About Us

Every country has done something rotten, France and the USA are
probably more similar than alike in that we both have a real problem in
dealing with it. For what it's worth France will probably outlast the
US. Arthur Miller outlasted Marilyn Monroe as well, I think history has
already decided which had a bigger and better impact on the world
however.

The French Resistance was heroic and paid an extreme price for their
acts, nothing can take that away from them. But, they were a very small
minority. On the other hand the United States did a lot of
rotten-spirited things and have to this day hid behind musty, soiled
bunting and an unsingable national anthem and douche bag popular
apologists, Toby Keith being the most recent in a long sordid line.

Perhaps it's just human nature.

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

The guy is obviously a phony. He could claim to be Bill
Clinton, Jet Li, or Osama. Instead, he claims to be a
make-up artist, and may actually be using another person's
name.

RAO is populated mostly by phonies and sockpuppets. Still
fun to kick them around, however.

I have been to his house
I saw his highly coveted awards.
maybe he was just 'borrowing' someone elses house!
You are an idiot!

And I am supposed to believe YOU? For all we know, you and
he are the same person. This place is a sockpuppet's
paradise.

Howard Ferstler

wrote:

Just because you are a phoney doesn't mean everyone else is too.

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

Howard Ferstler

wrote:

Howard Ferstler wrote:

If you are going to fabricate a
job to elevate your imaginary status here, why not brag
about being a physicist or lawyer, or doctor, or stock
broker?

Idiots like you think along those lines. I am quite at peace with my
life and my occupation.

Wherever and whatever it is.

I don't sit around fabricating lies to impress
people.

And the moon is made of green cheese. At least people can
check publication records or the books and magazines
themselves to see that the texts I say I have published have
really been published.

Try a different sockpuppet handle, pal. The one you are
using now is worn out.

Howard Ferstler

"Howard Ferstler" said:

wrote:
Just because you are a phoney doesn't mean everyone else is too.

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

And how do we know you're not some kind of anonymous coward who uses
the handle "Howard Ferstler" on usenet? ;-)

Does the real Howard Ferstler know you're playing in RAO under his
name?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Don't say thank you to a guy who disdains you, Dave.
You are now openly and stupidly supporting Sackman's xenophobic
propaganda. This gives us a precise idea of the filth in which you are
swimming now.

I am not fearful of foreigner's. It's just that
I don't like the arrogant, corrupt, and dishonest people in France.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

wrote in message
oups.com...
Every country has done something rotten, France and the USA are
probably more similar than alike in that we both have a real problem in
dealing with it. For what it's worth France will probably outlast the
US. Arthur Miller outlasted Marilyn Monroe as well, I think history has
already decided which had a bigger and better impact on the world
however.

The French Resistance was heroic and paid an extreme price for their
acts, nothing can take that away from them. But, they were a very small
minority. On the other hand the United States did a lot of
rotten-spirited things and have to this day hid behind musty, soiled
bunting and an unsingable national anthem and douche bag popular
apologists, Toby Keith being the most recent in a long sordid line.

Perhaps it's just human nature.

It's obvious to me who had the bigger impact on the world.
Marilyn Monroe

You would be surprised at how many people couldn't
tell you who Arthur Miller was nor identify his photograph.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

a écrit :
Every country has done something rotten, France and the USA are
probably more similar than alike in that we both have a real problem in
dealing with it.

If it your American problem, I cannot help, deal with it.

For what it's worth France will probably outlast the
US. Arthur Miller outlasted Marilyn Monroe as well, I think history has
already decided which had a bigger and better impact on the world
however.

I'm sure that it mainly depends in which world you are
living. ;-)

The French Resistance was heroic and paid an extreme price for their
acts, nothing can take that away from them. But, they were a very small
minority.

Resistance is always a very small minority.
In *all* the invaded countries I have cited you in a
previous post resistance *has* been the fact of a small
minority... Even in today conflicts resistance is still the
fact of a very small minority.
Note that in 1944 the US general Dwight
Eisenhower, famous for his expertise in military logistic,
has estimated the action of the french resistance to the
equivalent of 36 divisions.
In short the resistance is always the fact of a minority the
most important thing in *resistance* in general is to keep
this number *growing*.

