Is that by james Boyk.

http://www.performancerecordings.com


I was flatly amazed by some of his writings, which are so much better
than Kroo and Peter Aczel and David Rich. I think everyone should go
there and make Kroo defend his objection to things on this site. He
will probably go away in frustration.

wrote in message
oups.com
Is that by james Boyk.

http://www.performancerecordings.com


I was flatly amazed by some of his writings, which are so much better
than Kroo and Peter Aczel and David Rich.

Inability to determine the difference between formal and informal writing
noted. Inability to distinguish form from function noted. Inability to
notice that Boyk has never solo-engineered a recording session in his life,
and has been essentially retired for about a decade noted.

I think everyone should go there and make Kroo defend his objection to
things on this site.

Boyk's own site seems to be a sufficiently pregnant field for criticism.

He will probably go away in frustration.

LOL!

OK, that last one was a little rash.

Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com
Is that by james Boyk.

http://www.performancerecordings.com


I was flatly amazed by some of his writings, which are so much
better
than Kroo and Peter Aczel and David Rich.

Inability to determine the difference between formal and informal
writing
noted. Inability to distinguish form from function noted. Inability
to
notice that Boyk has never solo-engineered a recording session in his
life,
and has been essentially retired for about a decade noted.

Inability to get basic facts right noted.


I think everyone should go there and make Kroo defend his
objection to
things on this site.

Boyk's own site seems to be a sufficiently pregnant field for
criticism.

Posturing noted.


Scott wheeler

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:07:16 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Inability to
notice that Boyk has never solo-engineered a recording session in his life,

According to any reference sources other than your own statements,
neither have you.

Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com

Inability to distinguish form from function noted.


See arny old boy, competence always pays, compare this one to your
sites. Your websites are ****, they reflect directly upon what you
yourself and your viewpoints and conclusions are.

Arny old boy, note all you want, take notes feverishly, randomly,
drastically, in a psychotic frenzy, all you want; when **** is ****
people just see it for what it is: you.

When I call you "the ****borg" I do not mean to insult, though it might
offend, but all I am doing is being frank. Your pcavtech website is
repleted with both internal and external broken links. In it, there are
some pages that have background pictures that make the foreground text
almost unreadable. There are choices of color contrasts that gives one a
headache, etc. On pcavtech.com there is no taste, no harmony, no art, no
esthetics, no functionality. Form reflects directly upon function.

I haven't been able examine the *content* much. Since just looking at
the piece of **** for more then 10 seconds gave me a headache! Yikes!

When your "art director" showed you some of the godawful, **** he came
up with you didn't object, you let it pass. Why? Because you are not
able to distinguish between **** and anything else. To a piece of ****
everything is ****.

When you started gloating here about the chinese bootlegging that piece
of **** site you didn't stop to check if there were broken links in the
site. Why? Because you are an incompetent piece of ****. The only thing
you are competent at is being a piece of ****.

Now, you will answer all this by noting something or other, fecal
obsession, etc, or denial, or back-snapping about how one needs to be an
engineer in the auto industry to be able to say "yikes, that lada is one
incompetent piece of **** car!" .. Or you will call the terrorist at
this trailer to send some badly phrased finnish threats my way... Etc..

But arny, you know what you would do if you weren't such a piece of
****? .. You would thank me for the free consultation.

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
Arny Krueger wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com

Inability to distinguish form from function noted.


See arny old boy, competence always pays, compare this one to your sites.
Your websites are ****, they reflect directly upon what you yourself and
your viewpoints and conclusions are.

By **** you obviously mean well designed and chock full of useful
information.


Arny old boy, note all you want, take notes feverishly, randomly,
drastically, in a psychotic frenzy, all you want; when **** is **** people
just see it for what it is: you.

When I call you "the ****borg" I do not mean to insult, though it might
offend, but all I am doing is being frank.

Frankly, you are full of **** and are not smart enough to know even that
rather obvius fact.

Your pcavtech website is
repleted with both internal and external broken links.

I found 2. Considering how many links there are an din comparison to other
web sites I've been to with multiple links, this is better than average.

In it, there are
some pages that have background pictures that make the foreground text
almost unreadable.

Time to get your eyes checked. I've been all over the site and had no such
problem, probably, you're lying.

There are choices of color contrasts that gives one a
headache, etc. On pcavtech.com there is no taste, no harmony, no art, no
esthetics, no functionality. Form reflects directly upon function.

It's a technical website and it's form and fucntion go together very well.

I haven't been able examine the *content* much.

