Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trident-Neotek --upgrade from ghost??
I currently own a 32 channel Soundcraft Ghost with mute automation and
was considering a jump to a used mid level console such as a Trident 65,24,75, 70 series or a series 2/3 neotek.....Mic Pres are not that important since I have lots of outboard pres but EQ is............How does the EQ section stack up against a ghost EQ section.....is it a substatial step up or am I splitting hairs......my budjet is under 10 K so a trident 80 is out of the question... Thanks Ron |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Having installed the very first Neotek IIIC in the Los Angeles area, in
1984, I feel I can speak with some authority. THe Neotek consoles were pretty sophisticated, sounded really nice, had decent mic pres, lovely sounding EQ, and should be avoided at all costs. They used custom pot/switch assemblies in the EQ, with dual concentric pots with built in switches, which was very economical for surface real estate. But they didn't hold up well. Although made by CTS, a reputable American manufacturer, they started showing sever intermittents within a few years. By this time, Neotek had stopped supporting them, and was focused on building Elites & Elans. This was very disappointing, as I was still trying to support this, as well as other Neotek consoles. As a further note, I was working for a well known artist in '86, who was so taken with the ELite that he ordered 2 of them, one for home, another for his remote truck. When the first arrived, we set it up with his 3M 32 track digital recorder, and ran tests. We found that crosstalk on adjacent multitrack buses (odd if panned left, even if panned right) was totally unacceptable when used with the digital tape machine and its lower noise floor. When we contacted Neotek, they said, basically, tough. The order for the 2nd console was canceled, the already delivered first console was crated back up, an SSL was purchased, and life went on. The Trident 65/75 series is very generic, and easily supported. The fixed freq. Hi & Low can easily be modified with the addition of a 3 way toggle switch to support 3 frequencies. The 70 series is a little 80, well built, sounds good, easy to work on, IMHO very desirable. If you're not a maintenance masochist, avoid the Neoteks. Just one person's opinion. Ron Florentine wrote: I currently own a 32 channel Soundcraft Ghost with mute automation and was considering a jump to a used mid level console such as a Trident 65,24,75, 70 series or a series 2/3 neotek.....Mic Pres are not that important since I have lots of outboard pres but EQ is............How does the EQ section stack up against a ghost EQ section.....is it a substatial step up or am I splitting hairs......my budjet is under 10 K so a trident 80 is out of the question... Thanks Ron -- Stephen Anderson ~At the end of the day, it's all about the music |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Having installed the very first Neotek IIIC in the Los Angeles area, in
1984, I feel I can speak with some authority. THe Neotek consoles were pretty sophisticated, sounded really nice, had decent mic pres, lovely sounding EQ, and should be avoided at all costs. They used custom pot/switch assemblies in the EQ, with dual concentric pots with built in switches, which was very economical for surface real estate. But they didn't hold up well. Although made by CTS, a reputable American manufacturer, they started showing sever intermittents within a few years. By this time, Neotek had stopped supporting them, and was focused on building Elites & Elans. This was very disappointing, as I was still trying to support this, as well as other Neotek consoles. As a further note, I was working for a well known artist in '86, who was so taken with the ELite that he ordered 2 of them, one for home, another for his remote truck. When the first arrived, we set it up with his 3M 32 track digital recorder, and ran tests. We found that crosstalk on adjacent multitrack buses (odd if panned left, even if panned right) was totally unacceptable when used with the digital tape machine and its lower noise floor. When we contacted Neotek, they said, basically, tough. The order for the 2nd console was canceled, the already delivered first console was crated back up, an SSL was purchased, and life went on. The Trident 65/75 series is very generic, and easily supported. The fixed freq. Hi & Low can easily be modified with the addition of a 3 way toggle switch to support 3 frequencies. The 70 series is a little 80, well built, sounds good, easy to work on, IMHO very desirable. If you're not a maintenance masochist, avoid the Neoteks. Just one person's opinion. Ron Florentine wrote: I currently own a 32 channel Soundcraft Ghost with mute automation and was considering a jump to a used mid level console such as a Trident 65,24,75, 70 series or a series 2/3 neotek.....Mic Pres are not that important since I have lots of outboard pres but EQ is............How does the EQ section stack up against a ghost EQ section.....is it a substatial step up or am I splitting hairs......my budjet is under 10 K so a trident 80 is out of the question... Thanks Ron -- Stephen Anderson ~At the end of the day, it's all about the music |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If you're not a maintenance masochist, avoid the Neoteks.
OK. A counterpoint. I have been using an early Series IIIf (the hardwired one) hard for at least 5 years now. After fixing a dozen or so cold solder joints, replacing some bad op-amps (standard stuff there), and upgrading the fader buffer circuit to modern Neotek specs to allow me to use P&G's, the board has been EXTREMELY reliable. I did all that in the first year. I bet I haven't pulled a module in 18 months. The line amps and EQ sound great. The summing bus sounds good if you don't hit it too hard. If hit hard it gets a nice density for some kinds of work. The board is difficult to get any kind of harshness out of. It wants to be sweet and musical, and in my case, reliable. FWIW! -jeff |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If you're not a maintenance masochist, avoid the Neoteks.
OK. A counterpoint. I have been using an early Series IIIf (the hardwired one) hard for at least 5 years now. After fixing a dozen or so cold solder joints, replacing some bad op-amps (standard stuff there), and upgrading the fader buffer circuit to modern Neotek specs to allow me to use P&G's, the board has been EXTREMELY reliable. I did all that in the first year. I bet I haven't pulled a module in 18 months. The line amps and EQ sound great. The summing bus sounds good if you don't hit it too hard. If hit hard it gets a nice density for some kinds of work. The board is difficult to get any kind of harshness out of. It wants to be sweet and musical, and in my case, reliable. FWIW! -jeff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Firmware upgrade to 2.0 kit for the 02R96 | Pro Audio | |||
Trident 80 vs. New Neotek Elan II | Pro Audio | |||
Second round: Trident VS. Amek?? | Pro Audio | |||
Linux is dead...It doesn't even have a pulse. | Pro Audio | |||
CES + Von Schweikert VR-4 to VR-5/7 Upgrade? | High End Audio |