Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#521
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. he doesn't post anything here, i don't see him chiming in with vapid sugarcoated meaningless praise. Most people don't see me doing that either. Exactly what have I said about those players that you don't think I believe? |
#522
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 5, 2:39*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 5, 2:20*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 4, 10:05*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 7:47*pm, Jenn wrote: In article om, *ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 4:40*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Witlessmongrel Jr. yapped: My comment is that you and Dickie labeling Jenn a "sycophant" was irrational and not supported by any real evidence. (I do make allowances for the warpage of reality that occurs when you get tanked.) Like I said, you commented on it. It doesn't exist. Is that a "comment", or do you want to sober up? *Why are you and Jenn so into denying your own words? ScottW I'm not denying my words. *Not even close. *This is the kind of stuff that spirals the argument. You did exactly that with your blame the victim comments on Mary Jo and you denied them to Art in this thread. False. *I neither blamed Mary Jo for anything other than lack of good judgement if TK was drinking and she got in the car with him. Mary Jo was the victim. Yes, she was. You blame her. No, I don't. *You agreed when Shhtard called her practically a "co-conspirator". No, I didn't. I'll let you decide if you want to review that thread and see if you did or didn't do that. I think you did. Well, thanks for letting me decide, but no; I would never agree with that statement. *I said that she showed lack of good judgement and carries some responsibility for her fate, *So she gets some of the blame. Blame? *No, I wouldn't say it that way. *The accident wasn't her fault. * I never said that it was. What is the difference between "some responsibility for her fate" and "some of the blame"? Debate trade semantic argument. Yes or no: By willing getting in the car with a drunk driver, a person shares some responsibility for his or her fate? if TK was drunk and she got in the car with him knowing that. *I surprised that you would disagree with that. *Wasn't Kennedy her boss? I don't know. *But how would that matter? *If my boss is drunk, I wouldn't get in a car with her. Just acknowledging the position of authority he holds which diminishes somewhat her ability to freely deny him. Don't you have to attend sexual harrassment training? We have to recertify every year or so. I just checked: she didn't work for TK. **I denied "them" what to Art? them words. Because as you did above, he twisted the meaning of what I said. *Maybe you didn't mean what you said. *I'm ok with that too. I meant what I said. and therein lies the trouble. Not at all. |
#523
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 9:25*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 3:39*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. I will wait for him to post it. he doesn't post a bunch of oooh's and aah's about his buddies, YOU DO! He certainly does. refer me to his posts here. Good debate trade noted. *The issue is how to musicians generally speak about each other in public. *You don't hear Clapton or others rating the comparative skills of other musicians. That's fine, all it means is that your comments about other musicians are worthless garbage.. If I want to get good analytical information, I will have to get it from a music critic, not from a musician who won't speak her mind. |
#524
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:25*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 3:39*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article om, *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article oups .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. I will wait for him to post it. he doesn't post a bunch of oooh's and aah's about his buddies, YOU DO! He certainly does. refer me to his posts here. Good debate trade noted. *The issue is how to musicians generally speak about each other in public. *You don't hear Clapton or others rating the comparative skills of other musicians. That's fine, all it means is that your comments about other musicians are worthless garbage.. If I want to get good analytical information, I will have to get it from a music critic, not from a musician who won't speak her mind. I spoke my mind: I like the playing of those individuals. |
#525
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 9:46*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:52*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. Correction: *As I said, I won't be posting any more music here. LOL!!! not only will you not give us honest commentary about these performances, you won't even post any more links because you don't want to see anyone else say anything the least bit derogatory about your friends. What a thin skinned ******* you are!!!!! Don't forget; I'm also a witch. Clyde, when are you going to get off your high horse and just accept what I've said as the truth? You have said is that you refuse to offer critical comments about other musicians, therefore, any comments that yo do offer are grossly tainted. *I'm not going to rank those players, neither my friends nor those I don't know, like some entrants in a pig race at the county fair because, 1. It's not considered professional behavior in my business. *Perhaps that's not true in your business, but it's true in mine. *Additionally, I don't find a lot to be "derogatory" about concerning the performances that I posted. *That's why I posted them. Fine, then when you tell us how great each of them are, without any word of critical analysis and no chance of anything of the slightest negative implication to be said, the opinions youare giving us are worthless. That I'm not inclined to post more links has nothing to do with what you or anyone else might say about them. *Your opinions are your own, and you are welcome to them. *That's one of the cool things about art. You're embarrassing yourself. *You should follow James' lead and drop it. |