Because you are not competent enough to understand it.

Since just looking at
the piece of **** for more then 10 seconds gave me a headache!
Yikes!


I suspect the same thing happens when you look in a mirror.

When your "art director" showed you some of the godawful, **** he came up
with you didn't object, you let it pass. Why? Because you are not able to
distinguish between **** and anything else. To a piece of **** everything
is ****.

I think we all pretty well know what kind of **** you are.


When you started gloating here about the chinese bootlegging that piece of
**** site you didn't stop to check if there were broken links in the site.
Why? Because you are an incompetent piece of ****. The only thing you are
competent at is being a piece of ****.

Considering this is a free web site and part of a hobby, it is a very well
done web site and as usual you are not qualified to pass judgement.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
.. .

Arny Krueger wrote:

wrote in message
egroups.com

Inability to distinguish form from function noted.


See arny old boy, competence always pays, compare this one to your sites.
Your websites are ****, they reflect directly upon what you yourself and
your viewpoints and conclusions are.


By **** you obviously mean well designed and chock full of useful
information.

Ok, so the task was overwhelming for the terrorist, the mickmickey was
called in. Let's see what re-definition of a good website, re-definition
of esthetics mickmickey has to offer.

Mickmickey sees nothing wrong with these colors:

http://www.pcavtech.com/bar_logo.gif




Frankly, you are full of **** and are not smart enough to know even that
rather obvius fact.

Duh!mikey talking about others being smart.. Hmm. What's wrong with this
picture?


Your pcavtech website is

repleted with both internal and external broken links.


I found 2.

YOU Lying stupid-cocksucker gloryhole whore! Look again:

at: http://www.pcavtech.com/adc-dac/index.htm
"Sounds of Distortion" - broken

at: http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/links/index.htm
http://www.mclink.it/com/audiomatica/products.htm
http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/c...soundcards.htm
http://www.dspt.com/sig/saglab.html ------------ ALL BROKEN!

at:http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/com...tual/index.htm
ftp://ftp.pcabx.com/pub/download/SAM...430058_128.wav
ftp://ftp.pcabx.com/pub/download/SAM...10436_128.wav/
ftp://ftp.pcabx.com/pub/download/SAM...ical/nl-2.wav/
"sample library" -------------- ALLLLLLLLLLLL BROKEN!!!!!!!!!

at: http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/DR/index.htm
" PC Sound Card Technical Performance Benchmarks home page" BROKEN!

THAT MAKES ALMOST TEN YOU COCKSUCKER! NOT BAD FOR TWENTY PAGE WEBSITE!
And I haven't even checked all pages, or used any broken robot.

Considering how many links there are an din comparison to other
web sites I've been to with multiple links, this is better than average.

Speak english you pathetic twerp.


In it, there are

some pages that have background pictures that make the foreground text
almost unreadable.


I've been all over the site

AGAIN you are mixing up your gloryhole cocksucking duties with something
else! You been all over the dicks stuck at your ******** face at that
gloryhole, obviously. You are being cock dizzy again! If you had been
*browsing* the **** site of arny you would have seen that:

http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/DR/index.htm (the background !) for
instance
or http://www.pcavtech.com/disclaimer.htm (not enough contrast!)

have backgrounds that are NOT even technically acceptable, even for a
tasteless, artless down the sewer trailer trash piece of a whore borg
such as yourself!



It's a technical website and it's form and fucntion go together very well.


There are many technical, no bells&whistles websites out there that
function well. Leave it to an artless, devoid, INCOMPETENT ****borg to
SEARCH, pick and choose such HORRIBLE colors and combinations of
contrasts to DELIBERATELY anger any lost soul that happens to venture there!


Considering this is a free web site and part of a hobby,

Then it should have an ".org" suffix for the domain. .com is for
companies seeking profit. AGAIN incompetence.

it is a very well
done web site

You are puking this about the horrible www.pcavtech.com site. Then you
beg credibility from french sewage whores. Shape uo you worthless whore,
as usual, you are cock dizzy from being gangbanged in the mouth, try to
cut down on that gloryhole addiction.

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
.. .

Arny Krueger wrote:

wrote in message
legroups.com

Inability to distinguish form from function noted.


See arny old boy, competence always pays, compare this one to your sites.
Your websites are ****, they reflect directly upon what you yourself and
your viewpoints and conclusions are.


By **** you obviously mean well designed and chock full of useful
information.

Ok, so the task was overwhelming for the terrorist, the mickmickey was
called in. Let's see what re-definition of a good website, re-definition
of esthetics mickmickey has to offer.

