Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#561
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 6:06*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 7:57*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 3:15*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Prof. Sackmeister intoned: You've *demanded* a response to your ridiculous question. I don't care any more about rating your youtube links than I do about rating dish detergent, numbskull. What a ****ing idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you think that asking for a comparative analysis between those guitar players is a dumb question, that just shows what a shallow simpleton you are. I must have missed something. Are you teaching a class in guitar appreciation, with Jenn as one of your students? I hope you made clear what percentage of her grade will be made up of Usenet posts. Looks like our highly respected professor is flunking your imaginary class. Nah, the professor knows how to act professionally. then keep your fat yap shut Wow. You've found the deep end and jump off of it. about "oooh how marvelous they all are" Clyde, how many times have I said "how marvelous they are" compared to you? \when you know and admit that you won't say anything'with the least bit of negative implication about them. Your professional conduct is your excuse to not say anything'of any vale. Solution: IGNORE ME yes, you exhibit professional conduct, and it dictates that you give us nothing but sugarcoating. Yo9u have nothing useful to say, nothing analytical, nothing comparative, nothing in depth, and nothing that would comprise an honest assessment. Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You call it "sugarcoating". I call it sharing something that I like and see no real fault with not accounted for by difference in artistic taste. |
#562
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 8:08*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 8:50*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Shhhh! said: I hope you enjoyed whatever it was you were playing. I'd back off a few proof, Clyde. You're incoherent. Isn't it time for Sacky to jet off to Romania for another tryst? I'm off to Venezuela for a chit chat with Hugo. Try to cut your booze intake in half. That should at least stop yopu from slobbering. |
#563
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 8:43*pm, Jenn wrote:
You call it "sugarcoating". *I call it sharing something that I like and see no real fault with not accounted for by difference in artistic taste. Clyde's Romanian woman mistook his still for a washing machine. Do you know what dirty gymwear and boxers do to a batch of hooch? I've heard people have been driven blind and mad by only one dirty athletic supporter in a 50-gallon batch. Poor Clyde got the whole week's worth. |
#564
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? They have noooooo idea what grad students go through! How about some George Perle axes of symmetry? Stephen |
#565
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
MiNe 109 wrote: In article , Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? They have noooooo idea what grad students go through! How about some George Perle axes of symmetry? Stephen lol "in depth" They don't want to go there. |
#566
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 9:37*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *MiNe 109 * wrote: In article , *Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? They have noooooo idea what grad students go through! How about some George Perle axes of symmetry? lol *"in depth" *They don't want to go there. I'd go for it. Then you could both add "elitist" to your "worthless Internet resume". :-) |
#567
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
|
#568
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
MiNe 109 said: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? They have noooooo idea what grad students go through! How about some George Perle axes of symmetry? Can you summarize the value of learning music theory? |
#569
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
hophead said: Still I read rao when I can, and I appreciate what you bring to group. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. |
#570
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote: MiNe 109 said: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? They have noooooo idea what grad students go through! How about some George Perle axes of symmetry? Can you summarize the value of learning music theory? Learning about and obtaining the ability to analyze all of the component parts of compositions. Aids performance and composition. |
#572
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote: MiNe 109 said: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? They have noooooo idea what grad students go through! How about some George Perle axes of symmetry? Can you summarize the value of learning music theory? Deeper understanding of existing music and compositional procedures. Stephen |
#573
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 10:56*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
*George M. Middius wrote: Can you summarize the value of learning music theory? Deeper understanding of existing music and compositional procedures. Now, can you summarize the value of explaining all of that to 2pid and Clyde? |
#574
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 6, 10:56*pm, MiNe 109 wrote: *George M. Middius wrote: Can you summarize the value of learning music theory? Deeper understanding of existing music and compositional procedures. Now, can you summarize the value of explaining all of that to 2pid and Clyde? There's more to it than dancing about architecture. Stephen |
#575
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote:
Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, You call it "sugarcoating". *I call it sharing something that I like and see no real fault with not accounted for by difference in artistic taste. Well, some people like Giovanni. Your guilty pleasure is Juber!!! |
#576
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 10:53*pm, hophead wrote:
