Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio quality sucks
I just got an XM satellite tuner installed in my car yesterday,
thinking it would go great with my relatively decent car stereo. Then I come to find out, after spending $150 for the damn parts and another $75 or so for installation, that the quality of satellite radio sounds like ****. Sounds to me almost exactly the way steaming audio sounds over a dial-up modem connection on the internet. I had wrongly assumed it would at least be as decent as a standard 128 kpbs MP3 file... but I was sadly wrong. Maybe some people are "happy" with the sound quality, but no offence, these people are either idiots, deaf, or as listening to the music with blown 5 1/2 inch tweeters bought at WalMart for $19.95 a pair, and think they sound "neat". Sad.. Don't anyone else make this awful mistake. XM radio is owned by (guess who?) ... Clear Channel anyway so tell them to ***** off* and don't fall for their BS. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio quality sucks
I don't know what you're listening to, but on the music channels, my XM is
CD quality. I have an alpine head unit, alpine adapter, 5 channel alpine amp, Boston Acoustic speakers and kicker sub-woofer. It is by far, the best sounding radio I've ever had. I will admit that the talk channels can sound like streaming audio at times. Apparently they allocate more bandwidth to the music than they do to the talk. I think the worst sounding channel is the local traffic and weather. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio is quality
I sure like my XM,
I even have oe on my home stereo and it also sounds great..... You must have a bad one or a TIN EAR.... Scott Tenorman wrote: I just got an XM satellite tuner installed in my car yesterday, thinking it would go great with my relatively decent car stereo. Then I come to find out, after spending $150 for the damn parts and another $75 or so for installation, that the quality of satellite radio sounds like ****. Sounds to me almost exactly the way steaming audio sounds over a dial-up modem connection on the internet. I had wrongly assumed it would at least be as decent as a standard 128 kpbs MP3 file... but I was sadly wrong. Maybe some people are "happy" with the sound quality, but no offence, these people are either idiots, deaf, or as listening to the music with blown 5 1/2 inch tweeters bought at WalMart for $19.95 a pair, and think they sound "neat". Sad.. Don't anyone else make this awful mistake. XM radio is owned by (guess who?) ... Clear Channel anyway so tell them to ***** off* and don't fall for their BS. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio quality sucks
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio is quality
Most music channels sound great, occasionally on the 80's channel, I will
here some weird swishing in the highs, but other than that - everything is great. "Eddie Runner" wrote in message ... I sure like my XM, I even have oe on my home stereo and it also sounds great..... You must have a bad one or a TIN EAR.... Scott Tenorman wrote: I just got an XM satellite tuner installed in my car yesterday, thinking it would go great with my relatively decent car stereo. Then I come to find out, after spending $150 for the damn parts and another $75 or so for installation, that the quality of satellite radio sounds like ****. Sounds to me almost exactly the way steaming audio sounds over a dial-up modem connection on the internet. I had wrongly assumed it would at least be as decent as a standard 128 kpbs MP3 file... but I was sadly wrong. Maybe some people are "happy" with the sound quality, but no offence, these people are either idiots, deaf, or as listening to the music with blown 5 1/2 inch tweeters bought at WalMart for $19.95 a pair, and think they sound "neat". Sad.. Don't anyone else make this awful mistake. XM radio is owned by (guess who?) ... Clear Channel anyway so tell them to ***** off* and don't fall for their BS. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio quality sucks
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio quality sucks
The SQ on mine is great. I add a little treble and it sounds damn near CD
quality. I originally had mine hooked up through a FM modulator and it sounded terrible. It's now hooked up via RCA cords and I couldn't be happier. And my system is pretty high-end. Tony -- What's more likely? That an all-powerful mysterious god created the universe and then decided not to give any proof of his existence? Or, that he simply doesn't exist at all? And that we created him so that we wouldn't have to feel so small and alone. -Eleanor Arroway, Contact "Chuck P Adams" wrote in message ... From: (Scott Tenorman) Date: 4/29/2004 7:18 PM Eastern Maybe some people are "happy" with the sound quality, but no offence, these people are either idiots, deaf, or as listening to the music with blown 5 1/2 inch tweeters bought at WalMart for $19.95 a pair, and think they sound "neat". Sad.. Sounds good thru my 7998 HU, Boston pro series and JL amp and subs thru FM mod. Everyone I talk to likes the SQ of XM, I don't know what you are doing wrong or if you have a problem with clear channel and are trying to slam them?? Good Luck Sparky |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
XM Radio quality sucks
Hmm.. Maybe it is the FM modulator. Thats how mine is connected. The
thing is though, the distortion sounds like audio compression artifacts and not FM signal noise. Maybe I'll look into getting a different adaptor. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
YES, SATELITE RADIO DOES HEAVY COMPRESSION ISSUES.
