geolemon wrote:

Well, RAC, RIP. I'm with Lee here, in his prophesy of demise...
And it's not the prophecies that will make it true. ;-)

please get the **** out and leave us to die in peace then

kill the godamned 'gateway' and link to the faq instead of hosting a
pirated copy or cut it away altogether...
--
sancho
i said 'please'

ShinyAsstec wrote:

i second that motion, *****!
--
ShinyAsstec
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CarAssioForum.com - Usenet Inhole w/over one million posts online!

what motion?

you guys refuse to get it...

your forum does not work properly with usenet... it can't thread
properly... it can't quote properly... you're assing up our spot...

just get out... or get a newsreader and ass it up properly...
--
sancho

94StealthRT/TT wrote:

What is a newbie? You are clearly an ignorant *a*ss; don’t you ever
have a point beyond giving your fingers some exercise by dancing them
randomly over the keyboard? You're just another Internet-addicted idiot
suffering from diarrhea of the mouth and constipation of the mind.
Newbie this, Newbie that…you guy’s are in your own little world, 90% of
the individuals you are calling newbie’s not only have more field
experience then you, but also OWN there own audio companies you
cluster*f*ucked, brother-humping, latex-slurping, dick-gobbling,
zit-popping, *c*ock-brained *c*ock jockey!

you ****ers are pretty clever...

that's grade-a material

can i use your bits?
--
sancho
sighs...

Regal1975 wrote:

geolemon wrote:

Well, RAC, RIP. I'm with Lee here, in his prophesy of demise...
And it's not the prophecies that will make it true. ;-) *

yes it appears to me that Lee is breathing life into what a RAC member
has already stated (on this thread) is a dying medium which has a
declining use...
--
Regal1975

if what you guys have brought is 'life', i'm sure i speak for all of us
when i choose death...

have you read the tripe your compatriots have been posting?

any of it?
--
sancho

Regal1975 wrote:

What is the point of a FAQ? To facilitate in the search for information.
RAC and CAF both exist for this purpose, though by different means.
Why should these two mediums not co-exist if by this cooperative
sharing of information, people would have easier access to this
information?

nobody is proposing that CAssF be shut down...

we just want the assing to stop...

if you guys want to provide access to rec.audio.car, put up a tutorial
on how to access usenet...

if you want people to have access to the rec.audio.car faq, link to it...


Perhaps you should put a password
on rac that blocks out everyone who is new snip

we don't want to keep people out... we want to keep poorly threaded and
formatted messages out... and keep people from providing outdated,
altered or unauthorized versions of the rac-faq...

when people post poorly using newsreaders that are designed for usenet,
you will find us expalining to them how to properly quote and reply to
threads...

the fact is that your forum is incapable of conforming to usenet
standards of etiquette...
--
sancho

sl2perfect wrote:

Lizman=TheLizard=gay
--
sl2perfect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CarAssioForum.com - Usenet Inhole w/over one million posts online!

he's really got you pegged, liz
--
sancho
witty AND insightful... i'm starting to like these guys...

ShinyAsstec wrote:

the guys are donkey-raping-****-eaters!!

especially elizabeth, i mean lizman
--
ShinyAsstec
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CarAssioForum.com - Usenet Inhole w/over one million posts online!

which guys, ****stick?

and what is ****?
--
sancho
censorship is your friend...

delvryboy wrote:

i am only here because some of the elders seem to think anyone outside
their little usernet group are a bunch of idiots, which is far from the
truth

we think idiots are idiots...

what do you call a person that refuses to learn?

we have tried to explain to you that the way you access usenet does not
conform to the proper protocols...

we have tried to teach you how to correct this...

you don't listen...

you don't learn...

are you an idiot?
--
sancho

thumperfbc wrote:

Perfect reproduction? I certainly hope you don't mean sonically...

Logic would tell me sonic Perfection = Sonic Accuracy, which vinyl is
simply not capable of...

Where'd you hear this? A completely accurate reproduction would be most
people's definition of sonic perfection. While vinyl certainly doesn't
have the numbers compared to CDDA (Dynamic Range, S/N, etc), under
optimal conditions in a double blind A/B few people can tell a
difference. Those that can (or at least claim to and beat the
probability) often prefer the vinyl. There's something to be said for
the precision of an analog recording as opposed to the sibilant
gratedness of PCM encoded digital audio.

thumperfbc

Just a side note: you have to be the first (and thus far only) person
posting from CAF that has displayed a degree of maturity (on top of the
ability to quote). Are there more like you? Can you send them over?

