Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Still Another Kwestion for the Krooborg
the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote: unempowered nobodies hiding in their anonymity Pots and kettles, anyone? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Malesweski said:
the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote: unempowered nobodies hiding in their anonymity Pots and kettles, anyone? Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Porky Phillips wrote:
Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
Richard Malesweski said: the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote: unempowered nobodies hiding in their anonymity Pots and kettles, anyone? Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. nonexistent response |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Arny said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message Richard Malesweski said: the psycho posting as "George M. Middius" wrote: unempowered nobodies hiding in their anonymity Pots and kettles, anyone? Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. nonexistent response Whose? Yours? Make some sense for once. Boon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Malesweski said:
Porky Phillips wrote: Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and you're wondering where I've been? LOL! Boon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
Richard Malesweski said: Porky Phillips wrote: Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and you're wondering where I've been? LOL! Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in message Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, it doesn't take long for both newbies and oldies on RAO to give Krueger the kinds of flames he's been spreading for many years. Fella, a relative newcomer, was just one of the latest to join the "Have You Had A Bad Krueger Experience" club of numerous people that despise this chronic liar. Bruce J. Richman |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. "George" just doesn't realize what a vile asshole he is. :-0 Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. Turds of a feather post together? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
RAO's resident quack ranted:
As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, 6 years????? What about all those posts where you squealed "7 year history"? "sockpuppet!" "libel!" "character assassination!" "delusional!" "hated and despised!" "flamer!" -the oft-repeated rants of Bruce J. Richman, diagnosed psychotic |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Lionel said:
Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting? AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most psychologists. (=: -- Sander de Waal " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. " |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In , Sander deWaal wrote :
Lionel said: Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting? AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most psychologists. (=: I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message om Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Of course if there were a scatology exhibition, you might be invited to become the keynote speaker. Bruce J. Richman |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Lionel wrote:
In , Sander deWaal wrote : Lionel said: Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting? AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most psychologists. (=: I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-) So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either. It's a matter of Google record that John Atkinson and his publication have been libeled repeatedly over the years by Krueger. While only Mr. Atkinson obviously can know why he extended the invitation, I think most of us can pretty easily understand his motivations. Bruce J. Richman |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In , Bruce J. Richman wrote :
Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce... "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home Entertainment 2005". This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity... Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio show ? This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you never got in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need a little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh bruce ? Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips, Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story. You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an implicit desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-) Of course if there were a scatology exhibition, you might be invited to become the keynote speaker. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
In , Bruce J. Richman wrote :
Lionel wrote: In , Sander deWaal wrote : Lionel said: Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) What makes you think Bruce won't attend the meeting? AFAIC, this is what we call "gefundenes Fressen" for most psychologists. (=: I don't care if he will attend or not attend I'm just saying that nobody has *invited* him publicly on *RAO*... :-) So what? Nobody has invited Lionel or anybody else either. Lionel hasn't any competence to be inveited in an audio show. Lionel doesn't want to go in USA. Lionel want to stay in the french sewers... ;-) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Lionel wrote: In , Bruce J. Richman wrote : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce... "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home Entertainment 2005". This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity... Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio show ? Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake. This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you never got in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need a little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh bruce ? Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips, Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story. You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an implicit desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-) =20 =20 Bingo! |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Lionel wrote: In .com, wrote : Lionel wrote: In , Bruce J. Richman wrote : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce... "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home Entertainment 2005". This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity... Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio show ? Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake. Yes a real full invitation... Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as accepted to compromise himself with a well-known pedophile... LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a while... :-D Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Arny said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message Richard Malesweski said: Porky Phillips wrote: Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and you're wondering where I've been? LOL! Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this ****ing stupid. Boon |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Malesweski said:
Lionel wrote: In , Bruce J. Richman wrote : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce... "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home Entertainment 2005". This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity... Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio show ? Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake. Why would it stick in our craws? What the **** are you talking about, Internet geek? This *invitation* gives him more credit, more attention than you never got in all your life, Bruce. Can you understand this ? Do you really need a little French guy coming from the sewers to explain you that ? Eh bruce ? Now everything can happen to the show Bruce, you, Middius, Phillips, Sackman... are already the black sheeps of the story. You can turn it the way you want bruce, Atkinson's invitation is an implicit desavowal to Middius' clique. And you know it... ;-) =20 =20 Bingo! In your fantasy world, maybe. In reality, you don't even have a game board. Boon |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Malesweski said:
Lionel wrote: In .com, wrote : Lionel wrote: In , Bruce J. Richman wrote : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce... "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home Entertainment 2005". This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity... Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio show ? Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake. Yes a real full invitation... Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as accepted to compromise himself with a well-known pedophile... LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a while... :-D Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this conclusion. Boy, are you desperate for attention. Boon |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Lionel displays his ignorance as follows:
In .com, wrote : Lionel wrote: In .com, wrote : Lionel wrote: In , Bruce J. Richman wrote : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Arny Krueger wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message m Arnii, why do you depend on other "people" to fight your battles for you? Of course Middius, I don't. The people who are attacking you are simply pursuing their own agendas. They've got more than enough of your abuse to counter. Middius, at your earliest convenience, please explain why you Art, Fella, Borgma, and Richman play tag-team around here so much. As RAO's most widely hated and despised poster for over 6 years, Perhaps but he is the one who is *invited* to "Home Entertainment 2005". Be sure that everybody appreciate your POV you on RAO Bruce, but sorry you will stay in the floridian swamps... Sorry, next time perhaps. ;-) And of course, Lionel, you will remain in the sewers of France, where your views belong. Your POV on RAO seems to be shared by very few, and we appreciate your keeping it that way. Sorry but it seems to be the case of your POV also Bruce... "RAO's most widely hated and despised poster" is *publicly* invited to "Home Entertainment 2005". This sound to me like a discredit to your theories about Krueger insanity... Apparently, the idiot, Lionel, doesn't know the difference between "insanity" and being despised by large group of people on RAO. As usual, he likes to toss around terminology he can't even define, let alone use appropriately. This comes as no surprise, of course. Do you sincerely think that John Atkinson stereophile editor would *publicly* invite a paranoid, a pedophile (eh Phillips ?)... to an audio show ? Lionel's parasitic defense, and how pathetically predictable it is, of Krueger's lengthy campaign of smearing RAO posters (one of the things that flamer Lionel admires about Krueger) is about as lacking in logic as most of what he writes. Since Krueger's paranoid claims *are* oftren about Atkinson and his allleged cliques and conspiracies (via his magazine) to attack his "scientific" bloviations on RAO, I think it's fair to assume that Mr. Atkinson intends to hold Krueger accountable at the Home Entertainment Show for the various accusations (paranoid in tone) that Krueger has leveled against him and Stereophile. It is one thing for Krueger to make all sorts of accusations on RAO. It will be quite another for him to have to attend them in person, in a public forum, with Mr. Atkinson present. As usual, Lionel, just doesn't understand that people like him and his sockpuppet buddy can't stand the light of public, in person, debate. That's why they are confined to RAO, where their flames don't impress anybody. Not just invited, but with transportation and lodging provided. This must really stick in the craws of wannabes like Porky Phillips and groupies like BJ, "George M. Middius" and the Boston Snake. Only in Lionel's delusion-riddled imagination. I seriously doubt that any of the people he mentioned would have been interestred in this offer., Of course, for Lionel, a Krueger groupie and tool, along with his sockpuppet buddy, fantasies have to take th place of reality, since they can only make things up ad nauseam. Yes a real full invitation... Can you explain them in a good english that Mr John Atkinson as accepted to compromise himself with a well-known pedophile... LOL, I will not be surprised that Porky will be missing for a while... :-D Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) The most funny is "Doctor" Bruce Richman's deroute, for him this is obviously a professional desavowal... Considering his advanced senility I am sure that ridicule will not kill him. ;-) Lionel's apparent delusional rage has once again interfered with his ability be even remotely coherent. It's clear that this fool doesn't even know what senility is, although his memory problems about Krueger and his sockpuppet ally's history of RAO smear campaigns, certainlyu suggests he has a lot of brain demage. How else to explain this French idiot's failure to remember numerous facts backed by evidence. Instead, all he seems to come up with is a series of lies and delusional fabrications about all the folks on RAO that have exposed his parasitic alliance with Krueger, his sockpuppet tool, and of course, his endless stupidity. As far as presentations at conventions go, however, I've had the opportunity to present a research paper at a convention of the American Psychological Associaton in New York City. The paper I I presented formed the basis of an article that was later publised in the Journal of Coinsulting and Clinical Psychology, a peer-reviewed. journal. No doubt, the brain-damaged senility expert, Lionel, can give us some examples of his scholarly writings on sewers and their contents. Or perhaps he can explain why he tries to make RAO a virtual sewer for his debris? Sackman-the-boor also doesn't seem to understand what's happening. ) Bruce J. Richman |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-)
