Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
HOW DRM handles skywave propagation (digital radio mondiale)
This is copied directly from the DRM User Guide:
"For ionospheric propagation, the most severe Doppler spread is observed in the case of Near Vertical Incidence Sky-wave (NVIS) propagation. Because the path lengths between transmitter and receiver are quite short for NVIS, the distances between the ionospheric layers represent a larger proportion of the total path length. The several reflections can also have similar energy levels. This gives rise to significant values of Doppler spread. "To counter the effects of Doppler shift and Doppler spread the frequency separation between the OFDM carriers in the DRM signal is progressively increased (e.g. the carrier spacing in Mode D is more than 2.5 times that in Mode A). This ensures that the frequency spread experienced is kept to a sufficiently small fraction of the carrier spacing to allow correct demodulation." |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
HOW DRM handles skywave propagation (digital radio mondiale)
wrote:
"To counter the effects of Doppler shift and Doppler spread the frequency separation between the OFDM carriers in the DRM signal is progressively increased (e.g. the carrier spacing in Mode D is more than 2.5 times that in Mode A). This ensures that the frequency spread experienced is kept to a sufficiently small fraction of the carrier spacing to allow correct demodulation." better than IBOC ?? -- -- Shortwave transmissions in English, Francais, Nederlands, Deutsch, Suid-Afrikaans, Chinese, Dansk, Urdu, Cantonese, Greek, Spanish, Portuguese, ... http://shortwave.blogsite.org/ Updated every month or so .... |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
HOW DRM handles skywave propagation (digital radio mondiale)
On Oct 1, 1:42 pm, Ratata wrote:
wrote: "To counter the effects of Doppler shift and Doppler spread the frequency separation between the OFDM carriers in the DRM signal is progressively increased (e.g. the carrier spacing in Mode D is more than 2.5 times that in Mode A). This ensures that the frequency spread experienced is kept to a sufficiently small fraction of the carrier spacing to allow correct demodulation." better than IBOC ?? Digital Radio Mondiale *is* IBOC. (Like HD Radio, it sits right next- door to the AM signal, widening the channel by a few more kilohertz) |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
HOW DRM handles skywave propagation (digital radio mondiale)
|
#5
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 2, 4:26 am, wrote:
On Oct 1, 1:42 pm, Ratata wrote: wrote: "To counter the effects of Doppler shift and Doppler spread the frequency separation between the OFDM carriers in the DRM signal is progressively increased (e.g. the carrier spacing in Mode D is more than 2.5 times that in Mode A). This ensures that the frequency spread experienced is kept to a sufficiently small fraction of the carrier spacing to allow correct demodulation." better than IBOC ?? - Digital Radio Mondiale *is* IBOC. (Like HD Radio, it sits right next- - door to the AM signal, widening the channel by a few more kilohertz) SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man, DOH ! - You had beeter go back and re-do your DRM 101 and IBOC 101 Classes again. ~ RHF Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale Unique Digital Broadcast Signal Mode {Non-Analog AM} In-Band On-Channel (IBOC) so called "HD" Radio http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBOC Combined Analog and Digital Broadcast Signal Modes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_Radio DRM is All Digital Mode of Shortwave (HF) Radio Transmission http://www.eiinfo.fh-konstanz.de/dow...rm/image35.jpg DRM Digital Signal at 13,790 kHz with AM Analog http://shortwaveradio.org/drm_13_Af_010511_2100.jpg Signals at 13770 kHz; 13800 kHz; and 13810 kHz. * Clearly you can see that DRM requires at least 15 kHz of Channel "Spacing" for it not to interfere with any 'adjacent' DRM or Analog Radio Broadcast. Note - That the DRM Shortwave Radio Broadcasts are independent and separate from the older Analog "AM" Radio Transmission Mode Broadcasts. * International, National and Local DRM Broadcasts Underway in Markets Worldwide http://www.drm.org/livebroadcast/livebroadcast.php