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

Seriously. You need to get your children under control and excercise
some editorial review and moderation powers. I will begin forwarding
these messages to your nntp provider along with a request to have your
access blocked. Supernews has a strict policy against usenet abuse and
vulgarity, and I'd say theres a convincing case against you with the
last few thousand posts.

ShinyAltec wrote:
the guys are donkey-raping-****-eaters!!

especially elizabeth, i mean lizman
--
ShinyAltec
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CarAudioForum.com - Usenet Gateway w/over one million posts online!
View this thread: http://www.caraudioforum.com/showthr...hreadid=178609



--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

delvryboy wrote:

i am only here because some of the elders seem to think anyone outside
their little usernet group are a bunch of idiots,

No, just ones like you. Luckily you've gladly demonstrated this for us.

I believe "moron", "asshat", and "assclown" have also been used.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

sl2perfect wrote:
Lizman=TheLizard=gay

You say that like there's something wrong with being gay...

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

good god, thelizman.. are you as moronic and repulsive in real life a
you are on the internet when you have a keyboard in front of you?

LEE'S SITE IS NON-PROFIT, HAS ALWAYS BEEN!! can you get that throug
your thick ****ing skull?? what does he have to gain?? i doubt he ha
run the site for 7+years now all building up to the day when he coul
put a copy of the faq on his forum and gain millions of visitors h
could all sell things to.... sheesh, is it just me or does commo
****ing sense mean nothing to you. Your peers seem to have realize
that I came on this topic speaking common sense, and some of them
have actually agreed with, but you for some reason do not seem t
understand the meaning of common sense.

HOW CAN SOMEONE STEAL SOMETHING THAT IS PUBLIC DOMAIN??

if he stole it am i to assume that he is taking profit away from Ian?
does Ian no longer have it? Does RAC no longer have it?? Is Lee makin
money off of it?

and you speak of this "etiquette" .. of which i can obviously tell yo
are full of.. true southern gentleman i can tell... where is thi
posted?? i see nothing in the FAQ on RAC etiquette... or protocol..
where is THIS listed???

is the protocol of RAC to post endless posts starting dozens o
completely new ones about everyone that ****es you off?? as far as I'v
seen 99.9% of your posts have been off topic drivel..


lets see what kind of wonderful knowledge you have imparted upon us a
of late oh car audio god...

"The FAQ needs an article about Lees **** "
" the idjit inversion "
" LEE has no class! (and he tain't the only one) "
" The FUQ needs a major update "
"Sancho: I Win "
"Stop the Noisane "
"CAF Users Are Immature Little Children "
"delvryboy needs a major update "
" delvryboy misses the point "
"delvryboy on how to screw things up for other people "
"Audioholic - Epitome of the Clueless Newbie "
"Caraudioforum members are too stupid to quote. "
"Learn to quote moron "
"delvryboy may have a clue "
"CAF 94 StealthRT/TT lu53r can't speaky english "
" The FAQ needs a major update, and CAF users are whiney crybabies
"

all packed with information that will help out the 12V community..

IT IS IDIOT, IDIOT, NOT IDJIT....LEARN TO SPELL AT LEAST SIMPL
WORDS...



I Wrote "What is the point of a FAQ? To facilitate in the search fo
information."

And you said the exact same thing except you said it is only fo
noobies...



Thelizman said"This isn't a personal vendetta. It's just that those o
us who have
invested YEARS in this newsgroup aren't about to watch it get trashe
by
a bunch of young, dumb, full-of-cum pogey boots who think their way is
better than the way it has been being done."

im sorry if i trashed it by being friendly and not living up to you
model of "etiquette" and "protocol"

and im to assume since you call me a pogey that you must be infantry
-
Regal197
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CarAudioForum.com - Usenet Gateway w/over one million posts online
View this thread: http://www.caraudioforum.com/showthr...threadid=17647

Regal1975 wrote:
good god, thelizman.. are you as moronic and repulsive in real life as
you are on the internet when you have a keyboard in front of you?

I try to be.

LEE'S SITE IS NON-PROFIT, HAS ALWAYS BEEN!! can you get that through
your thick ****ing skull?? what does he have to gain??