On the other hand the United States did a lot of
rotten-spirited things and have to this day hid behind musty, soiled
bunting and an unsingable national anthem and douche bag popular
apologists, Toby Keith being the most recent in a long sordid line.

In 1936 French have regularly elected a socialist
government. We call this period "front populaire".
The president was a jewish : Léon Blum.
Socialist and Jewish !!! It was really too much for the
French industrial antisemitic bourgeoisie and potentate...

If you tell me now that the a certain classe of the French
society was not so embarrassed *in a first time* of the
military deroute and the Vichy collaboration govermnent I am
obliged to confirm that you are nearly right.

Perhaps it's just human nature.

Yes 10% of resistants, 10% of collaborators and 80% of the
people who are only interested in the return to the peace...
I am sure that in Iraq now the ratios are nearly the same.

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Clerkie comes up with a new rationalization for his sleaziness.

You've been proven to be a plagiarist.

Not really. In order to be a plagiarist you have to have the
material in question in print.

OK, you're an attempted plagiarist. ;-) But the only reason your
plagiarized material didn't get into print is that dave busted you in
the nick of time. I'd say you owe him a debt of gratitude.

Yep, I am glad that he caught that one. I went through some
of the others (those where my contacts at given companies
simply suggested that I go to their web sites to extract the
info I needed for company-history articles) and checked.
Everything was fine.

Notwithstanding your quibble about the degree of accomplishment in your
plagiarism activities, it's telling that you still profess not to see
anything wrong with stealing somebody else's work and passing it off as
your own.

Well, I admitted that I was tired and had been racing to
meet a deadline that was rushing up fast. (The project
lasted about 9 months, and I wrote well over 100 articles
and edited and updated perhaps even more than that.) I got
sloppy, but that was near the end of the project and I
checked and found that there were no problems elsewhere. Get
a copy of the book and look it over. (Well, it is really two
books: a two-volume set.) Perhaps you can travel out to LA
with John Atkinson and look over the copy that Floyd Toole
owns.

After all this time, the best you can do is claim you're not a
real plagiarist because you didn't get away with it.

Haw, haw, haw.

The book is in print, and I have also published four books
previously and over 150 articles. More than we can say for
you, who can do no better than mouth off on RAO.

Howard Ferstler

Sander deWaal wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" said:

wrote:
Just because you are a phoney doesn't mean everyone else is too.

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

And how do we know you're not some kind of anonymous coward who uses
the handle "Howard Ferstler" on usenet? ;-)

Could be. However, I would have to be pretty crazy to own
all four of this individual's books, as well as a copy of
the $275 Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound that he helped to
edit. Most sockpuppets would not go to such expensive
trouble.

I make this point, because you are at liberty to ask me what
each book says about something on any page within any of
them. I will tell you about what is on each page (say, page
80 or each or page 150 of each, whatever) and you can then
determine if the guy here who is behaving as a Ferstler
sockpuppet is the real Ferstler instead. I would assume that
only the "real" Howard Ferstler would have all of those
books on hand.

Does the real Howard Ferstler know you're playing in RAO under his
name?

Again, state a page number and I will tell you what is on
each of those pages in all five publications. I have the
books sitting right here beside me.

Howard Ferstler

Brother Horace the Impotent said:

After all this time, the best you can do is claim you're not a
real plagiarist because you didn't get away with it.

Haw, haw, haw.

The book is in print, and I have also published four books
previously and over 150 articles.

Yep, that's worse. So your cheap rationalization about not getting away
with it is still the best you've come up with.

More than we can say for
you, who can do no better than mouth off on RAO.

Good to see you don't consider yourself John Atkinson's colleague, nor
s****** his peer. All you've got is saying you're more prolific than
somebody who earns a real living out in the real world doing real work
that's useful. I also help actual people with their buying decisions,
unlike you. Nobody in their right mind would listen to you. Your
mediocre outputs just feed a big machine of mediocrity. You should add a
tagline to all your work, Clerkie, whether they're stolen or original:
"This article brought to you by Harold Ferstler. Just barely good enough
to publish."

"George M. Middius" wrote:

Good to see you don't consider yourself John Atkinson's colleague, nor
s****** his peer.

