| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#521
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. Actually, he nailed you. I don't think it was intended as an insult, either. Just the facts, ma'am. But you go, girl...;-) ________________________________________ toopid (n. Woefully Dense): a pitiful, bigoted, unsuccessful little man with fatal mental and cognitive issues who is prone to emotional meltdowns. He cannot distinguish between illogic and emotional appeal. He tries ever-so-hard to play with the big boys but is unsuccessful in that, too. |
|
#522
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! but that the clash between what I actually said and what I intended to say struck YOU as ironical.. May I in all kindness suggest that before you rush to the keyboard again you ask someone competent to read and advise.. Someone like the other master of amusing and trnsparent style- Like for instance Arny Krueger? You like the above as a teaching example of what irony means? Not too subtle but we 're at the elementary-introductory stege. Ludovic Mirabel My post was not "insulting". No more than the barely passing grade that you wrung out at your school was an insult. ItBoth wer meant as an incentive for you to try harder. Ludovic Mirabel |
|
#524
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: wrote in message ups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. Sorry, but you're wrong again. I find no humor in how sad and pathetic you've become over ABX. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic. The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. ScottW ====================================== It is quite a task to make the semiliterate understand where and how they betray theimselves.. Obviously if they knew howlers by instinct they would not come up with them again and again. But charity is my weakness: I will follow ScottW blundering further into the labirynth of his own making: You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic No Scottie , dear boy. As per usual you got the wrong end of the stick. No one questions what you MEANT to say. The point is that was NOT what you SAID because you're not literate enough,to convey your meaning and your language skills are not up to even the simplest declarative sentence. This is what you said verbatim (once again ad nauseam): Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. Webster:. "Irony... a method of humorous or subtly sarcastic expression in which the intended meaning of the words used is the direct opposite of their usual sense". Did you mean to chastise me because "I don't realise how ironiic I am"? This a straightforward IQ qustion. The answer is not more waffle but simple yes or no? Or did you want to say that imy inability to "properly phrase an insult" is ironical/funny when I dare to question your language skills? Which, Scottie? The first or the second? Try to learn that exclamations like "pathetic" are more convincing when backed by a direct quote. No fees for trying to teach you to think and express your thoughts lucidly. Your unspoken gratitude is my reward. Ludovic Mirabel |
|
#525
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message ups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. Sorry, but you're wrong again. I find no humor in how sad and pathetic you've become over ABX. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic. The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. ScottW ====================================== It is quite a task to make the semiliterate understand where and how they betray theimselves.. Obviously if they knew howlers by instinct they would not come up with them again and again. But charity is my weakness: I will follow ScottW blundering further into the labirynth of his own making: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. ScottW |
|
#526
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message ups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. Sorry, but you're wrong again. I find no humor in how sad and pathetic you've become over ABX. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic. The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. ScottW ====================================== It is quite a task to make the semiliterate understand where and how they betray theimselves.. Obviously if they knew howlers by instinct they would not come up with them again and again. But charity is my weakness: I will follow ScottW blundering further into the labirynth of his own making: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. ScottW ================================== I asked:Mr. Scott: Did you mean to chastise me because "I don't realise how ironiic I am"? This a straightforward IQ qustion. The answer is not more waffle but simple yes or no? And this is how he answers: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. Night classes? Ludovic Mirabel |
|
#527
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
wrote in message
oups.com ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message ups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. Sorry, but you're wrong again. I find no humor in how sad and pathetic you've become over ABX. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic. The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. ScottW ====================================== It is quite a task to make the semiliterate understand where and how they betray theimselves.. Obviously if they knew howlers by instinct they would not come up with them again and again. But charity is my weakness: I will follow ScottW blundering further into the labirynth of his own making: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. ScottW ================================== I asked:Mr. Scott: Did you mean to chastise me because "I don't realise how ironiic I am"? This a straightforward IQ qustion. The answer is not more waffle but simple yes or no? And this is how he answers: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. Night classes? Ludovic Mirabel I'd repeat the old saw about the blind leading the blind, but that would understate Scotty's English skills. Thanks for showing once again that you are seriously lacking in self-awareness, Ludo. |
