Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Simulation and hardware confirmation of dual CF and diode AM detector
In article , Robert Casey
wrote: Simulated and actually built the below AM detector. Uses two cathode followers and two diodes. One a 12AU7 and the other a 6AL5 with low heater voltage (makes for lower contact potential and better linearity). The simulation says distortion is about 50 dB down for input carrier levels of 20Vp-p to a low of 20mVp-p. This is by far the best I've seen. And the hardware I built (modified a Heathkit AM tuner) sounds great. The circuit is similar to PT's except I used 100pF caps to couple the CF'ed carrier to the detector diodes (one for audio, other for AVC). If the schematic you posted is correct, then you seem to have eliminated the bias circuit from your detector, which makes sense, because as the RDH4 bit that John Stewart pointed out says, the point of the bias is to compensate for a less then optimal AC/DC load ratio, and with the following cathode follwer you seem to have an ideal AC/DC load ratio. I don't yet understand the claim that Patrick has made that the bias insures that the diode is "on all the time", or that you have made that the bias is to "get it up above the Knee", I would welcome further enlightenment on these aspects of the design. As it is, it sounds like you may have equaled the distortion performance of the Selsted & Smith detector. It would be interesting to learn how your detector performs when the first cathode follower is removed, and the diode is driven directly from the IFT. That would yield a diode detector buffered only on the post detection side by a cathode follower, which is my first choice for a meritorious detector. Speaking of the IFT, I would tend to dismiss reports of how your circuit sounds in the Heathkit tuner, unless you have provided a resistive load for the secondary of the IFT equal to the load presented by the original voltage doubler detector in the Heathkit. I think the voltage doubler presents a load to the IFT equal to about 1/4 of the original detector load resistance. Also your circuit is going to provide less AGC voltage than the original circuit, and for an apples to apples comparison something should be done to address that difference. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote:
In article , Robert Casey wrote: Simulated and actually built the below AM detector. Uses two cathode followers and two diodes. One a 12AU7 and the other a 6AL5 with low heater voltage (makes for lower contact potential and better linearity). The simulation says distortion is about 50 dB down for input carrier levels of 20Vp-p to a low of 20mVp-p. This is by far the best I've seen. And the hardware I built (modified a Heathkit AM tuner) sounds great. The circuit is similar to PT's except I used 100pF caps to couple the CF'ed carrier to the detector diodes (one for audio, other for AVC). If the schematic you posted is correct, then you seem to have eliminated the bias circuit from your detector, which makes sense, because as the RDH4 bit that John Stewart pointed out says, the point of the bias is to compensate for a less then optimal AC/DC load ratio, and with the following cathode follwer you seem to have an ideal AC/DC load ratio. That's correct, I did remove the bias. With the cathode follower directly coupled to the detector circuit output, there are no caps other than the picofarad sized ones. Which discharge faster than the audio waveform changes. But these caps need to be chosen with some care to maintain a decent AC/DC ratio or else the downward stroke of the audio will get a "slope clipping". I don't yet understand the claim that Patrick has made that the bias insures that the diode is "on all the time", I don't either. If the diode is on all the time, it would just pass the carrier waveform and not detect. or that you have made that the bias is to "get it up above the Knee", I would welcome further enlightenment on these aspects of the design. Real diodes have a nonlinear curve down near zero volts. A 6AL5 operated with low heater voltage (about 4V) is the best, but still has some nonlinearity. Full heater voltage makes it a little worse, but allows higher peak currents. Geranimium diodes have a well known knee at about 300mV and Silicon at 700mV. But the vacuum tube diode has the least kinked curve and maintains conductivity to zero. SS diodes pretty much go dead around 100mV to 400mV (Ge or Si). With the FCC rule saying a minimum of 5% carrier at the valleys, the audio modulation spans a reasonally unkinked range at any signal strength. Oh, about below 1V signal strength the distortion goes up a bit (40dB vs 50dB down). But it doesn't go to bananas like it does in an average AA5. Seems that the "knee" I was avoiding before was really a lousy AC/DC ratio. As it is, it sounds like you may have equaled the distortion performance of the Selsted & Smith detector. It would be interesting to learn how your detector performs when the first cathode follower is removed, and the diode is driven directly from the IFT. That would yield a diode detector buffered only on the post detection side by a cathode follower, which is my first choice for a meritorious detector. I'll have to try it. One thing the CF does largely prevent is a loss of signal voltage vs. when the detector directly loads the IFT. But I did just that when I slapped on a 100K resistor on the IFT secondary. I'll have to give it more thought.... Speaking of the IFT, I would tend to dismiss reports of how your circuit sounds in the Heathkit tuner, unless you have provided a resistive load for the secondary of the IFT equal to the load presented by the original voltage doubler detector in the Heathkit. I approximately did, (forgot to mention it). I used 100K as a load across the secondary. