| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#561
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul Dormer" wrote in message ... "Clyde Slick" emitted : **** happens, get used to it, its war. Iraq is better off now Are you booking a holiday now? Not quite yet, maybe in 5 years it will condusive enough for that. Did you vacation there during Saddams' regime? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#562
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Iraq is better off now You know this because W, Cheney, Condi and Rumsfeld told you so, right? Ever ask an Iraqi? You want to believe Iraq was better off under Saddam, you knbow this because of Michael Moore? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#563
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... a écrit : Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Sackman is very generous with others' life... I am curious to know where he uses to place the Iraqi in his subhuman classification. Before or after the French ? :-( Where did I say the French were subhuman? I just don't like them. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#564
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... a écrit : Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Sackman is very generous with others' life... I am curious to know where he uses to place the Iraqi in his subhuman classification. Before or after the French ? :-( Where did I say the French were subhuman? I just don't like them. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#565
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... a écrit : Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Sackman is very generous with others' life... I am curious to know where he uses to place the Iraqi in his subhuman classification. Before or after the French ? :-( Where did I say the French were subhuman? I just don't like them. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#566
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... a écrit : Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Sackman is very generous with others' life... I am curious to know where he uses to place the Iraqi in his subhuman classification. Before or after the French ? :-( Where did I say the French were subhuman? I just don't like them. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#567
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clyde Slick wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Clyde Slick wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Clyde Slick wrote: snipped Try doing something productive like stealing food out of the mouths of Iraqi children. Why not do it the American way: kill their families. What bull****! We are not targeting families. Does the child that lost a parent care whether or not that parent was "targeted" or was merely "collateral damage"? Does the woman that lost a husband or child care? Does anyone that lost a family member, friend or neighbor care? How many completely innocent civilians were killed during the "Shock and Awe" phase of the illegal invasion of Iraq? And how many during the illegal occupation? Take your purple thumb and stick it up your rear. Do you want to lick it when I pull it out, Art? I suppose you are also one of those WWII revisionists. Only do the extent that it was easier to use the A bomb on the Japanese because they are Asians. Would we have used it on Adolph and his white, Christian country? And lets talk about the ugly mess of the Civil War, that saved the integrity of this Union, Well, those states did have a legal and ethical right to seceed. But, Lincoln did the only thing he could do. I guess you demand your wars on pristine silver paltters, anointed with fancy and proper doilies. This war serves three purposes, Art: feed the defense industry, serve the oil interests and insure the safety of Isreal. Theat's what all those people, Americans, Iraqis and others, are being killed and maimed for. National security and WMD were never anything but red herrings. And we made bin Laden look like a prophet: he predicted that the US would invade and occupy an oil-rich, Muslim country. Our actions have made his recruiting easier. |
|
#568
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... Clyde Slick wrote: I suppose you are also one of those WWII revisionists. Only do the extent that it was easier to use the A bomb on the Japanese because they are Asians. Would we have used it on Adolph and his white, Christian country? Under a similar set of circumstances, yes indeed. And lets talk about the ugly mess of the Civil War, that saved the integrity of this Union, Well, those states did have a legal and ethical right to seceed. But, Lincoln did the only thing he could do. I guess you demand your wars on pristine silver paltters, anointed with fancy and proper doilies. This war serves three purposes, Art: feed the defense industry, serve the oil interests and insure the safety of Isreal. Theat's what all those people, Americans, Iraqis and others, are being killed and maimed for. National security and WMD were never anything but red herrings. It is about the unfinished business of 1991. And we made bin Laden look like a prophet: he predicted that the US would invade and occupy an oil-rich, Muslim country. Our actions have made his recruiting easier. He had no problems before, As long as the mosques teach the brand of Islam that requires jihad against non Muslim society, and jihad against Muslims who don't sahre that brand of Islam, there will be no shortage of recruits. This is your red herring. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#569
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul Dormer said: The modern British soldier has a sense of nobility and ethics that IMO the typical GI lacks. Our army is extremely disciplined and diligent in attaining it's goals proficiently. I note that bravado and violence are glamorized in the US.... http://cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/02/...eut/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe...ial/index.html http://cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/02/...der/index.html This is pretty weak for you. Such exceptions pale into insignificance when compared to the US's track record.. I'd say it establishes a pattern quite different from your characterization involving "nobility and ethics". Also, you haven't shown any evidence that "the US's track record" is any worse. How many incidents of malfeasance have occurred, and how many soldiers has each country deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq? BTW, I recently had the displeasure of sampling a dish called Vegetarian Fajitas. bleaaah! |
|
#570
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arny Krueger wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message ups.com Arny Krueger wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message oups.com "Arny Krueger" wrote in message "Howard Ferstler" wrote in message I still think it would be cool if John and some of his associates and Arny and some of his supporters openly participated in an open and public, level-matched DBT... That is way too risky to the reputations of the usual list of suspects, to ever happen Note that had I meant to say that it had never happened, I would have said that it never happened. Instead, I used words that are oriented towards a future event. Thus Arny Kruger tries to lay the foundation for an argument that he really meant to say that for me to take part in a public listening test of amplifiers would only be "too risky" if that test took place _in the future_. Which is clearly nonsense on his part. One obvious clue that the sentence is incomplete is the absence of a period. I apparently got distracted by say a phone call, and never finished the sentence properly. Had I finished the sentence I intented [sic] to write I would have typed the word again, followed by a period. I think you meant to say the word "again" rather than the word again, Mr. Krueger. But then, English isn't your first language, is it. Rather than quibble over my typing error Atkinson, I'll say that you've corrected me, which in some sense you have. The post was made with an obvious error in typing. Only obvious to someone desparetely trying to claim that words he wrote were not what he intended, Mr. Krueger. :-) The rest of us can only respond to what you actually wrote. And now I have to clean my coffee off my computer screen. Please understand that I am just a serious about these claims as Stereophile is/was about its claims about Armor-All for improving the sound quality of CDs. As we _were_ serious, Mr. Krueger, I must take it that you were just as serious when you tried to pretend that you meant something other than what you wrote. That you are claiming that you meant tests "in the future" when you were deriding me for not having taken part in public listening tests, which as I have pointed out, is utter nonsense. So, let me get this straight: what you are dimly trying to explain is that _again_, what you typed is not what you meant, so therefore you are not obliged to admit that what you typed was wrong. Wrong Atkinson, since I'm not dimly doing anything. I'm doing it right out here in front of the only light there is on this forum. "Dimly" refers, of course, to your befuddled grasp of the English language, Mr. Krueger, not in any literal sense. All I am doing to is trying to get you to grasp that your claim that I would not "risk" my reputation in a public listening test is utterly and totally incorrect. Contrary to what you implied, I _have_ done so, and as mentioned in the part of my post that you oh so desperately clipped in the hope that no-one would see it, on multiple occasions (including some that you have commented on in the past, so don't pretend you don't know what I am talking about). I hope you can present a more persuasive case than this in front of a live audience. :-) I thought it would be fun to see how you responded to a taste of your own favorite kind of debating trade liqueor [sic], John. Well, we shall see how persuasive you can be in public, Mr. Krueger, when you try to persuade the audience that what you said was not actually what you meant. :-) John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
|
#571
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Atkinson said: I thought it would be fun to see how you responded to a taste of your own favorite kind of debating trade liqueor [sic], John. Well, we shall see how persuasive you can be in public, Mr. Krueger, when you try to persuade the audience that what you said was not actually what you meant. :-) Does this mean you won't be allowing "take-backs" in your debate? ;-) |
|
#572
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
ups.com Well, we shall see how persuasive you can be in public, Mr. Krueger, when you try to persuade the audience that what you said was not actually what you meant. :-) I have zero illusions about convincing this audience of true believers of anything. |
|
#573
|
|||
|
|||
|
And why should they? After a flurry of mid-budget films of his
plays-especially those that didn't get filmed because he wouldn't allow the obvious, or in the case of "Finishing the Picture" had just premiered-his work will largely be forgotten, especially as schools quit ramming "Crucible" and "Salesman" down kids' throats. Which they will. I'd bet anything Gwen Stefani gets "Maggie". |
|
#574
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes
|
|
#575
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message ups.com Well, we shall see how persuasive you can be in public, Mr. Krueger, when you try to persuade the audience that what you said was not actually what you meant. :-) I have zero illusions about convincing this audience of true believers of anything. That just goes to show that your real reason for engaging in the debate is a masochistic need for self humiliation. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#576
