Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
Hi, I have two DAT decks out for cleaning/repair and have been using
what we thought was a relatively good-condition recently serviced machine (an old SV DA-10) both for playback of DATs recorded in the past 1-2 years...as well as new tracking (using as analog backup for digital sessions). Upon insertion of just about every previously recorded DAT, after a FFD/RWD packing and start from the beginning, after engaging play, deck will intermittently lose the A-time readout - or it drops in and out...as does playback audio...and in other cases will go into Cleaning mode for the duration of play mode with PB distortion hash accompanying. Used Cleaning DAT a couple of times but didn't resolve the issue. Tracking on new/clean dat so far seems to be okay on playback. Using DDS1s, Maxell 90s and BASF DDS1 90s. Is this machine likely Confused at the lack of clean PB/ digital recognition 'loss' with the previously recorded material vs. newly recorded stuff. So far at least one snapped/eaten tape encountered. These tapes have been encased/stored properly and machine has had very little usage - in many years. Any advice appreciated, MikeE |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
voxguy wrote:
Upon insertion of just about every previously recorded DAT, after a FFD/RWD packing and start from the beginning, after engaging play, deck will intermittently lose the A-time readout - or it drops in and out...as does playback audio... Many DAT recordings are no longer playable without a whole lot of care and rescue. If these are really important, I'd suggest looking around for a tape recovery specialist who has DAT experience and spend the bucks to get them transferred. This sort of job requires opening up the recorder and fine-tuning the tension and alignment to the tape, and it may be necessary to transfer it in sections and then edit the pieces together. Needless to say, it ain't gonna come cheap, and also needless to say, you probably aren't equipped to open up your player and start tweaking it yourself. If it's just curiosity driving you to play these recordings, put the tapes back in the drawer and find something else to do. -- If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
voxguy wrote:
Upon insertion of just about every previously recorded DAT, after a FFD/RWD packing and start from the beginning, after engaging play, deck will intermittently lose the A-time readout - or it drops in and out...as does playback audio...and in other cases will go into Cleaning mode for the duration of play mode with PB distortion hash accompanying. Used Cleaning DAT a couple of times but didn't resolve the issue. Tracking on new/clean dat so far seems to be okay on playback. Using DDS1s, Maxell 90s and BASF DDS1 90s. Is this machine likely Confused at the lack of clean PB/ digital recognition 'loss' with the previously recorded material vs. newly recorded stuff. So far at least one snapped/eaten tape encountered. The machine is mechanically misaligned. It can record, but it is putting the tracks in the wrong place. When you play it back, it's fine, but if you play back on another machine with the tracks in the RIGHT place, it pitches erros. Likewise, tapes made on this machine won't play back on other machines, I suspect. These tapes have been encased/stored properly and machine has had very little usage - in many years. Any advice appreciated, Get the machine aligned. Re-align it once a year. If possible, get the tech to come and do it on-site because with some of these machines (especially the consumer models), they get knocked right out of alignment in shipping. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
On Jul 7, 7:25 pm, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
voxguy wrote: Upon insertion of just about every previously recorded DAT, after a FFD/RWD packing and start from the beginning, after engaging play, deck will intermittently lose the A-time readout - or it drops in and out...as does playback audio...and in other cases will go into Cleaning mode for the duration of play mode with PB distortion hash accompanying. Used Cleaning DAT a couple of times but didn't resolve the issue. Tracking on new/clean dat so far seems to be okay on playback. Using DDS1s, Maxell 90s and BASF DDS1 90s. Is this machine likely Confused at the lack of clean PB/ digital recognition 'loss' with the previously recorded material vs. newly recorded stuff. So far at least one snapped/eaten tape encountered. The machine is mechanically misaligned. It can record, but it is putting the tracks in the wrong place. When you play it back, it's fine, but if you play back on another machine with the tracks in the RIGHT place, it pitches erros. Likewise, tapes made on this machine won't play back on other machines, I suspect. These tapes have been encased/stored properly and machine has had very little usage - in many years. Any advice appreciated, Get the machine aligned. Re-align it once a year. If possible, get the tech to come and do it on-site because with some of these machines (especially the consumer models), they get knocked right out of alignment in shipping. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." Hmm. I have stuff that studios gave me DAT backups for from sessions in like, 2002-2003... i gather a whole lot of flaws were revealed in this format since the last time i paid attention to tech news about this medium(?) Starting to question whether i should've even bothered shipping two 3700s out to be serviced. In the late 90s through 2003-2004 I saved/archived hours of stuff to DAT...most recorded on one of these two particular decks -- Should i anticipate problems with PB of any of my DATs after the decks they were recorded on have been aligned/ cleaned? As i seem to recall, i was able to seamlessly playback DATs recorded in either machine interchangeably without issue. Sorry to drag it out but i'm curious... have DATs been found to lose integrity or otherwise have a much shorter shelf-life than was originally thought when this medium was the standard (in my radio daze we certainly relied heavily on em and i definitely know of stations still relying on them for backups). Again, just curious. Any event, Thanks for these replies.... 'seems like only yesterday...." i was using DAT tapes pretty consistently with no issue from one machine to another.......time flies and all that crap. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
