Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 13, 1:12 pm, "Craig Ruggels" wrote:
Have a small studio, but am tired of always switching cables. Rane or will the Behringer work well., needs to be clean, no noise? It will work just fine, for a while. Keep in mind that patchbays that work for 50 years or more (though they still require occasional cleaning) cost $500. Don't let the fact that the Behringer is likely to have some failures sooner stop you from enjoying the pleasures of using a well thought out patchbay. Don't forget to budget for cables. Remember that instead of one cable going from output A to input B, you'll need two cables, one from output A to the patchbay, and another from the patchbay to input B. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Isn't the 2000 version the unbalanced one, anyway I have 3 or 4 PX3000s (the
balanced version) and they work very well. It's true that they probably won't last forever but I use them in a pretty busy studio and 3 years down the road they still work fine. As a matter of fact I just bought a couple more to replace some worn out Neutriks because they really are quite nice (considering the price they are bloody marvellous). "Mike Rivers" skrev i en meddelelse ups.com... On Mar 13, 1:12 pm, "Craig Ruggels" wrote: Have a small studio, but am tired of always switching cables. Rane or will the Behringer work well., needs to be clean, no noise? It will work just fine, for a while. Keep in mind that patchbays that work for 50 years or more (though they still require occasional cleaning) cost $500. Don't let the fact that the Behringer is likely to have some failures sooner stop you from enjoying the pleasures of using a well thought out patchbay. Don't forget to budget for cables. Remember that instead of one cable going from output A to input B, you'll need two cables, one from output A to the patchbay, and another from the patchbay to input B. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Have a small studio, but am tired of always switching cables. Rane or will
the Behringer work well., needs to be clean, no noise? Your comments apprieciated. Thanks Craig -- www.craigruggels.com |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Craig Ruggels wrote:
Have a small studio, but am tired of always switching cables. Rane or will the Behringer work well., needs to be clean, no noise? My personal feeling is that if you want a patchbay that actually works, spend the money and get a long frame type. The cheapie Ranes will work for a while, but they won't be reliable with heavy use. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 13, 12:56 pm, "HKC" wrote:
Isn't the 2000 version the unbalanced one, The only patchbays I've ever seen from Behringer had TRS jacks. I don't know what the model numbers were, but I know I've seen two different models. One had switches on the top to select the normalling, the other one had something different that I don't remember. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:03:27 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Craig Ruggels wrote: Have a small studio, but am tired of always switching cables. Rane or will the Behringer work well., needs to be clean, no noise? My personal feeling is that if you want a patchbay that actually works, spend the money and get a long frame type. The cheapie Ranes will work for a while, but they won't be reliable with heavy use. --scott What the cheapie patch bays are really good for is when you are first adding a patch bay to your set up. If you haven't used a patch bay before, then you have some experimenting to do before you can really define your workflow. During that time, it's way better to have jacks on the back instead of solder lugs. When the jacks wear out on the cheapie, if you haven't changed anything on the back panel in six months, it's time for a real patch bay. If you rewired your entire setup last week, buy another cheapie. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
When the jacks wear out on the cheapie, if you haven't changed anything on
the back panel in six months, it's time for a real patch bay. Or another cheapie, you can buy 5-6 cheap ones for the price of one with solder lugs. The problem with the jack ones is the actual jack plugs. You have to calculate with buying 48 stereo jacks when you buy your first cheap patchbay which will cost you as much as the actual unit itself. If you have settled for that kind of patchbay I see no problem in staying with them even if they only last 5 years or so. You still have to stay in the business (or use that patchbay) for at least 25 years to make up for the cost of the ones with solder lugs. Like I wrote earlier, I have some of these patchbays and one of them is 7 years old and there is nothing wrong with it whatsoever but of course I may have to shell out $50 one of these days but still... |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Mike Rivers wrote: On Mar 13, 12:56 pm, "HKC" wrote: Isn't the 2000 version the unbalanced one, The only patchbays I've ever seen from Behringer had TRS jacks. I don't know what the model numbers were, but I know I've seen two different models. One had switches on the top to select the normalling, the other one had something different that I don't remember. The 2000 is the unbalanced one with 5-position switches on the top, which come in handy when you're not entirely sure how you're going to wiring the patchbay, so long as you remeber to allow yourself reasonably easy access to the top. Mine gets very light use, hasn't had any faults. It's probably about four years old. There are a lot of scuffs around the bolt heads, which gave me the idea that it wasn't assembled with the same care as on some older instances of the same model (maybe pre-Chinese manufacturing), which are also still going strong. When it starts getting faulty I'll replace it, probably with another cheap one. -Nick |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:36:01 +0100, "HKC" wrote:
The problem with the jack ones is the actual jack plugs. You have to calculate with buying 48 stereo jacks when you buy your first cheap patchbay which will cost you as much as the actual unit itself. Why would you need additional jacks? Or do you mean plugs? |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 13, 11:56 am, "HKC" wrote:
Isn't the 2000 version the unbalanced one, anyway I have 3 or 4 PX3000s (the balanced version) and they work very well. It's true that they probably won't last forever but I use them in a pretty busy studio and 3 years down the road they still work fine. As a matter of fact I just bought a couple more to replace some worn out Neutriks because they really are quite nice (considering the price they are bloody marvellous). "Mike Rivers" skrev i en meddelelsenews:1173803650.148327.15270@q40g2000cwq .googlegroups.com... On Mar 13, 1:12 pm, "Craig Ruggels" wrote: Have a small studio, but am tired of always switching cables. Rane or will the Behringer work well., needs to be clean, no noise? It will work just fine, for a while. Keep in mind that patchbays that work for 50 years or more (though they still require occasional cleaning) cost $500. Don't let the fact that the Behringer is likely to have some failures sooner stop you from enjoying the pleasures of using a well thought out patchbay. Don't forget to budget for cables. Remember that instead of one cable going from output A to input B, you'll need two cables, one from output A to the patchbay, and another from the patchbay to input B.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I've got three Neutriks that are about 7 years old and they are starting to crap out. worked well while they lasted hehe. I'm going to start looking for some mid priced bays to replace them... so far I've only seen cheap and expensive hehe (then again, I havnt looked that hard hehe). |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:36:01 +0100, HKC wrote:
When the jacks wear out on the cheapie, if you haven't changed anything on the back panel in six months, it's time for a real patch bay. Or another cheapie, you can buy 5-6 cheap ones for the price of one with solder lugs. The problem with the jack ones is the actual jack plugs. You have to calculate with buying 48 stereo jacks when you buy your first cheap patchbay which will cost you as much as the actual unit itself. I thought someone had told me the Behringer patchbay had sets of 4 jacks mounted on circuit cards, so you could only replace them 4 at a time, and only with parts purchased from Behringer or scarfed from a similar unit. What brand do you have, and is it different from this. My thought was if you could replace the jacks one at a time with Switchcraft as they went bad, it could be a pretty reasonable deal. Not as good as a longframe unit, but more cost effective for a lot of applications. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 14, 8:03 pm, Agent 86 wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:36:01 +0100, HKC wrote: When the jacks wear out on the cheapie, if you haven't changed anything on the back panel in six months, it's time for a real patch bay. Or another cheapie, you can buy 5-6 cheap ones for the price of one with solder lugs. The problem with the jack ones is the actual jack plugs. You have to calculate with buying 48 stereo jacks when you buy your first cheap patchbay which will cost you as much as the actual unit itself. I thought someone had told me the Behringer patchbay had sets of 4 jacks mounted on circuit cards, so you could only replace them 4 at a time, and only with parts purchased from Behringer or scarfed from a similar unit. What brand do you have, and is it different from this. My thought was if you could replace the jacks one at a time with Switchcraft as they went bad, it could be a pretty reasonable deal. Not as good as a longframe unit, but more cost effective for a lot of applications. I was at GC last night and saw that the Behringer pro 3000 was selling for $50 each. I almost bought 3 of them, but I was unsure of the sound quality. I don't care how much I have to spend on a patchbay, but is a more expensive patchbay any different sonically? or is it simply structural? |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
"Ben - TheStudioRI.com" wrote in message
oups.com... I was at GC last night and saw that the Behringer pro 3000 was selling for $50 each. I almost bought 3 of them, but I was unsure of the sound quality. I don't care how much I have to spend on a patchbay, but is a more expensive patchbay any different sonically? or is it simply structural? A patchbay is just a bunch of jacks and copper wire/pcb tracks which don't influence the sound. Meindert |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 15, 11:05 am, "Ben - TheStudioRI.com"