The more I read you stuff, the more convinced I am that you
work for the guy.

All you've got is saying you're more prolific than
somebody who earns a real living out in the real world doing real work
that's useful. I also help actual people with their buying decisions,
unlike you.

Bunk.

Howard Ferstler

Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Don't say thank you to a guy who disdains you, Dave.
You are now openly and stupidly supporting Sackman's xenophobic
propaganda. This gives us a precise idea of the filth in which you are
swimming now.

I am not fearful of foreigner's. It's just that
I don't like the arrogant, corrupt, and dishonest people in France.

You are not only a stupid xenophobe you are also a dangerous
liar.
Your past posts are full of disdainful and calumnious
declaration about France and French in *general*...

In the '20s France has welcome a lot of Russian Jewish
emigrants who were fleeding the Soviets' savagery.
Their past and today testimonials totally dismiss you.

Your recent comments are just an other demonstration of your
pathologic jingoist xenophobia and are certainly the
consequence of your total lack of personality.

The weaker is the personality the stronger is the propention
to the caricatural generalizations... :-(

Howard Ferstler wrote:
John Atkinson wrote:
Regarding Mr. Ferstler's plaintive cry for testing, both
Michael Fremer and I did take part in a series of public
amplifier tests at the 1988 AES convention. Our results
revealed statistically significant identification (to
the 95% confidence limit, if I remember correctly) but were
dismissed by skeptics on the gounds that we were just "lucky
coins."

Or, on a more practical level, you zeroed in on the click
noises generated by the ABX device.

What click noises, Mr. Ferstler? The switching in these tests,
organized by the AES, was silent.

you and your crew take a test like that, possibly pass by the
skins of your teeth, and then use that as justification for
proclaiming that amps that cost ten grand more than cheaper
versions are worth the cost. To me, that is spouting propaganda
to satisfy your knuckleheaded readers - who would dump the
magazine in a flash if you fessed up.

What is it about the phrase "statistically significant" that
you don't understand, Mr. Ferstler? In any case, I was merely
instancing these tests to prove Arny Krueger and you wrong
when you both implied that "me and my crew" would never take
part in public blind tests of amplifiers. I have, they have,
Arny was wrong, you were wrong, end of story.

Oh, yes. Remember to not only bring up the subject of Howard
Ferstler when you visit Floyd and Sean...

Whay are you obseesed with this planned visit of mine to Harman,
Mr. Ferstler? I mentioned it once briefly in passing. By
contrast, you have now referred to it more than 20 times. You
have claimed that you know Floyd Toole and Sean Olive; when was
the last time you actually met these gentlemen?

John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile

"Howard Ferstler" said:

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

And how do we know you're not some kind of anonymous coward who uses
the handle "Howard Ferstler" on usenet? ;-)

Could be. However, I would have to be pretty crazy to own
all four of this individual's books, as well as a copy of
the $275 Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound that he helped to
edit. Most sockpuppets would not go to such expensive
trouble.

You seem to think that Occam doesn't apply to Scott and some others.

I make this point, because you are at liberty to ask me what
each book says about something on any page within any of
them. I will tell you about what is on each page (say, page
80 or each or page 150 of each, whatever) and you can then
determine if the guy here who is behaving as a Ferstler
sockpuppet is the real Ferstler instead. I would assume that
only the "real" Howard Ferstler would have all of those
books on hand.

Or a library nearby, or just a fan of such huge proportions* that not
only he uses Howard's name on Usenet, but he also has his collective
work in print on the shelf. ;-)

* I admit this is a very remote possibility, note.
But Occam's razor doesn't apply here, apparently ;-)

Does the real Howard Ferstler know you're playing in RAO under his
name?

Again, state a page number and I will tell you what is on
each of those pages in all five publications. I have the
books sitting right here beside me.

I'm sure you can, and I can't verify it since I don't have any of the
tomes nearby (not even in the local library, you will note).