#526
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 10:38*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:25*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 3:39*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article om, *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article oups .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. I will wait for him to post it. he doesn't post a bunch of oooh's and aah's about his buddies, YOU DO! He certainly does. refer me to his posts here. Good debate trade noted. *The issue is how to musicians generally speak about each other in public. *You don't hear Clapton or others rating the comparative skills of other musicians. That's fine, all it means is that your comments about other musicians are worthless garbage.. If I want to get good analytical *information, I will have to get it from a music critic, not from a musician who won't speak her mind. I spoke my mind: *I like the playing of those individuals. And if you liked any one better than any other, you would just not tell us!!!! |
#527
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 9:47*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. he doesn't post anything here, i don't see him chiming in with vapid sugarcoated meaningless praise. Most people don't see me doing that either. *Exactly what have I said about those players that you don't think I believe? LOL!!!!! I don't know, because there are things you have not told us. THAT IS THE POINT!!!!!!!! You have told us that if there were the least bit negative things, that you would not tell us!!!! IF you would tell us such things, you would have no problem doing a comparative anlysis and ranking! |
#528
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:46*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:52*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article . com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article oups .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. Correction: *As I said, I won't be posting any more music here. LOL!!! not only will you not give us honest commentary about these performances, you won't even post any more links because you don't want to see anyone else say anything the least bit derogatory about your friends. What a thin skinned ******* you are!!!!! Don't forget; I'm also a witch. Clyde, when are you going to get off your high horse and just accept what I've said as the truth? You have said is that you refuse to offer critical comments about other musicians, therefore, any comments that yo do offer are grossly tainted. *I'm not going to rank those players, neither my friends nor those I don't know, like some entrants in a pig race at the county fair because, 1. It's not considered professional behavior in my business. *Perhaps that's not true in your business, but it's true in mine. *Additionally, I don't find a lot to be "derogatory" about concerning the performances that I posted. *That's why I posted them. Fine, then when you tell us how great each of them are, without any word of critical analysis and no chance of anything of the slightest negative implication to be said, the opinions youare giving us are worthless. THEN IGNORE THEM! I love the playing of all of them. If they were all doing concerts the same night in the same town, I would be torn to make a decision on which one to hear. If I were to be critical about the performances I posted, it would read like, "I think that the tone in measure 32 would be better if he changed his left hand position so his forth finger would have more strength." Is that the kind of nerdy stuff you want to read? In truth, I have precious like stuff like that to say, since these guys are WAY better guitarists than I, so they have pretty much figured out would I would have to say. That I'm not inclined to post more links has nothing to do with what you or anyone else might say about them. *Your opinions are your own, and you are welcome to them. *That's one of the cool things about art. You're embarrassing yourself. *You should follow James' lead and drop it. You're the one that is embarrassed. I have stripped the empress of her robes. Your opinion, an opinion that is admittedly devoid of any negative implications devoid of critical anlyisi, is not worth anything at all. THEN IGNORE THEM. I post videos to provide some entertainment. If you don't want to partake, FINE. You can't explain how an opinion that admittedly would hide anything in the negative would be a worthwhile opinion. Yet again: I would only post music that I think is really good. Why would I do otherwise? Basically you are telling us that there is nothing the least bit negative to say about any of those players, but even if there were, I wouldn't tell you anyway!!!!!! I'm telling you that I believe they are all really good. |
#529
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:47*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. he doesn't post anything here, i don't see him chiming in with vapid sugarcoated meaningless praise. Most people don't see me doing that either. *Exactly what have I said about those players that you don't think I believe? LOL!!!!! I don't know, because there are things you have not told us. THAT IS THE POINT!!!!!!!! THen it's a stupid point. You define me saying that someone or some performance is good as "fawning". Well goody for you. I envision a conversation between you and a friend about a restaurant you visited: You: I went to The Place and I loved the meal. Friend: What did you like about it? You: Everything: the food, the ambiance, the location, and the price. Well, one thing though: there was dust on the papertowel dispenser. Also, they used dishes that weren't my favorite color. |
#530