I wrote: Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) Stupid, fat and ugly groaned: For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this conclusion. That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your old posts to get a klew. ;-) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
Arny said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Richard Malesweski said: Porky Phillips wrote: Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and you're wondering where I've been? LOL! Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this ****ing stupid. Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail, it is you who are the stupid one. Come back when you learn how to read properly. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Richard Malesweski said: Porky Phillips wrote: Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and you're wondering where I've been? LOL! Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this ****ing stupid. Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail, it is you who are the stupid one. Come back when you learn how to read properly. "According to google you've been in jail" |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Malesweski said:
Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-) I wrote: Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) Stupid, fat and ugly groaned: For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this conclusion. That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your old posts to get a klew. ;-) What a huge copout. The truth, Internet geek, is that none of us are having the response that you so desperately need us to have. I suppose all these years of defending pedophiles has warped your intelligence more than you thought. Boon |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Arny said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Richard Malesweski said: Porky Phillips wrote: Yeah. Here's some for you, Internet geek. Boon What a day! This morning, I stepped on a slug in my greenhouse....what a mess. Anyway, that got me to wondering where you've been. And, this afternoon, what do I find but a post from the RAO slug-of-slugs, the one and only Porky Phillips. ;-) You're the one who slinks off for months at a time, utterly defeated...and you're wondering where I've been? LOL! Phillips no matter how you posture, lengthy unexplained absences are part of your MO. According to google you've been in jail or some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to today, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this ****ing stupid. Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail, it is you who are the stupid one. Come back when you learn how to read properly. Hmmm. Up above, you said "according to google you've been in jail." Are you quibbling over the capitalization, you incredible moron? Boon |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Apparently, the idiot, Lionel, doesn't know the difference between "insanity" and being despised by large group of people on RAO. Few weeks ago I have given you the possibility to explain your repeated misuse of the term "insane" (7 years of Google archives available)... No answer ! :-) As usual, he likes to toss around terminology he can't even define, let alone use appropriately. This comes as no surprise, of course. LOL ! Lionel's parasitic defense, and how pathetically predictable it is, of Krueger's lengthy campaign of smearing RAO posters (one of the things that flamer Lionel admires about Krueger) is about as lacking in logic as most of what he writes. Since Krueger's paranoid claims *are* oftren about Atkinson and his allleged cliques and conspiracies (via his magazine) to attack his "scientific" bloviations on RAO, I think it's fair to assume that Mr. Atkinson intends to hold Krueger accountable at the Home Entertainment Show for the various accusations (paranoid in tone) Why do you *suddenly* feel obliged to add "in tone". Usually you don't take so much precautions... (7 years of Google archives available) that Krueger has leveled against him and Stereophile. It is one thing for Krueger to make all sorts of accusations on RAO. It will be quite another for him to have to attend them in person, in a public forum, with Mr. Atkinson present. I'm afraid that you don't understand Mr. Atkinson's goal. From you to me I find that your above explanations of Mr. Atkinson's motivations insulting for him and for the audio lovers who are interested in their debate. Such petty and miserable considerations surely explain why I meet you so often in my sewers. LOL!!!. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips a écrit :
Boy, are you desperate for attention. Perhaps but I still haven't written the 1000 of messages you have written about Krueger's alleged pedophilia... (Google archives available) Who is desperate for attention ? Eh Mr Phillips ? ;-) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Phillips a écrit :
I suppose all these years of defending pedophiles has warped your intelligence more than you thought. Unfortunatly for your I suspect the same effect on the accusers' intelligence. ;-) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
George M. Middius wrote:
Did Thing really say that? Sounds like he thinks Krooger should be honored by the invitation. That would be similar to saying the missionary is the guest of honor at a cannibals' feast. ;-) "Cannibal" ? LOL, I'm sure Mr Atkinson will appreciate the comparison ! ---------- Sent via SPRACI - http://www.spraci.com/ - Parties,Raves,Clubs,Festivals |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"George M. Middius" wrote in message