"Gain" does not mean monetary profit. Perhaps you should introduce a
dictionary to your thick ****ing skull.

i doubt he has
run the site for 7+years now

Good, because he hasn't. He took the site over from a guy named Carl.

Your peers seem to have realized
that I came on this topic speaking common sense, and some of them i
have actually agreed with, but you for some reason do not seem to
understand the meaning of common sense.

Your 'common sense' has some uncommonly biased spin in it.

HOW CAN SOMEONE STEAL SOMETHING THAT IS PUBLIC DOMAIN??

The FAQ is not in the public domain.

if he stole it am i to assume that he is taking profit away from Ian??

Mobileaudio.com hosts banner ads which pay on a per impression basis. By
taking profit away, he is in fact costing Ian money. Probably a whopping
$1.20 a month at that. As if that was the point, however.

and you speak of this "etiquette" .. of which i can obviously tell you
are full of.. true southern gentleman i can tell... where is this
posted?? i see nothing in the FAQ on RAC etiquette... or protocol...
where is THIS listed???

Usenet protocol. You're familiar with google.

is the protocol of RAC to post endless posts starting dozens of
completely new ones about everyone that ****es you off?? as far as I've
seen 99.9% of your posts have been off topic drivel..

As have 99.9% of all posts by CAF members.

BTW, I have not started a new "thread" in months. You suffer the
limitation of your crappy usenet "gateway". All I do is alter the
subject line. A real newsreader would have threaded the posts according
to the X-Ref header. This is your handicap, not mine. Since you and your
kind show no respect for RAC, I'm more than happy to hand it back to
you. The difference is, my tweaking of subject lines doesn't ass up rac
the way your inane drivel asses up both RAC and CAF.

I Wrote "What is the point of a FAQ? To facilitate in the search for
information."

And you said the exact same thing except you said it is only for
noobies...

No, I didn't. You're lack of reading comprehension is rather atypical
given your former organization of enlistment. I defined the FAQ as a
tool which alleviates the burden upon regulars in assiting newbies. You
try to make it out to be some kind of encyclopedia.

and im to assume since you call me a pogey that you must be infantry?

I don't believe I called you a "pogey" specifically.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

Whew!... hehe... i agree with you totally on most points, and i agree,
that a RAC document has every right to be assembled and mantained by a
RAC person, however, it seems to me that by Lee putting a copy on his
site, it would only tend to broaden the scope of persons who view the
FAQ, and if any glory is brought about as a result, it would be the
persons who wrote and assembled the document, not the person hosting
it.

I see it differently. I think it would serve to dilute the FAQ, and instead
will lead to asynchrony between the two. When there are updates (Mar 3 is
the next one I believe), will Lee pick them up? And if CAF folks update it,
I know that Ian won't unless it goes through the review process that Ian has
set up. As you can see, there will essentially be two FAQs for the same
newsgroup. Five years from now, which will be the "right one"?

CAF should work towards putting together it's own FAQ, or tech section, or
whatever you want to call it. The RAC FAQ should be left to those who
actively participate in RAC, whether they've been participating for one year
or ten.

i think the FAQ on CAF should of simply been a link to the original
FAQ

i am only here because some of the elders seem to think anyone outside
their little usernet group are a bunch of idiots, which is far from the
truth

I don't think that's true at all. There are only a few "elders" left in
RAC. Most of the "elders" left about two years ago. Everyone else you see
around here is relatively new. People are only criticized if they say
something worth criticizing. Sometimes it's harsh, but that's life.

What is the point of a FAQ? To facilitate in the search for information.
RAC and CAF both exist for this purpose, though by different means.
Why should these two mediums not co-exist if by this cooperative
sharing of information, people would have easier access to this
information?

nobody is proposing that CAssF be shut down...

we just want the assing to stop...

if you guys want to provide access to rec.audio.car, put up a tutorial
on how to access usenet...

As an aside...

Why would ANYONE want to access usenet in a web-based system? I used to use
google when I was away from home to do it, and it was pure hell. I now pay
extra just to access through giganews using forte agent or outlook express.
My new theory is that these people are masochists...

good god, thelizman.. are you as moronic and repulsive in real life as
you are on the internet when you have a keyboard in front of you?

LEE'S SITE IS NON-PROFIT, HAS ALWAYS BEEN!! can you get that through
your thick ****ing skull?? what does he have to gain??