From what I have read and heard DRM appears to work best as a Directed Beam Radio {Audio} Delivery System up to 1000 Miles and out to 2500 Miles. * DRM Tropical Band {With-In-Country} Omni-Directional Radio Broadcasting best up to 300 Miles and out to 1000 Miles. Analog "AM" And DRM Can Not Co-Exist On The Same Channel {Frequency} At The Same Time [.] As with all Shortwave Radio Broadcasting the Coordinated Scheduling of Broadcast Time and Frequency is important for DRM Broadcasters since they take up Four Times (4X) the Bandwidth as the Analog "AM" Broadcasters. High Frequency Co-ordination Conference (HFCC) HFCC = http://www.hfcc.org/ drm ain't iboc -and- iboc ain't drm ~ RHF |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 2, 6:17 pm, RHF wrote:
drm ain't iboc -and- iboc ain't drm ~ RHF . You are dumb. DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH
(AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER) PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
RHF wrote:
But presently the majority of DRM Broadcasting on the Shortwave Radios is Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" Make it: all DRM broadcasts. A simultaneous AM transmission on an adjacent channel does not make the DRM transmission less digital. gr, Hein |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 3, 5:29 pm, "Hein ten Horn"
wrote: wrote On Oct 2, 6:17 pm, RHF wrote: drm ain't iboc -and- iboc ain't drm ~ RHF You are dumb. DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf No, the manual does not state "DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode". A simulcast is not necessarily hybrid. I also cannot find any affirmation on your statement Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel". RHF dumb? Don't think so. Take a good look on that page 20 of the manual. [quote] DRM supports a number of different simulcast options. Currently the supported simulcast modes require the use of additional spectrum outside an assigned 9 or 10 kHz channel (Multi-Channel or Multi-frequency Simulcast, MCS). The DRM signal can be located in the next adjacent upper or lower channel and can occupy a half or whole channel depending on the bandwidth option chosen. [unquote] So far nothing about IBOC. In general, a simulcast is a simultaneous transmission of the same programme. Here, both transmissions are located in two adjacent channels, the DRM transmitter operating with less power than the analogue signal transmitter. [quote] (..) a satisfactory compromise can be obtained when the DRM power level is around 14-16 dB below the adjacent analogue signal. [unquote] Unfortunately, operating on two adjacent frequencies (channels) may give rise to interference problems. With IBOC no such problems would occur, isn't it? Now read the following about a possible DRM-future... [quote] In an ideal world it would also be possible to transmit both an analogue and a digital signal within the same channel (9 or 10 kHz) so that the analogue service could be received, without interference from the digital signal, on any analogue receiver. [unquote] With only one transmission there would be no interference, so in the real world anno 2007 interference may arise and DRM is not IBOC. The statement "DRM is not IBOC" is also apparent from some other quotes from page 20: [quote] (..) promising proposals for a SCS (Single Channel Simulcast) option are currently being evaluated (..) Even if single channel simulcast may prove a difficult goal to achieve (..) [unquote] - DRM is not IBOC, - correct me if I'm wrong. - - gr, Hein HtH - I am so sorry - I can not correct you -cause- you ain't wrong. ~ RHF Yes HtH - You Are Right "DRM -Ain't- IBOC" ! SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man, Here are a few more thoughs to consider : DRM 'may' have the Analog "AM" Signal along-side 'Adjacent-To the Digital Signal. {Two Unque Functions} -NOTE- This uses up even more Bandwidth then DRM alone. -IMHO- The better approach for DRM would be to have the separate Digial and Analog "Simulcast" Signals 'spaced' 50 kHz apart so that each of the two independant Broadcast Signal would have no chance of interferring with each other; and the DRM Signal could be Transmitted at Full Power. -Remember- DRM is a single Mode of Transmission. -Also Note- DRM Radio/Receivers are Manual Single Mode Operation. IBOC has the Analog "AM" Signal 'nested' in-between the Two Outer Digital Side-Bands : By-Design and is Bi-Modal 100% of the time. {Functions in Tandem} -Remember- IBOC is a Dual Transmission Mode. -Also Note- IBOC Radio/Receivers are Automatic Dual Mode Operation. |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