Mickmickey sees nothing wrong with these colors:

http://www.pcavtech.com/bar_logo.gif



Not, what I would have chosen but I can read it.


Frankly, you are full of **** and are not smart enough to know even that
rather obvius fact.

Duh!mikey talking about others being smart.. Hmm. What's wrong with this
picture?

You don't make spelling errors ever?

Your pcavtech website is

repleted with both internal and external broken links.


I found 2.

YOU Lying stupid-cocksucker gloryhole whore! Look again:


I found 2 while I was looking. That doesn't make me a liar.

at: http://www.pcavtech.com/adc-dac/index.htm
"Sounds of Distortion" - broken

Works for me.

at: http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/links/index.htm
Works for me.

http://www.mclink.it/com/audiomatica/products.htm
http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/c...soundcards.htm
http://www.dspt.com/sig/saglab.html ------------ ALL BROKEN!

Yes those 3 don't work for me.

at:http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/com...tual/index.htm
ftp://ftp.pcabx.com/pub/download/SAM...430058_128.wav
ftp://ftp.pcabx.com/pub/download/SAM...10436_128.wav/
ftp://ftp.pcabx.com/pub/download/SAM...ical/nl-2.wav/
"sample library" -------------- ALLLLLLLLLLLL BROKEN!!!!!!!!!

Those also do not work for me.

at: http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/DR/index.htm
" PC Sound Card Technical Performance Benchmarks home page" BROKEN!

THAT MAKES ALMOST TEN YOU COCKSUCKER! NOT BAD FOR TWENTY PAGE WEBSITE! And
I haven't even checked all pages, or used any broken robot.

So? You want a refund?

Considering how many links there are an in comparison to other web sites
I've been to with multiple links, this is better than average.

Speak english you pathetic twerp.


Considering how many ****ing other goddamn websites I've been to **** head,
it's not that bad. I've visited others where nearly every ****ing link
didn't work. Is that what you mean by "english" you ****headed scum sucking
dickhead?

In it, there are

some pages that have background pictures that make the foreground text
almost unreadable.


I've been all over the site

AGAIN you are mixing up your gloryhole cocksucking duties with something
else! You been all over the dicks stuck at your ******** face at that
gloryhole, obviously.

I'm afraid you are confusing your life with mine.

You are being cock dizzy again! If you had been
*browsing* the **** site of arny you would have seen that:

http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/DR/index.htm (the background !) for
instance
or http://www.pcavtech.com/disclaimer.htm (not enough contrast!)

No eye doctors where you live?

have backgrounds that are NOT even technically acceptable, even for a
tasteless, artless down the sewer trailer trash piece of a whore borg such
as yourself!

I'm sorry that you are blind and stupid.

It's a technical website and it's form and fucntion go together very
well.


There are many technical, no bells&whistles websites out there that
function well. Leave it to an artless, devoid, INCOMPETENT ****borg to
SEARCH, pick and choose such HORRIBLE colors and combinations of contrasts
to DELIBERATELY anger any lost soul that happens to venture there!


You're the first to comment on it. Perhaps the others were all sane.

Considering this is a free web site and part of a hobby,

Then it should have an ".org" suffix for the domain. .com is for companies
seeking profit. AGAIN incompetence.

Not according to any law I know of.

it is a very well done web site

You are puking this about the horrible www.pcavtech.com site. Then you beg
credibility from french sewage whores.

Now, now, let's keep your mother out of this.

Shape uo you worthless whore,
as usual, you are cock dizzy from being gangbanged in the mouth, try to
cut down on that gloryhole addiction.

Get some glasses and wash your mouth out with soap.

Michael McKelvy wrote:


You don't make spelling errors ever?


Constantly writing "to much" or "to many" when meaning to use "too" is
not realy a typo issue.

Your pcavtech website is


repleted with both internal and external broken links.


I found 2.

YOU Lying stupid-cocksucker gloryhole whore! Look again:



I found 2 while I was looking. That doesn't make me a liar.


at: http://www.pcavtech.com/adc-dac/index.htm
"Sounds of Distortion" - broken


Works for me.

The link behind "Sounds of Distortion" on the
http://www.pcavtech.com/adc-dac/index.htm pagef you dumdum. Of course
the http://www.pcavtech.com/adc-dac/index.htm page works. I wouldn't say
"at:" if it didn't.



at: http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/links/index.htm

Works for me.