In article e96c80b1-3376-408c-9b69-75e6127d73c8 @k41g2000vbt.googlegroups.com, says... then keep your fat yap shut about "oooh how marvelous they all are" \when you know and admit that you won't say anything'with the least bit of negative implication about them. Your professional conduct is your excuse to not say anything'of any vale. yes, you exhibit professional conduct, and it dictates that you give us nothing but sugarcoating. Yo9u have nothing useful to say, nothing analytical, nothing comparative, nothing in depth, and nothing that would comprise an honest assessment. Wow - you've completely lost it. Do you have any idea how petty and imbecilic you appear in all this? Jenn, for what it's worth, I appreciate your posts and the musicians that you've shared here (yeah, I know: that makes me a "fawning sycophant" in Clyde World). Yes They are all so wonderful and perfect in every way. I know I don't contribute much around here, but my time is limited and that's the reality of my personal and professional life at the moment. Still I read rao when I can, and I appreciate what you bring to group. Useless pablum |
#577
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 6, 11:06*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: hophead said: Still I read rao when I can, and I appreciate what you bring to group. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. LOL!!! Its fun breaking in the virgins! Have you ever busted a hymen? |
#578
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, You call it "sugarcoating". *I call it sharing something that I like and see no real fault with not accounted for by difference in artistic taste. Well, some people like Giovanni. Who's that? Your guilty pleasure is Juber!!! lol |
#579
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 1:23*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, Clyde, have you ever considered that you're an idiot? Have you ever liked a band or an artist based on a review? I haven't. A review has only ever made me give them a listen. After that it's up to me. Now, that said, please give me a detailed description the ten stupidest things that 2pid does IYO. |
#580
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 1:27*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 6, 11:06*pm, George M. Middius wrote: hophead said: Still I read rao when I can, and I appreciate what you bring to group.. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. LOL!!! Its fun breaking in the virgins! Have you ever busted a hymen? Often, men who aren't good lovers prefer virgins. Then they won't know how poor he is as a lover. The fact that Clyde talks like this is proof enough that he falls in this category. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#581
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Sacky the Lantzschmuck plucks his strings. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. Its fun breaking in the virgins! Have you ever busted a hymen? You'd better bring a blood assay kit the next time you plan such a "triumph". Gadget to help women feign virginity Whether it's seen as a clever little gadget to help a woman keep a secret or a devilish deception that threatens Islam, the Artificial Virginity Hymen Kit is not welcome in Egypt. The kit allows a bride who is not a virgin to pretend that she is. A pouch inserted into the vagina on her wedding night ruptures and leaks a blood-like liquid designed to trick a new husband into believing that his wife is chaste. It's a wink of ingenuity to soothe a man's ego and keep the dowry intact. Egyptian conservatives condemn the device as technology that will promote promiscuity in a culture that forbids premarital sex. Their protests are arising in a nation that over the last 40 years has gone from miniskirts and secularism to hijabs and religious devotion. But seldom have conservatives faced such brazen advertising. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-fake-hymen7-2009oct07,0,6868813.story?track=rss You've probably been fooled the last three or four times. I hope you didn't pay too much extra for the privilege of deflowering a "virgin". |
#582
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article
, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 7, 1:27*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 11:06*pm, George M. Middius wrote: hophead said: Still I read rao when I can, and I appreciate what you bring to group. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. LOL!!! Its fun breaking in the virgins! Have you ever busted a hymen? Often, men who aren't good lovers prefer virgins. Then they won't know how poor he is as a lover. The fact that Clyde talks like this is proof enough that he falls in this category. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or it's a nod to his bar band career! Stephen |
#583
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 12:17*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 7, 1:23*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, Clyde, have you ever considered that you're an idiot? Have you ever liked a band or an artist based on a review? I haven't. A review has only ever made me give them a listen. After that it's up to me. There is no point in reading a reviewer who just adores and goes gaga over everyone she knows personally. Then when she posts clips of the exalted beings, some are wfully woeful. then she tells us that she wouldn't never ay anything about their playing that could in the least bit be construed' as detrimental. FINe, its just useless babble out of her mouth. You are stupid enough to pay attention to reviewers who only have good things to say. Now, that said, please give me a detailed description the ten stupidest things that 2pid does IYO. |
#584
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 12:17*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 7, 1:23*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, Clyde, have you ever considered that you're an idiot? Have you ever liked a band or an artist based on a review? I haven't. A review has only ever made me give them a listen. After that it's up to me. Now, that said, please give me a detailed description the ten stupidest things that 2pid does IYO. I will compare his stupidity with yours they are exactly equal, but if there were a difference, I 'would not tell you |
#585
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 4:09*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