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "John Atkinson" wrote in message ups.com Well, we shall see how persuasive you can be in public, Mr. Krueger, when you try to persuade the audience that what you said was not actually what you meant. :-) I have zero illusions about convincing this audience of true believers of anything. That just goes to show that your real reason for engaging in the debate is a masochistic need for self humiliation. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#577
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message ... a écrit : Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Sackman is very generous with others' life... I am curious to know where he uses to place the Iraqi in his subhuman classification. Before or after the French ? :-( Where did I say the French were subhuman? I just don't like them. You just don't like them ? Seems to me that I read that they were *disguting* you... |
|
#578
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick a écrit : "Lionel" wrote in message ... a écrit : Clyde "ChickenHawk" Slick wrote: **** happens, get used to it, its war. Easy to say when you're sitting safe and sound and watch the war on Fox News, idiot. Sackman is very generous with others' life... I am curious to know where he uses to place the Iraqi in his subhuman classification. Before or after the French ? :-( Where did I say the French were subhuman? I just don't like them. You just don't like them ? Seems to me that I read that they were *disguting* you... That would mean I don't like them. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#579
|
|||
|
|||
|
Clyde Slick wrote:
"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message Heck, the real Scott Wheeler ought to be mortified by the stuff you post here, the fact that you are claiming to be him, and the fact that you hang around RAO so much. Gee, the real Scott Wheeler at least has a job. Stop this Howard. You are looking quite ridiulous. Learn to type. Howard Ferstler |
|
#580
|
|||
|
|||
|
MINe 109 wrote:
In article , Howard Ferstler wrote: Try a different sockpuppet handle, pal. The one you are using now is worn out. This is really despicable, Howard. Says you. You have a consistent record of attacking your repliers by claiming they are fake despite evidence to the contrary. Worse, you published this pipe dream of circular logic. You need to get out more. Most of the "subjectivity at all cost" and preference-worshipping clowns who post here are sockpuppets. I would hazard a guess and say that many of them are tweako audio writers who are defending turf. The rest are just jerks. It's one thing if you're just having some fun on RAO, but you're way past the point of being excused on that count. Give me a break. If this guy is who he says he is, the situation is even worse. All of us would like to believe that famous people (who are not murderers, at least) are smarter than average and have level heads. And agree with you implicitly, right? No, emphatically. That this guy does not tells me one of two things: 1. Being famous does not make you smart. Ditto being published. Say, weren't those Armor-All and $1.25 tweaks published? Yes they were. An utterly goofy article by an utterly goofy individual. 2. The guy who posts here is borrowing a famous-person's name. If it is number 1, the guy is a disappointment, because we want famous people to be smart; if it is number 2, you tell me what is "really despicable." Your behavior. Only to high-strung tweako audio buffs, whose worlds revolve around their audio rigs. Howard Ferstler |
|
#581
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#582
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote: MINe 109 wrote: In article , Howard Ferstler wrote: Try a different sockpuppet handle, pal. The one you are using now is worn out. This is really despicable, Howard. Says you. You have a consistent record of attacking your repliers by claiming they are fake despite evidence to the contrary. Worse, you published this pipe dream of circular logic. You need to get out more. That doesn't even come close to addressing the issue. Most of the "subjectivity at all cost" and preference-worshipping clowns who post here are sockpuppets. I would hazard a guess and say that many of them are tweako audio writers who are defending turf. The rest are just jerks. Maybe you're just nuts. It's one thing if you're just having some fun on RAO, but you're way past the point of being excused on that count. Give me a break. As long as you admit it's a joyless ax you grind, sure. If this guy is who he says he is, the situation is even worse. All of us would like to believe that famous people (who are not murderers, at least) are smarter than average and have level heads. And agree with you implicitly, right? No, emphatically. Turns out they don't. That this guy does not tells me one of two things: 1. Being famous does not make you smart. Ditto being published. Say, weren't those Armor-All and $1.25 tweaks published? Yes they were. An utterly goofy article by an utterly goofy individual. So even the goofy get published... 2. The guy who posts here is borrowing a famous-person's name. If it is number 1, the guy is a disappointment, because we want famous people to be smart; if it is number 2, you tell me what is "really despicable." Your behavior. Only to high-strung tweako audio buffs, whose worlds revolve around their audio rigs. You write about what seems like every little change to your home and however many audio rigs you have, so this applies to you. Say, did you see that "branding" article from the LA Times that speculated, based on brain studies, that people who avoid stylish goods do so in part because of fear of humiliation? Stephen |
|
#583
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ruud Broens wrote:
hm, the rest of this post seems to be a continuation of some earlier 'work', let's see.. got it: http://groups.google.nl/groups?hl=nl...ta=gr oup%3Dr ec.audio.opinion Howard Ferstler wrote: Are you sure that I wrote this? I certainly might agree with some of it, but I am pretty sure I did not write it, at least not recently. Heck, Chuck Ross has not posted anything for years, and I would not have used his name if he had not been writing at that time. I do find it funny that you went out and dug up this bit of info from so long ago. You must have had it socked away on your hard drive for future reference purposes. It shows that you are rather obsessive about me. Heck, there is a good reason for this: audio tweakos are by nature obsessive. I am beginning to think that maybe all but Chuck Ross are Zipser. Wolfgang Goldberg, for sure, and possibly Fear3000 - aka "Felix.". Also a chance that Briggs, Middius, Duraybito, Singh, Leeds, and Rothmann are also him, as well. Or, else one of them is the original, with even Zipser being somebody's invention. Whether we are dealing with a genuine split personality or just someone with devious motives remains to be seen. It is hard to believe that so many different people could have such strange ideas. This is about the funniest thing I have ever read. You need to get out more, tweako. Hey Howie, if you were such a brilliant researcher, then why don't you perform some basic research to find out if some of these people really exist. Why should I? They are inconsequential goofballs who parrot the same goofy ideas over and over, and defend them by screaming "preference, preference, preference!" You seem to like doing research. Why don't you do some digging on your own that proves that these nitwit fellow travelers of yours are real people. I, for one, can be found through many references - if you know where to look. Talk is cheap. Heck, if you are a real person you should be more embarrassed than ever. At least a sockpuppet can hide behind his handle and not have people know how dumb the actual person is. Zipser is even easier to find. Yeah, he is buried in the ground! Oh, and by the way, the name is spelled ROTHMAN, there is no double "n" at the end - our family name does not hail from Germany. Rather it is an Americanization (courtesy of Ellis Island) of a Ukranian/Russian name that roughly translates to Reutman. Who cares? The other amazing thing is how you find the ideas of others to be so "strange". Not really amazing at all. They are strange. The really odd part is that most who read your commments have no idea that what you really find strange is not our views on audio, but rather those we hold about life, consumer spending, lifestyle issues, etc. There are two things about most of you knuckleheads that I find offensive. One, guys like Middius cannot discuss audio and instead substitute puerile interjections for real information. Second, most of you HAVE stated assorted positions on audio topics, and in nearly every case those positions have been preposterous. Being the quasi-depression era child you are, you have a hard time understanding how people can spend disposable income in what you consider to be a reckless manner. That, and I find it hard to believe that they could spend so stupidly. That kind of behavior transcends anything related to the "era" one lives in. Stupid is stupid, now or in the past. Howard Ferstler |
|
#584
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Atkinson wrote:
Howard Ferstler wrote: I felt obligated to get Floyd and Sean ready to deal with you. "Deal with me"? I had assumed that I was going to learn something about their work in loudspeaker design and measurement. Now you've given me something to look forward to, Mr. Ferstler. Them, too, John. Howard Ferstler |
|
#586
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick wrote: "Howard Ferstler" wrote in message Heck, the real Scott Wheeler ought to be mortified by the stuff you post here, the fact that you are claiming to be him, and the fact that you hang around RAO so much. Gee, the real Scott Wheeler at least has a job. Stop this Howard. You are looking quite ridiulous. Learn to type. Learn to listen to good helpful advice. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
|
#587
|
|||
|
|||
|
MINe 109 wrote:
Say, did you see that "branding" article from the LA Times that speculated, based on brain studies, that people who avoid stylish goods do so in part because of fear of humiliation? You responded to my post within minutes. Do you have a job? Howard Ferstler |
|
#588
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote: MINe 109 wrote: Say, did you see that "branding" article from the LA Times that speculated, based on brain studies, that people who avoid stylish goods do so in part because of fear of humiliation? You responded to my post within minutes. Do you have a job? Ah, you've found a new way not to answer questions. Stephen |
|
#589
|
|||
|
|||
|
MINe 109 wrote:
In article , Howard Ferstler wrote: MINe 109 wrote: Say, did you see that "branding" article from the LA Times that speculated, based on brain studies, that people who avoid stylish goods do so in part because of fear of humiliation? You responded to my post within minutes. Do you have a job? Ah, you've found a new way not to answer questions. The article sounds like bunk to me. In any case, I have both stylish goods and cut-rate versions at my place. This applies to more than audio equipment, too, by the way. Howard Ferstler |
|
#590
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote: MINe 109 wrote: In article , Howard Ferstler wrote: MINe 109 wrote: Say, did you see that "branding" article from the LA Times that speculated, based on brain studies, that people who avoid stylish goods do so in part because of fear of humiliation? You responded to my post within minutes. Do you have a job? Ah, you've found a new way not to answer questions. The article sounds like bunk to me. So you've read it? It's based on actual science. If you didn't, I posted the link in the "It's all in your mind" thread. In any case, I have both stylish goods and cut-rate versions at my place. This applies to more than audio equipment, too, by the way. It does fit your attitude towards gear and musical performances, eschewing any opinion that could show you up as ill-informed. Stephen |
|
#591
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message ... : Ruud Broens wrote: : : hm, the rest of this post seems to be a continuation of some earlier : 'work', let's see.. got it: : http://groups.google.nl/groups?hl=nl...ta=gr oup%3Dr : ec.audio.opinion : Howard Ferstler wrote: : : Are you sure that I wrote this? I certainly might agree with : some of it, but I am pretty sure I did not write it, at : least not recently. Heck, Chuck Ross has not posted anything : for years, and I would not have used his name if he had not : been writing at that time. : : I do find it funny that you went out and dug up this bit of : info from so long ago. You must have had it socked away on : your hard drive for future reference purposes. It shows that : you are rather obsessive about me. Heck, there is a good : reason for this: audio tweakos are by nature obsessive. nothing so convulated, Howard :-) just using ferstler + schizophrenia ......sure enough, turned up quite some hits ... this posting near the top cheers, Rudy no puppet to sneeze @ ;-) : That kind of behavior transcends anything related : to the "era" one lives in. Stupid is stupid, now or in the : past. : : Howard Ferstler |
|
#592
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ruud Broens wrote:
Ferstler wrote: : Are you sure that I wrote this? I certainly might agree with : some of it, but I am pretty sure I did not write it, at : least not recently. Heck, Chuck Ross has not posted anything : for years, and I would not have used his name if he had not : been writing at that time. : : I do find it funny that you went out and dug up this bit of : info from so long ago. You must have had it socked away on : your hard drive for future reference purposes. It shows that : you are rather obsessive about me. Heck, there is a good : reason for this: audio tweakos are by nature obsessive. nothing so convulated, Howard :-) just using ferstler + schizophrenia .....sure enough, turned up quite some hits ... this posting near the top I continue to marvel at how some of the clowns here spend time going into the archives and digging up anything that will show me up and a bad, misguided, and of course deceitful individual. They cannot debate head to head about audio (mainly because they do not know enough about the topic to debate and must depend upon freak-journalism magazine articles to satisfy their urges) and instead attack the messenger by any means possible. Of course, I am not referring to you. Actually, such dirt-digging activities can be a good thing, because newcomers just dropping in will discover just how goofy some of those tweakos are. Keep up the good work, guys. Howard Ferstler |
|
#593
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#595
|
|||
|
|||
|
Howard Ferstler said:
Howard Ferstler wrote: snip Are you sure that I wrote this? I certainly might agree with some of it, but I am pretty sure I did not write it, at least not recently. Heck, Chuck Ross has not posted anything for years, and I would not have used his name if he had not been writing at that time. It was a different sockpuppetmaster, as I suspected. I already thought your sense of humor is slightly different from the "Ferstler" that appeared here in the past -- Sander de Waal " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. " |
|
#596
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#597
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brother Horace the Unlettered said: digging up anything that will show me up and a bad, misguided Learn to write. |
|
#598
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sander deWaal said: It was a different sockpuppetmaster, as I suspected. I already thought your sense of humor is slightly different from the "Ferstler" that appeared here in the past Didn't the pre-surgery FerstlerPuppet™ seem a little feistier? The current iteration drones more and repeats itself more. |
|
#599
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message ... : Ruud Broens wrote: : : Ferstler wrote: : nothing so convulated, Howard :-) just using ferstler + schizophrenia : .....sure enough, turned up quite some hits ... this posting near the top : : I continue to marvel at how some of the clowns[*] here spend : time going into the archives and digging up anything that : will show me up and a bad, misguided, and of course : deceitful individual. [#]They cannot debate head to head about : audio (mainly because they do not know enough about the : topic to debate and must depend upon freak-journalism : magazine articles to satisfy their urges) and instead attack : the messenger by any means possible. Of course, I am not : referring to you. : : Actually, such dirt-digging activities can be a good thing, thanks for admitting you have a long & %dirty% RAO history ;-) : because newcomers just dropping in will discover just how : goofy some of those tweakos are. ...................... * r u sure, Howard ? : : Keep up the good work, guys. : We'll do, ehh, will do so, HF you choose : Howard Ferstler # let's get the stat's on his h2h debating audio perc |
|
#600
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sander deWaal wrote:
Howard Ferstler said: Howard Ferstler wrote: snip Are you sure that I wrote this? I certainly might agree with some of it, but I am pretty sure I did not write it, at least not recently. Heck, Chuck Ross has not posted anything for years, and I would not have used his name if he had not been writing at that time. It was a different sockpuppetmaster, as I suspected. I already thought your sense of humor is slightly different from the "Ferstler" that appeared here in the past I have turned bitter in my old age, but, yes, somebody else wrote that commentary. Howard Ferstler |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Linear Mode