On Jul 7, 7:25 pm, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
voxguy wrote: Upon insertion of just about every previously recorded DAT, after a FFD/RWD packing and start from the beginning, after engaging play, deck will intermittently lose the A-time readout - or it drops in and out...as does playback audio...and in other cases will go into Cleaning mode for the duration of play mode with PB distortion hash accompanying. Used Cleaning DAT a couple of times but didn't resolve the issue. Tracking on new/clean dat so far seems to be okay on playback. Using DDS1s, Maxell 90s and BASF DDS1 90s. Is this machine likely Confused at the lack of clean PB/ digital recognition 'loss' with the previously recorded material vs. newly recorded stuff. So far at least one snapped/eaten tape encountered. The machine is mechanically misaligned. It can record, but it is putting the tracks in the wrong place. When you play it back, it's fine, but if you play back on another machine with the tracks in the RIGHT place, it pitches erros. Likewise, tapes made on this machine won't play back on other machines, I suspect. These tapes have been encased/stored properly and machine has had very little usage - in many years. Any advice appreciated, Get the machine aligned. Re-align it once a year. If possible, get the tech to come and do it on-site because with some of these machines (especially the consumer models), they get knocked right out of alignment in shipping. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." ahh, wish i had somebody local for this....no dice. had to ship out the decks to midwest digital in chicago... hopefully they'll survive with some degree of alignment still intact -- tho i'm starting to feel like i should sell em to them for parts now, LOL) |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
voxguy wrote:
Hmm. I have stuff that studios gave me DAT backups for from sessions in like, 2002-2003... i gather a whole lot of flaws were revealed in this format since the last time i paid attention to tech news about this medium(?) It's fine. It just needs to be regularly aligned, just like any other mechanical system. You align the analogue machine every morning, so having to ship the DAT deck out for an annual alignment is nothing in comparison. Especially considering the whole mechanical nightmare that is the helical scan system. Starting to question whether i should've even bothered shipping two 3700s out to be serviced. In the late 90s through 2003-2004 I saved/archived hours of stuff to DAT...most recorded on one of these two particular decks -- The SV-3700 has one of the best transports built. However, the converters are just godawful, and the interfaces are nonstandard and do not actually meet AES/EBU specifications. They will usually work with most AES/EBU devices but not always. Should i anticipate problems with PB of any of my DATs after the decks they were recorded on have been aligned/ cleaned? As i seem to recall, i was able to seamlessly playback DATs recorded in either machine interchangeably without issue. Sorry to drag it out but i'm curious... have DATs been found to lose integrity or otherwise have a much shorter shelf-life than was originally thought when this medium was the standard (in my radio daze we certainly relied heavily on em and i definitely know of stations still relying on them for backups). Again, just curious. I have actually found DAT tapes to be surprisingly reliable, especially considering they are a helical scan system. Out of the archives, I have found far, far fewer bad tapes than I have found bad CD-Rs of the same era. Any event, Thanks for these replies.... 'seems like only yesterday...." i was using DAT tapes pretty consistently with no issue from one machine to another.......time flies and all that crap. As long as you keep everything regularly aligned, you should have no interchange issues with DAT. The problem is that folks let machines get out of alignment and they drift, and the nature of digital systems is that they can drift an awful lot without anybody noticing... until suddenly they drift too much and it doesn't work at all. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
On Jul 10, 8:30*am, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
voxguy wrote: Hmm. *I have stuff that studios gave me DAT backups for from sessions in like, 2002-2003... *i gather a whole lot of flaws were revealed in this format since the last time i paid attention to tech news about this medium(?) It's fine. *It just needs to be regularly aligned, just like any other mechanical system. *You align the analogue machine every morning, so having to ship the DAT deck out for an annual alignment is nothing in comparison. * Especially considering the whole mechanical nightmare that is the helical scan system. Starting to question whether i should've even bothered shipping two 3700s out to be serviced. In the late 90s through 2003-2004 I saved/archived hours of stuff to DAT...most recorded on one of these two particular decks -- The SV-3700 has one of the best transports built. *However, the converters are just godawful, and the interfaces are nonstandard and do not actually meet AES/EBU specifications. *They will usually work with most AES/EBU devices but not always. Should i anticipate problems with PB of any of my DATs after the decks they were recorded on have been aligned/ cleaned? *As i seem to recall, i was able to seamlessly playback DATs recorded in either machine interchangeably without issue. * Sorry to drag it out but i'm curious... have DATs been found to lose integrity or otherwise have a much shorter shelf-life than was originally thought when this medium was the standard (in my radio daze we certainly relied heavily on em and i definitely know of stations still relying on them for backups). *Again, just curious. I have actually found DAT tapes to be surprisingly reliable, especially considering they are a helical scan system. *Out of the archives, I have found far, far fewer bad tapes than I have found bad CD-Rs of the same era. Any event, Thanks for these replies.... 