Sacky the Lantzschmuck plucks his strings. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. Its fun breaking in the virgins! Have you ever busted a hymen? You'd better bring a blood assay kit the next time you plan such a "triumph". * * * * Gadget to help women feign virginity * * * * Whether it's seen as a clever little gadget to help * * * * a woman keep a secret or a devilish deception that * * * * threatens Islam, the Artificial Virginity Hymen Kit * * * * is not welcome in Egypt. * * * * The kit allows a bride who is not a virgin to pretend * * * * that she is. A pouch inserted into the vagina on her * * * * wedding night ruptures and leaks a blood-like liquid * * * * designed to trick a new husband into believing that * * * * his wife is chaste. It's a wink of ingenuity to soothe * * * * a man's ego and keep the dowry intact. * * * * Egyptian conservatives condemn the device as technology * * * * that will promote promiscuity in a culture that forbids * * * * premarital sex. Their protests are arising in a nation that * * * * over the last 40 years has gone from miniskirts and * * * * secularism to hijabs and religious devotion. But seldom * * * * have conservatives faced such brazen advertising. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-fake-hymen7-2009o... You've probably been fooled the last three or four times. I hope you didn't pay too much extra for the privilege of deflowering a "virgin". I happen to like the taste of cheap runny ketchup. |
#586
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 4:14*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 7, 1:27*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 11:06*pm, George M. Middius wrote: hophead said: Still I read rao when I can, and I appreciate what you bring to group. Clyde is on a witch-hunt to capture uncorraled females. LOL!!! Its fun breaking in the virgins! Have you ever busted a hymen? Often, men who aren't good lovers prefer virgins. Then they won't know how poor he is as a lover. The fact that Clyde talks like this is proof enough that he falls in this category. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or it's a nod to his bar band career! Stephen oK, I got the $20, but Where's my chicks for free? |
#587
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Prof. SackStuffer is still fuming. There is no point in reading a reviewer who just adores and goes gaga over everyone she knows personally. Although it appears you've given up the fantasy that you're teaching a class in dumbing-down musical performance critiques, I don't believe clinging to the delusion that Usenet is a locus for "reading reviewers" will help you on your road to sobriety. |
#588
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 11:49*am, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. |
#589
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 11:49*am, Jenn wrote:
In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. and I hope no more oohs and aahs from you |
#590
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 1:39*pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Oct 5, 8:52*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. Correction: *As I said, I won't be posting any more music here. *Don't be a wus. *If nobody posted anything someone didn't agree with...the place would be deader than dead. *You have Art's opinion on the value of your opinion in this area. But letting his opinion affect your posts, especially when you don't agree with his opinion, is, IMO, being a wus. 'she is a wus because she won't offer balanced and analytical opinions, |
#591
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 5, 3:39*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article I will wait for him to post it. he doesn't post a bunch of oooh's and aah's about his buddies, YOU DO! He certainly does. I haven't seen any, maybe he posts under an alias. Is he posting as SHHH!!? |
#592
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 4:06*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
You are stupid enough to pay attention to reviewers who only have good things to say. Or I'm smart enough to know that she isn't posting here as a "reviewer". Duh. |
#593
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 4:07*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:17*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 7, 1:23*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, Clyde, have you ever considered that you're an idiot? Agreement noted. Have you ever liked a band or an artist based on a review? I haven't. A review has only ever made me give them a listen. After that it's up to me. Silence equaling assent noted. Now, that said, please give me a detailed description the ten stupidest things that 2pid does IYO. I will compare his stupidity with yours they are exactly equal, but if there were a difference, I 'would not tell you I see now that you actually mean that 2pid is far too stupid for you to risk your friendship with an honest assessment. Agreed. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#594
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 4:18*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 5, 1:39*pm, ScottW2 wrote: On Oct 5, 8:52*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 5, 12:47*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 2:36*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 4, 12:20*am, Jenn wrote: In article , *Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 3, 10:49*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 1, 5:46*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 1, 3:59*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky burbled: LOL!!!! That is what being a fawning sycophant is all about!!!! Um, no, Clyde, it isn't. My dear SHhhh, yes it is No, it's not. yes it is fawning·ly adv. Synonyms: fawn1, apple-polish, bootlick, kowtow, slaver1, toady, truckle These verbs mean to curry favor by behaving obsequiously and submissively: fawned on her superior; students apple-polishing the teacher; bootlicked to get a promotion; lawyers kowtowing to a judge; slavered over his rich uncle; toadying to members of the club; nobles truckling to the king. syc·o·phant *(sk-fnt, sk-) n. A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people. Very good, Clyde. You can cut-and-paste as well as your stupid friend can. Um, what will Jenn "get" from these people? That's the thread you miss. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! then is she has nothing to gain then she has nothing to be afraid of and she should comparatively rank those players. She is afraid that those frail ego luimnaries will complain to the contractor that hires her. You are so full of bull**** that it oozes from you. *You've jumped to a massively bad conclusion. *Here's a concept that you obviously don't understand: *Of the 8 guitarists I posted, 4 of them are very good friends, and 2 others I know pretty well. *Perhaps it's not true for you, but in my life and in my business, it's considered impolite to rank the talents of your friends and colleagues like they were entrees at a restaurant. *If I have critical words for then, as I sometimes do, they are offered in private, where it is appropriate to do so. FINE!!! Then don't give us your sugarcoated bull**** opinions of these people I've not said anything about them that I don't believe. *There was nothing 'sugarcoated'. *I hope that you can understand that, but I doubt that. We already know that you won't say anything that could be construed as the least bit critical, in fear of offending your thin skinnned friends and professional acquaintances, No, it's a matter of professionalism. Then your "professional" opinions and evaluations, 'such as they are, are vacuous and worthless, you might as well kepp quiet about them, continuing your sugar coated oohs and aahs just makes you llook bad. As I said, I won't be any more music here. Correction: *As I said, I won't be posting any more music here. *Don't be a wus. *If nobody posted anything someone didn't agree with...the place would be deader than dead. *You have Art's opinion on the value of your opinion in this area. But letting his opinion affect your posts, especially when you don't agree with his opinion, is, IMO, being a wus. 'she is a wus because she won't offer balanced and analytical opinions, What are 2pid's ten most stupid traits? Show us the way! Teach us! Offer an honest "review"! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
#595
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote: Prof. SackStuffer is still fuming. There is no point in reading a reviewer who just adores and goes gaga over everyone she knows personally. Although it appears you've given up the fantasy that you're teaching a class in dumbing-down musical performance critiques, I don't believe clinging to the delusion that Usenet is a locus for "reading reviewers" will help you on your road to sobriety. I'm wondering what gave him the idea that I was offering a review. |
#596
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
Jenn said: Prof. SackStuffer is still fuming. There is no point in reading a reviewer who just adores and goes gaga over everyone she knows personally. Although it appears you've given up the fantasy that you're teaching a class in dumbing-down musical performance critiques, I don't believe clinging to the delusion that Usenet is a locus for "reading reviewers" will help you on your road to sobriety. I'm wondering what gave him the idea that I was offering a review. hic |
#597
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 5:36*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 7, 4:06*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: You are stupid enough to pay attention to reviewers who only have good things to say. Or I'm smart enough to know that she isn't posting here as a "reviewer". Duh. yes, she is not a reviewer, she's just posting personal opinions based on fluff |
#598
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 5:37*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Oct 7, 4:07*pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 7, 12:17*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Oct 7, 1:23*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On Oct 6, 9:43*pm, Jenn wrote: Oh Hon, you don't know how "in depth" I can be. *I've taken music theory through the doctoral level, and have taught it through the complete undergrad curriculum. *Hey Stephen, do you think that our mates here would enjoy some Schenkerian analysis? You can't be in depth here, not if your so-callled 'professionalism prevents you form telling us the least bit'detrimental opinion regarding another musician, Clyde, have you ever considered that you're an idiot? Agreement noted. Have you ever liked a band or an artist based on a review? I haven't. A review has only ever made me give them a listen. After that it's up to me. Silence equaling assent noted. Now, that said, please give me a detailed description the ten stupidest things that 2pid does IYO. I will compare his stupidity with yours they are exactly equal, but if there were a difference, I 'would not tell you I see now that you actually mean that 2pid is far too stupid for you to risk your friendship with an honest assessment. Agreed. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!! maybe the answer is that I don't want to insult you. |
#599
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 6:23*pm, Jenn wrote:
In article , *George M. Middius wrote: Prof. SackStuffer is still fuming. There is no point in reading a reviewer who just adores and goes gaga over everyone she knows personally. Although it appears you've given up the fantasy that you're teaching a class in dumbing-down musical performance critiques, I don't believe clinging to the delusion that Usenet is a locus for "reading reviewers" will help you on your road to sobriety. I'm wondering what gave him the idea that I was offering a review. you aren't even offering us your opinions. Just fluff. |
#600
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
A Theory About Scott
On Oct 7, 4:18*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Oct 7, 6:23*pm, Jenn wrote: In article , *George M. Middius wrote: Prof. SackStuffer is still fuming. There is no point in reading a reviewer who just adores and goes gaga over everyone she knows personally. Although it appears you've given up the fantasy that you're teaching a class in dumbing-down musical performance critiques, I don't believe clinging to the delusion that Usenet is a locus for "reading reviewers" will help you on your road to sobriety. I'm wondering what gave him the idea that I was offering a review. you aren't even offering us your opinions. Just fluff. Then you should be very happy that I'm not offering anything that I like anymore. You be sure to follow suit now... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
the rustbucket theory | Car Audio | |||
NAT: B-S Theory | Audio Opinions | |||
Forum for mic theory? | Pro Audio | |||
Forum for mic theory? | Pro Audio | |||
Sampling Theory | Pro Audio |