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 10:38*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:25*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 3:39*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article om, *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article ps.c om, *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article legr oups .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. I will wait for him to post it. he doesn't post a bunch of oooh's and aah's about his buddies, YOU DO! He certainly does. refer me to his posts here. Good debate trade noted. *The issue is how to musicians generally speak about each other in public. *You don't hear Clapton or others rating the comparative skills of other musicians. That's fine, all it means is that your comments about other musicians are worthless garbage.. If I want to get good analytical *information, I will have to get it from a music critic, not from a musician who won't speak her mind. I spoke my mind: *I like the playing of those individuals. And if you liked any one better than any other, you would just not tell us!!!! At that level, I don't think in those terms. One night I might put on an LJ recording; another night a TE recording. Either decision has nothing to do with who I think is "better". |
#531
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 11:21*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:46*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:52*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article . com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article oups .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. Correction: *As I said, I won't be posting any more music here. LOL!!! not only will you not give us honest commentary about these performances, you won't even post any more links because you don't want to see anyone else say anything the least bit derogatory about your friends. What a thin skinned ******* you are!!!!! Don't forget; I'm also a witch. Clyde, when are you going to get off your high horse and just accept what I've said as the truth? You have said is that you refuse to offer critical comments about other musicians, therefore, any comments that yo do offer are grossly tainted. *I'm not going to rank those players, neither my friends nor those I don't know, like some entrants in a pig race at the county fair because, 1. It's not considered professional behavior in my business. *Perhaps that's not true in your business, but it's true in mine. *Additionally, I don't find a lot to be "derogatory" about concerning the performances that I posted. *That's why I posted them. Fine, then when you tell us how great each of them are, without any word of critical analysis and no chance of anything of the slightest negative implication to be said, the opinions youare giving us are worthless. THEN IGNORE THEM! *I love the playing of all of them. *If they were all doing concerts the same night in the same town, I would be torn to make a decision on which one to hear. *If I were to be critical about the performances I posted, it would read like, "I think that the tone in measure 32 would be better if he changed his left hand position so his forth finger would have more strength." *Is that the kind of nerdy stuff you want to read? *In truth, I have precious like stuff like that to say, since these guys are WAY better guitarists than I, so they have pretty much figured out would I would have to say. That I'm not inclined to post more links has nothing to do with what you or anyone else might say about them. *Your opinions are your own, and you are welcome to them. *That's one of the cool things about art. You're embarrassing yourself. *You should follow James' lead and drop it. You're the one that is embarrassed. I have stripped the empress of her robes. Your opinion, an opinion that is admittedly devoid of any negative implications devoid of critical anlyisi, is not worth anything at all. THEN IGNORE THEM. *I post videos to provide some entertainment. *If you don't want to partake, FINE. I liistned to them, and i found qualitative variations. You can't explain how an opinion that admittedly would hide anything in the negative would be a worthwhile opinion. Yet again: *I would only post music that I think is really good. *Why would I do otherwise? The you don't post any excellent music? only music that is very good? and not any music that is quite good, only music that is very good? Basically you are telling us that there is nothing the least bit negative to say about any of those players, but even if there were, I wouldn't tell you anyway!!!!!! I'm telling you that I believe they are all really good. but are you telling me that they are all equally good. I listened to them, and I found profound differences, some of those differences made some of them better than some of the others. |
#532
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 11:28*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:47*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. False. *I think the motive for holding her toungue is slightly different than job opportunity though they may toss her a bone from time to time. I think it two fold - Public criticism from Jenn as a professional would be in somewhat bad form as these folks talent as guitarists are on a plane she can only aspire to. *She's not really in a position to criticize and accepting that is more a credit to her than a criticism. Then no guitar player can say anything critical of any guitar player on a higher plane, that is ridiculous. Have you ever read or heard Clapton critiquing another player? He doesn't post a bunch of oohs and aaahs about his buddied. Sure he does. *He speaks highly of several players quite often. *Read his book. he doesn't post anything here, i don't see him chiming in with vapid sugarcoated meaningless praise. Most people don't see me doing that either. *Exactly what have I said about those players that you don't think I believe? LOL!!!!! I don't know, because there are things you have not told us. THAT IS THE POINT!!!!!!!! THen it's a stupid point. *You define me saying that someone or some performance is good as "fawning". *Well goody for you. *I envision a conversation between you and a friend about a restaurant you visited: You: *I went to The Place and I loved the meal. Friend: *What did you like about it? You: *Everything: *the food, the ambiance, the location, and the price. Well, one thing though: *there was dust on the papertowel dispenser. * Also, they used dishes that weren't my favorite color. you envision wrong. Although the meal was very good, the peas were not as fresh as they should be \and the steak was a little gristly, It was also over seasoned and a little too salty for my taste. The browniw subae I had for desert was perfection. Last week I went to a competitor/s similar restaurant, serving a similar menu and of a similar quality level. the steak was tender, and it was seasoned just right, but it was serve a little cold. the vegetables were fresh, but a little over cooked for my taste. the sesert was just as good as in the other reatuarant, but it was a smaller serving. I think both restaurants were very good overall, but I preferred the second, |
