Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
Hi:
I like using variable-density analog B&W monaural negative [no positive and no "reversal"; just the negatives] film optical tracks for audio. The audio characteristics of the film make my mouth-water. Yes, for some weird reason, the film's audio makes me hungry. To add to the delicious audio quality, I would like to coat the film with bad butter* and tiny traces of bituminous and anthracite coals [as well the smoke of those coals] before recording. After recording, I would like to clean it in a dark environment and then develop the clean film. *Here is the link which describes how my "bad butter" is made: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.fo...111377c?hl=en& Why didn't they make an audio-only equivalent of this for music [i.e. an optical audio tape]? Why not replace *Analog Magnetic Audio Tapes* with *Analog Optical Audio Tapes*?? Analog optical audio is used in films and sound better than analog magnetic audio. Magnetic tape contains static, humming, and other electromagnetic disruptions whereas optical tape does not. Optical tape is resistant to bar magnets whereas magnetic tape is not. Analog optical audio records and plays in the same manner as film does. The difference for me, is, I'd like to use only the negative film and no positive. Any chance of my "Variable Density B&W Film for monaural audio" fantasy turning real? Audio signal, in the form of light changing its intensity in an analogous manner to the sound, is shined onto a negative film. The film is developed and playback is accomplished by shining light of a constant intensity onto the developed film. As the light goes through the film, the patterns on the film will change the intensity of the light that is received by a photoelectric cell. The change in light intensity results in a changing electric current which is sent into an amplifier and then to a loudspeaker. http://www.mtsu.edu/~smpte/twenties.html "The Tri Ergon Process uses a technology known as variable density, which differed from a later process known as variable area. The Tri Ergon process had a patented flywheel mechanism on a sprocket which prevented variations in film speed. This flywheel helped prevent distortion of the audio. Tri Ergon relied on the use of a photo- electric cell to transduce mechanical sound vibrations into electrical waveforms and then convert the electrical waveforms into light waves. These light waves could then be optically recorded onto the edge of the film through a photographic process. Another photo-electric cell could then be used to transduce the waveform on the film into an electrical waveform during projection. This waveform could then be amplified and played to the audience in the Theater. The Fox Film Corporation acquired the rights to the Tri Ergon technology in 1927." The ERPI system, Fox-Case's Movietone, and De Forest's Phonofilm use variable-density recording film audio. I think mono and VD are better in quality. I don't like stereo or VA. But then, "quality" is highly subjective. One's worst enemy can be another's best friend. Oh, and equally important. The source of light should be from the flames of burning anthracite, ignited bituminous coals, and bad butter that has caught fire -- instead of electric lights. I would like to record my favorite songs into a variable-density analog B&W monaural negative film track. I want to listen to these songs after they are "filmed". Last, but not least, the intensity-varying light shined onto the film [during recording] is intentionally [by my choice] too dim. So the signal is "amplified" within the film by using a stronger concentration of film-developing chemicals. Regards, Radium |
#2
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
"Radium" wrote in message oups.com... Hi: I like using variable-density analog B&W monaural negative [no positive and no "reversal"; just the negatives] film optical tracks for audio. The audio characteristics of the film make my mouth-water. Yes, for some weird reason, the film's audio makes me hungry. To add to the delicious audio quality, I would like to coat the film with bad butter* and tiny traces of bituminous and anthracite coals [as well the smoke of those coals] before recording. After recording, I would like to clean it in a dark environment and then develop the clean film. *Here is the link which describes how my "bad butter" is made: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.fo...111377c?hl=en& Here is the sentence that I do not believe/understand: "the new bacteria then flee the milk case." Tell me.....How do they do that? |
#3
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 28, 10:59 pm, "William Graham" wrote:
Tell me.....How do they do that? Magic! |
#4
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies,No Stories. Just Audio.
