Arny Krueger wrote:
"paul packer" wrote in message


Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting.

Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws,
and you have no practical background in the topic so you
can't spot the factual errors.

Of course no-one in
the ABX camp will applaud it, or likely even read it
through, but that's their loss.

It takes a lot of cups of coffee to retain consciousness
while reading Ludovic's highly repetitive and bogus posts.

Keep repeating common sense and who knows, maybe one day
it will be common.

Paul, you just flunked another IQ test.

Maybe there is some chemical that will energize your
synapses to the point where bilge like Ludovic's will start
wrinkling your nose.

Ask Paul Domer, in the past he's bragged about his
self-experimentation along these lines. Of course, we're
talking Paul Dormer, so many of us know that none of his
experiments ever bore what most would call fruit.
__________________________________________________ ______
Paul Packer said:

Bravo, Ludovic. A spot-on posting.
Arny answered:
Only if your IQ is low enough to not spot the logical flaws,
and you have no practical background in the topic so you
can't spot the factual errors.


Arny, how about a short list of these "logical flaws" and "factual
errors". Don't you at all care to educate your readers by lucid
examples rather than bare assertions? .
And while you're at it: when will you come up with that one reference
to an
ABX "test" published in any journal or mag. with a positive outcome:
"Yes , we heard the difference". You had 4 decades so far to do it,
Still counting.
Ludovic Mirabel
How did someone called Paul Dormer sin against you? Just curious.