Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C
because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. However, the FCC is auctioning off the 700Mhz range. What's the worst that could happen to this frequency range, and in the worst case scenerio, would the wireless mic become totally useless? The alternative is to buy block B or C which has some TV stations in it. I'm not sure which is the better choice. Is everyone holding off purchase of wireless system, or is there a clear choice? |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:51:37 GMT, "peter" wrote:
I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. However, the FCC is auctioning off the 700Mhz range. What's the worst that could happen to this frequency range, and in the worst case scenerio, would the wireless mic become totally useless? The alternative is to buy block B or C which has some TV stations in it. I'm not sure which is the better choice. Is everyone holding off purchase of wireless system, or is there a clear choice? There is a new frequency allocation for digital wireless mics in the 1790-1998MHz range. It is going through the International agreement phase right now. If you aren't in too much of a hurry, hang on. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"peter" wrote ...
I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. However, the FCC is auctioning off the 700Mhz range. What's the worst that could happen to this frequency range, and in the worst case scenerio, would the wireless mic become totally useless? The alternative is to buy block B or C which has some TV stations in it. I'm not sure which is the better choice. Is everyone holding off purchase of wireless system, or is there a clear choice? This is a frequent topic of conversation over on the movie/video production newsgroup: news:rec.arts.movies.production.sound Some of the high-end wireless equipment manufacturers (Zaxcom, Lectrosonics, et.al.) are moving into the digital arena, and the loss of the traditional analog bands are one major reason. Not clear, however, what that means for those of us who can't justify using $4000 wireless mics. OTOH, the proliferation of cell phones may kill off the use of budget-priced wireless mics before the loss of spectum does. :-( |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"Richard Crowley" wrote in message
... This is a frequent topic of conversation over on the movie/video production newsgroup: news:rec.arts.movies.production.sound I purposely avoid that group because I'm a low budget user and movie productions tend to be high budget. Some of the high-end wireless equipment manufacturers (Zaxcom, Lectrosonics, et.al.) are moving into the digital arena, and the loss of the traditional analog bands are one major reason. Not clear, however, what that means for those of us who can't justify using $4000 wireless mics. OTOH, the proliferation of cell phones may kill off the use of budget-priced wireless mics before the loss of spectum does. :-( In the USA, gsm and cdma cell phones uses 800 to 900 Mhz (and 1900Mhz which no wireless mic uses), so in theory this should not affect wireless mic outside that band, right? |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"peter" wrote ...
"Richard Crowley" wrote ... This is a frequent topic of conversation over on the movie/video production newsgroup: news:rec.arts.movies.production.sound I purposely avoid that group because I'm a low budget user and movie productions tend to be high budget. I am also a low-budget user (by their standards), but find it one of the most useful newsgroups I read regularly. There are plenty of low-budget questions and answers there all the time. Some of the high-end wireless equipment manufacturers (Zaxcom, Lectrosonics, et.al.) are moving into the digital arena, and the loss of the traditional analog bands are one major reason. Not clear, however, what that means for those of us who can't justify using $4000 wireless mics. OTOH, the proliferation of cell phones may kill off the use of budget-priced wireless mics before the loss of spectum does. :-( In the USA, gsm and cdma cell phones uses 800 to 900 Mhz (and 1900Mhz which no wireless mic uses), so in theory this should not affect wireless mic outside that band, right? In theory. Alas, not in practice. If you DID hang around r.a.m.p.s you would discover that cell phones are a perennial (and rapidly-growing) problem both in fixed-use venues, and in field production. GSM phones, in particular, put out distinctive bursts of high-power digital data which is very similar to cold-war broadband jamming. My favorite solution mentioned so far was the producer who confiscated offending cell phones and nailed them to the doorpost. :-) You can do that with employees/contractors who are supposed to be following the rules as a condition of their employment. However, you can't do that with the general public (i.e. audience at a public event, etc.) I've had to cut back on use of wireless mics (going back to wired in some cases) because of unmanageable cell-phone RF interference. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
Richard Crowley wrote:
"peter" wrote ... My favorite solution mentioned so far was the producer who confiscated offending cell phones and nailed them to the doorpost. :-) You can do that with employees/contractors who are supposed to be following the rules as a condition of their employment. However, you can't do that with the general public I think it would contravene safe workplace practices even to nail employees or contractor to the door, let alone the general public.... geoff1 |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
On Jan 7, 12:41*pm, "Richard Crowley" wrote:
"peter" wrote ... I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. However, the FCC is auctioning off the 700Mhz range. What's the worst that could happen to this frequency range, and in the worst case scenerio, would the wireless mic become totally useless? The alternative is to buy block B or C which has some TV stations in it. I'm not sure which is the better choice. Is everyone holding off purchase of wireless system, or is there a clear choice? Depends on your time frame. Short term the 700 MHz band is clear and would be better for you. Long term (5 years) the 700 MHz band will occupied with cell phones, [public service radios... or whatever. The TV bands (700 MHz) will be occupied with digital TV and maybe white space devices. I would select the devil I know rather then the devil I don't know. Mark |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
On Jan 7, 1:15*pm, "Richard Crowley" wrote:
My favorite solution mentioned so far was the producer who confiscated offending cell phones and nailed them to the doorpost. *:-) * Hear hear!! Now there is a video short I'd like to see!! :-) bobs Bob Smith BS Studios we organize chaos http://www.bsstudios.com |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"geoff" wrote ...