William Graham wrote:
Here is the sentence that I do not believe/understand: "the new bacteria then flee the milk case." Tell me.....How do they do that? I'm still wondering how the former, now dead bacteria can send out invitations. ===================================== Then these bacteria die [for some mysterious reason] and invite more anaerobic bacteria into the milk. ===================================== |
#5
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 28, 10:00 pm, Radium wrote:
Hi: I like using variable-density analog B&W monaural negative [no positive and no "reversal"; just the negatives] film optical tracks for audio. Be aware that photo film has about 10-15 dB dynamic range, much less than a good magnetic or digital recorder. On the other hand, the butter idea sounds great. Do you toast it first? Dangerous Bill |
#6
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 29, 11:33 am, Bill Penrose wrote:
On the other hand, the butter idea sounds great. Do you toast it first? The butter is raw and uncooked and it stinks like stale swiss cheese thats been left in an anaerobic, warm, humid environment for at least 30 years. |
#7
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 29, 10:13 am, m II wrote:
William Graham wrote: Here is the sentence that I do not believe/understand: "the new bacteria then flee the milk case." Tell me.....How do they do that? I'm still wondering how the former, now dead bacteria can send out invitations. ===================================== Then these bacteria die [for some mysterious reason] and invite more anaerobic bacteria into the milk. ===================================== I apologize profusely. The stuff in the link is outdated. Here is a more palatable version of my bad butter: Raw, uncooked, organic, un-homogenized, un-pasteurized cow's milk is used. Purely-anaerobic, non-pathogenic bacteria are what indirectly turn the milk into butter. Throughout the process, the butter is mysteriously protected completely against any degradation or abnormality [e.g. rancidity] other than bacterial decay. No microbes other than purely-anaerobic, non-pathogenic bacteria enter the milk/butter or travel anywhere near the milk/butter or their containers. First, any and all minerals, metals, ions, and electrolytes are removed from the milk. Then the bacteria enter the milk. These bacteria initially feed on all substances in the milk *excluding* the following entities naturally present in the milk: Lipids [including non-greasy lipids] Greasy substances [including greasy substances not classified as lipids] Elastic substances Natural emulsifiers Creamy substances Slimy substances The bacteria produce odorous compounds - including but not limited to -- skatole, indole, acetoin, methyl ketones [such as diacetyl], amines, butyric acid, isobutryic acid, caproic acid, propionic acid, isovaleric acid, and valeric acid. After all the bacterial processes are finished, the water content in the concoction is decreased to 15% [about the same water as most high- quality butter]. This butter smells bad like stinky cheese [including stale Swiss cheese that has been left in an anaerobic, warm, humid environment for at least 30 years], smelly feet, sweaty shirts, dirty socks, neck- sweat, back-sweat, filthy scalp and unwashed hair. You now have 1st-class butter!!!! Anyone want to try some of this delicious butter?? Important note on bacteria: All bacteria used in the above process are not pathogenic. IOW - much like intestinal bacteria -- they do not cause any disease or infection. In addition, none of these bacteria use oxygen for any of their biochemical processes. Some of them can survive in oxygen, while others can't. However, none of them use oxygen. Acetic-acid bacteria are an example of bacteria that are not used in the butter-making processes because - while they maybe anaerobic - they still require oxygen to produce acetic acid. |
#8
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
"William Graham" wrote ...