HOW DRM handles skywave propagation (digital radio mondiale)
Phil Kane wrote: On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:26:10 -0700, wrote: Digital Radio Mondiale *is* IBOC. (Like HD Radio, it sits right next- door to the AM signal, widening the channel by a few more kilohertz) A few kilohertz here, a few kilohertz there, pretty soon you have "real money" -- channel overlap a.k.a. harmful interference as defined in communications law. Yes, both HD and DRM have that flaw, because they are both IBOC. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
RHF wrote: On Oct 2, 4:26 am, wrote: Digital Radio Mondiale *is* IBOC. (Like HD Radio, it sits right next to the AM signal, widening the channel by a few more kilohertz) DOH ! - You had beeter go back and re-do your DRM 101 and IBOC 101 Classes again. ~ RHF Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale You had "beeter" try reading the wikipedia article you site. Read it. Quote: "A full 10 kHz channel for AM, plus a 5 kHz half-channel sideband for DRM." That's in-band on-channel mode. IBOC. duh |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
RHF wrote: On Oct 3, 5:02 am, wrote: - You are dumb. DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. - See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits - "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. - www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf But presenetly the majority of DRM Broadcasting on the Shortwave Radios is Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" and it Trashes 20 kHz of Bandwidth around it and makes good old AM Analog Shortwave Broadcasting very hard to Hear. Well what the heck do you expect from an IBOC format??? (Yes you heard right; IBOC.) |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
Hein ten Horn wrote:
wrote DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf No, the manual does not state "DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode". A simulcast is not necessarily hybrid. By that reasoning, HD Radio is not a hybrid format, because the digital information sits *next to* the AM signal. HD Radio is a simulcast format. [quote] DRM supports a number of different simulcast options. Currently the supported simulcast modes require the use of additional spectrum outside an assigned 9 or 10 kHz channel (Multi-Channel or Multi-frequency Simulcast, MCS). The DRM signal can be located in the next adjacent upper or lower channel and can occupy a half or whole channel depending on the bandwidth option chosen. [unquote] So far nothing about IBOC. Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 4, 10:31 am, wrote:
Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf No, the manual does not state "DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode". A simulcast is not necessarily hybrid. By that reasoning, HD Radio is not a hybrid format, because the digital information sits *next to* the AM signal. HD Radio is a simulcast format. [quote] DRM supports a number of different simulcast options. Currently the supported simulcast modes require the use of additional spectrum outside an assigned 9 or 10 kHz channel (Multi-Channel or Multi-frequency Simulcast, MCS). The DRM signal can be located in the next adjacent upper or lower channel and can occupy a half or whole channel depending on the bandwidth option chosen. [unquote] So far nothing about IBOC. Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? What statement? |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 4, 7:24 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote: On Oct 2, 4:26 am, wrote: Digital Radio Mondiale *is* IBOC. (Like HD Radio, it sits right next to the AM signal, widening the channel by a few more kilohertz) DOH ! - You had beeter go back and re-do your DRM 101 and IBOC 101 Classes again. ~ RHF Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale - - You had "beeter" try reading the wikipedia article you site. Read - it. Quote: "A full 10 kHz channel for AM, plus a 5 kHz half- channel - sideband for DRM." - - That's in-band on-channel mode. - - IBOC. - - duh DOH ! - When you 'sight' a spelling mistake and choose to 'cite' it; make sure you do not 'site' it instead. ~ RHF SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man, If you continue to argue that DRM 'is' IBOC : Then clearly some people on this Shortwave Radio Newsgroup are going to call to question your educational claims and technical expertise as an "EE". One Again Please Read : Note- The 'operative word here is 'may'. DRM 'may' have the Analog "AM" Signal along-side 'Adjacent-To {as an Adjunct to} the Digital Signal. {Two Unque and Separate Functions} -NOTE- This uses up even more Bandwidth then DRM alone and DRM alone uses up more Bandwidth then Analog "AM" alone. PLUS - The DRM Digital Signal Level Must be 'reduced' so that it will not Interfere with the Simulcast of the Analog "AM" Signal. -IMHO- The better approach for DRM would be to have the separate Digial and Analog "Simulcast" Signals 'spaced' 50 kHz apart so that each of the two independant Broadcast Signal would have no chance of interferring with each other; and the DRM Signal could be Transmitted at Full Power. -Remember- DRM is a single Mode of Transmission. -Also Note- DRM Radio/Receivers are Manual Single Mode Operation and you would have to Tune to each of the DRM or Analog "AM" Signals independly. BY-DESIGN - IBOC has the Analog "AM" Signal 'nested' in-between the Two Outer Digital Side-Bands and is Always 100% of the time Bi-Modal. {Always Functions in Tandem : Analog and Digital} -Remember- IBOC is a Dual Transmission Mode. -Also Note- IBOC Radio/Receivers are Automatic Dual Mode Operation; allowing you to Tune to a Single Frequency and Receive either the Digital or Analog when available. {True IBOC and not just a Simulcast} Please refer to the DRM Manual -wrt- IBOC www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf Pages 19, 43 and 58 apply. Wikipedia is 'Readers Digest' version of "What DRM Is" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale IBOC is a Single Frequency Broadcasting "Technology" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBOC In-Band On-Channel (IBOC) Simulcast is a Dual Frequency Broadcasting "Concept" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulcast The Bottom Line : DRM -Ain't- IBOC |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 4, 7:25 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote: On Oct 3, 5:02 am, wrote: - You are dumb. DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. - See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits - "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. -www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf - - But presenetly the majority of DRM Broadcasting on the - - Shortwave Radios is Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" and it - - Trashes 20 kHz of Bandwidth around it and makes good - - old AM Analog Shortwave Broadcasting very hard to Hear. - - Well what the heck do you expect from an IBOC format??? - (Yes you heard right; IBOC.) SFTV - Spoken like a 'true' "Hybrid Digital" Man ! ~ RHF - - - Clearly Digital "Hash" has had it's 'effect' on you. ;-} Please Understand that a Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" Signal; which the majority of DRM Shortwave Broadcasting 'is' - Is a Single Signal and hence can not be consider IBOC. They do NOT Transmit any Analog along with the DRM Digital Signal. |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 4, 8:24 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote: On Oct 2, 4:26 am, wrote: Digital Radio Mondiale *is* IBOC. (Like HD Radio, it sits right next to the AM signal, widening the channel by a few more kilohertz) DOH ! - You had beeter go back and re-do your DRM 101 and IBOC 101 Classes again. ~ RHF Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Radio_Mondiale You had "beeter" try reading the wikipedia article you site. Read it. Quote: "A full 10 kHz channel for AM, plus a 5 kHz half-channel sideband for DRM." That's in-band on-channel mode. IBOC. duh The Whore Book Encyclopedia can be written by any John. Doesn't justify the Whore... DUH Run along and play in the IN BAND OFF CHANNEL STREET--esp. if the adjacent frequency is a river or a cliff. |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