wrote: I was at GC last night and saw that the Behringer pro 3000 was selling for $50 each. I almost bought 3 of them, but I was unsure of the sound quality. Patchbays, like any other connector, don't have a sound when they're working properly. When a plug falls out, that can affect sound quality. If a jack or switch contact gets dirty, that can affect sound quality. It's just like anything else with a connector on it. The difference between a good patchbay and a poor one is how soon things start to give trouble. But if there's a problem, it will be obvious. You can either ignore it, fix it, or replace the faulty part. |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 15, 10:18 am, "Mike Rivers" wrote:
On Mar 15, 11:05 am, "Ben - TheStudioRI.com" wrote: I was at GC last night and saw that the Behringer pro 3000 was selling for $50 each. I almost bought 3 of them, but I was unsure of the sound quality. Patchbays, like any other connector, don't have a sound when they're working properly. When a plug falls out, that can affect sound quality. If a jack or switch contact gets dirty, that can affect sound quality. It's just like anything else with a connector on it. The difference between a good patchbay and a poor one is how soon things start to give trouble. But if there's a problem, it will be obvious. You can either ignore it, fix it, or replace the faulty part. I didnt know if there were different metals that the bay would be made out of. different alloys can conduct better than others... much in the same way different mic cables can sound different, I wasn't completely sure if the same held true for cheaper patchbays. Glad it doesnt! |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote:
I didnt know if there were different metals that the bay would be made out of. different alloys can conduct better than others... much in the same way different mic cables can sound different, I wasn't completely sure if the same held true for cheaper patchbays. Glad it doesnt! A mic cable is in most cases considerably longer than the conducting parts per channel in a patch bay. I wouldn't be too worried about these effects. Boris -- http://www.borislau.de - computer science, music, photos |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
"Ben - TheStudioRI.com" wrote in message
oups.com... I didnt know if there were different metals that the bay would be made out of. different alloys can conduct better than others You would be talking about differences in the sub-milli ohm range. Far less than the contact resistance of the jacks. And far less than the resitance of the patch cables. And astronomically less than the input resistance of an audio input. Meindert |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote:
I was at GC last night and saw that the Behringer pro 3000 was selling for $50 each. I almost bought 3 of them, but I was unsure of the sound quality. I don't care how much I have to spend on a patchbay, but is a more expensive patchbay any different sonically? or is it simply structural? It should be simply structural, but that's still a big difference when things start failing. The whole point of running balanced 600 ohm lines everywhere is to minimize cable and connector issues. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 15, 12:56 pm, "Ben - TheStudioRI.com"
wrote: I didnt know if there were different metals that the bay would be made out of. different alloys can conduct better than others. Well, as far as I know, they don't make patchbays with silver jacks, and that's about the only conductor that really makes a difference (however slight). Jacks that are bright plated are less prone to corrosion, and that's a good thing. .. much in the same way different mic cables can sound different, There's one audio company (and probably a bunch of audiophile companies) that makes cables with silver plated wire, but mostly the reason why mic cables sound different, if they sound different at all (and please, let's not go there now) is because of differences in capacitance between conductors or between conductor and shield. |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 15, 2:11 pm, "Mike Rivers" wrote:
On Mar 15, 12:56 pm, "Ben - TheStudioRI.com" wrote: I didnt know if there were different metals that the bay would be made out of. different alloys can conduct better than others. Well, as far as I know, they don't make patchbays with silver jacks, and that's about the only conductor that really makes a difference (however slight). Jacks that are bright plated are less prone to corrosion, and that's a good thing. .. much in the same way different mic cables can sound different, There's one audio company (and probably a bunch of audiophile companies) that makes cables with silver plated wire, but mostly the reason why mic cables sound different, if they sound different at all (and please, let's not go there now) is because of differences in capacitance between conductors or between conductor and shield. ok, we won't go there, but man, you gotta listen to a Zaolla mic cable some time! |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote:
ok, we won't go there, but man, you gotta listen to a Zaolla mic cable some time! I have. It sounds different. Different isn't necessarily better. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 15, 5:45 pm, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote: ok, we won't go there, but man, you gotta listen to a Zaolla mic cable some time! I have. It sounds different. Different isn't necessarily better. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. Amazing extended high end. But I do conceed that sometimes they can be too full. |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 16, 1:48 am, "Ben - TheStudioRI.com" wrote:
Zaolla mic cable Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. Amazing extended high end. But I do conceed that sometimes they can be too full. And so can some of the people who make a claim like that about mic cables, particularly without numbers to back it up. I warned you not to go there. Here goes the thread about patchbays. |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote:
On Mar 15, 5:45 pm, (Scott Dorsey) wrote: Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote: ok, we won't go there, but man, you gotta listen to a Zaolla mic cable some time! I have. It sounds different. Different isn't necessarily better. Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. Amazing extended high end. But I do conceed that sometimes they can be too full. No, it doesn't have a greater frequency response. The Canare stuff measures nice and flat well beyond 20 KHz with any reasonable source and load, even with a couple thousand feet lengths. Therefore what the Zaolla cable is doing to the high end is an _alteration_ to the sound. That's fine if that's what you want. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 16, 11:39 am, (hank alrich) wrote:
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote: Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. When is the last time you put some mic cable on a bench and ran frequency response tests on it? Any basic intact mic cable has response so far beyond our hearing it's not even funny. So what you're hearing with those cables is an alteration of the sound, and one you cannot adjust. If you want to tweak "air" I suggest the Speck ASC EQ, which has a lovely top band. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam so, you're telling me that by using more pure conductors, you're not getting a better overall top end, more defined with less smearing? Maybe frequency response was not the proper term I should have used, but I would certainly not suggest that the sound would be hyped as with using an EQ to add air. I own a pair of Zaolla mic cables. At $230 a pop, they are not cheap, but the sonic difference between those cables and a standard $30 mic cable CANNOT be achieved by compensating with EQ. Lord knows I've tried lol. p.s. sorry mike If it's a consolation, I bought a patchbay today lol. |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote:
Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. When is the last time you put some mic cable on a bench and ran frequency response tests on it? Any basic intact mic cable has response so far beyond our hearing it's not even funny. So what you're hearing with those cables is an alteration of the sound, and one you cannot adjust. If you want to tweak "air" I suggest the Speck ASC EQ, which has a lovely top band. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Scott Dorsey wrote:
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote: ok, we won't go there, but man, you gotta listen to a Zaolla mic cable some time! I have. It sounds different. Different isn't necessarily better. Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. Amazing extended high end. But I do conceed that sometimes they can be too full. No, it doesn't have a greater frequency response. The Canare stuff measures nice and flat well beyond 20 KHz with any reasonable source and load, even with a couple thousand feet lengths. Therefore what the Zaolla cable is doing to the high end is an _alteration_ to the sound. That's fine if that's what you want. It gives you "more". Lots of folks want "more". -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Well thanks for all the input, bought the behringer px 3000, works great,
but one thing thru this trwad was missed, if you dont have a cable tester it would be wise to get one, before you but all the wires back. thanks again -- www.craigruggels.com "Ben - TheStudioRI.com" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 16, 11:39 am, (hank alrich) wrote: Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote: Well, it certainly has a greater frequency response. When is the last time you put some mic cable on a bench and ran frequency response tests on it? Any basic intact mic cable has response so far beyond our hearing it's not even funny. So what you're hearing with those cables is an alteration of the sound, and one you cannot adjust. If you want to tweak "air" I suggest the Speck ASC EQ, which has a lovely top band. -- ha Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam so, you're telling me that by using more pure conductors, you're not getting a better overall top end, more defined with less smearing? Maybe frequency response was not the proper term I should have used, but I would certainly not suggest that the sound would be hyped as with using an EQ to add air. I own a pair of Zaolla mic cables. At $230 a pop, they are not cheap, but the sonic difference between those cables and a standard $30 mic cable CANNOT be achieved by compensating with EQ. Lord knows I've tried lol. p.s. sorry mike If it's a consolation, I bought a patchbay today lol. |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
On Mar 16, 12:31 pm, "Ben - TheStudioRI.com"
