Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#161
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
Tom McCreadie wrote:
Dave Plowman wrote: Thing with all these tests is you can usually get the result you are looking for - if in charge of the tests. But the whole point - well, half the point :-) - of a properly-conducted double blind test is that the researcher himself is _not_ in charge of the tests; he's not allowed to be aware of the identity pf the choices that he's presenting to the "patients", so he's not in a position to influence the results. You can still influence the results a lot by adjusting the time between the samples are presented, subject selection, equipment placement, and choice of material. ESPECIALLY choice of material. Edison did blind demonstrations at which members of the general public could not tell the difference between a live singer and cylinder playback. Today's unsophisticated audiences are more sophisticated than that, but it's a lot easier to do with a singer than a harpsichord. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#162
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
In article ,
Scott Dorsey wrote: Tom McCreadie wrote: Dave Plowman wrote: Thing with all these tests is you can usually get the result you are looking for - if in charge of the tests. But the whole point - well, half the point :-) - of a properly-conducted double blind test is that the researcher himself is _not_ in charge of the tests; he's not allowed to be aware of the identity pf the choices that he's presenting to the "patients", so he's not in a position to influence the results. You can still influence the results a lot by adjusting the time between the samples are presented, subject selection, equipment placement, and choice of material. ESPECIALLY choice of material. Edison did blind demonstrations at which members of the general public could not tell the difference between a live singer and cylinder playback. Today's unsophisticated audiences are more sophisticated than that, but it's a lot easier to do with a singer than a harpsichord. Even with double blind testing, the outcome can be influenced by the choice of material used. As a simple example, if doing a live versus recorded test, it would be much more difficult to reproduce an entire symphony orchestra than a single instrument - or voice. -- *If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#163
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On 3/02/2015 11:57 p.m., Scott Dorsey wrote:
Edison did blind demonstrations at which members of the general public could not tell the difference between a live singer and cylinder playback. Today's unsophisticated audiences are more sophisticated than that, but it's a lot easier to do with a singer than a harpsichord. --scott In that case it was more a case of the 'general public' simply being astounded at music coming from a machine than the sound quality of each. geoff |
#164
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:13:51 AM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote:
"JackA" skrev i en meddelelse ... On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 9:20:36 PM UTC-5, hank alrich wrote: Yeah, Mark, Hank knows a heck more than I. Correct. Jack Kind regards Peter Larsen Peter, have Hank tell me everything he knows. Really. I have a half minute to spare! Jack |
#165
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On 04/02/2015 01:57, JackA wrote:
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:13:51 AM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote: "JackA" skrev i en meddelelse ... On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 9:20:36 PM UTC-5, hank alrich wrote: Yeah, Mark, Hank knows a heck more than I. Correct. Jack Kind regards Peter Larsen Peter, have Hank tell me everything he knows. Really. I have a half minute to spare! So, that's half a minute to tell you all you can comprehend, and a years or two that you won't understand a word of. The people you are being so dismissive of in this thread all have proven track records, while you first appeared here a few days ago, spouting nonsense. Go to google groups and check their posting history over the last decade or so, then call them inexperienced and ignorant of the facts about audio, if you still consider that tp be the facts. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#166
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
The people you are being so dismissive of in this thread all have proven track records, while you first appeared here a few days ago, spouting nonsense. Go to google groups and check their posting history over the last decade or so, then call them inexperienced and ignorant of the facts about audio, if you still consider that tp be the facts. that is what a troll does. please don't feed the troll Mark |
#167
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
"that is what a troll does.