wrote:
Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf No, the manual does not state "DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode". A simulcast is not necessarily hybrid. By that reasoning, HD Radio is not a hybrid format, because the digital information sits *next to* the AM signal. [a copy] By that reasoning, HD Radio is not a hybrid format, (..) False. [copy] (..) HD Radio is not a hybrid format, because the digital information sits *next to* the AM signal. False. HD Radio is a simulcast format. True, on the understanding that both programme contents are the same. [quote] DRM supports a number of different simulcast options. Currently the supported simulcast modes require the use of additional spectrum outside an assigned 9 or 10 kHz channel (Multi-Channel or Multi-frequency Simulcast, MCS). The DRM signal can be located in the next adjacent upper or lower channel and can occupy a half or whole channel depending on the bandwidth option chosen. [unquote] So far nothing about IBOC. Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? As a whole? No. gr, Hein |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 4, 7:31 am, wrote:
Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf No, the manual does not state "DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode". A simulcast is not necessarily hybrid. - By that reasoning, HD Radio is not a hybrid format, because - the digital information sits *next to* the AM signal. SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man, As and "EE", your above Statement is NOT Correct nor Clear and it does not represent the Technical Specification {Facts} of both iBiquity's IBOC and DRM. Please endeavor to be more Factual and Accurate in your future representaions here. Now For The Third Time : iBiquity's IBOC Broadcast System is a Dual Mode Broadcasting Scheme; with both the Analog AM and Digital Signals 'being' "Intrinsic" to the Radio Transmission Process. The Key Word Being : "Intrinsic" http://www.answers.com/intrinsic&r=67 The DRM Broadcast System was initally designed and implemented as a Single (1) Mode All Digital Broadcasting Scheme. Note - Simulcasting and Analog AM Signal along with the Digital is a 'possibility' but is NOT currently done on the Shortwave Radio Band. FWIW - The DRM Digital Signal 'may' be Broadcast along side of an Analog AM Signal {Co-Channeled} -but- Both Signals are Broadcast Separately and are 'independent' of each other; they are NOT "Intrinsic" to each other as part of a Unified Radio Broadcast System. Caution - That the DRM Digital Signal has to be 'reduced' when it is Broadcast along side an Analog AM Signal to prevent any Interference to the Analog AM Signal. The-Bottom-Line : Presently in the Shortwave Bands DRM is Broadcast 'solely' in the 100% Digital Mode; as it was designed to do. for the third time or more - keeping it simple and practical ~ RHF |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
He isn't using a No. 2 pencil so the entire test is INVALID.
----- Fantastic Science by Better Abuse |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 3, 6:55 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote:
THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH (AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER) PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION Why didn't you remove them your self or change the follow-ups? Better yet why didn't you just hire Tonya HARDING to do a SEARCH AND KNEEWHACK? |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 6, 2:32 am, Steven wrote:
On Oct 3, 6:55 am, "Richard Crowley" wrote: THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF-TOPIC FOR REC.AUDIO.TECH (AND REC.AUDIO.CAR, FOR THAT MATTER) PLEASE DROP REC.AUDIO.TECH FROM THIS DISCUSSION - - Why didn't you remove them your self or change the follow-ups? - - Better yet why didn't you just hire Tonya HARDING - to do a SEARCH AND KNEEWHACK ? LMAO & ROTFL ! ) ~ RHF |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