So, mr. "Ferstler" , you'll have to come up with something better to
convince me you're not really a sockpuppet. ;-)

You also seem to have a slightly different kind of humor than the
previous sockpuppet master who did the "professional audio clown" act.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Sander deWaal wrote:

So, mr. "Ferstler" , you'll have to come up with something better to
convince me you're not really a sockpuppet. ;-)

Looks like you are just going to have to deal with the
sockpuppet. Of course, you could scope the internet a bit
and come up with the real Ferstler's email address (it ought
to be easy to find, possibly attached to a reproduction of
one of his articles or some book info), contact him, and see
if he has heard of the guy you deal with right here.

Or, you could just ask Dave Weil, who has emailed Ferstler
on occasion and even received copies of older article drafts
(published by Mr. Ferstler) from him. Dave, of course, did
not have access to the actual articles in print and so Mr.
Ferstler, being kind, sent him those Word-file drafts to
look over. Actually, there are quite a few real people who
occasionally post here who might help you discover the real
Mr. Ferstler.

You also seem to have a slightly different kind of humor than the
previous sockpuppet master who did the "professional audio clown" act.

I shift my approach in order to undermine tweako-freako
audio from as many directions as I can.

Trust me, the real Mr. Ferstler is offended by tweakos as
the RAO Mr. Ferstler.

Howard Ferstler

John Atkinson wrote:

Howard Ferstler wrote:

Oh, yes. Remember to not only bring up the subject of Howard
Ferstler when you visit Floyd and Sean...

Whay are you obseesed with this planned visit of mine to Harman,
Mr. Ferstler? I mentioned it once briefly in passing.

With an attached amendment stating that you would bring up
my supposed perfidious behavior when you arrived at Harman.
I felt obligated to get Floyd and Sean ready to deal with
you. You got this ball rolling, John, and now I have decided
to give it a few kicks myself.

By
contrast, you have now referred to it more than 20 times. You
have claimed that you know Floyd Toole and Sean Olive; when was
the last time you actually met these gentlemen?

I have never met either of them, but I have corresponded
with each for some time (almost 20 years, actually) and also
profiled each of them in The Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound.
While I do not agree completely with their approach to
speaker sound (I see their points, but I have checked some
points put forth by others, too, and find those to be
equally valid), I believe that all three of us are on the
same wavelength when it comes to the sound of amps, wires,
and CD players.

Trust me, John, you do not need to meet people face to face
to identify with them and discover that they are intelligent
and honest individuals.

Enjoy your visit.

Howard Ferstler

Howard Ferstler said:

You also seem to have a slightly different kind of humor than the
previous sockpuppet master who did the "professional audio clown" act.

I shift my approach in order to undermine tweako-freako
audio from as many directions as I can.

Thanks Howard, this convinced me you're the *real* one. ;-)

Trust me, the real Mr. Ferstler is offended by tweakos as
the RAO Mr. Ferstler.

I suppose this should read "the real mr. Ferstler is *as* offended by
tweakos as the RAO mr. Ferstler."?
Now you're making me doubt again......a writer of Ferstler fame and
proportions surely wouldn't make such errors, not even in haste?

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Brother Horace the Paranoid said:

Good to see you don't consider yourself John Atkinson's colleague, nor
s****** his peer.

The more I read you[sic] stuff, the more convinced I am that you
work for the guy.

Krooger has the same kind of bizarre conspiracy theories. Do yours keep
you warm at night when the cleaning lady freezes you out?

All you've got is saying you're more prolific than
somebody who earns a real living out in the real world doing real work
that's useful. I also help actual people with their buying decisions,
unlike you.

Bunk.

How do you KNOW that, Clerkie? Give us a lesson in your antilogic
syllogism.

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

The guy is obviously a phony. He could claim to be Bill
Clinton, Jet Li, or Osama. Instead, he claims to be a
make-up artist, and may actually be using another person's
name.

RAO is populated mostly by phonies and sockpuppets. Still
fun to kick them around, however.

I have been to his house
I saw his highly coveted awards.
maybe he was just 'borrowing' someone elses house!
You are an idiot!

And I am supposed to believe YOU? For all we know, you and
he are the same person. This place is a sockpuppet's
paradise.

Look it up.

www.imdb.com

http://www.emmys.org/awards/awardsearch.php

http://www.oscars.org/awardsdatabase/index.html

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Howard Ferstler wrote to "George M. Middius" :

The more I read you stuff, the more convinced I am that you
work for the guy [John Atkinson].