please don't feed the troll Mark " So I guess that makes Ghandi, Jesus, and Martin Luther King Jr. trolls. Anyone who challenges the status quo, or dares to breach a taboo subject? Then count JackA and me in!! |
#168
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
In article ,
wrote: "that is what a troll does. please don't feed the troll Mark " So I guess that makes Ghandi, Jesus, and Martin Luther King Jr. trolls. Anyone who challenges the status quo, or dares to breach a taboo subject? Then count JackA and me in!! You don't have a problem with self esteem, then? -- *Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#169
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
|
#170
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
geoff wrote: " and you themanjacks are something else. "
And so are you geoff. Love to criticize holders of alternative view points. |
#171
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
krissi dumb****i @ dumb****s-r-us.com wrote in message
... geoff wrote: " and you themanjacks are something else. " And so are you geoff. Love to criticize holders of alternative view points. In Krissi's world of dumb****ery, getting all your facts wrong, and not giving a **** whether it's wrong, is explained away with a lame dumb**** excuse about "alternative viewpoints." That's easier than trying to use it's limited brainpower to understand. |
#172
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
|
#173
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 1:15:25 AM UTC-5, John Williamson wrote:
On 04/02/2015 01:57, JackA wrote: On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:13:51 AM UTC-5, Peter Larsen wrote: "JackA" skrev i en meddelelse ... On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 9:20:36 PM UTC-5, hank alrich wrote: Yeah, Mark, Hank knows a heck more than I. Correct. Jack Kind regards Peter Larsen Peter, have Hank tell me everything he knows. Really. I have a half minute to spare! So, that's half a minute to tell you all you can comprehend, and a years or two that you won't understand a word of. The people you are being so dismissive of in this thread all have proven track records Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Jack , while you first appeared here a few days ago, spouting nonsense. Go to google groups and check their posting history over the last decade or so, then call them inexperienced and ignorant of the facts about audio, if you still consider that tp be the facts. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#174
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 9:21:54 AM UTC-5, wrote:
"that is what a troll does. please don't feed the troll Mark " So I guess that makes Ghandi, Jesus, and Martin Luther King Jr. trolls. Anyone who challenges the status quo, or dares to breach a taboo subject? Then count JackA and me in!! K', a lot of the regulars here are just old school. Maybe they are surviving ancient aliens playing their checkers game at the home. The don't want us humanoids to disrupt them. Maybe a few bottles of Maalox may be considered as a peace offering. JacK :-) |
#175
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On 05/02/2015 02:56, JackA wrote:
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 1:15:25 AM UTC-5, John Williamson wrote: The people you are being so dismissive of in this thread all have proven track records Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Of producing excellent, commercially successful sound recordings. You've probably heard some of them on the radio and TV. You may even have bought the occasional record they've been involved with making. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#176
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:57:59 AM UTC-5, John Williamson wrote:
On 05/02/2015 02:56, JackA wrote: On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 1:15:25 AM UTC-5, John Williamson wrote: The people you are being so dismissive of in this thread all have proven track records Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Of producing excellent, commercially successful sound recordings. You've probably heard some of them on the radio and TV. You may even have bought the occasional record they've been involved with making. -- Tciao for Now! John. Well, John, I'm all ears. Tell me which recording!! Thanks! Jack |
#177
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
JackA wrote: "Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!!
