Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing
a dynamic microphone? I could imagine that sensitivity would be something to consider, in that if one needs to crank the pre-amp up, the preamp noise would be more prevalent. Other than that, are dynamic mics as self-noise free as they come? Thanks, Tobiah |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On Friday, May 24, 2013 10:03:45 AM UTC-5, Tobiah wrote:
Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? I could imagine that sensitivity would be something to consider, in that if one needs to crank the pre-amp up, the preamp noise would be more prevalent. Other than that, are dynamic mics as self-noise free as they come? Nope. they have internal resistance, which will generate Johnson noise and will cause the preamp to generate noise based on the input devices' current noise if they're bipolar transistors. A good preamp won't add appreciably to the mic's own Johnson noise, so you're on target that the way to maximize signal-to-noise is to look for dynamic mics with higher sensitivities. Consistent with the response you want, of course. Peace, Paul |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
Tobiah wrote:
Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? I could imagine that sensitivity would be something to consider, in that if one needs to crank the pre-amp up, the preamp noise would be more prevalent. Other than that, are dynamic mics as self-noise free as they come? No, dynamic mikes tend to be fairly noisy because of the thermal noise of all of those windings. Add more turns, you get more signal, and you get a heavier coil that reduces your high frequency response. Make the wire smaller to reduce the mass, you get higher resistance and more noise. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On 5/24/2013 11:03 AM, Tobiah wrote:
Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? Microphone self noise is really only a problem if you're trying to record something very quiet. Singers at a reasonable distance? No problem. A fly's footsteps? Problem with any mic. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On Sat, 25 May 2013 07:24:32 -0400, Mike Rivers
wrote: On 5/24/2013 11:03 AM, Tobiah wrote: Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? Microphone self noise is really only a problem if you're trying to record something very quiet. Singers at a reasonable distance? No problem. A fly's footsteps? Problem with any mic. Not a problem if you can persuade the fly to walk on the diaphragm. d |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 25 May 2013 07:24:32 -0400, Mike Rivers wrote: On 5/24/2013 11:03 AM, Tobiah wrote: Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? Microphone self noise is really only a problem if you're trying to record something very quiet. Singers at a reasonable distance? No problem. A fly's footsteps? Problem with any mic. Not a problem if you can persuade the fly to walk on the diaphragm. I don't know how valid the equivalent self noise data can be assumed to be, but based on them a quiet condensermicrophone, like the MKH 406 is some 10 dB less noisy than a MD 421 and a cheap one is about the same as a MD 421 and some electret stage microphones are more noisy than a MD421, based on testing one I was offered to try and refusing it 20 years ago. And then there is the "how does the noise sound" issue ... d Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
Tobiah wrote:
Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? I could imagine that sensitivity would be something to consider, in that if one needs to crank the pre-amp up, the preamp noise would be more prevalent. Other than that, are dynamic mics as self-noise free as they come? Thanks, Tobiah Dynamic mics are like all other mics. It's down to what it is and the shape it's in. Some have high sensitivity, some have low sensitivity, and many work well with some preamps and not so well with others. That said, any good dynamic, one with a solid rep, and a decent pre and you're good to go. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://hankandshaidrimusic.com/ http://www.youtube.com/walkinaymusic |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
"hank alrich" wrote in message ... Tobiah wrote: Dynamic mics are like all other mics. It's down to what it is and the shape it's in. Some have high sensitivity, some have low sensitivity, and many work well with some preamps and not so well with others. That said, any good dynamic, one with a solid rep, and a decent pre and you're good to go. Given the generally low output of dynamic mics compared to condensor/active, I would think that external noise factors (from cable interference and mic pre front ends) would totally swamp any self-noise. geoff |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On 5/27/2013 2:57 AM, geoff wrote:
Given the generally low output of dynamic mics compared to condensor/active, .. . . . . Is this still true for today's mics? Used to be (when there weren't so many mics available) that that for a given SPL, for example, a U-47 put out about 10 dB more than an RE-15. There are some moderately popular dynamic mics that have a lower than average sensitivity, such as the Shure SM7, and the Neumann KM84 is about 10 dB hotter than average. But when comparing modern condenser mics with common dynamics such as the Shure SM57, I've found that that the condenser mics seem to be only about 3 dB hotter than the dynamics. Some (or maybe all) of this "normalization" seems to have stemmed from the early days of the "affordable" condenser mics. Early novice users complained that their new brilliant mic was too hot for their mixer or preamp, forcing them to commit the unpardonable sin of turning down the gain. So mic manufacturers adjusted. So did mixer manufacturers, forcing the next generation of users to commit the other unpardonable sin of turning the gain up. You can't win unless you understand and accept gain structure and recognize that the microphone is part of the system. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
geoff wrote:
Given the generally low output of dynamic mics compared to condensor/active, I would think that external noise factors (from cable interference and mic pre front ends) would totally swamp any self-noise. Dynamic mics are good at high spl and can then deliver line level output. geoff Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
geoff wrote:
"hank alrich" wrote in message Tobiah wrote: Dynamic mics are like all other mics. It's down to what it is and the shape it's in. Some have high sensitivity, some have low sensitivity, and many work well with some preamps and not so well with others. That said, any good dynamic, one with a solid rep, and a decent pre and you're good to go. Given the generally low output of dynamic mics compared to condensor/active, I would think that external noise factors (from cable interference and mic pre front ends) would totally swamp any self-noise. In the real world it often can. But with a modern low-noise preamp when you're not in crazy conditions with stage dimmers all over the place, you can easily get to the point where the thermal noise of the coil is the limiting factor on a 421. With an SM-57, I am not sure if the thermal noise of the coil or the transformer is dominant but I can tell you it's a lot higher than that of a 421. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On Monday, May 27, 2013 11:16:23 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
geoff wrote: "hank alrich" wrote in message Tobiah wrote: Dynamic mics are like all other mics. It's down to what it is and the shape it's in. Some have high sensitivity, some have low sensitivity, and many work well with some preamps and not so well with others. That said, any good dynamic, one with a solid rep, and a decent pre and you're good to go. Given the generally low output of dynamic mics compared to condensor/active, I would think that external noise factors (from cable interference and mic pre front ends) would totally swamp any self-noise. In the real world it often can. But with a modern low-noise preamp when you're not in crazy conditions with stage dimmers all over the place, you can easily get to the point where the thermal noise of the coil is the limiting factor on a 421. With an SM-57, I am not sure if the thermal noise of the coil or the transformer is dominant but I can tell you it's a lot higher than that of a 421. You may be seeing the effect of the SM57's inductive reactance, which is quite substantial if the graph published by Ballou is any indication. The rise in impedance created by inductive reactance doesn't create Johnson noise, but if the preamp's input stage uses bipolar transistors, their current noise may make for a worse equivalent input noise when the source impedance is inductive. It's like the difference I see in input noise when I plug a high-inductance phono cartridge like a Stanton into my preamp (which uses a bipolar-input NE-5534a in the front end) instead of a low-inductance cartridge like a Grado. |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
PStamler wrote:
You may be seeing the effect of the SM57's inductive reactance, which is qu= ite substantial if the graph published by Ballou is any indication. The ris= e in impedance created by inductive reactance doesn't create Johnson noise,= but if the preamp's input stage uses bipolar transistors, their current no= ise may make for a worse equivalent input noise when the source impedance i= s inductive. It's like the difference I see in input noise when I plug a hi= gh-inductance phono cartridge like a Stanton into my preamp (which uses a b= ipolar-input NE-5534a in the front end) instead of a low-inductance cartrid= ge like a Grado.=20 That would make sense... the SM57 is definitely quieter into a transformer input preamp, which would follow reasonably. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On Thu, 30 May 2013 21:06:53 -0400, Ty Ford wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:03:45 -0400, Tobiah wrote (in article ): Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? I could imagine that sensitivity would be something to consider, in that if one needs to crank the pre-amp up, the preamp noise would be more prevalent. Other than that, are dynamic mics as self-noise free as they come? Thanks, Tobiah Just had to help a friend with a RE20 and a small cheapish board because the preamp didn't have enough gain before noise. I lent him an AKG C414. Not all preamps are created equal. Regards, Ty Ford Expect the same from a Shure Sm7. Small Mackie board preamps (VLZ) are too noisy, when you turn up the gain pot for these mics. IMO Steve King |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
"S. King" wrote in message ... Expect the same from a Shure Sm7. Small Mackie board preamps (VLZ) are too noisy, when you turn up the gain pot for these mics. IMO Dunno is it's just my SM7, but very low output level,especially with voice. geoff |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
geoff wrote:
"S. King" wrote in message ... Expect the same from a Shure Sm7. Small Mackie board preamps (VLZ) are too noisy, when you turn up the gain pot for these mics. IMO Dunno is it's just my SM7, but very low output level,especially with voice. It officially needs a preamp with 60 dB gain, my lil' soundcraft does that beautifully. geoff Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
S. King wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2013 21:06:53 -0400, Ty Ford wrote: On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:03:45 -0400, Tobiah wrote (in article ): Are there any self noise issues to consider when choosing a dynamic microphone? I could imagine that sensitivity would be something to consider, in that if one needs to crank the pre-amp up, the preamp noise would be more prevalent. Other than that, are dynamic mics as self-noise free as they come? Thanks, Tobiah Just had to help a friend with a RE20 and a small cheapish board because the preamp didn't have enough gain before noise. I lent him an AKG C414. Not all preamps are created equal. Regards, Ty Ford Expect the same from a Shure Sm7. Small Mackie board preamps (VLZ) are too noisy, when you turn up the gain pot for these mics. IMO Steve King +1 -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://hankandshaidrimusic.com/ http://www.youtube.com/walkinaymusic |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On Sat, 01 Jun 2013 09:09:58 +0100, Peter Larsen wrote:
geoff wrote: "S. King" wrote in message ... Expect the same from a Shure Sm7. Small Mackie board preamps (VLZ) are too noisy, when you turn up the gain pot for these mics. IMO Dunno is it's just my SM7, but very low output level,especially with voice. It officially needs a preamp with 60 dB gain, my lil' soundcraft does that beautifully. geoff Kind regards Peter Larsen When you have the right preamp, it is a great mic. It is thought of as a radio announcer or narrator mic, but I've used it on baritone sax, cello, a number of things. It probably wasn't my first choice for those, but when you get to the back of the mic locker... Steve King |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
A state of the art mic preamp has an input self noise of about 400nV
(-128dBV), that is the same of a 480 Ohm resistor: en [nV]=18.2 SQR (R). Adding a 480 Ohm noise to such a preamp, noise increases of 3dB (the double noise power) |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamic mics and noise
On 6/11/2013 11:02 AM, LAB wrote:
A state of the art mic preamp has an input self noise of about 400nV (-128dBV), that is the same of a 480 Ohm resistor: en [nV]=18.2 SQR (R). Adding a 480 Ohm noise to such a preamp, noise increases of 3dB (the double noise power) You can't win (that's the First Law of Thermodynamics). Might as well quit worrying about it and just use the mic. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Dynamic Mics (Sennheiser, AKG, Beyer etc.) | Pro Audio | |||
For Sale: Some old dynamic mics and other stuff | Pro Audio | |||
For Sale: Some old dynamic mics and other stuff | Pro Audio | |||
3 Electro-Voice Dynamic Mics | Marketplace | |||
WTB: Ribbon Mics, Dynamic Mics | Pro Audio |