When "George" writes:

All you've got is saying you're more prolific than
somebody [Atkinson] who earns a real living out in the real world
doing real work that's useful.

"real work that's useful"? GMAFB!!!

and:

I also help actual people with their buying decisions,
unlike you.

It makes me think you may be correct, Howard. Or, at the very least,
"George" wishes he *did* work for Captain Snakeoil.

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Don't say thank you to a guy who disdains you, Dave.
You are now openly and stupidly supporting Sackman's xenophobic
propaganda. This gives us a precise idea of the filth in which you are
swimming now.

I am not fearful of foreigner's. It's just that
I don't like the arrogant, corrupt, and dishonest people in France.

You are not only a stupid xenophobe you are also a dangerous liar.
Your past posts are full of disdainful and calumnious declaration about
France and French in *general*...

In the '20s France has welcome a lot of Russian Jewish emigrants who were
fleeding the Soviets' savagery.
Their past and today testimonials totally dismiss you.

Your recent comments are just an other demonstration of your pathologic
jingoist xenophobia and are certainly the consequence of your total lack
of personality.

The weaker is the personality the stronger is the propention to the
caricatural generalizations... :-(

**** off, asshole.
You are a liar and an idiot.
I am not Xenophobic. My negative attitude
is directed only against France. I'm not even a
Francophobe, because I'm not really scared of your ilk,
just annoyed and disgusted by them.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

wrote:

Howard Ferstler wrote:

If you are going to fabricate a
job to elevate your imaginary status here, why not brag
about being a physicist or lawyer, or doctor, or stock
broker?

Idiots like you think along those lines. I am quite at peace with my
life and my occupation.

Wherever and whatever it is.

I don't sit around fabricating lies to impress
people.

And the moon is made of green cheese. At least people can
check publication records or the books and magazines
themselves to see that the texts I say I have published have
really been published.

Try a different sockpuppet handle, pal. The one you are
using now is worn out.

This is really despicable, Howard. You could check him out if you knew
where to look.

His work is more likely found in your library than yours in his.

Stephen

Sander deWaal wrote:

Howard Ferstler said:

You also seem to have a slightly different kind of humor than the
previous sockpuppet master who did the "professional audio clown" act.

I shift my approach in order to undermine tweako-freako
audio from as many directions as I can.

Thanks Howard, this convinced me you're the *real* one. ;-)

Trust me, the real Mr. Ferstler is as offended by tweakos as
the RAO Mr. Ferstler.

I suppose this should read "the real mr. Ferstler is *as* offended by
tweakos as the RAO mr. Ferstler."?
Now you're making me doubt again......a writer of Ferstler fame and
proportions surely wouldn't make such errors, not even in haste?

Sure he would. Just ask his wife. The word as has been
reinstalled, please note. With all of the writings that I
plan on publishing, I type, proof, and retype many times
before submitting a draft. Not so here on RAO.

Incidentally, over the last few days I have:

1. Sent a draft of an amplifier review off to a publisher.
2. Sent a draft dealing with the electrical performance of
the amp written by an engineer that I edited off to the same
publisher.
3. Sent a copy of a draft dealing with a subjective review
of that amp written by a subjectivist writer that I edited a
bit off to the same publisher. I disagree with his analysis
completely, but I still am allowing it to be published along
with my report.
4. Sent a draft of a DVD (SACD/DVD-A) player review off to a
publisher.
5. Sent a draft of an analysis of the player's DAC written
by an engineer and edited by me off to the same publisher.
6. Sent a draft of a bunch of SACD recording reviews off to
the same publisher. These are to be in the same issue of the
magazine as the player review.
7. Sent a draft of a speaker review to still another
publisher.

All this was done with my right hand, and I still managed to
deal with RAO with my left.

Howard Ferstler

MINe 109 said:

His work is more likely found in your library than yours in his.

Scott does make up work for adult moviestars? ;-)

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Howard Ferstler wrote:
wrote:

Howard Ferstler wrote:
wrote:

It is not up to me to prove that a
multitude of articles were not copied from other sources. It
is up to YOU to prove that they were.

No. You've been proven to be a plagiarist.

Not really.

Yes really.

