Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of
this unit? Richard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
(Rhgoo7) wrote:
Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Stewart Pinkerton wrote: Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. How did the MF *sound*, Stewart? Give us a description. Regards, Mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
(Mkuller) wrote:
How did the MF *sound*, Stewart? Give us a description. Stewart Pinkerton wrote: Like any other reasonably competent outboard DAC. Hence, overpriced and overhyped - and using irreplaceable components. You mean you couldn't hear any difference between the NuVista tubes and other solid state DACs? That seems pretty remarkable... Regards, Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
"Mkuller" wrote in message
news:bhzSb.143371$Rc4.1147042@attbi_s54... (Mkuller) wrote: How did the MF *sound*, Stewart? Give us a description. Stewart Pinkerton wrote: Like any other reasonably competent outboard DAC. Hence, overpriced and overhyped - and using irreplaceable components. You mean you couldn't hear any difference between the NuVista tubes and other solid state DACs? That seems pretty remarkable... Regards, Mike Actually, mike, he never said he *listened* to it. He just disavowed it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
news:EMURb.175034$xy6.818966@attbi_s02... On 28 Jan 2004 16:01:32 GMT, (Rhgoo7) wrote: Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering Why one box. Provided the output is reclocked from the dac the two box solution seems to offer a number of practical advantages. Alan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
On 29 Jan 2004 16:11:27 GMT, "Alan Murphy"
wrote: "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message news:EMURb.175034$xy6.818966@attbi_s02... On 28 Jan 2004 16:01:32 GMT, (Rhgoo7) wrote: Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. Why one box. Provided the output is reclocked from the dac the two box solution seems to offer a number of practical advantages. But it's *not* reclocked, which is why it's of necessity inferior. Check jitter results for even a cheap Sony player against these so-called 'high end' DACs. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
Stewart Pinkerton wrote:
On 29 Jan 2004 16:11:27 GMT, "Alan Murphy" wrote: "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message news:EMURb.175034$xy6.818966@attbi_s02... On 28 Jan 2004 16:01:32 GMT, (Rhgoo7) wrote: Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. Why one box. Provided the output is reclocked from the dac the two box solution seems to offer a number of practical advantages. But it's *not* reclocked, which is why it's of necessity inferior. Check jitter results for even a cheap Sony player against these so-called 'high end' DACs. Stewart, what do you make of the technical results of comparing one-box vs separates in this paper, where Dunn et al conclude that disc- or player-related sampling jitter is NOT the cause of the distortion observed in their measurements of one-box players? http://www.prismsound.com/downloads/cdinvest.pdf -- -S. "They've got God on their side. All we've got is science and reason." -- Dawn Hulsey, Talent Director |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
On 29 Jan 2004 20:29:55 GMT, Steven Sullivan wrote:
Stewart Pinkerton wrote: On 29 Jan 2004 16:11:27 GMT, "Alan Murphy" wrote: "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message news:EMURb.175034$xy6.818966@attbi_s02... On 28 Jan 2004 16:01:32 GMT, (Rhgoo7) wrote: Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. Why one box. Provided the output is reclocked from the dac the two box solution seems to offer a number of practical advantages. But it's *not* reclocked, which is why it's of necessity inferior. Check jitter results for even a cheap Sony player against these so-called 'high end' DACs. Stewart, what do you make of the technical results of comparing one-box vs separates in this paper, where Dunn et al conclude that disc- or player-related sampling jitter is NOT the cause of the distortion observed in their measurements of one-box players? http://www.prismsound.com/downloads/cdinvest.pdf I don't see anything relevant there, and as it happens, I was one of the 'postal votes'. Note that there is well-documented evidence of significantly lower jitter in one-box players from many years of Paul Miller's technical tests in HFN. -- Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
"Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message
news:3edSb.180973$xy6.868660@attbi_s02... On 29 Jan 2004 16:11:27 GMT, "Alan Murphy" wrote: "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message news:EMURb.175034$xy6.818966@attbi_s02... On 28 Jan 2004 16:01:32 GMT, (Rhgoo7) wrote: Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. Why one box. Provided the output is reclocked from the dac the two box solution seems to offer a number of practical advantages. But it's *not* reclocked, which is why it's of necessity inferior. Check jitter results for even a cheap Sony player against these so-called 'high end' DACs. Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering I understood that Meridian dacs buffer the incoming digital data stream and reclock the anologue output using an internal clock. This is possible because the timing is implicit in the digital data. Provided it buffers the incoming data a dac has all the information necessary to output a jitterless anologue output stream. Alan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC
The only practical advantage would be if it had multiple inputs. The
reason that I offer my customers to avoid outboard DACs in favor of one box players is that even if all other things are equal you get a free transport, which is the most likely part of the system to fail. What's not to like? A DAC upgrade and a free transport. It seems pretty obvious where the advantages lie without even looking into how the sections were purpose designed to operate together. That said, I bought an on-board upgrade to my Bryston BP25 preamp (BP25DA), which is a DAC installed where the phono board might go. I have their excellent external phono stage (BP1.5) and had the space. What I gained by doing that was the ability to plug-in whatever DVD player I liked and also have a second digital input available for Satellite TV or Digital Cable Radio or whatever digital medium that I fancy next. It also takes-up no space being on-board. (ok I can't wait to hear the physics gurus tell me how it does take-up space...). The reason that I bought the upgrade was to take advantage of the additional input and the fact that I already had a nice DVD player with low hours. - Bill www.uptownaudio.com Roanoke VA (540) 343-1250 "Alan Murphy" wrote in message ... "Stewart Pinkerton" wrote in message news:EMURb.175034$xy6.818966@attbi_s02... On 28 Jan 2004 16:01:32 GMT, (Rhgoo7) wrote: Has anyone heard the new Musical Fidelity TriVista DAC and formrd an opinion of this unit? Overpriced and overhyped - typical MF. Buy a good one-box player, ideally a 'universal' like the top Denon or Pioneer models. Stewart Pinkerton | Music is Art - Audio is Engineering Why one box. Provided the output is reclocked from the dac the two box solution seems to offer a number of practical advantages. Alan |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Musical & Political Facts | Audio Opinions | |||
Objective Testing for Audio Fidelity | High End Audio | |||
Users guide for Musical Fidelity X-A2 amplifier | High End Audio | |||
science vs vs pseudo science | High End Audio | |||
Musical Fidelity & Monitor Audio Events in Chicago, IL 7-29 & 7-30 | High End Audio |