"at:" is said. Which part of that two letter word you do not understand
dumdum?



http://www.mclink.it/com/audiomatica/products.htm
http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/c...soundcards.htm
http://www.dspt.com/sig/saglab.html ------------ ALL BROKEN!


Yes those 3 don't work for me.

DUH!



So? You want a refund?


The issue is that your master has the audacity to gloat about such a
godawful site, you dumdum.

I've visited others where nearly every ****ing link
didn't work.

That's no excuse for arny the ****borgs site.

Is that what you mean by "english" you ****headed scum sucking
dickhead?


I am a "normal" and you are a scum sucker, by your *own* words, read below.

In it, there are


some pages that have background pictures that make the foreground text
almost unreadable.


I've been all over the site

AGAIN you are mixing up your gloryhole cocksucking duties with something
else! You been all over the dicks stuck at your ******** face at that
gloryhole, obviously.


I'm afraid you are confusing your life with mine.

You dickdizzy dumdum, you were the one commenting on the size of my dick
just because I happen to like sonus faber speakers. SInce I am an
anonymous poster elementary logic concludes that you are familiar with
anonymous dicks, in fact, you are dickdizzy from being constantly
gangbanged in the mouth to speculate about the size of my dick just from
the make of the speakers I use to listen to music.



*browsing* the **** site of arny you would have seen that:

http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/DR/index.htm (the background !) for
instance
or http://www.pcavtech.com/disclaimer.htm (not enough contrast!)


No eye doctors where you live?


ANYONE, with the LEAST BIT OF impartiality can attest to the fact that
the colors used in the ****borg site are just that: ****! You can't
paint the sun with mud, you hopeless dumdum borg.


have backgrounds that are NOT even technically acceptable, even for a
tasteless, artless down the sewer trailer trash piece of a whore borg such
as yourself!


I'm sorry that you are blind and stupid.

You would rather re-define the definition of a working website rather
than accept the obvious. WHY!? What makes you a slave to the ****borg,
WHAT? Un****ingbelievable.



Now, now, let's keep your mother out of this.

This is getting too ugly.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:


You don't make spelling errors ever?


Constantly writing "to much" or "to many" when meaning to use "too" is not
realy a typo issue.

Big deal. I forget you never get anything wrong.






I am a "normal" and you are a scum sucker, by your *own* words, read
below.

In it, there are


some pages that have background pictures that make the foreground text
almost unreadable.


I've been all over the site

AGAIN you are mixing up your gloryhole cocksucking duties with something
else! You been all over the dicks stuck at your ******** face at that
gloryhole, obviously.


I'm afraid you are confusing your life with mine.

You dickdizzy dumdum, you were the one commenting on the size of my dick
just because I happen to like sonus faber speakers.

No, because you are obviously compensating for being a dickless twerp and
general know-nothing.

SInce I am an
anonymous poster elementary logic concludes that you are familiar with
anonymous dicks, in fact, you are dickdizzy from being constantly
gangbanged in the mouth to speculate about the size of my dick just from
the make of the speakers I use to listen to music.

Elementary logic concludes that you talk so much about dicks becuase yours
is so tiny and seldom used.

*browsing* the **** site of arny you would have seen that:

http://www.pcavtech.com/techtalk/DR/index.htm (the background !) for
instance
or http://www.pcavtech.com/disclaimer.htm (not enough contrast!)


No eye doctors where you live?


ANYONE, with the LEAST BIT OF impartiality can attest to the fact that the
colors used in the ****borg site are just that: ****! You can't paint the
sun with mud, you hopeless dumdum borg.

And you can't learn about audio by trashing the people who already know more
than you.

have backgrounds that are NOT even technically acceptable, even for a
tasteless, artless down the sewer trailer trash piece of a whore borg
such as yourself!


I'm sorry that you are blind and stupid.

You would rather re-define the definition of a working website rather than
accept the obvious. WHY!? What makes you a slave to the ****borg, WHAT?
Un****ingbelievable.

I'm not redefining anything, I just think that somebody who puts up a free
website with lots of useful information, even when it has some links that
don't work, shouldn't be savaged by a dickless know nothing, with an
inferiority complex.


Now, now, let's keep your mother out of this.

This is getting too ugly.

Then be civil.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
news

I'm not redefining anything, I just think that somebody who puts up a free
website with lots of useful information, even when it has some links that
don't work, shouldn't be savaged by a dickless know nothing, with an
inferiority complex.
..

Then be civil.

so, then you are instructing him to be a civil dickless nothing with an
inferiority complex?





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


You don't make spelling errors ever?


