Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Bubba
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.


  #2   Report Post  
EnJneer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Look into Steinberg's Nuendo. I use it at the studio and it's a stable,
flexible alternative to ProTools. The studio is setup with 24 channels of
A/D and a Steinberg Midex timepiece. It all flows well and reliably. Plus,
the whole universe of VST and DX effects are avaailable to you.

--
J
Engineer/Producer
(Delete "no.spam" from my e-mail address to reply direct)


"Bubba" wrote in message news:5y7eb.4471$hp5.1812@fed1read04...
I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP

users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.




  #3   Report Post  
Rail Jon Rogut
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Pro Tools works without any problems on my XP system....???

Rail
--
Recording Engineer/Software Developer
Rail Jon Rogut Software
http://home.earthlink.net/~railro


"Bubba" wrote in message news:5y7eb.4471$hp5.1812@fed1read04...
I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP

users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.




  #5   Report Post  
Erik Gavriluk
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

"Bubba" wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.


Pro Tools works fine on XP, Bubba.

--Erik


  #6   Report Post  
Peter Hewitt-Dutton
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Pro Tools only runs on Windows XP now! They have withdrawn support, and
software for all other versions of windows.

"Bubba" wrote in message news:5y7eb.4471$hp5.1812@fed1read04...
I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP

users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.




  #7   Report Post  
Denny Conn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Bubba wrote:

I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.


It doesn't? Wow, what am I running then? FYI, I'm running PT 6.1 on
WinXP.

-------Denny
--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is.

Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com
  #8   Report Post  
Marc Wielage
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:22:22 -0700, Bubba wrote
(in message 5y7eb.4471$hp5.1812@fed1read04):

I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.
-----------------------------snip----------------------------


At the risk of making an a$$hole comment, a good alternative would be to use
ProTools under Mac OS (IMHO). Make that a GREAT alternative. The program
just plains run better on a Mac.

But it does run OK on an XP -- as long as you can live without a bunch of TDM
plug-ins only available for Mac.

--MFW


  #9   Report Post  
Peter Hewitt-Dutton
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Wow, you managed to get a copy! I live in the UK, and can't seem to get a
copy of 6.1LE!! Starting to get on my nerves now!


"Denny Conn" wrote in message
...
Bubba wrote:

I'm wondering if there is a good alternative out there for Windows XP

users
for Digidesign's Pro Tools, since Pro Tools doesnt work on XP.


It doesn't? Wow, what am I running then? FYI, I'm running PT 6.1 on
WinXP.

-------Denny
--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is.

Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com



  #10   Report Post  
Denny Conn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Marc Wielage wrote:

At the risk of making an a$$hole comment, a good alternative would be to use
ProTools under Mac OS (IMHO). Make that a GREAT alternative. The program
just plains run better on a Mac.


I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?

But it does run OK on an XP -- as long as you can live without a bunch of TDM
plug-ins only available for Mac.


Admittedly, there are more TDM plugs for Mac, but XP is catching up
quickly. I certainly don't lack any of the PIs I need.

---------Denny


--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is.

Reply to denny_dot_g_dot_conn_at_ci_dot_eugene_dot_or_dot_u s


  #11   Report Post  
Denny Conn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Marc Wielage wrote:

At the risk of making an a$$hole comment, a good alternative would be to use
ProTools under Mac OS (IMHO). Make that a GREAT alternative. The program
just plains run better on a Mac.


I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?

But it does run OK on an XP -- as long as you can live without a bunch of TDM
plug-ins only available for Mac.


Admittedly, there are more TDM plugs for Mac, but XP is catching up
quickly. I certainly don't lack any of the PIs I need.

---------Denny


--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is.

Reply to denny_dot_g_dot_conn_at_ci_dot_eugene_dot_or_dot_u s
  #12   Report Post  
EggHd
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Wow, you managed to get a copy! I live in the UK, and can't seem to get a
copy of 6.1LE!! Starting to get on my nerves now!

Have you gone to the digi website?



---------------------------------------
"I know enough to know I don't know enough"
  #13   Report Post  
EggHd
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Wow, you managed to get a copy! I live in the UK, and can't seem to get a
copy of 6.1LE!! Starting to get on my nerves now!

Have you gone to the digi website?



---------------------------------------
"I know enough to know I don't know enough"
  #14   Report Post  
Edvard Puskaric
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:

I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?


Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!

Ed
  #15   Report Post  
Edvard Puskaric
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:

I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?


Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!

Ed


  #16   Report Post  
Andrew M.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

I just installed a Digi001 XP system for a client and he now swears by
the PC. He says it works better than any TDM Mac based system he has
used (at major studios in the Los Angeles area). Don't forget that
Digi's parent company dropped Mac support and switched to PC's a few
years ago. There must be a really good reason that AVID switched to PC's
and I am sure it's not because Mac's are better than PC's.

I think with the right hardware both platforms can be stable and you can
get tons of work done.




Edvard Puskaric wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:


I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?



Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!