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Robert Casey wrote: John Byrns wrote: In article , Robert Casey wrote: Simulated and actually built the below AM detector. Uses two cathode followers and two diodes. One a 12AU7 and the other a 6AL5 with low heater voltage (makes for lower contact potential and better linearity). The simulation says distortion is about 50 dB down for input carrier levels of 20Vp-p to a low of 20mVp-p. This is by far the best I've seen. And the hardware I built (modified a Heathkit AM tuner) sounds great. The circuit is similar to PT's except I used 100pF caps to couple the CF'ed carrier to the detector diodes (one for audio, other for AVC). If the schematic you posted is correct, then you seem to have eliminated the bias circuit from your detector, which makes sense, because as the RDH4 bit that John Stewart pointed out says, the point of the bias is to compensate for a less then optimal AC/DC load ratio, and with the following cathode follwer you seem to have an ideal AC/DC load ratio. That's correct, I did remove the bias. With the cathode follower directly coupled to the detector circuit output, there are no caps other than the picofarad sized ones. Which discharge faster than the audio waveform changes. But these caps need to be chosen with some care to maintain a decent AC/DC ratio or else the downward stroke of the audio will get a "slope clipping". I don't yet understand the claim that Patrick has made that the bias insures that the diode is "on all the time", I don't either. If the diode is on all the time, it would just pass the carrier waveform and not detect. Try building the detector circuit that I have just posted using two CFs and a handful of other easily obtainable bits. Then examine all the working voltages and waveforms with a low capacitance probe of a CRO. Then you'll see how these things work. Compare the results of my detector design with anything else in "normal" sets. Patrick Turner. or that you have made that the bias is to "get it up above the Knee", I would welcome further enlightenment on these aspects of the design. Real diodes have a nonlinear curve down near zero volts. A 6AL5 operated with low heater voltage (about 4V) is the best, but still has some nonlinearity. Full heater voltage makes it a little worse, but allows higher peak currents. Geranimium diodes have a well known knee at about 300mV and Silicon at 700mV. But the vacuum tube diode has the least kinked curve and maintains conductivity to zero. SS diodes pretty much go dead around 100mV to 400mV (Ge or Si). With the FCC rule saying a minimum of 5% carrier at the valleys, the audio modulation spans a reasonally unkinked range at any signal strength. Oh, about below 1V signal strength the distortion goes up a bit (40dB vs 50dB down). But it doesn't go to bananas like it does in an average AA5. Seems that the "knee" I was avoiding before was really a lousy AC/DC ratio. As it is, it sounds like you may have equaled the distortion performance of the Selsted & Smith detector. It would be interesting to learn how your detector performs when the first cathode follower is removed, and the diode is driven directly from the IFT. That would yield a diode detector buffered only on the post detection side by a cathode follower, which is my first choice for a meritorious detector. I'll have to try it. One thing the CF does largely prevent is a loss of signal voltage vs. when the detector directly loads the IFT. But I did just that when I slapped on a 100K resistor on the IFT secondary. I'll have to give it more thought.... Speaking of the IFT, I would tend to dismiss reports of how your circuit sounds in the Heathkit tuner, unless you have provided a resistive load for the secondary of the IFT equal to the load presented by the original voltage doubler detector in the Heathkit. I approximately did, (forgot to mention it). I used 100K as a load across the secondary. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Robert Casey
wrote: Real diodes have a nonlinear curve down near zero volts. A 6AL5 operated with low heater voltage (about 4V) is the best, but still has some nonlinearity. Full heater voltage makes it a little worse, but allows higher peak currents. Geranimium diodes have a well known knee at about 300mV and Silicon at 700mV. There are those that will tell you that Geranium diodes have no knee or discontinuity, that they follow a continuous mathematical function that has no discontinuity or "knee". They say that the appearance of a "knee" is simply due to the way the curve is commonly plotted. IIRC, if you plot the curve on the right sort of "log" paper, then the curve becomes a straight line with no "knee" at all. But the vacuum tube diode has the least kinked curve and maintains conductivity to zero. SS diodes pretty much go dead around 100mV to 400mV (Ge or Si). With the FCC rule saying a minimum of 5% carrier at the valleys, the audio modulation spans a reasonally unkinked range at any signal strength. Are you sure about that the FCC has a 5% rule for normal AM monophonic broadcasting? I am too lazy to look it up right now, but I suspect that the 5% rule applies to stereo broadcasting only and that normal AM is allowed to have negative modulation peaks all the way down to 0% carrier. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some simulation results on various AM detectors | Vacuum Tubes |