Constantly writing "to much" or "to many" when meaning to use "too" is not
realy a typo issue.


Big deal. I forget you never get anything wrong.

On the contrary, I am able to stand corrected when having made any
mistake. It's dumdum, zero-ethics borgs like you who'd rather DENY THE
OBVIOUS sitting RIGHT IN FRONT of your eyes! rather then accept a mistake.

I've been all over the site

This is PROOF that you are a *lying* son of ganbang crackhead slut! *If
you have been all over the site* how is it that you could only find TWO
broken links on a site replete with them!???

The answer is simple. You are a kroobitch, a lapdog of the ****borg,
sent in to fight this battle. YOU WILL LOSE!

ONLY a son of a crackhead gangbang whore (there are SO MANY of them in
the US that .... ) would be so SHAMELESLY able to openly act as a lapdog
of an INCOMPETENT ****borg! Would be so shamelesly trying to redefine
WHAT THE EYE SEES!! WOULD BE SO SHAMLESSLY DISHING OUT LAME and INVALID
EXCUSES for OTHERS' obvious mistakes!!


You dickdizzy dumdum, you were the one commenting on the size of my dick
just because I happen to like sonus faber speakers.


No, because you are obviously compensating for being a dickless

Ok, I get it, you want me to PROVE to you that I have dick.. Hmmm..
You want me to come down to that gloryhole post and stick it up your
face? The dickdizzy scum-soaked gangbang whore called
mickeymickmickey cooks up new stategies to get some action. Don't you
sluts EVER get enough, ferchrissakes!


Elementary logic concludes that you talk so much about dicks


AGAIN you step on your own **** you slut! It was YOU, who OUT OF THE
BLUE started talking about the size of my dick, not me..



And you can't learn about audio by trashing the people who already know more
than you.


Keep up with your lies you lapdog slut. You will, eventually, get what
you deserve for your services.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


You don't make spelling errors ever?


Constantly writing "to much" or "to many" when meaning to use "too" is
not realy a typo issue.


Big deal. I forget you never get anything wrong.

On the contrary, I am able to stand corrected when having made any
mistake. It's dumdum, zero-ethics borgs like you who'd rather DENY THE
OBVIOUS sitting RIGHT IN FRONT of your eyes! rather then accept a mistake.

Where exactly did I deny that I misuse to and too?

I've been all over the site

This is PROOF that you are a *lying* son of ganbang crackhead slut! *If
you have been all over the site* how is it that you could only find TWO
broken links on a site replete with them!???

A civil person would ask, how did you miss so many of the broken links? I
would reply that I visited every page and not every single link.

The answer is simple. You are a kroobitch, a lapdog of the ****borg, sent
in to fight this battle. YOU WILL LOSE!

I'm not fighting a battle, I'm just tweaking you because you are fun to
watch as you sputter and spew.

ONLY a son of a crackhead gangbang whore (there are SO MANY of them in the
US that .... ) would be so SHAMELESLY able to openly act as a lapdog of an
INCOMPETENT ****borg!

You've been listening to the wrong people if you believe that. Arny and I
agree on some things and not on others.

Would be so shamelesly trying to redefine
WHAT THE EYE SEES!!

You see differently than I do, it's not al that unusual for people to
perceive things differntly, especially in the world of audio.

WOULD BE SO SHAMLESSLY DISHING OUT LAME and INVALID
EXCUSES for OTHERS' obvious mistakes!!


I make no excuses, I just think that when someone puts up a useful website,
they ought to be congratulated rather than condemned on the basis of color
scheme and some broken links. YMMV

You dickdizzy dumdum, you were the one commenting on the size of my dick
just because I happen to like sonus faber speakers.


No, because you are obviously compensating for being a dickless

Ok, I get it, you want me to PROVE to you that I have dick..

I think you feel a need to prove you have one, I couldn't care less.

Hmmm..
You want me to come down to that gloryhole post and stick it up your face?
The dickdizzy scum-soaked gangbang whore called mickeymickmickey cooks
up new stategies to get some action. Don't you sluts EVER get enough,
ferchrissakes!


Enough of what? You're strictly a lightwieght, with a limited vocabulary.

Elementary logic concludes that you talk so much about dicks


AGAIN you step on your own **** you slut! It was YOU, who OUT OF THE BLUE
started talking about the size of my dick, not me..

Tut, tut, why would I talk about something of such little consequence. You
seem hell bent on bringing up your shortcomings, but I don't get the
impression that it makes you feel any better.

And you can't learn about audio by trashing the people who already know
more than you.