Jack - show quoted text -" And, cowardly hiding behind a stupid alias when calling others "dumbf - " and "shortbus". Really professional, I must add. |
#178
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
wrote in message
... JackA wrote: "Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Jack - show quoted text -" And, cowardly hiding behind a stupid alias when calling others "dumbf - " and "shortbus". Really professional, I must add. Aren't you "hiding behind a stupid alias" yourself, Krissi-boy? More dumb****ery from the short-bus dumb****! |
#179
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:20:29 AM UTC-5, wrote:
JackA wrote: "Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Jack - show quoted text -" And, cowardly hiding behind a stupid alias when calling others "dumbf - " and "shortbus". Really professional, I must add. Very common in usenet. Always a small klan or some sort. I never see Scott criticizing their language, so he must be in full support of their childish actions here. Don't take me wrong, Scott's okay, but, geez, after FIVE years and that tape recorder still isn't fixed! Troubleshooting isn't one of his strong points. Jack |
#182
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:49:25 -0800 (PST), JackA
wrote: On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 2:51:33 PM UTC-5, david gourley wrote: JackA said...news:0713ff64-9f91-4d54-b250- : On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:20:29 AM UTC-5, wrote: JackA wrote: "Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Jack - show quoted text -" And, cowardly hiding behind a stupid alias when calling others "dumbf - " and "shortbus". Really professional, I must add. Very common in usenet. Always a small klan or some sort. I never see Scott criticizing their language, so he must be in full support of their childish actions here. Don't take me wrong, Scott's okay, but, geez, after FIVE years and that tape recorder still isn't fixed! Troubleshooting isn't one of his strong points. Jack You may be a legend in your own mind, but every time you post crap like this it just makes you look more juvenile. Who needs any valid point of reference when you can sit on a broken hobby horse (and you don't even do it very well as a hobby, either). david Go on, pick on me, but your "regulars" here enjoy calling people f'k tards and such. This certainly isn't where "pros" hang out, that is a given. Jack If the service is so rotten why do you come here? Would you like a refund? |
#183
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On 05 Feb 2015, Gray_Wolf wrote in
rec.audio.pro: If the service is so rotten why do you come here? Would you like a refund? Because he's a serial troll. This group is his latest target. |
#184
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 11:43:49 PM UTC-5, Nil wrote:
On 05 Feb 2015, Gray_Wolf wrote in rec.audio.pro: If the service is so rotten why do you come here? Would you like a refund? Because he's a serial troll. This group is his latest target. Cereal troll!! Give me all your Rice Krispies and one refund!! Jack :-) |
#185
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
JackA said...news:7a13adb9-cc98-4c89-be66-
: On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 2:51:33 PM UTC-5, david gourley wrote: JackA said...news:0713ff64-9f91-4d54-b250- : On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:20:29 AM UTC-5, wrote: JackA wrote: "Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Jack - show quoted text -" And, cowardly hiding behind a stupid alias when calling others "dumbf - " and "shortbus". Really professional, I must add. Very common in usenet. Always a small klan or some sort. I never see Scott criticizing their language, so he must be in full support of their childish actions here. Don't take me wrong, Scott's okay, but, geez, after FIVE years and that tape recorder still isn't fixed! Troubleshooting isn't one of his strong points. Jack You may be a legend in your own mind, but every time you post crap like this it just makes you look more juvenile. Who needs any valid point of reference when you can sit on a broken hobby horse (and you don't even do it very well as a hobby, either). david Go on, pick on me, but your "regulars" here enjoy calling people f'k tards and such. This certainly isn't where "pros" hang out, that is a given. Jack It's really redundant of me to put you down since G_d has already done such a great job of it. david |
#186
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 7:55:58 PM UTC-5, david gourley wrote:
JackA said...news:7a13adb9-cc98-4c89-be66- : On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 2:51:33 PM UTC-5, david gourley wrote: JackA said...news:0713ff64-9f91-4d54-b250- : On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:20:29 AM UTC-5, wrote: JackA wrote: "Of what, best insults? Okay, I'll agree!! Jack - show quoted text -" And, cowardly hiding behind a stupid alias when calling others "dumbf - " and "shortbus". Really professional, I must add. Very common in usenet. Always a small klan or some sort. I never see Scott criticizing their language, so he must be in full support of their childish actions here. Don't take me wrong, Scott's okay, but, geez, after FIVE years and that tape recorder still isn't fixed! Troubleshooting isn't one of his strong points. Jack You may be a legend in your own mind, but every time you post crap like this it just makes you look more juvenile. Who needs any valid point of reference when you can sit on a broken hobby horse (and you don't even do it very well as a hobby, either). david Go on, pick on me, but your "regulars" here enjoy calling people f'k tards and such. This certainly isn't where "pros" hang out, that is a given. Jack It's really redundant of me to put you down since G_d has already done such a great job of it. Oh, what's this, Top My Insult challenge??!! To Purgatory with you!! --- Jack :-) david |
