Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
[email protected] simonelvladtepes@yahoo.com.au is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

Is there any point of getting the SONY SACD SCD-XA5400ES player if I already have the best current Oppo available? Does the SONY SCD-XA5400ES player still offer any advantage for CD and SACD playing?

Thanks,

Simonel

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

Tater wrote:
On 25 Jul 2013 18:38:54 GMT, wrote:

Is there any point of getting the SONY SACD SCD-XA5400ES player if I
already have the best current Oppo available? Does the SONY
SCD-XA5400ES player still offer any advantage for CD and SACD
playing?


Or you could upgrade the BDP-105:

http://www.modwright.com/modificatio...dp83se-mod.php


Hold on, you've got one of the best-performing players ever made, with
the remarkable SaberDAC, and someone puts *tubes* into the signal
path. How is that not like hitching your Lamborghini to a carthorse?
Madness!

Andrew.

  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio_Empire Audio_Empire is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

In article , Tater
wrote:

On 25 Jul 2013 18:38:54 GMT, wrote:

Is there any point of getting the SONY SACD SCD-XA5400ES player if I already
have the best current Oppo available? Does the SONY SCD-XA5400ES player
still offer any advantage for CD and SACD playing?

Thanks,

Simonel


Or you could upgrade the BDP-105:

http://www.modwright.com/modificatio...dp83se-mod.php


This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it, It you want the best SACD playback, one of the
purpose-built ES series Sony players is likely going to do a better job
than any player which converts DSD before playing it.

*As to whether or not this difference is better or worse than the stock
Oppo BDP-105 player depends upon one's taste in playback. There are a
number of mods being done to the Oppos and I've heard a few (not this
one though) and even though I've never compared a modded Oppo to the
same model, stock, I have compared them directly with my XA777ES and
they always come off sounding second best - not by much, you understand,
but enough that I would NEVER consider trading my Sony for one.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

Audio_Empire wrote:

This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it,


I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD
data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high
frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM
first; or do you have some other information?

Why would downsampling to LPCM do any harm, anyway? All the damage
has been done already during the DSD encoding.

Andrew.



  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Bob Lombard[_3_] Bob Lombard[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

On 7/26/2013 2:42 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Audio_Empire wrote:
This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it,

I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD
data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high
frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM
first; or do you have some other information?

Why would downsampling to LPCM do any harm, anyway? All the damage
has been done already during the DSD encoding.

Andrew.

Hah. In either case there appears to be some god-like hearing
involved. Personally I wouldn't buy a Sony CD/DVD player anyway, but
that has to do with their fussiness about CD-Rs and DVD-Rs; something
fishy going on there.

bl

  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio_Empire[_2_] Audio_Empire[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 235
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

On Friday, July 26, 2013 12:26:53 PM UTC-7, Bob Lombard wrote:
On 7/26/2013 2:42 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:

Audio_Empire wrote:


This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"


difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in


question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM


before playing it,


I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD


data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high


frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM


first; or do you have some other information?




Why would downsampling to LPCM do any harm, anyway? All the damage


has been done already during the DSD encoding.




Andrew.




Hah. In either case there appears to be some god-like hearing

involved.


Nah, just some critical, informed listening.

Personally I wouldn't buy a Sony CD/DVD player anyway, but

that has to do with their fussiness about CD-Rs and DVD-Rs; something

fishy going on there.


I've never owned a Sony CD/DVD player, so I can't comment on that.
bl


  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio_Empire Audio_Empire is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 179
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

In article ,
Andrew Haley wrote:

Audio_Empire wrote:

This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it,


I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD
data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high
frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM
first; or do you have some other information?


They use the SabreDAC 32. It converts DSD to LPCM. My information comes
from the Oppo Technical guy.

Why would downsampling to LPCM do any harm, anyway? All the damage
has been done already during the DSD encoding.


Damage? What damage?

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Tater[_2_] Tater[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

On 26 Jul 2013 17:24:21 GMT, Audio_Empire
wrote:

In article , Tater
wrote:

On 25 Jul 2013 18:38:54 GMT, wrote:

Is there any point of getting the SONY SACD SCD-XA5400ES player if I already
have the best current Oppo available? Does the SONY SCD-XA5400ES player
still offer any advantage for CD and SACD playing?

Thanks,

Simonel


Or you could upgrade the BDP-105:

http://www.modwright.com/modificatio...dp83se-mod.php


This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it, It you want the best SACD playback, one of the
purpose-built ES series Sony players is likely going to do a better job
than any player which converts DSD before playing it.


Looking at the BDP-105 manual, there is a SACD Output menu option that
allows you to select either DSD or PCM to be supplied to both the HDMI
output and the internal DAC for the analog outputs. Why would they
have this option if the DAC always converts DSD to PCM as you claim?
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

Audio_Empire wrote:
In article ,
Andrew Haley wrote:

Audio_Empire wrote:

This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it,


I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD
data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high
frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM
first; or do you have some other information?