You're not suggesting that he doesn't care if anyone looks at his site or
not, are you? Most people who put up sites, especially those with forums,
want people to come. I'm not saying it's a financial benefit, but he's
clearly running a site in hopes that people come to it!

PS - there is a usenet protocol page somewhere. Do a google search. In
fact, since google allows access to usenet, I'd bet they have a protocol
listed on their own site.

Regal1975 wrote:

HOW CAN SOMEONE STEAL SOMETHING THAT IS PUBLIC DOMAIN??

the faq is not public domain...

is the protocol of RAC to post endless posts starting dozens of
completely new ones about everyone that ****es you off??

he hasn't been posting completely new threads as far as anyone on usenet
is concerned...

your forum software cannot properly thread and it is your forum which is
breaking the continuity of the threads...

it is breaking the threads, putting them on your forum as new threads
and then when you people post here it starts a new thread... to us it
looks like you are a bunch of raving ****tards...

lets see what kind of wonderful knowledge you have imparted upon us as
of late oh car audio god...

snip

thread title changes do not break threads on usenet...

im sorry if i trashed it by being friendly and not living up to your
model of "etiquette" and "protocol"

we'll forgive you, if you stop...
--
sancho

thelizman wrote:


Just a side note: you have to be the first (and thus far only) person
posting from CAF that has displayed a degree of maturity (on top of the
ability to quote). Are there more like you? Can you send them over?

and could you give them newsreaders

many are FREE

outlook express is bundled with most internet explorer installs

thunderbird is free, ported to many operating systems and available at
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird

check http://www.newsreaders.com for more...
--
sancho

thelizman wrote:

Supernews has a strict policy against usenet abuse and
vulgarity

the guys are donkey-raping-****-eaters!!

yeah... that "****" **** really offended my delicate ****ing
sensiblities, asshole...

i almost cried
--
sancho

i have never, i say never, seen anyone so interested in asshats
"sancho" wrote in message
...
The_spacemonkey wrote:

thelizman wrote:


Don't you ****ants have something better to do with your browsers
than
spam threads that died last week?


aww ****ants... he knows a word with more than one syllabol... how
cute
--
The_spacemonkey
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CarAssioForum.com - Usenet Inhole w/over one million posts online!

bet you a dollar he can spell "syllable" as well...
--
sancho
remind me to thank lee for his 'contribution' of 'members' to r.a.c.
and by 'contribution' i mean 'unwanted dumping'
and by 'members' i mean 'people who wear their asses for hats'

"delvryboy" wrote in message
...
i have never, i say never, seen anyone so interested in asshats
snippage

They are quite interesting though. Imagine, if you will, someone using a web
forum and messing up the entire format of usenet, wearing their ass as a
hat?

no, you are correct, i am no web wizard such as yourself

regardless, how does this benifit Lee?

my personal opinion is simple

every forum/user group should have a FAQ...most of them are going to reflect
the same knowledge considering the fundamentals(sp) shouldn't change
regardless of where you are

i honsetly don't see what the big deal is over this FAQ...there is nothing
special about it what-so-ever

yes, it is very informative, and, if it served it's purpose, would eliminate
some of the basic questions asked by newcomers

but i really don't see what you are trying to protect..

please, enlighten me...and don't spew some **** about ass clowns, hats, and
the like...because the more you use the terms, the more i think the same
about yourself
"thelizman" wrote in message
...
delvryboy wrote:
why would he want more traffic to his site, it's uses no advertising,

The spillover benefit is that it increases Lee's exposure within the car
audio Internet community. What he hadn't counted on when he installed
the link to RAC is the negative publicity he'd receive because all you
idgits flood rac with crap.

and if anything, more traffic equals more money out of his pocket for
maintaining the server

Verio charges a flat rate up to a given amount of traffic. Since the
entire forum is mostly text, it'll be a cold day in hell before he hits
his quota.

get a clue

Indeed. Not only do you not appear to know jack **** about car audio,
you know even less about web hosting.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

i feel bad for your children, i cannot imagine their home life...being
subjected to both your horrible attitude and your vulgar language

but more than likely, you have not found a woman who will take your sorry
ass attitude long enough to concieve :shakes head:
"thelizman" wrote in message
...
delvryboy wrote:

i am only here because some of the elders seem to think anyone outside
their little usernet group are a bunch of idiots,

No, just ones like you. Luckily you've gladly demonstrated this for us.