news Calling Thing! Calling Oobie the Boobie! Calling duh-Mikey and Slut! Earlier today, Arny Krueber said this: According to google you've been in jail or some other place without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. Prior to oday, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. That was in message . Right, and once I corrected the bogus quoting, my statement stands as written. Or perhaps Middius, you are unaware of the meaning of the word "or"? Here is some helpful information: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...a=or&x=11&y=10 Main Entry: 1or Pronunciation: &r, 'or, Southern also 'är Function: conjunction Etymology: Middle English, alter. of other, alteration of Old English oththe; akin to Old High German eddo or 1 -- used as a function word to indicate an alternative coffee or tea sink or swim, the equivalent or substitutive character of two words or phrases lessen or abate, or approximation or uncertainty in five or six days 2 archaic : EITHER 3 archaic : WHETHER 4 -- used in logic as a sentential connective that forms a complex sentence which is true when at least one of its constituent sentences is true; compare DISJUNCTION Marc said: According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this ****ing stupid. Now Arny tries to Marc Phillips' broken record straight: Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in jail, Somebody needs to push the Krooborg's reset button. The "debating trade" is even more fecal than usual. ;-) Fecal obsession and creative editing noted. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
Richard Malesweski said: Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-) I wrote: Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) It's an interesting twist of fate how Atkinson has set up the *Normals* to take a fall. Stupid, fat and ugly groaned: For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this conclusion. Well Marc, inability to reach a logical conclusion like this is completely in character for a bozo like you who just showed that he doesn't know the meaning of the word "or". That's because you are S-T-U-P-I-D, Porky One. Go Google some of your old posts to get a klew. ;-) Yup, it seems like the *Normals* live on a steady diet of stupid pills. This conclusion is inescapable to anybody who has watched their antics here over the past several years. For example, we've got Richman who can't tell the difference between six years or seven years, Marc Phillips and Middius who don't understand the meaning of the word *or*, and Art Sackman whose idea of a cogent post is to repost the post he's replying to three times in a row, completely unaltered. What a huge copout. The truth, Internet geek, is that none of us are having the response that you so desperately need us to have. I dunno, Phillips tricking you into exposing your manifold stupidity seems like a worthwhile response for us to elicit from you. I suppose all these years of defending pedophiles has warped your intelligence more than you thought. It's true Phililips that dealing with your mindless numbing stupididity has not left us unphased. However, given how polluted and senseless most of your posts are, we're doing pretty good,. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... : "George M. Middius" wrote in message : news : Calling Thing! Calling Oobie the Boobie! Calling duh-Mikey and Slut! : : Earlier today, Arny Krueber said this: : According to google you've been in jail or some other place : without internet service for inmates, for the past two weeks. : Prior to oday, you made your last post on 1/11/2005. : : That was in message . : : Right, and once I corrected the bogus quoting, my statement stands as : written. : : Or perhaps Middius, you are unaware of the meaning of the word "or"? : : Here is some helpful information: : : http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...a=or&x=11&y=10 : : Main Entry: 1or : Pronunciation: &r, 'or, Southern also 'är : Function: conjunction : Etymology: Middle English, alter. of other, alteration of Old English : oththe; akin to Old High German eddo or : 1 -- used as a function word to indicate an alternative coffee or : tea sink or swim, the equivalent or substitutive character of two words : or phrases lessen or abate, or approximation or uncertainty in five or : six days : 2 archaic : EITHER : 3 archaic : WHETHER : 4 -- used in logic as a sentential connective that forms a complex : sentence which is true when at least one of its constituent sentences is : true; compare DISJUNCTION : : Marc said: : According to Google, I've been in jail? You really can't be this : ****ing stupid. : : Now Arny tries to Marc Phillips' broken record straight: : : Phillips since I never said that according to Google you've been in : jail, : : Somebody needs to push the Krooborg's reset button. The "debating : trade" is even more fecal than usual. ;-) : : Fecal obsession and creative editing noted. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Here's some helpful information, part 2, Krueger: if clause 1 of your OR statement is false, you therefore claim this to be true: "some other place without internet service for inmates" care to show the "Google evidence" , mate ? Rudy |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Or perhaps Middius, you are unaware of the meaning of the word "or"? Arny, you have been ****ing little kiddie boys in the ass again, or you have been locked up in some place without internet service for inmates. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Arny Krueger wrote: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Richard Malesweski said: Is the Porkster really this stupid?? ;-) I wrote: Yes, this is the conundrum for "George M. Middius", Marc "Porky" Phillips, et al: either John Atkinson thinks Arny Krueger is neither insane nor a pedophile *or* John Atkinson is supporting a known pedophile and giving him a public platform on which to perform, as well as the means to arrive at that platform. Sounds like "Hobson's Choice" for the Middius Clique! :-)) It's an interesting twist of fate how Atkinson has set up the *Normals* to take a fall. Yep, the "Normals" can have it one way, or they can have it the other way. This is the funniest thing on RAO since Singh jumped off the lap of "George M. Middius" and started nipping at his ankles. That was followed, of course, by "George" accusing Singh of having sexual relations with his mother. That was fun to watch. Stupid, fat and ugly groaned: For the life of me I can't understand why you'd come to this conclusion. Well Marc, inability to reach a logical conclusion like this is completely in character for a bozo like you who just showed that he doesn't know the meaning of the word "or". Even Porky can't be *this* stupid.....I think he's just in denial. ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kwestion for the Krooborg (redux) | Audio Opinions | |||
Kwestion for the Krooborg | Audio Opinions | |||
Kwestion for Arnii Krooborg. | Audio Opinions | |||
Another Kwestion for Arnii Krooborg. | Audio Opinions | |||
Kwestion for the Krooborg | Audio Opinions |