Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Trying to emulate sound of Roger Whitaker recording
I'm listening to a Roger Whitaker Christmas album and trying to ascertain
what I'm hearing, in particular his vocals, with the aspiration of coming as close as possible with my modest home rig. I'm referring to the overall effect, or presence of the vocal. The album, at least to my ears, sounds superb. The instruments are crisp and clear and while plenty hot, you can clearly hear the vocal, which has this big, warm, yet not overbearing sound that conversely doesn't drown out the orchestra either. It's always been my understanding that vocals are virtually always recorded in mono. I've never seen a picture of a vocalist in a studio in front of more than one mic. And clearly, his voice is tracked center compared to the stereo field I can hear from the orchestra, yet it's a sort of an "enhanced center" like it's coming from everywhere at once. If I've described this enough for you to get the idea, how do they achieve this sound? Another way to ask is what's done to the vocal to give it this big, shimmering sound like that? I've been horsing around with recording for a while and while can get it sound "good", I never seem to quite be able to achieve the kind of presence that I'm hearing. Is it more than just reverb, are there other tricks? And on the subject of reverb, is it likely that it's added to his original track or done later during mixdown? This album was recorded in '84 so I'm guessing it's not done digitally. The tools I have to work with at the moment are a reasonably beefy computer w/dedicated h/d, SB Audigy card, decent-sounding MXL condensor mic, Cakewalk PA8, Soundforge 5.0, Alesis Nanoverb and Nanocompressor. Is there any particular "magic" vocal enhancement software that would make all the difference? I've heard of a "vocal expander" but have never used one and don't really know what they do. Ultimately, I'd be recording either to Karaoke tracks or a midi accompaniment converted to .wav. While I might not be able to completely duplicate the sound of a major recording studio, I bet I can come closer. Thanks for any input. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Doc" wrote in message...
The tools I have to work with at the moment are a reasonably beefy computer w/dedicated h/d, SB Audigy card, decent-sounding MXL condensor mic, Cakewalk PA8, Soundforge 5.0, Alesis Nanoverb and Nanocompressor. Is there any particular "magic" vocal enhancement software that would make all the difference? I've heard of a "vocal expander" but have never used one and don't really know what they do. Ultimately, I'd be recording either to Karaoke tracks or a midi accompaniment converted to .wav. While I might not be able to completely duplicate the sound of a major recording studio, I bet I can come closer. Thanks for any input. All you're missing is Roger Whitaker. -- David Morgan (MAMS) http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com Morgan Audio Media Service Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901 _______________________________________ http://www.artisan-recordingstudio.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Doc" wrote in message...
The tools I have to work with at the moment are a reasonably beefy computer w/dedicated h/d, SB Audigy card, decent-sounding MXL condensor mic, Cakewalk PA8, Soundforge 5.0, Alesis Nanoverb and Nanocompressor. Is there any particular "magic" vocal enhancement software that would make all the difference? I've heard of a "vocal expander" but have never used one and don't really know what they do. Ultimately, I'd be recording either to Karaoke tracks or a midi accompaniment converted to .wav. While I might not be able to completely duplicate the sound of a major recording studio, I bet I can come closer. Thanks for any input. All you're missing is Roger Whitaker. -- David Morgan (MAMS) http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com Morgan Audio Media Service Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901 _______________________________________ http://www.artisan-recordingstudio.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Doc wrote:
I'm listening to a Roger Whitaker Christmas album and trying to ascertain what I'm hearing, in particular his vocals, with the aspiration of coming as close as possible with my modest home rig. I'm referring to the overall effect, or presence of the vocal. The album, at least to my ears, sounds superb. The instruments are crisp and clear and while plenty hot, you can clearly hear the vocal, which has this big, warm, yet not overbearing sound that conversely doesn't drown out the orchestra either. A lot of that has to do with the arrangement. Some of it may have to do with the degree of projection in the voice. A little bit has to do with the vocal mike. I don't know what was on the Christmas album but I know his earlier stuff was very 44B-sounding. It's always been my understanding that vocals are virtually always recorded in mono. I've never seen a picture of a vocalist in a studio in front of more than one mic. And clearly, his voice is tracked center compared to the stereo field I can hear from the orchestra, yet it's a sort of an "enhanced center" like it's coming from everywhere at once. Right, this is what fake reverb does for you... and there is a HUGE amount of fake reverb being used here. Not having the recording in front of me, I can't tell you if it