RHF wrote: On Oct 4, 7:25 am, SFTV_troy wrote: RHF wrote: On Oct 3, 5:02 am, wrote: - You are dumb. DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. - See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits - "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. -www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf - - But presenetly the majority of DRM Broadcasting on the - - Shortwave Radios is Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" and it - - Trashes 20 kHz of Bandwidth around it and makes good - - old AM Analog Shortwave Broadcasting very hard to Hear. - - Well what the heck do you expect from an IBOC format??? - (Yes you heard right; IBOC.) SFTV - Spoken like a 'true' "Hybrid Digital" Man ! ~ RHF - - - Clearly Digital "Hash" has had it's 'effect' on you. ;-} Please Understand that a Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" Signal; which the majority of DRM Shortwave Broadcasting 'is' - Is a Single Signal and hence can not be consider IBOC. They do NOT Transmit any Analog along with the DRM Digital Signal. Neither does HD Radio you stupid dog-****ing idiot. I am sick and tgired of tlaking to asswhokle like ytou .s yogu sutpiodk fudge0- pioamncing bastaredd. |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote: Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? As a whole? No. There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
Steven wrote: He isn't using a No. 2 pencil so the entire test is INVALID. Hey look!!!! A two-year-old wittle baby boyee!!! He hasn't learned manners yet. |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 9, 10:08 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote: On Oct 4, 7:25 am, SFTV_troy wrote: RHF wrote: On Oct 3, 5:02 am, wrote: - You are dumb. DRM has a hybrid digital/analog mode. - See this manual, page 20. Notice how the DRM sits - "in-band on-channel" same as the HD Radio works. -www.drm.org/pdfs/Broadcast_Manual.pdf - - But presenetly the majority of DRM Broadcasting on the - - Shortwave Radios is Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" and it - - Trashes 20 kHz of Bandwidth around it and makes good - - old AM Analog Shortwave Broadcasting very hard to Hear. - - Well what the heck do you expect from an IBOC format??? - (Yes you heard right; IBOC.) SFTV - Spoken like a 'true' "Hybrid Digital" Man ! ~ RHF - - - Clearly Digital "Hash" has had it's 'effect' on you. ;-} Please Understand that a Pure {100%} DRM "Digital" Signal; which the majority of DRM Shortwave Broadcasting 'is' - Is a Single Signal and hence can not be consider IBOC. They do NOT Transmit any Analog along with the DRM Digital Signal. - Neither does HD Radio you stupid dog-****ing idiot. - I am sick and tgired of tlaking to asswhokle like ytou .s yogu - sutpiodk fudge0- pioamncing bastaredd. SFTV - Spoken like a 'true' "Hybrid Digital" Man ! ~ RHF -Once Again- Clearly Digital "Hash" has had it's 'effect' on you. ;-} -wrt- "Dog-****ing" Please don't express your Sexual Fantasies on this Shortwave Radio Newsgroup - They Are Clealy Off-Topic. -and- yes i am an 'idiot' who loves to listen to free over-the-air radio ~ RHF |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 9, 10:13 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote: Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? As a whole? No. - There is no technical difference. - Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal SFTV -aka- "Hybrid Digital" Man, Once Again the Key Word Being : "Intrinsic" http://www.answers.com/intrinsic&r=67 iBquity's IBOC Broadcast System is 'Intrinsic' DRM's Simulcast Broadcast Scheme is NOT 'Intrinsic' yes it is that simple ~ RHF |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
In article om,
SFTV_troy wrote: Steven wrote: He isn't using a No. 2 pencil so the entire test is INVALID. Hey look!!!! A two-year-old wittle baby boyee!!! He hasn't learned manners yet. Looks like its time to up the Prozac dosage. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
In article . com,
SFTV_troy wrote: RHF wrote: As and "EE", your above Statement is NOT Correct nor Clear and it does not represent the Technical Specification {Facts} of both iBiquity's IBOC and DRM. Please endeavor to be more Factual and Accurate in your future representaions here. There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal YOU go read the specs. Hey nobody here is forcing you to get educated. Staying ignorant is your prerogative. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
It ain't no Jack Kennedy either.
