Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Hello. I'm investigating using rechargeable with a pair of diversity
wireless microphones. I believe that they are A-T; I will check the model number in the next day or two. From looking through some NG archives, it looks like the Maha/Powerex 200mA 9.6V batteries paired with their 10-channel charger would be a good choice. Questions: 1. Has the NiMh technology gotten to the point where I can expect that I can get close to alkaline reliability? 2. Is the above manufacturer a good choice? Any other recommendations? 3. I plan to manage/track the charge/recharge cycles. Is 500 cycles a reasonable target for the batteries before I cycle them out? 4. Is there any means of predicting when I will have a failure on any particular battery? 5. Any other caveats/warnings/advice on how to have the rechargeables work reliably? 6. Recommendations for a supplier? TIA. --phil (If you wish to e-mail, use the host kaosol dot net rather than the one in the header). |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
"Phil Earnhardt" 1. Has the NiMh technology gotten to the point where I can expect that I can get close to alkaline reliability? ** Please define reliability ? Normal alkalines only have one discharge cycle and a very long shelf life. BTW Are you not concerned about the run time ? An Energiser 522 will likely run nearly twice as long as that 200mAh Ni-MH. http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/522.pdf ....... Phil |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:50:09 +1100, "Phil Allison"
wrote: 1. Has the NiMh technology gotten to the point where I can expect that I can get close to alkaline reliability? ** Please define reliability ? Somewhere north of 99% the time there would be no battery-related failure. Normal alkalines only have one discharge cycle and a very long shelf life. BTW Are you not concerned about the run time ? Of course. I'm looking for runtimes of around 3 hours. An Energiser 522 will likely run nearly twice as long as that 200mAh Ni-MH. http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/522.pdf And what is the nominal run-time one should expect to have with a typical diversity wireless transmitter? --phil |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
"Phil Earnhardt" "Phil Allison" 1. Has the NiMh technology gotten to the point where I can expect that I can get close to alkaline reliability? ** Please define reliability ? Somewhere north of 99% the time there would be no battery-related failure. ** No battery type has reached that exalted level. More than 1% of alkalines are duds out of the pack. An Energiser 522 will likely run nearly twice as long as that 200mAh Ni-MH. http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/522.pdf And what is the nominal run-time one should expect to have with a typical diversity wireless transmitter? ** Try asking a question that you actually need a reply too. Leave dumb hypotheticals out. .......... Phil |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
I can understand wanting to save money, but NiCad and NiMH batteries show an
abrupt voltage drop at the end of charge. This is _not_ what you want when a performer is depending on a cordless mic! The battery's capacity has to be enough to power the mic for the time you intend to use it. And, as the battery's capacity will decline with usage, its initial capacity has to be substantially greater than what's "needed", or the useful life of the battery will disappointingly short. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
"William Sommer******" I can understand wanting to save money, but NiCad and NiMH batteries show an abrupt voltage drop at the end of charge. ** Err - this ought to be *discharge*, not *charge*. This is _not_ what you want when a performer is depending on a cordless mic! ** Nonsense. Radio mics have internal voltage regulators that shut the mic down very abruptly with any type of battery. This is done to make *sure* the mic stays *on frequency * during operation. The battery's capacity has to be enough to power the mic for the time you intend to use it. ** Certainly true. And, as the battery's capacity will decline with usage, ** How ambiguous. Maybe "usage" should have been "cycling" ???? its initial capacity has to be substantially greater than what's "needed", or the useful life of the battery will disappointingly short. ** Where NiMH batteries are to be used in a radio mic - spares MUST be always available. The spare MUST be installed after a few hours use if experience shows that end point is close. The beauty of using an alkaline is that it will typically last long enough not to worry about the time. .......... Phil |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
For what it is worth, I have made quite a few service calls to
customers that complain of their wireless mics are not functioning properly. The most common answer is rechargable batteries. We install new alkaline batteries, make them swear to never use rechargables and we have no more complaints. You can buy them fairly cheap if you buy them by the box at a Costco, Sams or professional tape company. Good Luck, Doc |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
"Phil Earnhardt" wrote ...