|
#528
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message ups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. Sorry, but you're wrong again. I find no humor in how sad and pathetic you've become over ABX. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic. The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. ScottW ====================================== It is quite a task to make the semiliterate understand where and how they betray theimselves.. Obviously if they knew howlers by instinct they would not come up with them again and again. But charity is my weakness: I will follow ScottW blundering further into the labirynth of his own making: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. ScottW ================================== I asked:Mr. Scott: Did you mean to chastise me because "I don't realise how ironiic I am"? This a straightforward IQ qustion. The answer is not more waffle but simple yes or no? And this is how he answers: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. .? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can. ScottW |
|
#529
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
|
|
#530
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
The Krooborg leads the way in "self-consciousness". Thanks for showing once again that you are seriously lacking in self-awareness, Ludo. I see you accidentally used the correct term this time, Turdy. Well done! BTW, Scottie doesn't want your "help". He pities you. -- Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence. |
|
#531
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
In article ,
"ScottW" wrote: .? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can. This is acceptable under the usenet rule requiring a misspelling in any spel flaim post. Let it slide, if you can. Stephen |
|
#532
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote: wrote in message oups.com ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message ups.com... ScottW wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: Scottw authoritatively pronounces:: I'm sure the FDA is happy to know their entire drug testing protocol is BS when it comes to applying the results to the general population. It would help if people reastricted themselves to spouting about things of which they have the foggiest idea. You need to "think outside of the small box" that you're in, Ludovic. That's what toopid says to me when he authoritatively makes comments about another area in which he does not have the foggiest idea of what he's talking about: military matters. It seems that toopid thinks that he's an expert in all sorts of areas that he has no experience, training, or knowledge in. Do you want to know how to pilot a supersonic fighter in combat and then safely land on an aircraft carrier with a strong crosswind? Do you want to know how to make a perfect souffle? Do you want to know how to expertly perform Bach on the lute? Or how to design the perfect drug test, or how to array your infantry formation tactically? Or how to build the best pipe organ ever? Just ask toopid: I'm sure that he knows. LOL! +++++++++++++++++++++ In a way it is even more simple than lack of knowledge. The underlying problem is semiliteracy. Mr. ScottW simply does not know what the big words he uses: like "perception" mean. As a esult he waffles on at best muddle-headed, at worst incomprehensible using a mish-mash of terms that he does not understand but is too ignorant to recognise that and look up a good dictionary .. Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW --------------------- ScottW commiserates: Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. ScottW Again semiliteracy interferes. Scottie dear you tried for wit and you came up with a stylistic horror. Sorry, but you're wrong again. I find no humor in how sad and pathetic you've become over ABX. You did not mean to say that I was being ironic ( I was Scottie)! How futile are you when you're left trying to claim someone didn't mean to say what they said? Pathetic. The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. ScottW ====================================== It is quite a task to make the semiliterate understand where and how they betray theimselves.. Obviously if they knew howlers by instinct they would not come up with them again and again. But charity is my weakness: I will follow ScottW blundering further into the labirynth of his own making: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. ScottW ================================== I asked:Mr. Scott: Did you mean to chastise me because "I don't realise how ironiic I am"? This a straightforward IQ qustion. The answer is not more waffle but simple yes or no? And this is how he answers: WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad. Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. Night classes? Ludovic Mirabel I'd repeat the old saw about the blind leading the blind, but that would understate Scotty's English skills. Thanks for showing once again that you are seriously lacking in self-awareness, Ludo. Just a typo or misspelling, not a lack of "self-awareness" which is RAO short-hand for 'how dare you disagree with me' and unprovable without engaging in that other RAO bugaboo, "delusions of omniscience." Some googling...ah! a pictu http://store.thebadartgallerydublin....mvc?Screen=PRO D&Store_Code=BADART&Product_Code=TheLabirynth&Cate gory_Code=Andreas To guess from the names associated with that spelling, it may be an accepted Eastern European form of the word or that certain languages have a propensity for the misspelling. Stephen |
|
#533