|
#32
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
David Eduardo wrote: "SFTV_troy" wrote in message There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have DRM on 1070. And I repeat: HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the station at 1070. |
#33
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 9, 9:10 pm, Telamon
wrote: SFTV_troy wrote: Steven wrote: He isn't using a No. 2 pencil so the entire test is INVALID. Hey look!!!! A two-year-old wittle baby boyee!!! He hasn't learned manners yet. Looks like its time to up the Prozac dosage. Time to pick-out your coffin, and crawl in. The world will be a better place without assholes like yourself. |
#34
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
RHF wrote: On Oct 9, 10:13 am, SFTV_troy wrote: Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote: Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? As a whole? No. - There is no technical difference. - Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal iBquity's IBOC Broadcast System is 'Intrinsic' DRM's Simulcast Broadcast Scheme is NOT 'Intrinsic' That distinction is more about FAITH, than reality. There's no real difference between DRM's version (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version (also sitting next-to the AM signal). Neither sits their digital signal on-top of the AM! That would not work. Duh. |
#35
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 11, 5:45 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
On Oct 9, 9:10 pm, Telamon wrote: SFTV_troy wrote: Steven wrote: He isn't using a No. 2 pencil so the entire test is INVALID. Hey look!!!! A two-year-old wittle baby boyee!!! He hasn't learned manners yet. Looks like its time to up the Prozac dosage. - Time to pick-out your coffin, and crawl in. The world - will be a better place without assholes like yourself. SFTV - Please Take Your Own Advise First as a Demostration of Commitment to Your Own Words. {Walk-the-Talk} ~ RHF |
#36
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 11, 5:43 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "SFTV_troy" wrote in message There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have DRM on 1070. And I repeat: - HD radio works the same way. - The digital signal sits *next to* the station at 1070. SFTV, BLATANTLY TECNICALLY WRONG ARE YOU SURE YOU ARE AN "EE" ? us lesser being would like proof ~ RHF |
#37
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 11, 5:48 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
RHF wrote: On Oct 9, 10:13 am, SFTV_troy wrote: Hein ten Horn wrote: wrote: Okay. By that reasoning, because HD Radio sits "next to" the AM signal, then it is not IBOC either. It is a simulcast format. Do you agree with that statement? As a whole? No. - There is no technical difference. - Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal iBquity's IBOC Broadcast System is 'Intrinsic' DRM's Simulcast Broadcast Scheme is NOT 'Intrinsic' - That distinction is more about FAITH, than reality. - There's no real difference between DRM's version - (sitting next-to the AM signal) and HD's version - (also sitting next-to the AM signal). SFTV, BLATANTLY TECNICALLY WRONG ! ARE YOU SURE YOU ARE AN "EE" ? us lesser being would like proof ~ RHF |
#38
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
In article .com,
SFTV_troy wrote: On Oct 9, 9:10 pm, Telamon wrote: SFTV_troy wrote: Steven wrote: He isn't using a No. 2 pencil so the entire test is INVALID. Hey look!!!! A two-year-old wittle baby boyee!!! He hasn't learned manners yet. Looks like its time to up the Prozac dosage. Time to pick-out your coffin, and crawl in. The world will be a better place without assholes like yourself. You must have taken your meds today. Nice to see you calmed down a bit. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#39
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
In article . com,
SFTV_troy wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "SFTV_troy" wrote in message There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have DRM on 1070. And I repeat: HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the station at 1070. If you took a buss how many people would sit down next to you? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#40
Posted to rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
|
|||
|
|||
DRM -Ain't- IBOC
On Oct 11, 8:16 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article . com, SFTV_troy wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "SFTV_troy" wrote in message There is no technical difference. Both HD radio and DRM operate on the same principles: - 2 separate signals - 1 analog - 1 digital - the digital is simulcast "next to" the original analog signal No, DRM is 100% digital. To run analog simultaneously you need a separate frequency. Some testing is being done, like that in Mexico, by placing the DRM signal on the adjacent AM channel... a station on 1060 is going to have DRM on 1070. And I repeat: HD radio works the same way. The digital signal sits *next to* the station at 1070. If you took a buss how many people would sit down next to you? The owner of the store selling the fuses. If they are littelfuses, he might get away with it. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: ends tomorrow, classic Sansui TU-719 AM/FM tuner with rack handles | Marketplace | |||
FA: BUILDERS>32 NOS Rack Handles, 6-Vintage Panel Meters@$10 | Marketplace | |||
FA: $10>12 NOS RAF HI-QUALITY USA ELECTRONIC RACK PANEL HANDLES | Marketplace | |||
FS vintage Sunn parts - logos, knobs, handles, casters, 15" spkrs | Pro Audio | |||
WTB:PIONEER Spec 1 or 2 rack handles | Tech |