And what is the nominal run-time one should expect to have with a typical diversity wireless transmitter? Woudn't it be nice if the world were that simple. There is no "diversity wireless transmitter". Only receivers are "diversity". Transmitters know/care nothing about "diversity". There is no "typical" either. If you want to know how long a particular brand/model battery works with YOUR transmitter, run the exeriment. Note that different brands and different models of batteries will perform differently in your transmitter. Note also that because of their intrinsic chemistry, rechargable batteries tend to have lower voltage (even when "full") than primary batteries and lots of equipment doesn't perform as well (or as long) with rechargable. Over on rec.arts.movies.production.sound are many pros who do sound for the movies/TV shows we see every week. They discuss wireless mics and batteries there almost weekly. Suggest doing an archive search http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en There are many hours of very informative reading there on the topic of wireless transmitters and batteries of different kinds. There are also 1 or 2 wireless equipment manufacturers represented there. One of them just ran the experiment with a couple of new brand/sources of batteries that someone discovered. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
"Doc Weaver" wrote ...
For what it is worth, I have made quite a few service calls to customers that complain of their wireless mics are not functioning properly. The most common answer is rechargable batteries. We install new alkaline batteries, make them swear to never use rechargables and we have no more complaints. You can buy them fairly cheap if you buy them by the box at a Costco, Sams or professional tape company. Indeed, over on rec.arts.movies.production.sound they are perpetually on the lookout for cheaper (but reliable) sources of batteries. They are in a high-stakes game with big-name talent using their wireless mics and they don't trust rechargables as a rule. They virtually all use primary batteries from a reliable source. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Phil Earnhardt wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:50:09 +1100, "Phil Allison" ** Please define reliability ? Somewhere north of 99% the time there would be no battery-related failure. Phil, use Duracell "Procells". They have product specs exactly the same as the regular Duracell Alkalines, but according to Network guys Duracell Procells have better quality control, and as they come in bulk packaging they are cheaper too. There is no need to reinvent the wheel, that's what most everyone in TV and movies use because it is the most reliable. If you save $5 a gig by using rechargables and blow the gig, you haven't saved anything. Are you not concerned about the run time ? Of course. I'm looking for runtimes of around 3 hours. An Energiser 522 will likely run nearly twice as long as that 200mAh Ni-MH. http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/522.pdf You can get a solid 3 1/2 hours with most RF's I have used (Sony's, Sennheisers, Vegas) but after that you will start to take "hits" if you work in an area with a lot of RF traffic. See, the RF up the block will walk on down to you and smack your receiver around and, like weak Diner coffee your transmitter won't be strong enough to defend itself. Spend the money, and don't go to rechargables until they come up with something reliable enough that all the TV Network and Movies guys use them everyday (and that covers your butt somewhat if things fail somehow.) If it's a critical gig, check your battery voltage even when they are fresh out of the box. I have come across a box or two of Procells in the last 9 years that were bad and below 9 volts, and they're the good ones. Some guys do use rechargables for IFB receievers though, as it takes less power to run one of those than to power a trahnsmitter. Will Miho NY TV/Audio Post/Music/Live Sound Guy "The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
BTW, these guys seem to have great prices....