#187
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
"Nil" wrote in message
... Because he [Jersey Jackoff] is a serial troll. This group is his latest target. You are correct. |
#188
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 7:54:18 PM UTC-5, None wrote:
"Nil" wrote in message ... Because he [Jersey Jackoff] is a serial troll. This group is his latest target. You are correct. You are brilliant, though I wouldn't drop out of grade-school just yet. Look what it did to Hank!!! And chain your Gary_Wolf (aka ROTFLMAO - sounds German to me) to a post, where he belongs!! Jack |
#189
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On 6/02/2015 5:43 p.m., Nil wrote:
On 05 Feb 2015, Gray_Wolf wrote in rec.audio.pro: If the service is so rotten why do you come here? Would you like a refund? Because he's a serial troll. This group is his latest target. Actually his trolling (surely it must be ....) does provide a bit of light relief. Just hope nobody is actually led astray by it. geoff |
#190
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
geoff wrote:
On 6/02/2015 5:43 p.m., Nil wrote: On 05 Feb 2015, Gray_Wolf wrote in rec.audio.pro: If the service is so rotten why do you come here? Would you like a refund? Because he's a serial troll. This group is his latest target. Actually his trolling (surely it must be ....) does provide a bit of light relief. Just hope nobody is actually led astray by it. geoff I don't think he's up to cereal trolling. That's a complex activity. He's more on the cracker crumbs trolling level. -- shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com HankandShaidriMusic.Com YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic |
#191
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 1:39:37 AM UTC-5, hank alrich wrote:
geoff wrote: On 6/02/2015 5:43 p.m., Nil wrote: On 05 Feb 2015, Gray_Wolf wrote in rec.audio.pro: If the service is so rotten why do you come here? Would you like a refund? Because he's a serial troll. This group is his latest target. Actually his trolling (surely it must be ....) does provide a bit of light relief. Just hope nobody is actually led astray by it. geoff I don't think he's up to cereal trolling. That's a complex activity. He's more on the cracker crumbs trolling level. -- shut up and play your guitar * HankAlrich.Com HankandShaidriMusic.Com YouTube.Com/WalkinayMusic WARNING: Children at Play!... Geoff wrote: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap... whine *sigh* Hank replied: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, *BURP*. Gray Wolf wrote: ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO!!! None wrote: Yip yap, Yip Yap, hehehehe. |
#192
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
JackA wrote: "- show quoted text -
WARNING: Children at Play!... Geoff wrote: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap... whine *sigh* Hank replied: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, *BURP*. Gray Wolf wrote: ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO!!! None wrote: Yip yap, Yip Yap, hehehehe. " DON'T stoop to their level. Keep your h. e. a. d. u. p! |
#193
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On 18/02/2015 7:15 a.m., JackA wrote:
WARNING: Children at Play!... Geoff wrote: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap... whine *sigh* Hank replied: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, *BURP*. Gray Wolf wrote: ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO!!! None wrote: Yip yap, Yip Yap, hehehehe. Naa we're all the same people. geoff |
#194
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
geoff wrote:
Naa we're all the same people. Some of us are different. A lot of people confuse me with Mike Rivers because we have the same beard, but actually we share it. He has it on even days and I have it on odd ones. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#195
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Questions
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 3:07:02 PM UTC-5, geoff wrote:
On 18/02/2015 7:15 a.m., JackA wrote: WARNING: Children at Play!... Geoff wrote: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap... whine *sigh* Hank replied: Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, Yip yap, *BURP*. Gray Wolf wrote: ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO!!! None wrote: Yip yap, Yip Yap, hehehehe. Naa we're all the same people. Yeah, sock-puppets!! :-) Jack geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reason 3.0 Install Questions, questions... | Pro Audio | |||
Jolida 502a ----Chassis is missing C7.....Questions questions..... | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Sub Box Questions | Car Audio | |||
UAD-1 Questions | Pro Audio | |||
Seven Questions + | Audio Opinions |