Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers Part 3 The Curse of the External Eternal
Continuing related drivel in previous threads:
To date, we've generated three pairs of small signal response plots, with each pair comprising a "Bode plot". The first pair describes our amplifier's "forward" or "open-loop" response. We've measured this by removing the feedback scaling network from the amplifier output and connecting that end of the network to ground. We've then roughly (we don't need a lot of detail) plotted output, both amplitude and phase, compared to a fixed input. Our second pair of amplitude and phase response plots is of the feedback scaling network itself. We've measured this by driving the network at the point just previously "removed from the amplifier output and connected to ground" for the first pair plot and observing at the input summing junction, what in the conventional case Patrick calls V1 cathode. Good name. The third Bode plot is just a combination of the first two, but it's what describes our feedback amplifier's response, including both forward and feedback response together (duh.) We all know about how gain must fall below unity before phase shift approaches 180 degrees, yada-yada, and *this* is the place where that applies. Enough recap. Now let's do three new pairs of response plots at large signal and with a Cursedly difficult load. Definitions of "difficult" vary with amplifier topology, expected loudspeaker type and personal threat aversion. Hopefully, useful discussion here will broaden perspectives and help narrow choices. "Large signal" means voltage swings near the maximum possible, and can most conservatively include an attempt to measure response when in clipping. Can't be trusted, but might be interesting. The new second pair of response plots (of feedback scaling network response) doesn't normally need to be redone from small-signal conditions (shouldn't change enough to matter), so new The Curse plots are just for the forward path and a new summed third pair representing our amplifier in (what we define as) worst-case conditions. And we're STILL not to a "what to do with this bullcrap" point. Sheesh. But we do have a nominally complete picture of our amplifier's performance under both idling and wailing conditions. To understand stability, we literally have *everything* that we need. Everything. Hoping Patrick will jump in near this point with some of the next stuff... (he can hardly be comparatively too long-winded!) Chris Hornbeck |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers Part 3 The Curse of the ExternalEternal
Chris Hornbeck wrote: Continuing related drivel in previous threads: To date, we've generated three pairs of small signal response plots, with each pair comprising a "Bode plot". The first pair describes our amplifier's "forward" or "open-loop" response. We've measured this by removing the feedback scaling network from the amplifier output and connecting that end of the network to ground. We've then roughly (we don't need a lot of detail) plotted output, both amplitude and phase, compared to a fixed input. Our second pair of amplitude and phase response plots is of the feedback scaling network itself. We've measured this by driving the network at the point just previously "removed from the amplifier output and connected to ground" for the first pair plot and observing at the input summing junction, what in the conventional case Patrick calls V1 cathode. Good name. The third Bode plot is just a combination of the first two, but it's what describes our feedback amplifier's response, including both forward and feedback response together (duh.) We all know about how gain must fall below unity before phase shift approaches 180 degrees, yada-yada, and *this* is the place where that applies. Enough recap. Now let's do three new pairs of response plots at large signal and with a Cursedly difficult load. Definitions of "difficult" vary with amplifier topology, expected loudspeaker type and personal threat aversion. Hopefully, useful discussion here will broaden perspectives and help narrow choices. "Large signal" means voltage swings near the maximum possible, and can most conservatively include an attempt to measure response when in clipping. Can't be trusted, but might be interesting. The new second pair of response plots (of feedback scaling network response) doesn't normally need to be redone from small-signal conditions (shouldn't change enough to matter), so new The Curse plots are just for the forward path and a new summed third pair representing our amplifier in (what we define as) worst-case conditions. And we're STILL not to a "what to do with this bullcrap" point. Sheesh. But we do have a nominally complete picture of our amplifier's performance under both idling and wailing conditions. To understand stability, we literally have *everything* that we need. Everything. Hoping Patrick will jump in near this point with some of the next stuff... (he can hardly be comparatively too long-winded!) Chris Hornbeck I am just trying to work out exactly what is expected of me. Patrick Turner. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers Part 3 The Curse of the External Eternal
"Patrick Turner" wrote in message ... Hoping Patrick will jump in near this point with some of the next stuff... (he can hardly be comparatively too long-winded!) Chris Hornbeck I am just trying to work out exactly what is expected of me. Patrick Turner. Some diagrams? Of typical examples. Excellent thread: Thank you Chris Iain |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers, Part Deux-A | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers Part 2B with badly needed corrections! | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers, Part 2B | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Stability in Feedback Amplifiers | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Feedback Stability Margin | Vacuum Tubes |