Richard Crowley wrote: "peter" wrote ... My favorite solution mentioned so far was the producer who confiscated offending cell phones and nailed them to the doorpost. :-) You can do that with employees/contractors who are supposed to be following the rules as a condition of their employment. However, you can't do that with the general public I think it would contravene safe workplace practices even to nail employees or contractor to the door, let alone the general public.... It was the phones that were nailed to the doorpost, not the users. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:15:33 -0800, "Richard Crowley"
wrote: My favorite solution mentioned so far was the producer who confiscated offending cell phones and nailed them to the doorpost. :-) Vlad! How the heck is he doing? It's been ages... Much thanks, as always, Chris Hornbeck "There's little that's impossible, but it becomes more complicated if you move between different systems." - Mike Rivers, in another context |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"Don Pearce" wrote in message
... There is a new frequency allocation for digital wireless mics in the 1790-1998MHz range. It is going through the International agreement phase right now. If you aren't in too much of a hurry, hang on. Doesn't that collide with GSM cellphone 1900Mhz band in the US? |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 01:09:20 GMT, "peter" wrote:
"Don Pearce" wrote in message ... There is a new frequency allocation for digital wireless mics in the 1790-1998MHz range. It is going through the International agreement phase right now. If you aren't in too much of a hurry, hang on. Doesn't that collide with GSM cellphone 1900Mhz band in the US? Sorry, I meant 1790 to 1798MHz. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"peter" wrote in message
news:tMsgj.6957$LL6.6281@trndny06... I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. Sennheiser just updated their database. Now it says the 700Mhz block may become unavailable in near future. Does that mean if I own a wireless system in the 700Mhz block, it would become illegal to use if FCC decided to remove that block from wireless mic usage? |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:50:59 GMT, "peter" wrote:
"peter" wrote in message news:tMsgj.6957$LL6.6281@trndny06... I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. Sennheiser just updated their database. Now it says the 700Mhz block may become unavailable in near future. Does that mean if I own a wireless system in the 700Mhz block, it would become illegal to use if FCC decided to remove that block from wireless mic usage? Yes. I seriously would be hiring rather than buying wireless mics right now. In most of the civilized world the UHF bands are in a state of transition from analogue to digital TV. This is freeing up some spectrum, and the regulators are keen to maximise their revenues. So all the old legacy systems are getting thrown off their existing assignments. This includes wireless mics, which in their analogue form are unbelievably wasteful of spectrum. The new generation of digital wireless mics goes a long way towards improving that, but the final frequency home is still far from certain. The one thing that is certain is that the current UHF channels are too valuable a piece of real estate to hand over to a bunch of ad hoc users who don't want to be licensed or pay any license fees. d -- Pearce Consulting http://www.pearce.uk.com |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
safe frequency range for wireless mic?
"peter" wrote in message
news:tMsgj.6957$LL6.6281@trndny06... I'm thinking of buying a sennheiser g2 evolution wireless mic, block C because right now there are no TV broadcast in this range in my area (seattle) according to sennheiser, last updated on 11/9/2005. Sennheiser just updated their database. Now it says the 700Mhz block may become unavailable in near future. Yes. Does that mean if I own a wireless system in the 700Mhz block, it would become illegal to use if FCC decided to remove that block from wireless mic usage? It already IS illegal unless you have filled out a license request for use of a broadcast channel as a broadcast auxiliary service, and had it approved. The thing is, nobody ever does the proper licensing for wireless mikes, so when the FCC started looking at what to do with soon-to-be-unused television spectrum, they did not take wireless users into account. If you do not get a license, you have no right to complain about the spectrum going away. Soon the FCC will be auctioning that block off to the highest bidder, for whatever folks want it for. Because of the way the current auctions work, your ability to purchase a small sliver of spectrum is almost nonexistent. Your ability to continue using wireless mikes in an illegal and unlicensed fashion may continue unimpeded, or it may be totally disrupted, depending on who winds up with the spectrum at auction and what they decide to use it for. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Frequency range of the voice | Pro Audio | |||
select frequency range | Pro Audio | |||
select frequency range | General | |||
Monitor Frequency Range | Pro Audio | |||
Monitor Frequency Range | Pro Audio |