on a sound system | Car Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 1/5) | Car Audio | |||
Sound, Music, Balance | High End Audio | |||
Suggestions for new/replacement Rink sound system | Pro Audio |