Ed


  #17   Report Post  
Andrew M.
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

I just installed a Digi001 XP system for a client and he now swears by
the PC. He says it works better than any TDM Mac based system he has
used (at major studios in the Los Angeles area). Don't forget that
Digi's parent company dropped Mac support and switched to PC's a few
years ago. There must be a really good reason that AVID switched to PC's
and I am sure it's not because Mac's are better than PC's.

I think with the right hardware both platforms can be stable and you can
get tons of work done.




Edvard Puskaric wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:


I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?



Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!

Ed


  #18   Report Post  
Bsiemer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

You mean I am not the only one????
Bsiemer
  #19   Report Post  
Bsiemer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

You mean I am not the only one????
Bsiemer
  #22   Report Post  
Denny Conn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Edvard Puskaric wrote:

Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!


What can I say??? In spite of your diatribe, everything works greeat fo
me. Have you actually tried it?

------------Denny

--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is.

Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com
  #23   Report Post  
Denny Conn
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

Edvard Puskaric wrote:

Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!


What can I say??? In spite of your diatribe, everything works greeat fo
me. Have you actually tried it?

------------Denny

--
Life begins at 60 - 1.060, that is.

Reply to denny_at_projectoneaudio_dot_com
  #24   Report Post  
David Morgan \(MAMS\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Bsiemer" wrote in message ...
You mean I am not the only one????
Bsiemer


I can't use PT yet either, but I have no idea if I would try it on
a Mac or a PC were I to decide to use it.


  #25   Report Post  
David Morgan \(MAMS\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Bsiemer" wrote in message ...
You mean I am not the only one????
Bsiemer


I can't use PT yet either, but I have no idea if I would try it on
a Mac or a PC were I to decide to use it.




  #28   Report Post  
Steve Rhodes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

I can't support your claim.
I was a Mac/ProTools user for 10 years.

I switched to the PC/WinXP platform 2-3 years ago (initially it was WinMe
before XP came out).
WinXP works like a dream. I had not a single major problem since.
The Mac isn't always plain sailing as most people like to paint a picture
here. I had to know every trick in the book to maintain a working system
with ProTools/Mac.

I decided to go for Nuendo2 which is far superior to ProTools in my opinion.
Far less downtime, too. when they upgrade the software from V1 to V2 all
your existing plugins always work.
I can't say that of ProTools. Man, did I hate the wait for every single
plugin to be upgraded when ProTools got changed. It happened once too many
times for me. I quit.

Would I go back to the Mac. No.
I don't like Microsoft either, but hey, at the moment it works.

Steve

"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:

I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?


Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!

Ed





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #29   Report Post  
Steve Rhodes
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

I can't support your claim.
I was a Mac/ProTools user for 10 years.

I switched to the PC/WinXP platform 2-3 years ago (initially it was WinMe
before XP came out).
WinXP works like a dream. I had not a single major problem since.
The Mac isn't always plain sailing as most people like to paint a picture
here. I had to know every trick in the book to maintain a working system
with ProTools/Mac.

I decided to go for Nuendo2 which is far superior to ProTools in my opinion.
Far less downtime, too. when they upgrade the software from V1 to V2 all
your existing plugins always work.
I can't say that of ProTools. Man, did I hate the wait for every single
plugin to be upgraded when ProTools got changed. It happened once too many
times for me. I quit.

Would I go back to the Mac. No.
I don't like Microsoft either, but hey, at the moment it works.

Steve

"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:

I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?


Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!

Ed





----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #30   Report Post  
Charles Tomaras
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:

I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?


Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!


How much time did Microsoft put into XP? Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.




  #31   Report Post  
Charles Tomaras
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:20:33 -0700, Denny Conn wrote:

I've heard this before, but I'm confused...if it runs perfectly on XP,
how could it run _better_ on a Mac? I'm serious about this, not
trolling..what runs better on a Mac about it?


Nothing runs perfectly when it comes to XP. Microslop is too worried
about making money. Instead of working with an existing OS and
constantly improving on it, they release "new and improved" OS'es
whose stability is marginal. It takes time to tune an OS'es stability,
much more time than M$ is willing to put into it. Instead they
reinvent the wheel. Their philosophy: In the time it took us to
perfect XP, we could have created and released at least three new
OS'es... we lost billions! Shucks!


How much time did Microsoft put into XP? Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


  #32   Report Post  
Bob Olhsson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

In article , Andrew M.
wrote:

There must be a really good reason that AVID switched to PC's
and I am sure it's not because Mac's are better than PC's.


The fact that Intel is a major stockholder in Avid could be that really
good reason combined with the fact that they'd be competing directly
with Apple...

Still, the power of my new PT-le 6.11 XP system is utterly amazing
compared to all but the biggest TDM systems I've used.

--
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN 615.385.8051
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
http://www.hyperback.com/olhsson.html
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
  #33   Report Post  
Bob Olhsson
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

In article , Andrew M.
wrote:

There must be a really good reason that AVID switched to PC's
and I am sure it's not because Mac's are better than PC's.


The fact that Intel is a major stockholder in Avid could be that really
good reason combined with the fact that they'd be competing directly
with Apple...