'seems like only yesterday...." i was using DAT tapes pretty consistently with no issue from one machine to another.......time flies and all that crap. As long as you keep everything regularly aligned, you should have no interchange issues with DAT. *The problem is that folks let machines get out of alignment and they drift, and the nature of digital systems is that they can drift an awful lot without anybody noticing... until suddenly they drift too much and it doesn't work at all. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. *C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." From a long history of servicing DAT and BETACAM "tape" machines, alignment IS CRITICAL and MOST PERTINENT when servicing them is PINCH ROLLER REPLACEMENT! Most servicers clean but do not replace the rollers subsequently skewing tape and creating the illusion of misalignment, when if pinch roller was replaced, many alignment issues would not be a concern. When submitting a michine for service, INSISIT on PINCH ROLLOER REPLACEMENT and all should be well, old and new tapes included. |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
Steve Maki wrote:
On 10 Jul 2008 09:30:57 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote: The SV-3700 has one of the best transports built. However, the converters are just godawful, and the interfaces are nonstandard and do not actually meet AES/EBU specifications. They will usually work with most AES/EBU devices but not always. If you needed a reliable DAT player for the simple task of getting material off of hours and hours of tapes (recorded on many different machines), what would you look for? There seems to be no shortage of models to choose from on ebay. Get something, then get it aligned and gone over by a good tech, then use it. I am personally very partial to the Tascam DA-20 and the Fostex D-5 (basically the same machine although the D-5 allows error reporting). They feel very cheap, but they are actually extremely rugged and seem outlast the competition. If they are properly set up, they are better at reading misaligned tapes than most machines too. Eddie Cilletti prefers the Sony PCM-R500, which is also one of the last generation of machines made. It's also pretty solid. I ran across a Roger Nichols rant http://www.rogernichols.com/EQ/EQ_91-12.html which convinces me that digital transfers to/from DAT can be a can of worms, so I'd like a machine that had good analog out in addition to (relatively) standard digital I/O and a reliable transport. Oh, and not one of the machines still commanding $2000 type prices. There's nothing wrong with digital transfers, and you will never have a bit of problems with them as long as you avoid Panasonic machines. Panasonic refused to obey the AES/EBU standard in several ways, opting instead to send their representatives to the standards committee meetings where they demanded the standard be changed. Do not use the SV-3700. For the most part, SCMS is a non-issue in the modern world, although it can be an issue if you want to make DAT-DAT dubs. Nichols also makes a point about the 32 ksamp/sec standards... there are two of them, and if you actually have tapes that use them, you need to make sure you have a machine to play them that obeys the same standard. I have never actually encountered this problem in the real world because the 32 ksamp/sec standards both sounded pretty awful and nobody in their right mind ever used them. His comment about the consumer format always having incorrect checksum is also totally incorrect... the consumer format has no checksum at all, and it uses those bits for other functions. This also is a non-issue... if you have an interface that meets the standards (ie. not Panasonic) it all works seamlessly. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I have seen many instances of DATs recorded one one machine not being read by another. My guess is it's an alignment issue- whether it's the record deck or the playback I don't know. I have an old DA-30 whose tapes won't play in my SV3700. The 3700's tapes have some problems playing on the DA-30. Tapes made on my 3800 will play back on either of the other two decks, but it has trouble with some tapes made on both the 3700 and the DA-30. Go figure.
|
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
Eganmedia wrote:
I have seen many instances of DATs recorded one one machine not being read by another. My guess is it's an alignment issue- whether it's the record deck or the playback I don't know. I have an old DA-30 whose tapes won't play in my SV3700. The 3700's tapes have some problems playing on the DA-30. Tapes made on my 3800 will play back on either of the other two decks, but it has trouble with some tapes made on both the 3700 and the DA-30. Go figure. This is what happens when you don't do regular alignment on all the decks. If you don't keep up with the maintenance, the alignment drifts. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
|
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
DAT playback issue- refresher course needed
Steve Maki wrote:
To be safe I picked up two machines - a DA-20MKII and a PCM-R500. Both seem in mint condx and both play all the tapes I've tried so far, so I don't think alignment is needed at this time. What gets (mis)aligned anyway? The guides? There are dozens and dozens of alignment points on these things, from guides to tensions to control track azimuth. Get it aligned BEFORE you have problems, not afterward. Then get it aligned once a year after that. In the digital world, you don't notice alignment issues until they are so bad all hell breaks loose. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mp3/WMA/CD playback from a PC in 5.1 via SPDIF | Tech | |||
HUs with DVD-ROM but no video playback? | Car Audio | |||
Best mp3 playback quality ? | Car Audio | |||
Help needed for Tuner issue, Technics SA-828 | Tech | |||
Line pre-amp for CD playback | Pro Audio |