I believe "moron", "asshat", and "assclown" have also been used.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

actually, you have never tryed to explain anything

all you have said is that we are asshats/clowns, idiots, and that we have no
clue how to access usernet

why not try and teach eveyone, or direct them to a link that explains how to
use it correctly....

wait...

the lizzman already did that

it's one thing to be an ass like the liz...but it is even worse to be his
dim-witted, homosexual sidekick
"sancho" wrote in message
...
delvryboy wrote:

i am only here because some of the elders seem to think anyone outside
their little usernet group are a bunch of idiots, which is far from the
truth

we think idiots are idiots...

what do you call a person that refuses to learn?

we have tried to explain to you that the way you access usenet does not
conform to the proper protocols...

we have tried to teach you how to correct this...

you don't listen...

you don't learn...

are you an idiot?
--
sancho

every forum/user group should have a FAQ...

Why doesn't CAF have a CAF FAQ then? Or do they?

most of them are going to reflect
the same knowledge considering the fundamentals(sp) shouldn't change
regardless of where you are

I don't think so. Every site I go to says different things about many many
topics. In fact, since some of the current FAQ is going to be changed, then
obviously your assertion is not correct.

Regal1975 wrote:

HOW CAN SOMEONE STEAL SOMETHING THAT IS PUBLIC DOMAIN??

The FAQ is not public domain!

actually, now that i am seeing beyond some of the childlike behavior of the
senior rac members....

the FAQ is for the rac newsgroup, why someone would want to copy it word for
word is beyond me

however, the majority of the information is very basic and general
knowledge...i could basically copy it word for word, remove anything that
had to do with rac, call it the CAF FAQ, and it would be entirely legal
"Eddie Runner" wrote in message
...
Regal1975 wrote:

HOW CAN SOMEONE STEAL SOMETHING THAT IS PUBLIC DOMAIN??

The FAQ is not public domain!

the majority of the content is general knowledge

for example, the competition section is obviously outdated...i could rewrite
it to contain basic info about all 6 sanctioning bodies, put it in a FAQ at
CAF or RAC and it would serve it's purpose all the same regardless of where
it is located

i understand that the FAQ at rac is meant to be used by members of this
newsgroup, however, that does not mean the content is group specific
knowledge
"MZ" wrote in message
...
every forum/user group should have a FAQ...

Why doesn't CAF have a CAF FAQ then? Or do they?

most of them are going to reflect
the same knowledge considering the fundamentals(sp) shouldn't change
regardless of where you are

I don't think so. Every site I go to says different things about many
many
topics. In fact, since some of the current FAQ is going to be changed,
then
obviously your assertion is not correct.

the majority of the content is general knowledge

That "general knowledge" varies depending on who you ask. The answers to
those questions are often wrong.

for example, the competition section is obviously outdated...i could
rewrite
it to contain basic info about all 6 sanctioning bodies, put it in a FAQ
at
CAF or RAC and it would serve it's purpose all the same regardless of
where
it is located

i understand that the FAQ at rac is meant to be used by members of this
newsgroup, however, that does not mean the content is group specific
knowledge

I don't know what "group specific knowledge" is. If you mean answers to
questions that have been provided by those posting in RAC, then I think by
definition the RAC FAQ is "group specific knowledge." The answers differ in
many respects to those that you'll receive in other forums, probably
including those in CAF. We know this is true because Lee posted addendums
to the bottom of some of the FAQ pages he put on his site - they generally
said "We at CAF don't agree with this"

delvryboy wrote:

actually, now that i am seeing beyond some of the childlike behavior of the
senior rac members....

And the RAC members are starting to see beyond the childish behaviour
of some jackass CAF members....

the FAQ is for the rac newsgroup, why someone would want to copy it word for
word is beyond me

I asked LEE the same question, no answer....

however, the majority of the information is very basic and general
knowledge...i could basically copy it word for word, remove anything that
had to do with rac, call it the CAF FAQ, and it would be entirely legal

Sure as long as you dont tell anyone....
And even then its possible (specially with this contoversy as evedence)
to pursue anyone that does do anything that looks remotely similar....
(but of course thats not up to me, its up to IAN)

There is some great copyright info at http://www.uspto.gov
I had problems two years ago with someone that took over 400 offroad
photos from my websites (http://www.tx4x4.com) and was selling
them on a CD on Ebay....

I also have gone through the trademark process which is very similar.