Still, the power of my new PT-le 6.11 XP system is utterly amazing
compared to all but the biggest TDM systems I've used.

--
Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN 615.385.8051
Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
http://www.hyperback.com/olhsson.html
Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
  #34   Report Post  
Edvard Puskaric
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:12:58 -0700, "Charles Tomaras"
wrote:


How much time did Microsoft put into XP?


Apparently, not enough ;-)

Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


Are you familiar with the term "triple reboot"? I thought not. As far
as "real" information goes, my former daytime job was an NT
administrator. I could tell you horror stories about the evils of
microslop OS'es. Again, let me ask you, are you familiar with the term
triple reboot? There's a reason why NT is shunned away from for
mission critical applications. That's the facts.

If you can offer facts otherwise, I'm all ears, Charlie!

Ed
  #35   Report Post  
Edvard Puskaric
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools

On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:12:58 -0700, "Charles Tomaras"
wrote:


How much time did Microsoft put into XP?


Apparently, not enough ;-)

Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


Are you familiar with the term "triple reboot"? I thought not. As far
as "real" information goes, my former daytime job was an NT
administrator. I could tell you horror stories about the evils of
microslop OS'es. Again, let me ask you, are you familiar with the term
triple reboot? There's a reason why NT is shunned away from for
mission critical applications. That's the facts.

If you can offer facts otherwise, I'm all ears, Charlie!

Ed


  #36   Report Post  
Charles Tomaras
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:12:58 -0700, "Charles Tomaras"
wrote:


How much time did Microsoft put into XP?


Apparently, not enough ;-)

Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just

another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


Are you familiar with the term "triple reboot"? I thought not. As far
as "real" information goes, my former daytime job was an NT
administrator. I could tell you horror stories about the evils of
microslop OS'es. Again, let me ask you, are you familiar with the term
triple reboot? There's a reason why NT is shunned away from for
mission critical applications. That's the facts.

If you can offer facts otherwise, I'm all ears, Charlie!


I'm not familiar with the term triple reboot and apparently Google isn't either.
It is not a familiar term to anyone. You haven't presented any facts, just more
bashing.


  #37   Report Post  
Charles Tomaras
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:12:58 -0700, "Charles Tomaras"
wrote:


How much time did Microsoft put into XP?


Apparently, not enough ;-)

Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just

another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


Are you familiar with the term "triple reboot"? I thought not. As far
as "real" information goes, my former daytime job was an NT
administrator. I could tell you horror stories about the evils of
microslop OS'es. Again, let me ask you, are you familiar with the term
triple reboot? There's a reason why NT is shunned away from for
mission critical applications. That's the facts.

If you can offer facts otherwise, I'm all ears, Charlie!


I'm not familiar with the term triple reboot and apparently Google isn't either.
It is not a familiar term to anyone. You haven't presented any facts, just more
bashing.


  #38   Report Post  
Charles Tomaras
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:12:58 -0700, "Charles Tomaras"
wrote:


How much time did Microsoft put into XP?


Apparently, not enough ;-)

Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just

another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


Are you familiar with the term "triple reboot"? I thought not. As far
as "real" information goes, my former daytime job was an NT
administrator. I could tell you horror stories about the evils of
microslop OS'es. Again, let me ask you, are you familiar with the term
triple reboot? There's a reason why NT is shunned away from for
mission critical applications. That's the facts.

If you can offer facts otherwise, I'm all ears, Charlie!


I'm not familiar with the term triple reboot and apparently Google isn't either.
It is not a familiar term to anyone. You haven't presented any facts, just more
bashing.



  #39   Report Post  
Charles Tomaras
 
Posts: n/a
Default Any alternative for Windows XP user who cant use ProTools


"Edvard Puskaric" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:12:58 -0700, "Charles Tomaras"
wrote:


How much time did Microsoft put into XP?


Apparently, not enough ;-)

Do you have any facts? Can you
substantiate anything you have dreamed up in your fictional post? Just

another
MS basher without any real information, only blind hatred.


Are you familiar with the term "triple reboot"? I thought not. As far
as "real" information goes, my former daytime job was an NT
administrator. I could tell you horror stories about the evils of
microslop OS'es. Again, let me ask you, are you familiar with the term
triple reboot? There's a reason why NT is shunned away from for
mission critical applications. That's the facts.

If you can offer facts otherwise, I'm all ears, Charlie!


I'm not familiar with the term triple reboot and apparently Google isn't either.
It is not a familiar term to anyone. You haven't presented any facts, just more
bashing.



Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ProTools or Cool Edit ? ? ? IS Pro Audio 34 December 27th 04 07:05 PM
FA; Custom ProTools panel with wiring harness Adam Pro Audio 0 August 25th 03 11:26 PM
ProTools 6 Slows To A Crawl Jonathan Viking Pro Audio 10 August 12th 03 03:18 AM
Importing video into ProTools Free? Richard Kuschel Pro Audio 8 July 22nd 03 11:43 AM
protools mac and pc compatability PopFormula Pro Audio 2 July 20th 03 03:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"