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
MiNe 109 said: To guess from the names associated with that spelling, it may be an accepted Eastern European form of the word or that certain languages have a propensity for the misspelling. The "Labirynth" looks like a cracked-out oneiromancer's vision of an Escher drawing buried in a Dali painting. But now that our favorite nonhuman has pushed his way™ into this thread, here's a glimpse of the Krooborg's qualifications on the subject: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...b4853512a7eb88 And, not gratuitously, this is where rampant misspellings can lead us: http://monkey.org/sl/7c538d55 -- Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence. |
|
#534
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote: MiNe 109 said: To guess from the names associated with that spelling, it may be an accepted Eastern European form of the word or that certain languages have a propensity for the misspelling. The "Labirynth" looks like a cracked-out oneiromancer's vision of an Escher drawing buried in a Dali painting. I was missing out when I was content with domestic bad art. But now that our favorite nonhuman has pushed his way™ into this thread, here's a glimpse of the Krooborg's qualifications on the subject: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...b4853512a7eb88 A cautionary tale for us all. I hope my K-horn evaluation certification course isn't very time-consuming. And, not gratuitously, this is where rampant misspellings can lead us: http://monkey.org/sl/7c538d55 Natty! Stephen |
|
#535
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: The rest of your babble isn't worth deciphering. How typical of toopid when he doesn't understand something... LOL! ________________________________________ toopid (n. Woefully Dense): a pitiful, bigoted, unsuccessful little man with fatal mental and cognitive issues who is prone to emotional meltdowns. He cannot distinguish between illogic and emotional appeal. He tries ever-so-hard to play with the big boys but is unsuccessful in that, too. |
|
#536
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
MiNe 109 wrote: In article , "ScottW" wrote: .? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can. This is acceptable under the usenet rule requiring a misspelling in any spel flaim post. Let it slide, if you can. Stephen ================== Very shrewd. Polish spelling is "labirynt", Russian:"labirint", But generalisations almost always suffer from fatal accidents: Italian- labirinto, Spanish- laberinto :. Western enough? In any case why not let ScottW. have that one moment of glory? He spotted a misspelling. I never sad he was illiterate (If I did it was another mispelling). He can read and write and he can keep copying blogs and mag. editorials. Now he proved that he can look up a dictionary when eager to find misspellings. What he can't do is to achieve the level of self expression and text comprehension that would graduate him to form 5. Being semiliterate is more of a nuisance to the bystanders flooded by incomprehensible outbursts. Illiterates keep quiet. Ludovic Mirabel |
|
#537
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Sorry, Ludo, this is the best I can do this evening. Prediction: toopid
will still not get it. ScottW wrote: wrote in message Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. .? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can. toopid, he did not say you were incapable of spelling. He said you were incapable of comprehension, and that you do not know what the meanings are of the words that you choose to use. I think the precise word that Ludo used was 'semiliterate.' Here are some definitions for you, so that you do not continue to blunder on your way, making an even bigger ass of yourself in the process: sem·i·lit·er·ate (sÄ•m'Ä“-lÄ*t'É™r-Ä*t, sÄ•m'Ä«-) adj. Having achieved an elementary level of ability in reading and writing. Having limited knowledge or understanding, especially of a technical subject. semiliteracy sem'i·lit'er·a·cy (-É™r-É™-sÄ“) n. WordNet The adjective semiliterate has 3 meanings: Meaning #1: literate but poorly informed Meaning #2: barely able to read and write Meaning #3: able to read but not to write http://www.answers.com/topic/semiliterate You have somehow transformed 'semiliterate' into 'illiterate' in your 'mind' which, of course, has an entirely different meaning. And then you have the (lack of) brains to attack spelling. This absolutely proves Ludo's point. Thanks for playing. Game over. LOL! Moron. Do try to 'think' sometime... if you can. LOL! Moron. (That second "LOL! Moron." was r e d u n d a n t, toopid. Look it up.) (In your case, the first "LOL! Moron." was redundant, too.) ________________________________________ toopid (n. Woefully Dense): a pitiful, bigoted, unsuccessful little man with fatal mental and cognitive issues who is prone to emotional meltdowns. He cannot distinguish between illogic and emotional appeal. He tries ever-so-hard to play with the big boys but is unsuccessful in that, too. |
|
#538
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Shhhh! said: Sorry, Ludo, this is the best I can do this evening. Prediction: toopid will still not get it. Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. .? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can. toopid, he did not say you were incapable of spelling. He said you were incapable of comprehension, and that you do not know what the meanings are of the words that you choose to use. I think the precise word that Ludo used was 'semiliterate.' All of this explaining the meaning and usage of words is simply noise to Terrierdork. If one takes the charitable view, poor Scottie actually deserves a pat on the head. Why? one might reasonably inquire. My explanation is that Scooter perceived he was being corrected on a point of word usage. To him, all topics related to language are a big fuzzy cloud of imcomprehensibility. He doesn't understand any of it, so for Scottie, it's all the same thing. When Ludo corrected his diction, Scottie thought "language", and he went blank. Then he noticed Ludo's typo, which to him was an error of equivalent depth and magnitude to whatever Ludo was telling him about the meaning of words. To Scottie, a language error is a language error. They're all the same. And so the kneejerk "irony" response was triggered. So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. -- Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence. |
