Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:00:55 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: I akways thought they were horizontal like the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/LS360om.pdf The LS360 is a fairly standard multiway tower loudspeaker with an array of tweeters. or the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/CS350om.pdf The CS350 is a conventional center speaker for HT applications, using the same type of tweeter array, no wonder it is designed for horizontal placement... "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:00:55 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: I akways thought they were horizontal like the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/LS360om.pdf The LS360 is a fairly standard multiway tower loudspeaker with an array of tweeters. or the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/CS350om.pdf The CS350 is a conventional center speaker for HT applications, using the same type of tweeter array, no wonder it is designed for horizontal placement... "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:00:55 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: I akways thought they were horizontal like the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/LS360om.pdf The LS360 is a fairly standard multiway tower loudspeaker with an array of tweeters. or the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/CS350om.pdf The CS350 is a conventional center speaker for HT applications, using the same type of tweeter array, no wonder it is designed for horizontal placement... "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:00:55 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: I akways thought they were horizontal like the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/LS360om.pdf The LS360 is a fairly standard multiway tower loudspeaker with an array of tweeters. or the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/CS350om.pdf The CS350 is a conventional center speaker for HT applications, using the same type of tweeter array, no wonder it is designed for horizontal placement... "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:00:55 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: I akways thought they were horizontal like the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/LS360om.pdf The LS360 is a fairly standard multiway tower loudspeaker with an array of tweeters. or the one he http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/product_docs/CS350om.pdf The CS350 is a conventional center speaker for HT applications, using the same type of tweeter array, no wonder it is designed for horizontal placement... "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:09:22 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." And your point is? Fact is that the LS360 is a pretty standard multiway loudspeaker which does happen to use a tweeter array, as anyone can verify: http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/products...?product_id=29 Now, let me kindly rephrase, just in case your neuron is stuck in neutral mode, again: THE LS360 IS NOT AN ARRAY LOUDSPEAKER. Back to normal programming. News at eleven. FU2. Francois, Your insults are noted and uncalled for. You sir, are apparantly looking for a fight and I will not participate. I leave you to you own opinions which are obviously not based on facts. I also found it quite revealing that you attempted to thwart any response by setting the header "Followup-To" to junk. Welcome to my killfile. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:09:22 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." And your point is? Fact is that the LS360 is a pretty standard multiway loudspeaker which does happen to use a tweeter array, as anyone can verify: http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/products...?product_id=29 Now, let me kindly rephrase, just in case your neuron is stuck in neutral mode, again: THE LS360 IS NOT AN ARRAY LOUDSPEAKER. Back to normal programming. News at eleven. FU2. Francois, Your insults are noted and uncalled for. You sir, are apparantly looking for a fight and I will not participate. I leave you to you own opinions which are obviously not based on facts. I also found it quite revealing that you attempted to thwart any response by setting the header "Followup-To" to junk. Welcome to my killfile. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:09:22 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." And your point is? Fact is that the LS360 is a pretty standard multiway loudspeaker which does happen to use a tweeter array, as anyone can verify: http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/products...?product_id=29 Now, let me kindly rephrase, just in case your neuron is stuck in neutral mode, again: THE LS360 IS NOT AN ARRAY LOUDSPEAKER. Back to normal programming. News at eleven. FU2. Francois, Your insults are noted and uncalled for. You sir, are apparantly looking for a fight and I will not participate. I leave you to you own opinions which are obviously not based on facts. I also found it quite revealing that you attempted to thwart any response by setting the header "Followup-To" to junk. Welcome to my killfile. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:09:22 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." And your point is? Fact is that the LS360 is a pretty standard multiway loudspeaker which does happen to use a tweeter array, as anyone can verify: http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/products...?product_id=29 Now, let me kindly rephrase, just in case your neuron is stuck in neutral mode, again: THE LS360 IS NOT AN ARRAY LOUDSPEAKER. Back to normal programming. News at eleven. FU2. Francois, Your insults are noted and uncalled for. You sir, are apparantly looking for a fight and I will not participate. I leave you to you own opinions which are obviously not based on facts. I also found it quite revealing that you attempted to thwart any response by setting the header "Followup-To" to junk. Welcome to my killfile. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
François Yves Le Gal wrote in
: On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 17:09:22 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: "The LS360 utilizes five tweeters wired to produce a Bessel Function Array." And your point is? Fact is that the LS360 is a pretty standard multiway loudspeaker which does happen to use a tweeter array, as anyone can verify: http://66.216.98.167/mcprod/products...?product_id=29 Now, let me kindly rephrase, just in case your neuron is stuck in neutral mode, again: THE LS360 IS NOT AN ARRAY LOUDSPEAKER. Back to normal programming. News at eleven. FU2. Francois, Your insults are noted and uncalled for. You sir, are apparantly looking for a fight and I will not participate. I leave you to you own opinions which are obviously not based on facts. I also found it quite revealing that you attempted to thwart any response by setting the header "Followup-To" to junk. Welcome to my killfile. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"TonyP" wrote in news:40836797$0$6018$afc38c87
@news.optusnet.com.au: "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. I can guess why the "Followup-To" header was changed. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"TonyP" wrote in news:40836797$0$6018$afc38c87
@news.optusnet.com.au: "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. I can guess why the "Followup-To" header was changed. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"TonyP" wrote in news:40836797$0$6018$afc38c87
@news.optusnet.com.au: "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. I can guess why the "Followup-To" header was changed. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"TonyP" wrote in news:40836797$0$6018$afc38c87
@news.optusnet.com.au: "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. I can guess why the "Followup-To" header was changed. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
vertical arrays
"TonyP" wrote in news:40836797$0$6018$afc38c87
@news.optusnet.com.au: "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:46:30 -0000, "Rich Andrews." wrote: Your insults are noted and uncalled for. There are no insults whatsoever in my post. Your neuron must really be jammed. The Follow-up to was duly signaled by FU2 at the end of my post. Any other questions? Yes, If there were no insults, can you tell us what FU2 stands for ? TonyP. I can guess why the "Followup-To" header was changed. r -- Nothing beats the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with DLT tapes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
3-4 Schoeps mics creative arrays | Pro Audio | |||
Cool Edit - Spectral display vertical scale | Pro Audio |