#533
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 11:30*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 10:38*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 9:25*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 3:39*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 11:48*am, Jenn wrote: In article om, *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 1:13*am, Jenn wrote: In article ps.c om, *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 10:49*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 3, 9:21*pm, Jenn wrote: In article legr oups .com , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. |
#534
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 4, 10:43*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:18*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 3, 9:58*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:48*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Now I suppose you'll call me a "fawning sycophant". LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are afraid to state your opinions of those players, that is your cowardice. It has nothing to do with whether or not you know those people. So if I don't offer an opinion on dish detergent is best when you demand one, the fact that I choose to say "**** off" shows cowardice on my part? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is among the dumbest things I've ever heard. LOl!!!! That is one of the dumbest things I never said!!! Oh, but that's *exactly* what you're doing. You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#535
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 4, 10:50*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:22*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 12:43*am, Clyde Slick wrote: FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people, Why not? And why don't you jump on 2pid for "giving us" his massively stupid political opinions? Jenn's opinions are at least audio-related. 2pid's aren't. **** off, drunk. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jenn's opinions about her acquaintances are totally worthless, Are they? What kind of box do you have? she admits she can't tell us what she really thinks *about them. No, she clearly states that she doesn't have to based upon your stupid demands. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She should just keep them to herself, it'will make her look better than giving us sugar coated goo goos. To you, and who really cares about you? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I tought I could help Jenn, I have been trying to help Scott with his image also, but I have mostly given up. While I tought I taw a puddy tat. And while 2pid remains an imbecile. |
#536
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 4, 10:51*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 4, 11:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote: *Don't get carried away. *They are your friends and colleagues so your opinion is of course, biased. *No big deal. Just acknowledge it and then put it out there for what it's worth. I'd like your opinion on why Clyde drinks too much. For what it's worth. its the typo of person i aqm I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#537
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 4, 11:34*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Oct 4, 8:50*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: I tought I could help Jenn, I have been trying to help Scott with his image also, but I have mostly given up. *That's good. *You were screwing up my "image". *LoL. Your image as an imbecile is secure. LoL. |
#538
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 2:57*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 4, 10:43*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:18*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 3, 9:58*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:48*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Now I suppose you'll call me a "fawning sycophant". LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are afraid to state your opinions of those players, that is your cowardice. It has nothing to do with whether or not you know those people. So if I don't offer an opinion on dish detergent is best when you demand one, the fact that I choose to say "**** off" shows cowardice on my part? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is among the dumbest things I've ever heard. LOl!!!! That is one of the dumbest things I never said!!! Oh, but that's *exactly* what you're doing. You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. |
#539
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 3:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: Are they? What kind of box do you have? certainly not the kind she has! she admits she can't tell us what she really thinks *about them. No, she clearly states that she doesn't have to based upon your stupid demands. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sure, she doesn't have to. never said she did. but her refusal shows us that she is unwilling to provide any meaningful analysis, just sugar coating She should just keep them to herself, it'will make her look better than giving us sugar coated goo goos. To you, and who really cares about you? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I tought I could help Jenn, I have been trying to help Scott with his image also, but I have mostly given up. While I tought I taw a puddy tat. And while 2pid remains an imbecile. |