They use the SabreDAC 32. It converts DSD to LPCM. My information comes
from the Oppo Technical guy.


Hmm. Must be true, then. Under the circumstances, I think I'll go by
the ESS white paper. But even if it does, there's no reason to
suspect that doing so will cause any audible damage.

Why would downsampling to LPCM do any harm, anyway? All the damage
has been done already during the DSD encoding.


Damage? What damage?


Single-bit sigma-delta converters are inherently unstable.

Whether it's during analogue to digital conversion or shortening the
wordlength from PCM, you must add dither to linearize the process.
The problem with single-bit sigma-delta (aka DSD) is that it is
impossible to add enough dither without overloading the modulator.
(There wouldn't have been any problem if the designers of DSD had used
two-bit sigma-delta instead of one-bit.) DSD-wide (i.e. 8-bit
sigma-delta) solves the problem, but you still have to go down from
wide to 1-bit to maks a SACD, and the problem recurs. This was proven
by Vanderkooy and Lip****z in their clasic paper. [1]

There was a rather feeble reply from Philips, but no attempt to rebut
Vanderkooy and Lip****z's proof. And it is a real mathematical proof,
the most reliable indication of truth there is.

These days, the highest-quality audio converters use multi-bit
sigma-delta modulators. (The one in the Sabre DAC is probably six
bits wide, although the white paper is rather vague about that.)

For these reasons, I suspect that if you want to convert DSD to
analogue (and remove high-frequency spuriae) there isn't any better
way to do it. As usual, I'm happy to be proved wrong by some real
evdence.

Andrew.


[1] http://sjeng.org/ftp/SACD.pdf



  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio_Empire[_2_] Audio_Empire[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 235
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

On Saturday, July 27, 2013 8:59:47 AM UTC-7, Andrew Haley wrote:
Audio_Empire wrote:

In article ,


Andrew Haley wrote:




Audio_Empire wrote:




This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"


difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in


question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM


before playing it,




I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD


data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high


frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM


first; or do you have some other information?




They use the SabreDAC 32. It converts DSD to LPCM. My information comes


from the Oppo Technical guy.




Hmm. Must be true, then. Under the circumstances, I think I'll go by

the ESS white paper. But even if it does, there's no reason to

suspect that doing so will cause any audible damage.



Why would downsampling to LPCM do any harm, anyway? All the damage


has been done already during the DSD encoding.




Damage? What damage?




Single-bit sigma-delta converters are inherently unstable.



Whether it's during analogue to digital conversion or shortening the

wordlength from PCM, you must add dither to linearize the process.

The problem with single-bit sigma-delta (aka DSD) is that it is

impossible to add enough dither without overloading the modulator.

(There wouldn't have been any problem if the designers of DSD had used

two-bit sigma-delta instead of one-bit.) DSD-wide (i.e. 8-bit

sigma-delta) solves the problem, but you still have to go down from

wide to 1-bit to maks a SACD, and the problem recurs. This was proven

by Vanderkooy and Lip****z in their clasic paper. [1]



There was a rather feeble reply from Philips, but no attempt to rebut

Vanderkooy and Lip****z's proof. And it is a real mathematical proof,

the most reliable indication of truth there is.



These days, the highest-quality audio converters use multi-bit

sigma-delta modulators. (The one in the Sabre DAC is probably six

bits wide, although the white paper is rather vague about that.)



For these reasons, I suspect that if you want to convert DSD to

analogue (and remove high-frequency spuriae) there isn't any better

way to do it. As usual, I'm happy to be proved wrong by some real

evdence.


Thanks for the clarification. I'm going to have to run over to Oppo US
headquarters and talk with their technical guy again (they're about a
mile from here). What you say makes sense and the white paper
certainly points at what you say being correct.


On the other hand, it still doesn't alter the fact that my Sony XA777ES
player provides the best sounding SACD and Red Book playback I've
ever heard.
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio_Empire[_2_] Audio_Empire[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 235
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

On Friday, July 26, 2013 8:17:44 PM UTC-7, Tater wrote:
On 26 Jul 2013 17:24:21 GMT, Audio_Empire

wrote:

snip
Looking at the BDP-105 manual, there is a SACD Output menu option that

allows you to select either DSD or PCM to be supplied to both the HDMI

output and the internal DAC for the analog outputs. Why would they

have this option if the DAC always converts DSD to PCM as you claim?


Damn good question. I'm going to have to look into this some more.

  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

Audio_Empire wrote:
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 8:59:47 AM UTC-7, Andrew Haley wrote:
Audio_Empire wrote:

In article ,
Andrew Haley wrote:

Audio_Empire wrote:

This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"
difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in
question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM
before playing it,
I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD
data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high
frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM
first; or do you have some other information?

They use the SabreDAC 32. It converts DSD to LPCM. My information comes
from the Oppo Technical guy.