|
#539
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
MiNe 109 wrote: George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net And, not gratuitously, this is where rampant misspellings can lead us: http://monkey.org/sl/7c538d55 Natty! A little too natty. A black mock tee is not something an alien Arns would wear: it's far too stylish. I'd say maroon polyester slacks with white shoes, a Hawaiian shirt, and a puka shell necklace. Think "Wlid and Crazy Guys." After all, Arns *is* crazy...;-) |
|
#540
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
George M. Middius wrote: Shhhh! said: Sorry, Ludo, this is the best I can do this evening. Prediction: toopid will still not get it. Any more volunteers for teaching him grade 4 language skills.? I tried. .? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can. toopid, he did not say you were incapable of spelling. He said you were incapable of comprehension, and that you do not know what the meanings are of the words that you choose to use. I think the precise word that Ludo used was 'semiliterate.' All of this explaining the meaning and usage of words is simply noise to Terrierdork. If one takes the charitable view, poor Scottie actually deserves a pat on the head. Why? one might reasonably inquire. My explanation is that Scooter perceived he was being corrected on a point of word usage. To him, all topics related to language are a big fuzzy cloud of imcomprehensibility. He doesn't understand any of it, so for Scottie, it's all the same thing. When Ludo corrected his diction, Scottie thought "language", and he went blank. Then he noticed Ludo's typo, which to him was an error of equivalent depth and magnitude to whatever Ludo was telling him about the meaning of words. To Scottie, a language error is a language error. They're all the same. And so the kneejerk "irony" response was triggered. So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. ================================== I think we're all underestimating Mr. ScottW. The world is full of businessmen and politicians with low literacy skills who manage to outwit and outlast their brighter and better. They have cunning.. Look at our own Mr.Scott. He managed successfully to divert the discussion of his poor comprehension skills into an argument about a typo. And that was just his 3rd. try. I'm sure he has quite a few more up his sleeve. My question repeated again and again was... "This is what you said verbatim (once again ad nauseam): Poor Ludo....you don't realize how ironic you are. You can't even properly phrase an insult. Did you mean to chastise me because "I don't realise how ironiic I am"? This is a straightforward IQ qustion. The answer is not more waffle but simple yes or no? " Poor me thinking I pinned him down.. Scott's serial answer in his own inimitable meaning-devoid style. : "WTH is a labirynth? Keep it up Ludo...how many times can you idiotically (you're well past ironic) accuse illiteracy while proving the shallowness of your own? I suspect you can do this.....forever as long as ssshhhh reassures you that a blithering hypocrite isn't all bad." Who will bother to decipher the meaning? The purpose was to avoid answering. And he did - didn't he. I repeated the question:: ScottW reaches for his native cunning. He looks up the spelling of "ironic" and finds an ace. ".? ironiic .... Come on teacher....you should practice what you preach, if you can." He still did not answer the IQ/ language skills question but managed to get everyone chasiing a red herring of a superfluous second "i" Not so toopid our Scott Ludovic Mirabel. |
|
#541
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
|
|
#542
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
George M. Middius wrote: So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. Jesus. If I have to drink every time somebody recognizes the fact that toopid is toopid, I'll be a chronic drunk in about three days, I'll lose my driver's license for having multitudinous DUIs, and I'll need a liver transplant within a month.:-) |
|
#543
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
George M. Middius wrote: So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. Jesus. If I have to drink every time somebody recognizes the fact that toopid is toopid, I'll be a chronic drunk in about three days, I'll lose my driver's license for having multitudinous DUIs, and I'll need a liver transplant within a month.:-) |
|
#544
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. Jesus. If I have to drink every time somebody recognizes the fact that toopid is toopid, I'll be a chronic drunk in about three days, I'll lose my driver's license for having multitudinous DUIs, and I'll need a liver transplant within a month.:-) Check it out...its Ralph, Jack, and Piggy sitting around to see who can outdo each other in insulting me. Amazing. Welcome to your island. ScottW |
|
#545
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Winnie pipes up:
ScottW wrote: Check it out...its Ralph, Jack, and Piggy sitting around to see who can outdo each other in insulting me. LOL! Somebody might (if they had a 'brain') ask, "Now why would that be?" But we are, of course, talking about you. Amazing. Stupidity often is. Welcome to your island. That would imply that there are only three people who realize that you are an idiot. The numbers are far greater than that, toopid. Perhaps, if you think there really are only three people who realize that you're an idiot, a more appropriate statement might be, "Welcome to the vast ocean that surrounds my very small island." LOL! Moron. ________________________________________ toopid (n. Woefully Dense): a pitiful, bigoted, unsuccessful little man with fatal mental and cognitive issues who is prone to emotional meltdowns. He cannot distinguish between illogic and emotional appeal. He tries ever-so-hard to play with the big boys but is unsuccessful in that, too. |
|
#546
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. Jesus. If I have to drink every time somebody recognizes the fact that toopid is toopid, I'll be a chronic drunk in about three days, I'll lose my driver's license for having multitudinous DUIs, and I'll need a liver transplant within a month.:-) Check it out...its Ralph, Jack, and Piggy sitting around to see who can outdo each other in insulting me. Amazing. Welcome to your island. ScottW The argument is whether low intelligence level is compatible with cunning. What's your vote? Don't let your only chance at fifteen minutes of fame slide away.. Ludovic Mirabel |
|
#547
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
|
|
#548
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote: wrote: ScottW wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message oups.com... George M. Middius wrote: So let's remember Scooter's little triumph when we're slurping the bubbly this weekend: To Scottiedork, who successfully understood that his idiocy was recognized by yet another RAO poster. Jesus. If I have to drink every time somebody recognizes the fact that toopid is toopid, I'll be a chronic drunk in about three days, I'll lose my driver's license for having multitudinous DUIs, and I'll need a liver transplant within a month.:-) Check it out...its Ralph, Jack, and Piggy sitting around to see who can outdo each other in insulting me. Amazing. Welcome to your island. ScottW The argument is whether low intelligence level is compatible with cunning. What's your vote? Don't let your only chance at fifteen minutes of fame slide away.. Ludo, not to be a stick-in-the-mud or anything, but doesn't the fact that you have to explain what the argument is to toopid tell you something? And doesn't the fact that toopid is "amazed" at what is going on show that he is not capable of understanding the world around him? I do not pick up a trace of cunning on toopid's part. I sense the denseness of a black hole. While I do agree with you that stupid people can be cunning, the stupid people who are capable of cunning are far smarter than our dear toopid. I think that toopid has extended the Bell Curve a few standard deviations to the left. ================================================= Ssssh looks at ScottW and says: While I do agree with you that stupid people can be cunning, the stupid people who are capable of cunning are far smarter than our dear toopid. I think that toopid has extended the Bell Curve a few standard deviations to the left. Your analysis has merits. Consider though that Scottie, unable to rise to Krueger's collection of debating trade tricks, found his own way to stall a debate. Dictionary in hand he scans for typos. He found one! Ole, ole! He pulls the handle and waits for the coins to drop in his hat. . Still not convinced? Then watch Scottie put on the crown of martyrdom. He proclaims himself to be the prophet crying in wilderness, insulted by the ignorant crowd (of three). He announces he is the RAO's own littler Socrates sentenced by the same crowd (of three) to commit suicide He needs a respite. "Other topics" is what he doctor ordered.. But watch him remerge when it all dies down. Ludovic Mirabel. |
|
#549
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
|
|
#550
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Yapper barked: your ill voiced vendetta Mangled grammar aside, against whom do you imagine Ludo has a "vendetta"? -- Lionella loves the Krooborg from afar. With mud on top. |
|
#551
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
George M. Middius wrote: Yapper barked: your ill voiced vendetta Mangled grammar aside, against whom do you imagine Ludo has a "vendetta"? A "vendetta" would imply that toopid matters. He doesn't. |
|
#552
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
ScottW wrote: wrote: Still not convinced? Then watch Scottie put on the crown of martyrdom. That would imply your posts matter. They don't. Neither does your ill voiced vendetta. But without it, what's left? You poor, poor, confused little man. ESL? LOL! Moron. ________________________________________ toopid (n. Woefully Dense): a pitiful, bigoted, unsuccessful little man with fatal mental and cognitive issues who is prone to emotional meltdowns. He cannot distinguish between illogic and emotional appeal. He tries ever-so-hard to play with the big boys but is unsuccessful in that, too. |
|
#553
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said:
ESL? Scott can't be all bad, he owns Quads. Just like Maggies, Quads are.......... ..........an addiction for life. -- - Maggies are an addiction for life. - |
|
#554
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Sander deWaal wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said: ESL? Scott can't be all bad, he owns Quads. Just like Maggies, Quads are.......... .........an addiction for life. I've never said toopid was 'bad.' I've said he was stupid. Even stupid paople can have nice speakers.:-) |
|
#555
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
|
Better Than ABX?
Sander deWaal wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said: ESL? Scott can't be all bad, he owns Quads. Just like Maggies, Quads are.......... .........an addiction for life. I've never said toopid was 'bad.' I've said he was stupid. Even stupid paople can have nice speakers.:-) |
Linear Mode