#540
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 3:01*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 4, 10:51*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote: *Don't get carried away. *They are your friends and colleagues so your opinion is of course, biased. *No big deal. Just acknowledge it and then put it out there for what it's worth. I'd like your opinion on why Clyde drinks too much. For what it's worth. its the typo of person i aqm I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good for you!!! |
#541
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 10:43*am, ScottW2 wrote:
*Did you click your heels as you typed that? No, silly. It's DOROTHY who clicks her heels, not the witch. |
#542
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 8:18*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 2:57*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:43*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:18*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 3, 9:58*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:48*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Now I suppose you'll call me a "fawning sycophant". LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are afraid to state your opinions of those players, that is your cowardice. It has nothing to do with whether or not you know those people. So if I don't offer an opinion on dish detergent is best when you demand one, the fact that I choose to say "**** off" shows cowardice on my part? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is among the dumbest things I've ever heard. LOl!!!! That is one of the dumbest things I never said!!! Oh, but that's *exactly* what you're doing. You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. Really? I think it shows that I am totally uninterested in the question you DEMAND an answer to. YMMIV LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#543
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 3:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Are they? What kind of box do you have? certainly not the kind she has! Again with the pussy "jokes". Grow the **** up, nimrod. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! she admits she can't tell us what she really thinks *about them. No, she clearly states that she doesn't have to based upon your stupid demands. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sure, she doesn't have to. End of subject. Thanks for playing. |
#544
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 3:01*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:51*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote: *Don't get carried away. *They are your friends and colleagues so your opinion is of course, biased. *No big deal. Just acknowledge it and then put it out there for what it's worth. I'd like your opinion on why Clyde drinks too much. For what it's worth. its the typo of person i aqm I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good for you!!! And I demand that you grow the **** up. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#545
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Prof. Sackmeister intoned: You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. |
#546
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 11:59*am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Oct 6, 9:39*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:01*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:51*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote: *Don't get carried away. *They are your friends and colleagues so your opinion is of course, biased. *No big deal. Just acknowledge it and then put it out there for what it's worth. I'd like your opinion on why Clyde drinks too much. For what it's worth. its the typo of person i aqm I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good for you!!! And I demand that you grow the **** up. *Irony noted. Lack of knowledge of the word "irony" noted. Duh. |
#547
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 11:59*am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Oct 6, 9:39*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:01*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:51*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote: *Don't get carried away. *They are your friends and colleagues so your opinion is of course, biased. *No big deal. Just acknowledge it and then put it out there for what it's worth. I'd like your opinion on why Clyde drinks too much. For what it's worth. its the typo of person i aqm I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good for you!!! And I demand that you grow the **** up. *Irony noted. Almost, 2pid. That was "sarcasm". |
#548
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 3:04*pm, Boon wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:59*am, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 6, 9:39*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:01*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:51*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 11:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 4, 10:07*am, ScottW2 wrote: *Don't get carried away. *They are your friends and colleagues so your opinion is of course, biased. *No big deal. Just acknowledge it and then put it out there for what it's worth. I'd like your opinion on why Clyde drinks too much. For what it's worth. its the typo of person i aqm I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good for you!!! And I demand that you grow the **** up. *Irony noted. Lack of knowledge of the word "irony" noted. I've already corrected our errant imbecile. Duh. No ****. |
#549