Eddie Runner

while combining both formats is horrible on both parts...

can you honesty say that if the teamROCS forum had the broad membership and
content that is currently on rac...would you still find rac faster and
better?

even using it the correct way, i find it very basic and harder on the eyes
"thelizman" wrote in message
...
delvryboy wrote:
* the problem is...it like throwing my pen and paper away, and using a

stick in the dirt

Ironic, since a real newsreader is so much more feature rich, faster,
and more efficient than that crappy web page you are on.

It's not hard. If you don't like it, get out of our dirt. It's a simple
request. You don't want to be here. We don't want you here. Leave. Go
away. Stop screwing it up for the people who do like it here.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

delvryboy wrote:

i honsetly don't see what the big deal is over this FAQ...there is nothing
special about it what-so-ever

but i really don't see what you are trying to protect..

please, enlighten me...

How about I just go to your house and steal your car. Honestly, there's
nothing special about it. Why would you care? What are you trying to
protect? What's the big deal?

Getting the point yet?

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

delvryboy wrote:
actually, you have never tryed to explain anything

snip

You just don't get it. We have told you people time and time again what
is expected of you on this forum. I have gone so fare as to spell it out
in detail. You inparticular have flaunted your disrespect of this medium.

It's not that we haven't "tried" (spell checkers are included in many
newsgroup readers, by the way), it's that you haven't given a care. Now
stop trying to act like you're some kind of victim of circumstance. You
and most of your CAF buddies are arrogant crapflooding trolls with no
respect for anything.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

narcolept wrote:
"delvryboy" wrote in message
...

i have never, i say never, seen anyone so interested in asshats

snippage

They are quite interesting though. Imagine, if you will, someone using a web
forum and messing up the entire format of usenet, wearing their ass as a
hat?

Indeed, and delvryboy is the Sombrero of asshats.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

delvryboy wrote:
actually, now that i am seeing beyond some of the childlike behavior of the
senior rac members....

Don't you think your own immaturity had something to do with this issue?
We didn't come to CAF and start assing your forum up - you came here.

however, the majority of the information is very basic and general
knowledge...i could basically copy it word for word, remove anything that
had to do with rac, call it the CAF FAQ, and it would be entirely legal

No, it wouldn't. It'd be called plagiarism, and it would get you in very
serious trouble legally. Any individual who contributed to the FAQ
granted license to the FAQ maintainer to reproduce that text. Copying
something verbatim gives them the legal right to sue you for damages.

Don't they teach about plagiarism and academic honesty anymore?

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

delvryboy wrote:
the majority of the content is general knowledge

for example, the competition section is obviously outdated...

Which is why Mark Zarella started discussing updating the FAQ, and
that's when Lee revealed that he had stolen the FAQ, and this whole mess
got started.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

sorry, the Sombrero of asshats is reserved for poncho
"thelizman" wrote in message
...
narcolept wrote:
"delvryboy" wrote in message
...

i have never, i say never, seen anyone so interested in asshats

snippage

They are quite interesting though. Imagine, if you will, someone using a
web
forum and messing up the entire format of usenet, wearing their ass as a
hat?

Indeed, and delvryboy is the Sombrero of asshats.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.

i know there is a spell checker...i honestly don't see anyone else using it,
so why should i care?

the more you make personal attacks, the more i shall hang around
"thelizman" wrote in message
...
delvryboy wrote:
actually, you have never tryed to explain anything

snip

You just don't get it. We have told you people time and time again what
is expected of you on this forum. I have gone so fare as to spell it out
in detail. You inparticular have flaunted your disrespect of this medium.
how have i done this, i have tried to post the correct way since i have
entered this newsgroup...

It's not that we haven't "tried" (spell checkers are included in many
newsgroup readers, by the way), it's that you haven't given a care. Now
stop trying to act like you're some kind of victim of circumstance. You
and most of your CAF buddies are arrogant crapflooding trolls with no
respect for anything.

--
thelizman "I didn't steal the FAQ either"

Before you ask a question, check the FAQs for this newsgroup at
http://www.mobileaudio.com/rac-faq. It contains over a decade and
a half of knowledge.

teamROCS Car Audio Forums http://www.teamrocs.com/caraudio/
teamROCS Car Audio News http://www.teamrocs.com/news/
"It's about the music, stupid"

This post is Copyright (C) 2004. Reproduction of its content anywhere
other than usenet without the express written permission of the author
is forbidden.