Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Older Alpine Vs. Newer Alpine HU's
Hi all:
I have two systems setup almost the same way in an Acura Integra and a Toyota 4runner. Both have Boston Pros for the front, and cheap Bostons for rear fill. Each has a Boston Pro 12" sub in a sealed enclosure and both are driven by an Xtant 603X each. There are two main differences between the systems. One has an older Alpine 7840 (Integra) HU and the other has a newer Alpine 9815 (4runner) HU. Taking into consideration the size difference between the cars it seems that the older Alpine performs a lot better than the newer one quality wise. The highs are crisper and the bass has more definition. The 9815 sounds a bit dull. I have even tried to change the settings with that file you configure and download from the Alpine site. Has anyone experienced this? Why could be the reason for the difference? I am asking this because I am getting ready to buy a new car and I am really in love with the 7998. But I rather have good sound quality instead of good looks. I am going to keep everything from my old system except for the HU, which I was thinking to exchange the 7840 for the newer 7998. The car that I am selling is the Acura and I am going to put the system on a G35. I wanted to get some thoughts from people that have experience with older and newer Apine units. Please advise. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.627 / Virus Database: 402 - Release Date: 3/16/2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For Sale - Sydney, Australia - Alpine Car Audio | Car Audio | |||
Older 2 volt maximum Amplifier gains with newer 4 volt preout head units | Car Audio | |||
Alpine CDA-9815 vs Clarion DXZ835MP | Car Audio | |||
Alpine CDA-9815 vs Clarion DXZ835MP | Car Audio | |||
Alpine deck blew my subs! | Car Audio |