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Shhhh! said: I asked 2pid. I demand an answer. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! good for you!!! And I demand that you grow the **** up. *Irony noted. Almost, 2pid. That was "sarcasm". Was it? Witless truly believes that yapping about Serious Stuff means he's highly mature. He believes that the random impressions he gets from his heavily filtered "news" sources render him better informed than professional politicians and military strategists. Witless also believes that he is one of the favored few who possess secret knowledge about consumer audio. This secret knowledge allows him to understand conspiracies, frauds, and hocus-pocus that the unenlightened masses ascribe to mundane marketing techniques. Witless further believes that JEE-zus is going to "save" him when the last bark leaves his lungs, when his mangy tail wags its last. Like most of the feeble-minded faithful, Witless is unable to understand the Golden Rule without the threat of "eternal damnation" hanging over him. So it's yap-yap-yap all day long about everything that runs across his field of vision. He can't chase every annoyance because he's no longer a young pup. But yap he can, and yap he does. Yappity-yappity-yap. |
#550
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 12:39*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Are they? What kind of box do you have? certainly not the kind she has! Again with the pussy "jokes". Grow the **** up, nimrod. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! she admits she can't tell us what she really thinks *about them. No, she clearly states that she doesn't have to based upon your stupid demands. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sure, she doesn't have to. End of subject. Thanks for playing. it never was the subject. you have been playing a different game. I hope you enjoyed whatever it was you were playing. |
#551
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 3:15*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
Prof. Sackmeister intoned: You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking your imaginary class. |
#552
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:15*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Prof. Sackmeister intoned: You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking your imaginary class. Nah, the professor knows how to act professionally. |
#553
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
duh-Sacky gurgled: If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking [my] imaginary class. I fixed your grammar error. You're welcome. |
#554
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 5:21*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 12:39*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 6, 8:21*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:00*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: Are they? What kind of box do you have? certainly not the kind she has! Again with the pussy "jokes". Grow the **** up, nimrod. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! she admits she can't tell us what she really thinks *about them.. No, she clearly states that she doesn't have to based upon your stupid demands. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sure, she doesn't have to. End of subject. Thanks for playing. it never was the subject. you have been playing a different game. I hope you enjoyed whatever it was you were playing. I'd back off a few proof, Clyde. You're incoherent. |
#555
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Shhhh! said: I hope you enjoyed whatever it was you were playing. I'd back off a few proof, Clyde. You're incoherent. Isn't it time for Sacky to jet off to Romania for another tryst? |
#556
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 7:57*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:15*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Prof. Sackmeister intoned: You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking your imaginary class. Nah, the professor knows how to act professionally. then keep your fat yap shut about "oooh how marvelous they all are" \when you know and admit that you won't say anything'with the least bit of negative implication about them. Your professional conduct is your excuse to not say anything'of any vale. yes, you exhibit professional conduct, and it dictates that you give us nothing but sugarcoating. Yo9u have nothing useful to say, nothing analytical, nothing comparative, nothing in depth, and nothing that would comprise an honest assessment. |
#557
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 8:50*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
Shhhh! said: I hope you enjoyed whatever it was you were playing. I'd back off a few proof, Clyde. You're incoherent. Isn't it time for Sacky to jet off to Romania for another tryst? I'm off to Venezuela for a chit chat with Hugo. |
#558
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Sacky McGrumpy snarled: I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking [my] imaginary class. Nah, the professor knows how to act professionally. then keep your fat yap shut about "oooh how marvelous they all are" Is your dictionary still working? Try looking up "transference". It's a psych term. |
#559
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Sacky McDumped shrilled: You're incoherent. Isn't it time for Sacky to jet off to Romania for another tryst? I'm off to Venezuela for a chit chat with Hugo. We're your family, Sackster. You can tell us about your problem. |
#560
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 6:58*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
duh-Sacky gurgled: If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking [my] imaginary class. I fixed your grammar error. You're welcome. Isn't it funny how that works? Clyde or 2pid create a strawman and then in their 'minds' it becomes fact. What is causing Clyde's onrush into imbecility? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
the rustbucket theory | Car Audio | |||
NAT: B-S Theory | Audio Opinions | |||
Forum for mic theory? | Pro Audio | |||
Forum for mic theory? | Pro Audio | |||
Sampling Theory | Pro Audio |