Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
"Peter Sammon" wrote in message ... Peter Sammon wrote in : In response to the many supportive emails: http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Do feel free to add comments at the bottom. Constructive criticism or support is greatly appreciated! I read it. It's spin control, nothing more. Bose products are, IMHO, inferior trash. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
"Robert Morein" wrote in message ... Bose products are, IMHO, inferior trash. Right, eggshells, corncobs, steakbones, and banana skins are much better trash. ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:05:24 -0000, Peter Sammon
wrote: Peter Sammon wrote in : In response to the many supportive emails: http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Do feel free to add comments at the bottom. Constructive criticism or support is greatly appreciated! What do you have against the Sammon guy anyway? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
"Rich Andrews" wrote in message .44... "Robert Morein" wrote in news:wsqdndBzga97_ : "Peter Sammon" wrote in message ... Peter Sammon wrote in : In response to the many supportive emails: http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Do feel free to add comments at the bottom. Constructive criticism or support is greatly appreciated! I read it. It's spin control, nothing more. Bose products are, IMHO, inferior trash. No one that I know of likes being lied to and Bose lied to everyone. It is just that simple. Yes, and they trade on the name, and they play the IP game. Even if some of their speakers are in the average pack, I would choose a company with some semblance of ethics. And their cabinetry is in general shoddy. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:05:24 -0000, Peter Sammon wrote: Peter Sammon wrote in : In response to the many supportive emails: http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Do feel free to add comments at the bottom. Constructive criticism or support is greatly appreciated! What do you have against the Sammon guy anyway? Nothing. He's an unwitting dupe of the Bose conspiracy. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
Peter Sammon wrote:
In response to the many supportive emails: http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Interesting reading. If someone likes the sound of Bose speakers and are willing to buy them, fine. It's their money. But, I am sure that they really didn't shop around much. Didn't hear other speakers in the price range that sound "better". Bose is a marketing empire. And, along with $10k cables, marketing sells. The list of speakers that will perform better are too long to put here. Especially at the $1.5k price of 901's. And, if you looked into the used market of speakers, the list of better performing speakers increases. People that buy bose do not shop outside of Sears. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
In response to the many supportive emails:
http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Do feel free to add comments at the bottom. Constructive criticism or support is greatly appreciated! Your use of the word "pursuit" in your article is incorrect. It should have been "pursue". ; ) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The Art Of Bose Bashing And Amar's Supposed Descent Into Mediocrity
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:53:10 -0500, "Robert Morein"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:05:24 -0000, Peter Sammon wrote: Peter Sammon wrote in : In response to the many supportive emails: http://www.epinions.com/content_3766788228 Thanks for reading and I hope you enjoyed it! Do feel free to add comments at the bottom. Constructive criticism or support is greatly appreciated! What do you have against the Sammon guy anyway? Nothing. He's an unwitting dupe of the Bose conspiracy. No Bob, I don't think you understand. I personally don't find identity theft particularly savory... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Sammon" wrote in message ... http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 I guess from the beginning of time itself generalizations, theories, cleverness and sarcasm seem to be the proud trademarks of the lowly common Bose (speaker enthusiast). Edited to fit your Monitor |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Sammon" wrote in message
http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:12:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. Ummmm Arnold, "this guy" is the the guy that you're replying to. Just thought you should know. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. That was just 'horrible' sentence structure. I think that you 'clearly obfuscated' (that's a nice oxymoron!) your intended message. Did you mean to say, " Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than WITH anybody who is technically competent."? or, "Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent shares belrifs in common with this guy."?. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"dave weil" wrote in message
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:12:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. Ummmm Arnold, "this guy" is the the guy that you're replying to. Just thought you should know. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. That was just 'horrible' sentence structure. I think that you 'clearly obfuscated' (that's a nice oxymoron!) your intended message. Did you mean to say, " Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than WITH anybody who is technically competent."? or, "Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent shares belrifs in common with this guy."?. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Arny Krueger"
Date: 8/22/2004 11:04 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. That was just 'horrible' sentence structure. I think that you 'clearly obfuscated' (that's a nice oxymoron!) your intended message. Did you mean to say, " Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than WITH anybody who is technically competent."? or, "Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent shares belrifs in common with this guy."?. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Mr. Wheeler wrote:
From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/22/2004 11:04 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. That was just 'horrible' sentence structure. I think that you 'clearly obfuscated' (that's a nice oxymoron!) your intended message. Did you mean to say, " Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than WITH anybody who is technically competent."? or, "Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent shares belrifs in common with this guy."?. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Bruce J. Richman |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:04:02 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:12:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. Ummmm Arnold, "this guy" is the the guy that you're replying to. Just thought you should know. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. No, it's not nit-picking. I didn't dog you about it, just wanted you to know that the author of the post was also the author of the quoted material. If you're so sensitive that you see it as hectoring, well then, you've got more problems than just me. Now, if you *want* me to hector about this, just let me know and I can comply. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Wheeler wrote:
From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? For Krueger's parasitic sycophant, ignorance is bliss. Bruce J. Richman |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
S888Wheel a écrit :
From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? My english isn't very good but you didn't get mine too. Definately. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Scott Wheeler wrote: From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? For Krueger's parasitic sycophant, ignorance is bliss. Still deaf Doctor ? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) that figures!!! The language of Lionel speaking warrants skills listening of Krooglish logic!!! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Scott Wheeler wrote: From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? For Krueger's parasitic sycophant, ignorance is bliss. Brtter stated as: The ignorance that is his bliss is of the sycophant being parasitic of Krueger.. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"dave weil" wrote in message
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:04:02 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:12:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. Ummmm Arnold, "this guy" is the the guy that you're replying to. Just thought you should know. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. No, it's not nit-picking. Of course not, observing the obvious and pretending that I didn't know it isn't hectoring. It's just Dave Weil showing that he thinks that comprehending the obvious is remarkable. I agree. I didn't dog you about it, just wanted you to know that the author of the post was also the author of the quoted material. Weil, why do I need you to tell me something that painfully obvious? If you're so sensitive that you see it as hectoring, well then, you've got more problems than just me. Oh, the punch line! Now, if you *want* me to hector about this, just let me know and I can comply. Weil, you obviously lack the required self-awareness to see yourself as you appear to others. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. That was just 'horrible' sentence structure. I think that you 'clearly obfuscated' (that's a nice oxymoron!) your intended message. Did you mean to say, " Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than WITH anybody who is technically competent."? or, "Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent shares belrifs in common with this guy."?. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. Yes, any attempt to figure out the meaning of your ramblings IS nit picking, if not lint picking, apologies to my friend, Howard. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
From: Lionel ahc
Date: 8/22/2004 1:40 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: S888Wheel a écrit : From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? My english isn't very good but you didn't get mine too. Definately. OK, you didn't get the joke. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Mr. Slick wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Scott Wheeler wrote: From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? For Krueger's parasitic sycophant, ignorance is bliss. Brtter stated as: The ignorance that is his bliss is of the sycophant being parasitic of Krueger.. Evidence he provides on a daily basis of this. Words truer were spoken never. Could Frooglish be the dialect it is? Bruce J. Richman |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Seminar in advanced Krooglish.
From: (Bruce J. Richman) Date: 8/22/2004 1:34 PM Central Daylight Time Message-id: Mr. Wheeler wrote: From: "Arny Krueger" Date: 8/22/2004 11:04 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Peter Sammon" wrote in message http://www.epinions.com/content_3779895428 snip Bruce J. Richman, Renowned Asshole Shame of his Family Life-long Failure and Fraud All-around Putz ;-) |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
S888Wheel a écrit :
From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 1:40 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: S888Wheel a écrit : From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? My english isn't very good but you didn't get mine too. Definately. OK, you didn't get the joke. OK, you didn't get the joke. :-) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) that figures!!! The language of Lionel speaking warrants skills listening of Krooglish logic!!! Three attempts for one successful post ! You are what one calls an onanist writer. :-) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Evidence he provides on a daily basis of this. Words truer were spoken never. Could Frooglish be the dialect it is? Our good doctor, eminent *psychologist*, who use to do free *slandering* diagnostics on a *public* NG is also a linguist. Too bad he has done the choice of deafness. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
From: Lionel ahc
Date: 8/22/2004 10:23 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: S888Wheel a écrit : From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 1:40 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: S888Wheel a écrit : From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/22/2004 11:55 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Mr. Wheeler wrote: Are you sure? Are you positive? Definately? Maybe he can get "Lionel" to help him with his language skills. Oh, the Relic feels teasing on today. Note that concerning the language skills I am more confident in Krueger than in Wheeler... *Definately*... ) Dog piling on poor Arny? Or did you not get the joke? My english isn't very good but you didn't get mine too. Definately. OK, you didn't get the joke. OK, you didn't get the joke. :-) It was my joke. Now it's on you as well as Krueger. Thanks for playing. Get back to me when you figure it out. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
S888Wheel a écrit :
It was my joke. Now it's on you as well as Krueger. Thanks for playing. Get back to me when you figure it out. You should find a little time to learn how to lose with dignity. :-) |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
S888Wheel a écrit :
From: Lionel ahc Date: 8/23/2004 9:53 AM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: S888Wheel a écrit : It was my joke. Now it's on you as well as Krueger. Thanks for playing. Get back to me when you figure it out. You should find a little time to learn how to lose with dignity. :-) You should learn to follow directions. Get back to me when you figured out why the joke is now on you. Since the time that the joke is on *you*. I will do like you... and try to forget. :-D |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "dave weil" wrote in message On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 14:04:02 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:12:29 -0400, "Arny Krueger" wrote: Many of the self-inflating RAO regulars actually share more beliefs in common with this guy, than anybody who is technically competent. Ummmm Arnold, "this guy" is the the guy that you're replying to. Just thought you should know. BTW, this nit-picking post is most definately not an example of the dreaded "Hectoring" that Weil is so concerned about. No, it's not nit-picking. Of course not, observing the obvious and pretending that I didn't know it isn't hectoring. It's just Dave Weil showing that he thinks that comprehending the obvious is remarkable. I agree. I didn't dog you about it, just wanted you to know that the author of the post was also the author of the quoted material. Weil, why do I need you to tell me something that painfully obvious? Perhaps it has something to do with your child pornography debacle. Cheers, Margaret |