In order to be a plagiarist you have to have the
material in question in print.

OK you are a plagiarist and an idiot.
Read it and weep.
Main Entry: pla=B7gia=B7rize
Pronunciation: 'plA-j&-"rIz also -jE-&-
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -rized; -riz=B7ing
Etymology: plagiary
Date: 1716
transitive senses
: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own :
use (another's production) without crediting the source
intransitive senses
: to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or
product derived from an existing source
- pla=B7gia=B7riz=B7er noun

Pronunciation Key

=A9 2001 by Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
Merriam-Webster Privacy Policy
Doesn't say anything about being printed or published. Gosh a some
writer you are. You are a plagiarist who doesn't know the meaning of
the word plagiarist. Haw haw haw.

The world awaits your
compilation of the articles in question.

The world, by and large, has no interest and has no idea who the hell
you are.

That casts a doubt on
anything you claim to write yourself.

Which is why I urge all of my readers to do their own DBT
work,

Really? You urge others to do DBTs because you are not trust-worthy?
OK.....

in order to see if they can hear what they say they
can hear when the blindfolds are not in place.

I have done that. You didn't like the results. Deal with it.

Remember, even if I were a published plagiarist,

You are. Think about it.

the
important point for YOU is to discover if your beliefs about
wires and amps can be substantiated - if only to benefit you
and nobody else.

Been there done that.

Scott Wheeler

Howard Ferstler wrote:
wrote:

Just because you are a phoney doesn't mean everyone else is too.

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

Are you trying to convince us that you are so stupid that you cannot
even do a basic internet search? If so consider it a point proven. You
are too stupid to do a simple basic internet search.

Scott Wheeler

Sander deWaal wrote:
"Howard Ferstler" said:

wrote:
Just because you are a phoney doesn't mean everyone else is too.

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

And how do we know you're not some kind of anonymous coward who uses
the handle "Howard Ferstler" on usenet? ;-)

That's easy. He is as inept in print as he is on RAO.

Scott Wheeler

Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Clyde Slick a écrit :

"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Don't say thank you to a guy who disdains you, Dave.
You are now openly and stupidly supporting Sackman's xenophobic
propaganda. This gives us a precise idea of the filth in which you are
swimming now.

I am not fearful of foreigner's. It's just that
I don't like the arrogant, corrupt, and dishonest people in France.

You are not only a stupid xenophobe you are also a dangerous liar.
Your past posts are full of disdainful and calumnious declaration about
France and French in *general*...

In the '20s France has welcome a lot of Russian Jewish emigrants who were
fleeding the Soviets' savagery.
Their past and today testimonials totally dismiss you.

Your recent comments are just an other demonstration of your pathologic
jingoist xenophobia and are certainly the consequence of your total lack
of personality.

The weaker is the personality the stronger is the propention to the
caricatural generalizations... :-(

**** off, asshole.
You are a liar and an idiot.
I am not Xenophobic. My negative attitude
is directed only against France.

No in fact your negative attitude is directed only against
*you*. You are the only one to ignore that and this is very
funny. The more you speak the more you are ridiculous. ;-)

I'm not even a
Francophobe, because I'm not really scared of your ilk,
just annoyed and disgusted by them.

I understand and I share your point of view.
In fact Hitler wasn't really anti-semitic you know, he was
just "annoyed" and "disgusted" by Jewish people.
In the end he has murdered 6 millions of innocents so I'm
not persuaded of the importance of the nuance, sorry.

Howard Ferstler wrote:
wrote:

Howard Ferstler wrote:

If you are going to fabricate a
job to elevate your imaginary status here, why not brag
about being a physicist or lawyer, or doctor, or stock
broker?

Idiots like you think along those lines. I am quite at peace with
my
life and my occupation.

Wherever and whatever it is.

Your severe learning disability is noted.

I don't sit around fabricating lies to impress
people.

And the moon is made of green cheese.

Gosh, you think the basic facts of my life and occupation are
fabricated lies designed to impress people? I am flattered.

At least people can
check publication records or the books and magazines
themselves to see that the texts I say I have published have
really been published.

Thanks for once again reminding us you lack the basic smarts needed to
do a simple internet search.