Here is the sentence that I do not believe/understand: "the new bacteria then flee the milk case." Tell me.....How do they do that? Remember that "Radium" is posting from an alternate universe. The laws of physics, biology, etc that we take for granted don't apply in "Radium"s Troll-land. |
#9
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
"Radium" wrote in message oups.com... Hi: I like using variable-density analog B&W monaural negative [no positive and no "reversal"; just the negatives] film optical tracks for audio. The audio characteristics of the film make my mouth-water. Yes, for some weird reason, the film's audio makes me hungry. To add to the delicious audio quality, I would like to coat the film with bad butter* and tiny traces of bituminous and anthracite coals [as well the smoke of those coals] before recording. After recording, I would like to clean it in a dark environment and then develop the clean film. *Here is the link which describes how my "bad butter" is made: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.fo...7fa111377c?hl= en& Why didn't they make an audio-only equivalent of this for music [i.e. an optical audio tape]? Why not replace *Analog Magnetic Audio Tapes* with *Analog Optical Audio Tapes*?? Analog optical audio is used in films and sound better than analog magnetic audio. Magnetic tape contains static, humming, and other electromagnetic disruptions whereas optical tape does not. Optical tape is resistant to bar magnets whereas magnetic tape is not. Analog optical audio records and plays in the same manner as film does. The difference for me, is, I'd like to use only the negative film and no positive. Any chance of my "Variable Density B&W Film for monaural audio" fantasy turning real? Audio signal, in the form of light changing its intensity in an analogous manner to the sound, is shined onto a negative film. The film is developed and playback is accomplished by shining light of a constant intensity onto the developed film. As the light goes through the film, the patterns on the film will change the intensity of the light that is received by a photoelectric cell. The change in light intensity results in a changing electric current which is sent into an amplifier and then to a loudspeaker. http://www.mtsu.edu/~smpte/twenties.html "The Tri Ergon Process uses a technology known as variable density, which differed from a later process known as variable area. The Tri Ergon process had a patented flywheel mechanism on a sprocket which prevented variations in film speed. This flywheel helped prevent distortion of the audio. Tri Ergon relied on the use of a photo- electric cell to transduce mechanical sound vibrations into electrical waveforms and then convert the electrical waveforms into light waves. These light waves could then be optically recorded onto the edge of the film through a photographic process. Another photo-electric cell could then be used to transduce the waveform on the film into an electrical waveform during projection. This waveform could then be amplified and played to the audience in the Theater. The Fox Film Corporation acquired the rights to the Tri Ergon technology in 1927." The ERPI system, Fox-Case's Movietone, and De Forest's Phonofilm use variable-density recording film audio. I think mono and VD are better in quality. I don't like stereo or VA. But then, "quality" is highly subjective. One's worst enemy can be another's best friend. Oh, and equally important. The source of light should be from the flames of burning anthracite, ignited bituminous coals, and bad butter that has caught fire -- instead of electric lights. I would like to record my favorite songs into a variable-density analog B&W monaural negative film track. I want to listen to these songs after they are "filmed". Last, but not least, the intensity-varying light shined onto the film [during recording] is intentionally [by my choice] too dim. So the signal is "amplified" within the film by using a stronger concentration of film-developing chemicals. Use a SB/Creative FM synth :-) MrT. |
#10
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 30, 8:31 am, "Mr.T" MrT@home wrote:
Use a SB/Creative FM synth :-) OOOOOH! A "variable-density analog B&W monaural negative film" version of Creative Music Synth! How fun! Add some metal-free, oxide-free, mineral-free, ion-free, electrolyte- free volatiles of anthracite and bituminous coal in a base of this bad stinky butter http://groups.google.com/group/uk.fo...7fa111377c?hl= to the film prior to recording. Record with light that is too dim. Wash off the butter and coal-volatiles. Then, develop with unusually strong concentration of chemicals to make up for the light that was too dim to encode with any efficiency. Wash off the chemicals. Then playback those delicious FM signals of Creative Music Synth. Just can't wait to listen to it. |
#11
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
Richard Crowley wrote:
"William Graham" wrote ... Here is the sentence that I do not believe/understand: "the new bacteria then flee the milk case." Tell me.....How do they do that? Remember that "Radium" is posting from an alternate universe. The laws of physics, biology, etc that we take for granted don't apply in "Radium"s Troll-land. An excellent use of the "kill-file" IMHO... -- Ron Jones Process Safety & Development Specialist Don't repeat history, unreported chemical lab/plant near misses at http://www.crhf.org.uk Only two things are certain: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not certain about the universe. ~ Albert Einstein |
#12
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 29, 12:31 pm, Radium wrote:
On Apr 29, 11:33 am, Bill Penrose wrote: On the other hand, the butter idea sounds great. Do you toast it first? The butter is raw and uncooked and it stinks like stale swiss cheese thats been left in an anaerobic, warm, humid environment for at least 30 years. Mm. Gets better all the time. A little kim-chi on top, too? DB |
#13
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On 2007-04-30 14:35:14 -0400, Radium said:
Add some metal-free, oxide-free, mineral-free, ion-free, electrolyte- free volatiles of anthracite and bituminous coal in a base of this bad stinky butter... to the film prior to recording. Record with light that is too dim. Then audition in a special oxygen-free listening environment. -- Jay Rose CAS tutorials and other sound goodies at dplay.com email is "jay@" plus the dot-com in the previous line. |
#14
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
"Jay Rose" wrote ...