Hmm. Must be true, then. Under the circumstances, I think I'll go by
the ESS white paper. But even if it does, there's no reason to
suspect that doing so will cause any audible damage.


Thanks for the clarification. I'm going to have to run over to Oppo US
headquarters and talk with their technical guy again (they're about a
mile from here). What you say makes sense and the white paper
certainly points at what you say being correct.


It might just be a matter of terminology. Perhaps there is some
decimation going on. However, DSD runs at 2.8224 MHz and the
SabreDac's anti-imaging filter runs at "up to" 40 MHz, so the obvious
way to do it, if you had compute power to spare, would be to convert
DSD to DSD-wide (i.e. PCM-narrow) and feed it straight into the
filter.

Andrew.
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
[email protected] arunajayaratna@gmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 10:51:55 PM UTC+9, Andrew Haley wrote:
Audio_Empire wrote:

On Saturday, July 27, 2013 8:59:47 AM UTC-7, Andrew Haley wrote:


Audio_Empire wrote:




In article ,


Andrew Haley wrote:




Audio_Empire wrote:




This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"


difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in


question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM


before playing it,


I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD


data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high


frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM


first; or do you have some other information?




They use the SabreDAC 32. It converts DSD to LPCM. My information comes


from the Oppo Technical guy.




Hmm. Must be true, then. Under the circumstances, I think I'll go by


the ESS white paper. But even if it does, there's no reason to


suspect that doing so will cause any audible damage.




Thanks for the clarification. I'm going to have to run over to Oppo US


headquarters and talk with their technical guy again (they're about a


mile from here). What you say makes sense and the white paper


certainly points at what you say being correct.




It might just be a matter of terminology. Perhaps there is some

decimation going on. However, DSD runs at 2.8224 MHz and the

SabreDac's anti-imaging filter runs at "up to" 40 MHz, so the obvious

way to do it, if you had compute power to spare, would be to convert

DSD to DSD-wide (i.e. PCM-narrow) and feed it straight into the

filter.



Andrew.


Hi Andrew,
In your opinion, what would be the best choice for serious listening (Oppo 105 or XA5400ES)?. Any comments would be gratefully appreciated. I am not good with technical details.

Many Thanks in Advance
/Aruna
  #17   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

news wrote:

I don't like the performance of my Oppo's RC, and there seem to be many
others who say the same thing.
It's not too responsive, as compared to many others that I use.


"RC" as in Remote Control? Yes, I agree. It's not very good at all.

Andrew.

  #18   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
George Graves George Graves is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 132
Default Oppo BDP-105 vs. SONY SCD-XA5400ES

In article ,
wrote:

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 10:51:55 PM UTC+9, Andrew Haley wrote:
Audio_Empire wrote:

On Saturday, July 27, 2013 8:59:47 AM UTC-7, Andrew Haley wrote:


Audio_Empire wrote:




In article ,


Andrew Haley wrote:




Audio_Empire wrote:




This is all fine and good, and perhaps you can even hear "some*"


difference, but it still doesn't alter the fact that the Oppo in


question still uses the same SabreDac 32 which converts DSD to LPCM


before playing it,


I don't think so: according to their white paper, they feed the DSD


data into their anti-imaging filter, which runs at a very high


frequency. There's no suggestion that they downsample it to LPCM


first; or do you have some other information?




They use the SabreDAC 32. It converts DSD to LPCM. My information
comes


from the Oppo Technical guy.




Hmm. Must be true, then. Under the circumstances, I think I'll go by


the ESS white paper. But even if it does, there's no reason to


suspect that doing so will cause any audible damage.




Thanks for the clarification. I'm going to have to run over to Oppo US


headquarters and talk with their technical guy again (they're about a


mile from here). What you say makes sense and the white paper


certainly points at what you say being correct.




It might just be a matter of terminology. Perhaps there is some

decimation going on. However, DSD runs at 2.8224 MHz and the

SabreDac's anti-imaging filter runs at "up to" 40 MHz, so the obvious

way to do it, if you had compute power to spare, would be to convert

DSD to DSD-wide (i.e. PCM-narrow) and feed it straight into the

filter.



Andrew.


Hi Andrew,
In your opinion, what would be the best choice for serious listening (Oppo 105 or XA5400ES)?. Any comments would be gratefully appreciated. I am not good with technical details.

Many Thanks in Advance
/Aruna



I'm not Andrew and while I have heard a XA5400ES, I'm more familiar
with a Sony XA77ES SACD/CD player. It is still, after 10 years, the
best sounding CD player (and SACD player) I have heard. Easily besting
the Oppo 105.

Audio_Empire
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sony SCD-XA5400ES CD Player Peter High End Audio 14 June 5th 09 05:00 AM
Sony SCD-XA5400ES CD Player Peter Audio Opinions 5 April 20th 09 05:49 PM
OPPO 970HD as a DVD-A or SACD player claus High End Audio 6 March 13th 07 11:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"