http://www.batterywarehousedirect.com/2.html Will Miho NY TV/Audio Post/Music/Live Sound Guy "The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Just don't do it. Alkalines are flaky enough. If anything, I would
suggest trying the Ultralife 9V lithiums. They aren't rechargeable either but have much longer operating life as well as a longer shelf life. If your problems are due to the talent leaving his pack on when he should have turned it off, that's another issue, and one that cannot be solved by cheaper or rechargeable batteries. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Just don't do it. Alkalines are flaky enough. If anything, I would suggest trying the Ultralife 9V lithiums. They aren't rechargeable either but have much longer operating life as well as a longer shelf life. Ditto, Ditto, Ditto...with a capital 'D'. If your problems are due to the talent leaving his pack on when he should have turned it off, that's another issue, and one that cannot be solved by cheaper or rechargeable batteries. ....but which can be solved with a case of fresh batteries and eternal vigilance. I never rely on 'talent' to wrangle their own transmitters. I either use the 'lock' function on the transmitter, if it has one--or gaff tape--to lock all transmitters *on* and change batteries every chance I get. Expecting talent to manage their own belt packs is a much more sure invitation to *silence*--when there's supposed to be dialog--than dead batteries. jak --scott |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters Group: rec.audio.pro Date: Mon, Jan 23, 2006, 6:48am (EST-3) From: (Richard*Crowley) Over on rec.arts.movies.production.sound are many pros who do sound for the movies/TV shows we see every week. They discuss wireless mics and batteries there almost weekly. Suggest doing an archive search http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en There are many hours of very informative reading there on the topic of wireless transmitters and batteries of different kinds. There are also 1 or 2 wireless equipment manufacturers represented there. One of them just ran the experiment with a couple of new brand/sources of batteries that someone discovered. That would be Lectrosonics who found that the best time to complete failure was 5 hrs for rechargeables & alkalines. De facto standard is to change batterys at most every 4 hrs in tx's at 50mw and 100mw output if on continously. Eric |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
"Eric Toline" wrote in message
... Using rechargables with wireless transmitters Group: rec.audio.pro Date: Mon, Jan 23, 2006, 6:48am (EST-3) From: (Richard Crowley) Over on rec.arts.movies.production.sound are many pros who do sound for the movies/TV shows we see every week. They discuss wireless mics and batteries there almost weekly. Suggest doing an archive search http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search?hl=en There are many hours of very informative reading there on the topic of wireless transmitters and batteries of different kinds. There are also 1 or 2 wireless equipment manufacturers represented there. One of them just ran the experiment with a couple of new brand/sources of batteries that someone discovered. That would be Lectrosonics who found that the best time to complete failure was 5 hrs for rechargeables & alkalines. De facto standard is to change batterys at most every 4 hrs in tx's at 50mw and 100mw output if on continously. Eric Wasn't the most recent test for some Lo-cost Lithiums (non-rechargable) vs. Alkalines? The Lithiums, higher cost than Alkalines, had no advantage. Steve King |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters Group: rec.audio.pro Date: Mon, Jan 23, 2006, 12:15pm (EST-1) From: (Steve*King) "Eric Toline" wrote in message That would be Lectrosonics who found that the best time to complete failure was 5 hrs for rechargeables & alkalines. De facto standard is to change batterys at most every 4 hrs in tx's at 50mw and 100mw output if on continously. Eric Wasn't the most recent test for some Lo-cost Lithiums (non-rechargable) vs. Alkalines? The Lithiums, higher cost than Alkalines, had no advantage. Steve King I'm not sure about the non-rechageable part but other than that, you're correct. Eric |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
|
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
change batterys at most every 4 hrs in tx's at 50mw and 100mw output if
on continously. Or: Change batteries at the start of every set, or every other set. (If you can't remember when you changed the batteries, change the batteries!) The Lithiums, higher cost than Alkalines, had no advantage. Lithiums have advantages under specific kinds of load. I wouldn't expect a small transmitter to suck on them hard enough to make that difference noticable. |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Using rechargables with wireless transmitters
Joe Kesselman wrote:
change batterys at most every 4 hrs in tx's at 50mw and 100mw output if on continously. Or: Change batteries at the start of every set, or every other set. (If you can't remember when you changed the batteries, change the batteries!) The Lithiums, higher cost than Alkalines, had no advantage. Lithiums have advantages under specific kinds of load. I wouldn't expect a small transmitter to suck on them hard enough to make that difference noticable. The advantage of the lithiums is the enormous shelf life. If you only use the unit irregularly, it's good to know you can pick it up and the batteries will be still fine after being on the shelf a couple years. A smaller advantage is the higher capacity... most equipent will run about three times as long on the Ultralife lithiums as on alkaline batteries. On the other hand, if you're paying five times as much, this is not a real improvement. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wireless ? | General | |||
Wireless ? | Pro Audio | |||
Wireless ? | Tech | |||
Wireless ULXS Series Beta 87A | Pro Audio | |||
Possible to convert to wireless speakers? | Tech |