Keep up with your lies you lapdog slut. You will, eventually, get what you
deserve for your services.

At least I have something I can keep up. :-)

Michael McKelvy wrote:



Tut, tut, why would I talk about something of such little consequence.


Dunno, but sure as hell YOU brought up the subject, not the thing itself
up, mind, it aint served for gloryhole motuh-gangbang sluts, such as
yourself.


Keep up with your lies you lapdog slut. You will, eventually, get what you
deserve for your services.


At least I have something I can keep up. :-)



Haha! That was a good one.

Humour is OK, even coming from a dumdum sockpuppet lapdog "enemy" such
as yourself.

BTW: My vocabulary you say, you find shortcomings in my vocabulary, as
per, compaired to yours! Another good one.

You *are* in a funny mood today, boy.

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
news
I'm not redefining anything, I just think that somebody who puts up a free
website with lots of useful information, even when it has some links that
don't work, shouldn't be savaged by a dickless know nothing, with an
inferiority complex.

.


Then be civil.


so, then you are instructing him to be a civil dickless nothing with an
inferiority complex?



It's this dumdum thingy with him, amongst other things, makes him
self-unaware to the max.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
news

I'm not redefining anything, I just think that somebody who puts up a
free
website with lots of useful information, even when it has some links that
don't work, shouldn't be savaged by a dickless know nothing, with an
inferiority complex.
.

Then be civil.

so, then you are instructing him to be a civil dickless nothing with an
inferiority complex?



I can only do so much.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:



Tut, tut, why would I talk about something of such little consequence.


Dunno, but sure as hell YOU brought up the subject, not the thing itself
up, mind, it aint served for gloryhole motuh-gangbang sluts, such as
yourself.

You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost constantly
since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep ****ing, gang bangs,
and other assorted activities.



Keep up with your lies you lapdog slut. You will, eventually, get what
you deserve for your services.


At least I have something I can keep up. :-)

Haha! That was a good one.

Humour is OK, even coming from a dumdum sockpuppet lapdog "enemy" such as
yourself.

BTW: My vocabulary you say, you find shortcomings in my vocabulary, as
per, compaired to yours! Another good one.

Let's just say yours is decidedly lacking in efficacy for talking to anyone
outside of a middle school.

You *are* in a funny mood today, boy.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost constantly
since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep ****ing, gang bangs,
and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.


Let's just say yours is decidedly lacking in efficacy for talking to anyone
outside of a middle school.


Outside of a middle school... Hmm.. Quite eloquent and descriptive ..

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep ****ing,
gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.


It's all there in Google.

Let's just say yours is decidedly lacking in efficacy for talking to
anyone outside of a middle school.


Outside of a middle school... Hmm.. Quite eloquent and descriptive ..

Fer sure, totally.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep ****ing,
gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.


It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:


You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep ****ing,
gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.


It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.

Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs. You seem
sort of obsessed that way. You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:



You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep ****ing,
gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.



It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.


Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs.


You are a disgusting liar.

You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

You deserve to be treated like ****, lapdog of the ****borg, you also
have the ethics of a piece of ****.

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
t...


Michael McKelvy wrote:



You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep
****ing, gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.



It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.


Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs.


You are a disgusting liar.

You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

You deserve to be treated like ****, lapdog of the ****borg, you also have
the ethics of a piece of ****.

Lack of value for honesty noted.

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
t...


Michael McKelvy wrote:



You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep
****ing, gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.



It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.


Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs.


You are a disgusting liar.

You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

You deserve to be treated like ****, lapdog of the ****borg, you also have
the ethics of a piece of ****.

For the record, I didn't call you dickless, until after you called me a
cocksucker.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
.. .

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Fella" wrote in message
et...



Michael McKelvy wrote:




You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep
****ing, gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.



It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.


Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs.


You are a disgusting liar.


You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

You deserve to be treated like ****, lapdog of the ****borg, you also have
the ethics of a piece of ****.


For the record, I didn't call you dickless, until after you called me a
cocksucker.




You are a dumdum, so I was addressing you accordingly. Then you went and
claimed I had "small dick" since I was listening to SF speakers. That's
where it all started. Of course, I deducted, you must suck *anonymous*
cock, since you never saw me, or had anything to do with me, but somehow
deducted the size of my cock. You must be a GLORYHOLE type of cocksucker
since again NOT HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH ME!, you started talking
about my cock! Granted, you must have VAST experience with cock, you
must of sucked real schlongs in your day, SINCE YOU GET GANGBANGED IN
THE MOUTH all day at that gloryhole post.

This is just all elementary logic, you dumdum. It's as obvious as you
being a dumdum, SO LIVE WITH IT!

For my part I'll admit also. Ok, *compared* to some of the **** you've
been through, or compared to some of the **** thats been thorugh YOU!,
my dick must be comparetively small, so what! THERE! I don't mind it
that you are an obsessive cocksucker. You are happy to admit that you
don't know the difference between "to" and "too", like you would write
"this is to much" in your mother tounge. Ok, so just say "so what" ALSO
about your cocksucker career and lets get on with it.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
.. .

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
...


Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Fella" wrote in message
et...



Michael McKelvy wrote:




You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep
****ing, gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.



It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.


Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs.


You are a disgusting liar.


You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

You deserve to be treated like ****, lapdog of the ****borg, you also have
the ethics of a piece of ****.


Lack of value for honesty noted.



Google is there you dumdum. You just keep forgetting that. A search with
the words "small dick" would reveal everything.

Read my other response for further clarification.

"Fella" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message
.. .

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Fella" wrote in message
t...


Michael McKelvy wrote:


"Fella" wrote in message
. net...



Michael McKelvy wrote:




You're the one who has been m,aking the sexual references almost
constantly since November. You've mentioned masturbation, deep
****ing, gang bangs, and other assorted activities.

Suprise surprise, the two-bit ****borg lapdog resorts to lying.



It's all there in Google.

Exactly. And you being a lapdog of the ****borg, it's all here, in this
thread.


Yep, you were the first to bring up any kind of sexual organs.


You are a disgusting liar.


You obviously haven't read the manual, it feces
you're supposed to be obsessed with.

You deserve to be treated like ****, lapdog of the ****borg, you also
have the ethics of a piece of ****.


For the record, I didn't call you dickless, until after you called me a
cocksucker.




You are a dumdum, so I was addressing you accordingly. Then you went and
claimed I had "small dick" since I was listening to SF speakers.

Please provide the quote that says so.

That's
where it all started.

I don't think so. You've been calling me and others cocksuckers for quite
some time, well before anyone suggested that you were compensating for your
tiny dick.

Of course, I deducted, you must suck *anonymous*
cock, since you never saw me, or had anything to do with me, but somehow
deducted the size of my cock.

The only thing "dedcuted" was the size of your dick.

You must be a GLORYHOLE type of cocksucker
since again NOT HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH ME!,

Of course not, since you have no dick.

you started talking
about my cock! Granted, you must have VAST experience with cock, you must
of sucked real schlongs in your day, SINCE YOU GET GANGBANGED IN THE MOUTH
all day at that gloryhole post.

Rich fantasy life noted.

This is just all elementary logic, you dumdum. It's as obvious as you
being a dumdum, SO LIVE WITH IT!

For my part I'll admit also. Ok, *compared* to some of the **** you've
been through, or compared to some of the **** thats been thorugh YOU!, my
dick must be comparetively small, so what! THERE! I don't mind it that you
are an obsessive cocksucker. You are happy to admit that you don't know
the difference between "to" and "too", like you would write "this is to
much" in your mother tounge. Ok, so just say "so what" ALSO about your
cocksucker career and lets get on with it.


Assuming any of that were true it would still be problematic due to your
tiny dick.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...


Assuming any of that were true it would still be problematic due to your
tiny dick.

I think JA should relent, and let Mikey sub for Arny.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...


Assuming any of that were true it would still be problematic due to
your tiny dick.

I think JA should relent, and let Mikey sub for Arny.


You're awfully free with my all-expenses-paid trip to Manhattan, Art.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
nk.net...


Assuming any of that were true it would still be problematic due to
your tiny dick.

I think JA should relent, and let Mikey sub for Arny.


You're awfully free with my all-expenses-paid trip to Manhattan, Art.


No, no. no, I wouldn't deprive you of that. You can be strolling through
Central Park while Mikey casts aspersions at his enemies' dick size.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Arny Krueger" wrote
Clyde Slick" wrote



I think JA should relent, and let Mikey sub for Arny.


You're awfully free with my all-expenses-paid trip to Manhattan, Art.



I'm surprise you didn't demand a first-class sitting in the plane. Is it
too late to ask for an upgrade? You might be all crumpled up in
the general area, or your hand carry might fell from the overhead
cabin and hit you in the head during turbulance. Have you traveled
with first-class ticket before?

What do you think? Why not!

Michael McKelvy wrote:



Please provide the quote that says so.


It's all in the thread "Sneaky dumbdaft mckelvy "


I don't think so. You've been calling me and others cocksuckers for quite
some time,

You are a lying cocksucker. There.


well before anyone suggested that you were compensating for your
tiny dick.

No one else talks about dicks here other then you.

The only thing "dedcuted" was the size of your dick.

Yeah, sure.



Assuming any of that were true it would still be problematic due to your
tiny dick.



Yeah yeah, sure, I have a tiny dick, ok.

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...


Assuming any of that were true it would still be problematic due to
your tiny dick.

I think JA should relent, and let Mikey sub for Arny.



You're awfully free with my all-expenses-paid trip to Manhattan, Art.



Well done Arny! You sent in your duh-sumsum lapdog, he turned the thread
around and started whining about the size of my dick, all the while
the FACT that the whole thread got so stretched out was because I
mentioned that you have a GODAWFUL, ****, TASTELESS and all around
generally BAD website. So you sent in your lapdog
hereee-mickeymickmickeeey! to try to change the subject, as it were.

But then again, WHATEVER the size of my dick, it still remains a fact
that your website is ****. All you did was that PROVE, without any
doubt, that the hereee-mickeymickmickeeey! is your lapdog.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

You must be a GLORYHOLE type of cocksucker
since again NOT HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH ME!,


Of course not, since you have no dick.

There you go boy! The FINALY *admits to* its gloryhole activities.


Look a here now dumdum mickey boy: We have ESTABLISHED, without a shadow
of a doubt, that:

1) *You are a lapdog of the ****borg* for coming in here to this thread
and turning the subject around from the **** website of arny to about
the size of my dick. To counter the lapdog observations you first
claimed that it was bugging you that arny was providing something for
free, hobby, non-profit, useful information, and that I was critisizing
such a charitable effort. Well, it turns out that although you had been
all over that site, as you are all over the many cocks stuck at your
face every day, you *naturally* missed the fact that www.pcavtech.com
intends to earn money. It says so right smack on their "privacy
statement" page. I had to copy-paste the text to some editor to read it,
SINCE THE GODWAFUL CHOICE OF BACKGROUND/FOREGROUND COLORS WERE GIVING ME
A HEADACHE!!, but yes, *after* the cut-paste it says in plain black and
white that:

"We use an outside ad company to display ads on our site. These ads may
contain cookies. Cookies received with banner ads may be collected by
our ad company" ..

http://www.pcavtech.com/privacy.htm


Now, I saw no "banner ad" in that site, obviously, no one would want to
advertise anyting on that godawfull **** site, but failure is no excuse,
the fact that it is a "dot com" and that they use some company for ad
placement, PROVES that they have, although unsuccesful, commercial
interests with that site.

So, all this, in short, again PROVES that you are a lapdog to the
****borg, since the only reason you jumped in to this thread to "save"
the ****borg is totaly invalid.

2) *That you are a gloryhole type of multi-cocksucker*, and being a
male, this makes you a homo, but it's OK with me, I have nothing against
homosexuals. The PROOF of statement is above. You clearly state that
your gloryhole activities have nothing to do with me since I have no dick.

Now, the size of my dick, or whether or not it exists, is completely my
business, you need not ever think about my dick, my cock, my schlong, my
whopper, etc, you need not EVER, I repeat, EVER concern yourself about
my dick.

That you are gay, and a gloryhole cocksucker is also established, so
stop this denial, it's OK, if you get your kicks that way. But do
regularly get checked for AIDS, etc, as you would not want to infect
other people when after your are infected.


about my cock! Granted, you must have VAST experience with cock, you must
of sucked real schlongs in your day, SINCE YOU GET GANGBANGED IN THE MOUTH
all day at that gloryhole post.


Rich fantasy life noted.



Such activities are a stuff of YIKES! in my book, for you, yes, they
might have been the stuff YOUR fantasies are made of, before you went
ahead and startied realizing them, of course.

"JBorg" wrote in message
t
Arny Krueger" wrote
Clyde Slick" wrote



I think JA should relent, and let Mikey sub for Arny.


You're awfully free with my all-expenses-paid trip to Manhattan, Art.

I'm surprise you didn't demand a first-class sitting in the plane.

It's a short flight.

Is it too late to ask for an upgrade? You might be all crumpled up in
the general area, or your hand carry might fell from the overhead
cabin and hit you in the head during turbulance. Have you traveled
with first-class ticket before?

Yes.

What do you think?

Borglet, I think you're nuts

Why not!

You're obviously just trolling.