Radium said: Add some metal-free, oxide-free, mineral-free, ion-free, electrolyte- free volatiles of anthracite and bituminous coal in a base of this bad stinky butter... to the film prior to recording. Record with light that is too dim. Then audition in a special oxygen-free listening environment. Excellent suggestion! :-) |
#15
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 29, 3:31 pm, Radium wrote:
On Apr 29, 11:33 am, Bill Penrose wrote: On the other hand, the butter idea sounds great. Do you toast it first? The butter is raw and uncooked and it stinks like stale swiss cheese thats been left in an anaerobic, warm, humid environment for at least 30 years. Pretty much like everything you write. You're an idiot, and have put an exquisite amount of effort into demonstrating this beyond any notion of doubt. |
#16
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On 28 Apr 2007 22:00:09 -0700, in rec.arts.movies.production.sound
Radium wrote: Hi: I like using variable-density analog B&W monaural negative [no positive and no "reversal"; just the negatives] film optical tracks for audio. Regards, Radium 1) you are an idiot 2) have you figured out what GNR is yet? 3) does it do binaural, or do I need optically coupled headphones 4) you are still an idiot martin |
#17
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 30, 11:35 am, Radium wrote:
Add some metal-free, oxide-free, mineral-free, ion-free, electrolyte- free volatiles of anthracite and bituminous coal in a base of this bad stinky butter http://groups.google.com/group/uk.fo...7fa111377c?hl= OOPS!! Wrong link. http://groups.google.com/group/uk.fo...c0a10ce870fe91 Now thats the right link. F--king typos. |
#18
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On Apr 30, 3:46 pm, martin griffith wrote:
2) have you figured out what GNR is yet? Generalized Noise Resonance 3) does it do binaural, or do I need optically coupled headphones Its monaural, so whether its optically-coupled or not, you'll still hear the same thing from both left and right. |
#19
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On 30 Apr 2007 17:53:41 -0700, in rec.arts.movies.production.sound
Radium wrote: On Apr 30, 3:46 pm, martin griffith wrote: 2) have you figured out what GNR is yet? Generalized Noise Resonance not even close martin |
#20
Posted to rec.arts.movies.production.sound,sci.chem,sci.electronics.basics,rec.audio.tech,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
|
|||
|
|||
Variable Density B&W Film for Monaural Music Only. No Movies, No Stories. Just Audio.
On May 1, 2:03 am, martin griffith wrote:
On 30 Apr 2007 17:53:41 -0700, in rec.arts.movies.production.sound Radium wrote: On Apr 30, 3:46 pm, martin griffith wrote: 2) have you figured out what GNR is yet? Generalized Noise Resonance not even close martin Okay. Then what is GNR? I did my own research and it came out to be Generalized Noise Resonance. From what you know, what is GNR? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Do you need subwoofer for music (no movies) | High End Audio | |||
Do you need subwoofer for music (no movies) | High End Audio | |||
Do you need subwoofer for music (no movies) | High End Audio | |||
Do you need subwoofer for music (no movies) | High End Audio | |||
Conversation vs music in movies on PC | Pro Audio |