wrote: so, you're telling me that by using more pure conductors, you're not getting a better overall top end, more defined with less smearing? Maybe frequency response was not the proper term I should have used, Whatever you're hearing isn't due to extended frequency response. There's a possibility that the stranded conductors make better contact with each other, reducing the "semiconductor" effect. It's also possible that the end-to-end resistance may be lower than standard tin plated copper, improving the "Q" of a filter that may be formed from the capacitance of the cable. It may also be that the physical construction of the cable - the diameter of the conductors, the distance between them and between a conductor and the shield, and the dielectric constant of the insulation results in a lower capacitance per foot, which means less high frequency attenuation of the microphone (the source), This can give an apparent boost in high frequency response of the SYSTEM (mic plus cable plus preamp) but not an increase in high frequency response of the cable itself. That can be easily measured. The system response cannot be easily measured. It's not impossible but not something I'd expect you (Ben) to be able to do at home. I own a pair of Zaolla mic cables. At $230 a pop, they are not cheap, but the sonic difference between those cables and a standard $30 mic cable CANNOT be achieved by compensating with EQ. Lord knows I've tried lol. We all like to be able to justify our purchases, particularly of "edge" products. If you care enough about the change in sound through these cables so that they're worth the cost to you, fine. But not everyone would find that single investment worth while. Otherwise all cables would be made out of silver and they'd probably cost $100. p.s. sorry mike If it's a consolation, I bought a patchbay today Just don't run your $230 mic cables through it. |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Mike Rivers wrote:
Whatever you're hearing isn't due to extended frequency response. There's a possibility that the stranded conductors make better contact with each other, reducing the "semiconductor" effect. It's also possible that the end-to-end resistance may be lower than standard tin plated copper, improving the "Q" of a filter that may be formed from the capacitance of the cable. Actually, more likely the use of plated conductors of different composition _increases_ the semiconductor effect and that's what is causing the increase in brightness. I have seen this in more than one audiophile cable design. Standard OFC stranded copper out of the Belden catalogue is going to be much more neutral and accurate. But maybe neutrality isn't what you want. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
This can
give an apparent boost in high frequency response of the SYSTEM (mic plus cable plus preamp) but not an increase in high frequency response of the cable itself. That can be easily measured. The system response cannot be easily measured. It's not impossible but not something I'd expect you (Ben) to be able to do at home. I don't need fancy equipement. I use my ears. We all like to be able to justify our purchases, particularly of "edge" products. If you care enough about the change in sound through these cables so that they're worth the cost to you, fine. But not everyone would find that single investment worth while. Otherwise all cables would be made out of silver and they'd probably cost $100. If we all care enough to own $1000+ mics and pres and comps, etc.. then what's the big deal about spending more for a mic cable? p.s. sorry mike If it's a consolation, I bought a patchbay today Just don't run your $230 mic cables through it. ??? |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Standard OFC stranded copper out of the Belden catalogue is going to be much more neutral and accurate. But maybe neutrality isn't what you want. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." somtimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you need something more neutral... hehe. |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer 2000 audio patchbays?
Ben - TheStudioRI.com wrote:
This can give an apparent boost in high frequency response of the SYSTEM (mic plus cable plus preamp) but not an increase in high frequency response of the cable itself. That can be easily measured. The system response cannot be easily measured. It's not impossible but not something I'd expect you (Ben) to be able to do at home. I don't need fancy equipement. I use my ears. Ahh, but you DO need fancy equipment, so you can understand what your ears are telling you. Likewise you need to use your ears so you know what the equipment readings actually mean. If the response measures flat, but there is a perceived tonal change, what is going on is almost certainly harmonic or intermodulation issues caused by nonlinearity. This is a good thing to know, because it tells you basically what is going on, how to measure what _is_ going on, and how to simulate it isolation. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
toslink adc audio G5 adv-2000 | Tech | |||
Behringer B-Control BCF-2000 - opinions? | Pro Audio | |||
2000 Bmw 740iL Audio question | Car Audio | |||
FA: Under 3 hours left for Pro Audio (API, Furman, Patchbays) | Pro Audio | |||
FA: MXR Noise Gates, Audio-Technica Wireless Receiver, Patchbays, Alesis XT, Kelsey Talkback | Pro Audio |