Try a different sockpuppet handle, pal. The one you are
using now is worn out.

Sorry that reality once again bursts your bubble.

Scott Wheeler

Howard Ferstler wrote:
Sander deWaal wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" said:

wrote:
Just because you are a phoney doesn't mean everyone else is too.

At least I can prove that I have stuff in print (check
Amazon; check the newsstands). On the other hand, all we
have from you, Mr. Phony, are unsubstantiated and over
inflated statements about your accomplishments.

Bunk.

And how do we know you're not some kind of anonymous coward who
uses
the handle "Howard Ferstler" on usenet? ;-)

Could be. However, I would have to be pretty crazy to own
all four of this individual's books, as well as a copy of
the $275 Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound that he helped to
edit.

That goes for anyone. I wonder if anyone has ever actually purchased
all of your garbage. What a waste of money that would be.

Scott Wheeler

Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

The guy is obviously a phony. He could claim to be Bill
Clinton, Jet Li, or Osama. Instead, he claims to be a
make-up artist, and may actually be using another person's
name.

RAO is populated mostly by phonies and sockpuppets. Still
fun to kick them around, however.

I have been to his house
I saw his highly coveted awards.
maybe he was just 'borrowing' someone elses house!
You are an idiot!

And I am supposed to believe YOU? For all we know, you and
he are the same person. This place is a sockpuppet's
paradise.

Look it up.

www.imdb.com

http://www.emmys.org/awards/awardsearch.php

http://www.oscars.org/awardsdatabase/index.html

Look, stupid, all the guy posting here needs to do is steal
the real person's name.

In any case, what does being a makeup artist, or even an
Oscar winner, have to do with the guy being an expert on
audio? He can be as deluded as the next idiot, including
you.

Howard Ferstler

Howard Ferstler wrote:
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

The guy is obviously a phony. He could claim to be Bill
Clinton, Jet Li, or Osama. Instead, he claims to be a
make-up artist, and may actually be using another person's
name.

RAO is populated mostly by phonies and sockpuppets. Still
fun to kick them around, however.

I have been to his house
I saw his highly coveted awards.
maybe he was just 'borrowing' someone elses house!
You are an idiot!

And I am supposed to believe YOU?

Why not? Art hasn't plagiarized anyone that we know of nor has he
published fraudulant DBTs. Not everyone is as dishonest as you.

Scott Wheeler

MINe 109 wrote:

In article ,
Howard Ferstler wrote:

And the moon is made of green cheese. At least people can
check publication records or the books and magazines
themselves to see that the texts I say I have published have
really been published.

Try a different sockpuppet handle, pal. The one you are
using now is worn out.

This is really despicable, Howard.

Says you. If this guy is who he says he is, the situation is
even worse. All of us would like to believe that famous
people (who are not murderers, at least) are smarter than
average and have level heads. That this guy does not tells
me one of two things:

1. Being famous does not make you smart.

2. The guy who posts here is borrowing a famous-person's
name.

If it is number 1, the guy is a disappointment, because we
want famous people to be smart; if it is number 2, you tell
me what is "really despicable."

Howard Ferstler

Howard Ferstler wrote:
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:

"Howard Ferstler" wrote in message
...

The guy is obviously a phony. He could claim to be Bill
Clinton, Jet Li, or Osama. Instead, he claims to be a
make-up artist, and may actually be using another person's
name.

RAO is populated mostly by phonies and sockpuppets. Still
fun to kick them around, however.

I have been to his house
I saw his highly coveted awards.
maybe he was just 'borrowing' someone elses house!
You are an idiot!

And I am supposed to believe YOU? For all we know, you and
he are the same person. This place is a sockpuppet's
paradise.

Look it up.

www.imdb.com

http://www.emmys.org/awards/awardsearch.php

http://www.oscars.org/awardsdatabase/index.html

Look, stupid, all the guy posting here needs to do is steal
the real person's name.

Once again I am flattered that you think other people would want to be
me.

In any case, what does being a makeup artist, or even an
Oscar winner, have to do with the guy being an expert on
audio?

Nothing. No one said it did. To bad you are too stupid to follow the
thread. By the way, I didn't win the Oscar. I was just nominated.

Scott Wheeler