Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Any suggestion of upgrading from MG 1,6Q/R
Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a
"standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Peter Fagerström" wrote: Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a "standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. Used Quad 63s can be found for the price of new 1.6s. Stephen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
That's the problem once you had Maggies.
Do what I did. I had MG12's and I just waited until I found a set of Tympani iva's on the used market. Why not look for used 3.6's? I set up a respectible set of older Rega, 2-way boxes while doing spring cleaning (then I could easlily vacuum around where the tympani's had been standing) and my daughters said "when are you going to put back the REAL speakers? Best of luck. Tom eh! "Peter Fagerström" wrote in message ... Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a "standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It is intresting that when others have asked the same question in
reverse,ie. having those of the kind mentioned for consideration, that your brand is seemingly a very frequent suggestion. What does "upgrade" and "move forward" mean to you, is it price only? What aspect of reporduction do you assume is lacking in your current speakers? I would look to making the room in which you use them optimised for best production as you want to experience it. Most likely you can spend many times the price and still not get as much bang for the buck as can be had by room tuning. For a starter, bookcases placed in the right place can be had for little and provide a very big difference and greatly added control over those acoustic elements which tend to degrade reproduction. If the room ain't right, spending 10 times more on speakers will not help at all. Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a "standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Yep, after hearing the Tannoy and JM Lab speakers, I have never wanted
for a panel speaker of any type. The Tannoy Sensys and JM Lab Chorus series speakers are relatively affordable ($350-1300/pr.) and sound great at any place in the room. I am definately a fan of dynamic speakers and there are plenty to choose from; I have just found these to be outstanding sonically and to represent excellent value. -Bill www.uptownaudio.com Roanoke VA (540) 343-1250 "Peter Fagerström" wrote in message ... Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a "standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
You don't like the better Maggies? I never considered their prices
unreasonable, particularly on the used market if you can find one. What's unreasonable - that is, a price range would help. -- Bob T. Peter Fagerström wrote: Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a "standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
OK. Thanks for the advice.
I agree on room treatment that it should be taken care of in the first place. I once had a pair of Apogee duettas in my listening room and I that was in my opinion the sonic perspective of those I would like to hear again. What I am missing with 1,6's is the smooth upper frequencies. as well as the lowest octaves Problem is that living in Finland I have real trouble finding any 3,6 on the used market. What I.have located though is apair of MG 3,3 r that would be bargain for around 1 k euro, but haven't heard them yet. On the other hand I have never listened to Martin Logans for example SL 3's and I think have to do that to have some understanding of the differencies between big MG:s and ML:s Here's a list of possible speakers i found this week and going to listen to, please comment as it would be a great help to me. - Inner Sound Eros I'm not sure if they are MKI or MK II, but they are definitely not MK III - Dunlavy SC III - ML SL 3 - MG 3,3 r - Audiostatic Padua - Apogee Caliper Signature what do you think? "Robert Trosper" wrote in message ... You don't like the better Maggies? I never considered their prices unreasonable, particularly on the used market if you can find one. What's unreasonable - that is, a price range would help. -- Bob T. Peter Fagerström wrote: Any happy people that have upgraded from Magneplanar 1,6 Q/ R to a "standard" speaker or electrostatic panel? I would like to move forward but have problem finding any reasonable priced speakers that sounds better. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suggestion for the Krooborg | Audio Opinions | |||
Upgrading to Basic Component System | Audio Opinions | |||
Tweeter Suggestion... | Car Audio | |||
Would like to by receiver first, looking for suggestion. | High End Audio | |||
Upgrading from Mackie pres to??? | Pro Audio |