The fact is that they are trying to pack as many channels as possible in the bandwdth they have at their disposition in the hope that most people won't notice, and in most cases, it sounds bad. And please no talks about CD quality here. Grab some headphones and take a listen on your home system if you have one, you may be surprised. I mean, this is no picky sound guy bitching here; I can definetely live with 128 kps MP3's, but if I'm going to shell out 200 bucks, and get milked 10-12 bucks a month, it will have to get A WHOLE LOT better. I think the compression is around 60kbps, and not with the best encoder to add to the problem. Compare that to CD quality ? CD "clarity" should be the term used here. I can only imagine adding an FM transmitter to the equation; I might be able to get better streaming quality out of my 12kbps CDMA smartphone. Want commercial free music ? Keep your Ipod... Scott Tenorman wrote: Hmm.. Maybe it is the FM modulator. Thats how mine is connected. The thing is though, the distortion sounds like audio compression artifacts and not FM signal noise. Maybe I'll look into getting a different adaptor. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Kenr" wrote in message news:1104871348.0f487b9fe51307373813a3651e0a645e@t eranews... Wrote: YES, SATELITE RADIO DOES HEAVY COMPRESSION ISSUES. Yes, I agree, XM doesn't even come close to CD quality. But even worse XM doesn't transmitt above 15khz. They don't think there is anything worthwhile listening to at that range. S**t why am I buy speakers that are flat to 20khz? I'm not sure. I doubt you could hear it anyway. I think I can only hear to 18k. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bull****.
Sound quality is better than FM but not as good as CD. But reasonably good. Also, XM is NOT owned by Clear Channel. Idiot. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
After a few years of listening to compressed audio, I've become more and more sensitive to it. If the rate is over 192kbs, it's harder for me to notice artifacts but they occasionally pop up. I just bought a Roady 2 and immediatly heard the 'wateryness' and 'hollowness' of highly compressed sound. I really enjoy the stations and selection but it's like listening to music over a cell phone. I hope that this bandwidth issue gets better over time 'cause it's kinda sucky right now. -- Mattedj ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mattedj's Profile: http://www.caraudioforum.com/vbb3/me...p?userid=36542 View this thread: http://www.caraudioforum.com/vbb3/sh...d.php?t=188075 CarAudioForum.com - Usenet Gateway w/over one million posts online! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
You will likely never have music streams on Xm or Sirius at over 48 or
50 kbps, if that. It would be a total waste. Probably 98% of people simply don't care; most of the rest think they care but really can't tell the difference in "artifacts" and just noise from FM Modulators, road noise in the car, and other local connection issues. I do think those people can be served by XM's upcoming new Napster arrangement where you can purchase high-quality downloads of music you heard on XM by tagging the music you're hearing for future downloads. Mattedj wrote: After a few years of listening to compressed audio, I've become more and more sensitive to it. If the rate is over 192kbs, it's harder for me to notice artifacts but they occasionally pop up. I just bought a Roady 2 and immediatly heard the 'wateryness' and 'hollowness' of highly compressed sound. I really enjoy the stations and selection but it's like listening to music over a cell phone. I hope that this bandwidth issue gets better over time 'cause it's kinda sucky right now. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Mattedj wrote in
news:1125581124.93047df9e1a4b8a13f6aec68aff24188@t eranews: After a few years of listening to compressed audio, I've become more and more sensitive to it. I killed my Sirius last year for the same reason. It didn't matter if I liked the programming, the SQ was unbearable. I just didn't listen to it. I went to a dealer show this spring and spoke to a Sirius employee. He said even if they get more bandwidth allocated, they have no intention of improving the bitrate. He said (and I believe him) that most people don't care, and they'll use whatever bandwidth they can garner to put more channels on. I gotta tell ya, every time I hear any type of advertisement use the word digital to insinuate quality, I wanna puke. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What you have to understand is - most people do not know what they are
listening to, and it sounds good to them. Sirius and XM both sound just fine on a factory system. Infact, I didn't really hear a major difference until I went to a 5.1 digital processor. -- WDW is a Way of Life "BrianQ" wrote in message 0... Mattedj wrote in news:1125581124.93047df9e1a4b8a13f6aec68aff24188@t eranews: After a few years of listening to compressed audio, I've become more and more sensitive to it. I killed my Sirius last year for the same reason. It didn't matter if I liked the programming, the SQ was unbearable. I just didn't listen to it. I went to a dealer show this spring and spoke to a Sirius employee. He said even if they get more bandwidth allocated, they have no intention of improving the bitrate. He said (and I believe him) that most people don't care, and they'll use whatever bandwidth they can garner to put more channels on. I gotta tell ya, every time I hear any type of advertisement use the word digital to insinuate quality, I wanna puke. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and XM both sound just fine on a factory system. Infact, I didn't really hear a major difference until I went to a 5.1 digital processor.
They're pretty reasonable if you have them on a good system. Not CD quality, but a hell of a lot better than anything else. But if you're using an FM Modulator or a crappy system to begin with, you're going to get crap in return. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
U.S. car radio with LW or SW bands? | Car Audio | |||
New Ford Explorer factory radio sucks - What to do? | Car Audio | |||
Rear unsupported??? Mounting a DIN radio in a Dodge RAM | Car Audio | |||
CD changer interface plug query | Car Audio | |||
On a mission : finding a basic radio | General |