was a plate or a chamber. But a plate reverb with acoustic predelay (garden hose, etc) was very common in the late sixties. If I've described this enough for you to get the idea, how do they achieve this sound? Another way to ask is what's done to the vocal to give it this big, shimmering sound like that? I've been horsing around with recording for a while and while can get it sound "good", I never seem to quite be able to achieve the kind of presence that I'm hearing. Is it more than just reverb, are there other tricks? And on the subject of reverb, is it likely that it's added to his original track or done later during mixdown? This album was recorded in '84 so I'm guessing it's not done digitally. '84 is way later than any of the Whittaker stuff I have heard. In that era, I'd have guessed a condenser mike, probably a fancy digital reverb unit like the QRS or something. And probably outrageous spotmiking on the band. The tools I have to work with at the moment are a reasonably beefy computer w/dedicated h/d, SB Audigy card, decent-sounding MXL condensor mic, Cakewalk PA8, Soundforge 5.0, Alesis Nanoverb and Nanocompressor. Is there any particular "magic" vocal enhancement software that would make all the difference? I've heard of a "vocal expander" but have never used one and don't really know what they do. Ultimately, I'd be recording either to Karaoke tracks or a midi accompaniment converted to .wav. While I might not be able to completely duplicate the sound of a major recording studio, I bet I can come closer. Well, what you need before anything else is a big room with a band in it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Doc wrote:
I'm listening to a Roger Whitaker Christmas album and trying to ascertain what I'm hearing, in particular his vocals, with the aspiration of coming as close as possible with my modest home rig. I'm referring to the overall effect, or presence of the vocal. The album, at least to my ears, sounds superb. The instruments are crisp and clear and while plenty hot, you can clearly hear the vocal, which has this big, warm, yet not overbearing sound that conversely doesn't drown out the orchestra either. A lot of that has to do with the arrangement. Some of it may have to do with the degree of projection in the voice. A little bit has to do with the vocal mike. I don't know what was on the Christmas album but I know his earlier stuff was very 44B-sounding. It's always been my understanding that vocals are virtually always recorded in mono. I've never seen a picture of a vocalist in a studio in front of more than one mic. And clearly, his voice is tracked center compared to the stereo field I can hear from the orchestra, yet it's a sort of an "enhanced center" like it's coming from everywhere at once. Right, this is what fake reverb does for you... and there is a HUGE amount of fake reverb being used here. Not having the recording in front of me, I can't tell you if it was a plate or a chamber. But a plate reverb with acoustic predelay (garden hose, etc) was very common in the late sixties. If I've described this enough for you to get the idea, how do they achieve this sound? Another way to ask is what's done to the vocal to give it this big, shimmering sound like that? I've been horsing around with recording for a while and while can get it sound "good", I never seem to quite be able to achieve the kind of presence that I'm hearing. Is it more than just reverb, are there other tricks? And on the subject of reverb, is it likely that it's added to his original track or done later during mixdown? This album was recorded in '84 so I'm guessing it's not done digitally. '84 is way later than any of the Whittaker stuff I have heard. In that era, I'd have guessed a condenser mike, probably a fancy digital reverb unit like the QRS or something. And probably outrageous spotmiking on the band. The tools I have to work with at the moment are a reasonably beefy computer w/dedicated h/d, SB Audigy card, decent-sounding MXL condensor mic, Cakewalk PA8, Soundforge 5.0, Alesis Nanoverb and Nanocompressor. Is there any particular "magic" vocal enhancement software that would make all the difference? I've heard of a "vocal expander" but have never used one and don't really know what they do. Ultimately, I'd be recording either to Karaoke tracks or a midi accompaniment converted to .wav. While I might not be able to completely duplicate the sound of a major recording studio, I bet I can come closer. Well, what you need before anything else is a big room with a band in it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Doc" wrote in message
nk.net I'm listening to a Roger Whitaker Christmas album and trying to ascertain what I'm hearing, in particular his vocals, with the aspiration of coming as close as possible with my modest home rig. I work with one of Roger's past backup vocalists - I guess she toured europe with him. She's got a great voice, if only I could *bottle* it! I hope this helps! ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Doc" wrote in message
nk.net I'm listening to a Roger Whitaker Christmas album and trying to ascertain what I'm hearing, in particular his vocals, with the aspiration of coming as close as possible with my modest home rig. I work with one of Roger's past backup vocalists - I guess she toured europe with him. She's got a great voice, if only I could *bottle* it! I hope this helps! ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |