![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24 2009, 5:35*pm, MiNe 109 >
wrote: > In article > >, > *John Atkinson > wrote: > > > On Dec 24, 1:28*pm, George M. Middius > > > wrote: > > > 'Twas the night before Kroodown, and all 'round Goose Puke... > > > An oldie but goldie, George. But the foe seems long gone, > > if not into that dark night, at least somewhere else. > > > But Harold Ferstler has reemerged, writing equipment > > reports for AudioXpress under the title "Reliable Reviews." > > He's beating the same old drum, with ossified thoughts about level > matching, pink noise and even that Villchur live-vs-recorded string > quartet demo. > > "Reliable." Gotta give him that! > > Stephen Yo, Stephen. Interesting to see that after me being away for months and months you still have not found anything better to do with your life than make smart-assed remarks about me on RAO. Yeah, I am reliable, and I am also correct. It is interesting that you found a relatively straightforward article on setting up speaker levels for intelligent comparison work so "old drum" in concept. How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your conclusions? As for the Villchur demos, well, you have not a clue what you are talking about. Howard Ferstler |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Ferstler > wrote: > On Dec 24 2009, 5:35*pm, MiNe 109 > > wrote: > > In article > > >, > > *John Atkinson > wrote: > > > > > On Dec 24, 1:28*pm, George M. Middius > > > > wrote: > > > > 'Twas the night before Kroodown, and all 'round Goose Puke... > > > > > An oldie but goldie, George. But the foe seems long gone, > > > if not into that dark night, at least somewhere else. > > > > > But Harold Ferstler has reemerged, writing equipment > > > reports for AudioXpress under the title "Reliable Reviews." > > > > He's beating the same old drum, with ossified thoughts about level > > matching, pink noise and even that Villchur live-vs-recorded string > > quartet demo. > > > > "Reliable." Gotta give him that! > > > > Stephen > > Yo, Stephen. Interesting to see that after me being away for months > and months you still have not found anything better to do with your > life than make smart-assed remarks about me on RAO. Yeah, I am > reliable, and I am also correct. I made a bunch of other comments that hardly mentioned you at all. > It is interesting that you found a relatively straightforward article > on setting up speaker levels for intelligent comparison work so "old > drum" in concept. How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > conclusions? > > As for the Villchur demos, well, you have not a clue what you are > talking about. That would be a failure of your powers of description if you really think so. Stephen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Ferstler > wrote: > How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > conclusions? I don't churn my equipment. In my main system I'm happy with my Quads. In the tv systems the differences are large enough that level-matching, etc is too much trouble. Stephen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 4:11*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article > >, > > > > > > *Ferstler > wrote: > > On Dec 24 2009, 5:35*pm, MiNe 109 * > > > wrote: > > > In article > > > >, > > > *John Atkinson > wrote: > > > > > On Dec 24, 1:28*pm, George M. Middius > > > > > wrote: > > > > > 'Twas the night before Kroodown, and all 'round Goose Puke... > > > > > An oldie but goldie, George. But the foe seems long gone, > > > > if not into that dark night, at least somewhere else. > > > > > But Harold Ferstler has reemerged, writing equipment > > > > reports for AudioXpress under the title "Reliable Reviews." > > > > He's beating the same old drum, with ossified thoughts about level > > > matching, pink noise and even that Villchur live-vs-recorded string > > > quartet demo. > > > > "Reliable." Gotta give him that! > > > > Stephen > > > Yo, Stephen. Interesting to see that after me being away for months > > and months you still have not found anything better to do with your > > life than make smart-assed remarks about me on RAO. Yeah, I am > > reliable, and I am also correct. > > I made a bunch of other comments that hardly mentioned you at all. > > > It is interesting that you found a relatively straightforward article > > on setting up speaker levels for intelligent comparison work so "old > > drum" in concept. How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > > conclusions? > > > As for the Villchur demos, well, you have not a clue what you are > > talking about. > > That would be a failure of your powers of description if you really > think so. > > Stephen- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - You are a paradigm of the modern audio expert and enthusiast. I'll bet you have never done a refined comparison between speakers or between amps in your life. Howard Ferstler |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 4:13*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote:
> In article > >, > > *Ferstler > wrote: > > How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > > conclusions? > > I don't churn my equipment. In my main system I'm happy with my Quads. > In the tv systems the differences are large enough that level-matching, > etc is too much trouble. > > Stephen Too much trouble?. Yep, you are a paradigm of the ignorance is bliss audio buff. Howard Ferstler |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Ferstler > wrote: > On Jan 7, 4:11*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote: > > In article > > >, > > > > > > > > > > > > *Ferstler > wrote: > > > On Dec 24 2009, 5:35*pm, MiNe 109 * > > > > wrote: > > > > In article > > > > >, > > > > *John Atkinson > wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 24, 1:28*pm, George M. Middius > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > 'Twas the night before Kroodown, and all 'round Goose Puke... > > > > > > > An oldie but goldie, George. But the foe seems long gone, > > > > > if not into that dark night, at least somewhere else. > > > > > > > But Harold Ferstler has reemerged, writing equipment > > > > > reports for AudioXpress under the title "Reliable Reviews." > > > > > > He's beating the same old drum, with ossified thoughts about level > > > > matching, pink noise and even that Villchur live-vs-recorded string > > > > quartet demo. > > > > > > "Reliable." Gotta give him that! > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > Yo, Stephen. Interesting to see that after me being away for months > > > and months you still have not found anything better to do with your > > > life than make smart-assed remarks about me on RAO. Yeah, I am > > > reliable, and I am also correct. > > > > I made a bunch of other comments that hardly mentioned you at all. > > > > > It is interesting that you found a relatively straightforward article > > > on setting up speaker levels for intelligent comparison work so "old > > > drum" in concept. How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > > > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > > > conclusions? > > > > > As for the Villchur demos, well, you have not a clue what you are > > > talking about. > > > > That would be a failure of your powers of description if you really > > think so. > > > > Stephen- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > You are a paradigm of the modern audio expert and enthusiast. I'll bet > you have never done a refined comparison between speakers or between > amps in your life. Here's a clue, Howard: Most people who like listening to their audio systems and to music haven't, never will, and don't care to. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 3:55*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article > >, > > > > > > *Ferstler > wrote: > > On Jan 7, 4:11 pm, MiNe 109 * > wrote: > > > In article > > > >, > > > > Ferstler > wrote: > > > > On Dec 24 2009, 5:35 pm, MiNe 109 > > > > > wrote: > > > > > In article > > > > > >, > > > > > John Atkinson > wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 24, 1:28 pm, George M. Middius > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > 'Twas the night before Kroodown, and all 'round Goose Puke... > > > > > > > An oldie but goldie, George. But the foe seems long gone, > > > > > > if not into that dark night, at least somewhere else. > > > > > > > But Harold Ferstler has reemerged, writing equipment > > > > > > reports for AudioXpress under the title "Reliable Reviews." > > > > > > He's beating the same old drum, with ossified thoughts about level > > > > > matching, pink noise and even that Villchur live-vs-recorded string > > > > > quartet demo. > > > > > > "Reliable." Gotta give him that! > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > Yo, Stephen. Interesting to see that after me being away for months > > > > and months you still have not found anything better to do with your > > > > life than make smart-assed remarks about me on RAO. Yeah, I am > > > > reliable, and I am also correct. > > > > I made a bunch of other comments that hardly mentioned you at all. > > > > > It is interesting that you found a relatively straightforward article > > > > on setting up speaker levels for intelligent comparison work so "old > > > > drum" in concept. How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > > > > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > > > > conclusions? > > > > > As for the Villchur demos, well, you have not a clue what you are > > > > talking about. > > > > That would be a failure of your powers of description if you really > > > think so. > > > > Stephen- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > You are a paradigm of the modern audio expert and enthusiast. I'll bet > > you have never done a refined comparison between speakers or between > > amps in your life. > > Here's a clue, Howard: *Most people who like listening to their audio > systems and to music haven't, never will, and don't care to. Amen. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Ferstler > wrote: > On Jan 7, 4:11*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote: > > In article > > >, > > > > > > > > > > > > *Ferstler > wrote: > > > On Dec 24 2009, 5:35*pm, MiNe 109 * > > > > wrote: > > > > In article > > > > >, > > > > *John Atkinson > wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 24, 1:28*pm, George M. Middius > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > 'Twas the night before Kroodown, and all 'round Goose Puke... > > > > > > > An oldie but goldie, George. But the foe seems long gone, > > > > > if not into that dark night, at least somewhere else. > > > > > > > But Harold Ferstler has reemerged, writing equipment > > > > > reports for AudioXpress under the title "Reliable Reviews." > > > > > > He's beating the same old drum, with ossified thoughts about level > > > > matching, pink noise and even that Villchur live-vs-recorded string > > > > quartet demo. > > > > > > "Reliable." Gotta give him that! > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > Yo, Stephen. Interesting to see that after me being away for months > > > and months you still have not found anything better to do with your > > > life than make smart-assed remarks about me on RAO. Yeah, I am > > > reliable, and I am also correct. > > > > I made a bunch of other comments that hardly mentioned you at all. > > > > > It is interesting that you found a relatively straightforward article > > > on setting up speaker levels for intelligent comparison work so "old > > > drum" in concept. How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > > > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > > > conclusions? > > > > > As for the Villchur demos, well, you have not a clue what you are > > > talking about. > > > > That would be a failure of your powers of description if you really > > think so. > > > > Stephen- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > You are a paradigm of the modern audio expert and enthusiast. I'll bet > you have never done a refined comparison between speakers or between > amps in your life. If by that you mean I've never tried to guess if a string quartet in a train station is miming or not, you're right. Stephen |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Ferstler > wrote: > On Jan 7, 4:13*pm, MiNe 109 > wrote: > > In article > > >, > > > > *Ferstler > wrote: > > > How do you compare speakers, bucko? Do you bother to > > > level match at all, or do you just guesstimate and then revel in your > > > conclusions? > > > > I don't churn my equipment. In my main system I'm happy with my Quads. > > In the tv systems the differences are large enough that level-matching, > > etc is too much trouble. > > > > Stephen > > Too much trouble?. Yep, you are a paradigm of the ignorance is bliss > audio buff. It's like Scottie with a new word. Stephen |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 4:55*pm, Jenn > wrote:
> In article > > Here's a clue, Howard: *Most people who like listening to their audio > systems and to music haven't, never will, and don't care to. Good point, at least as it relates to people like you. This is one reason (not the only one, but at least one of the reasons) the hobby has declined into the muddle it is today. There are two kinds of primary embracers of the hobby as it now exists. (1) The kind who go to Best Buy with a small budget, buy some packaged gear, take it home and enjoy it in blissful ignorance. I actually admire people like that. (2) The kind who go to an audio salon with big bucks in hand and purchase items that look good, sound maybe decent, and which were possibly praised in some lunatic-fringe magazine report. For people like this, audio is almost a religious experience that demands as little rational behavior as possible. Neither (1) nor (2) has any interest in understanding just why the gear they have is good (or possibly not so good), with the underlying motivation based upon blissful ignorance.The first group has many other things on their minds than audio, and their lack of interest in the details is actually quite normal. Sometimes blissful ignorance is a good thing. On the other hand, the second group continues to baffle me, because so many of them spend large percentages of their respective net worths on audio gear, and yet do not take the time to analyze whether or not their cash outlays (or credit charges) are paying off in absolute terms. No doubt, they are paying off in terms related to wishful thinking and speculation, of course, but is that something that is healthy for anyone? Is it normal for a person who is seriously interested in a hobby to willfully be ignorant of some of the more basic concepts around that hobby, or be lacking in any kind of interest that involves knowing instead of believing? Audio is the only hobby I know of where many of those supposedly interested in it are not interested in digging any deeper into the details than what speculation offers. If that is not the very definition of religion, I do not know what else is. It is the only hobby I know of where so many enthusiasts are utterly uninterested in basic epistemology. Today, most so-called audio enthusiasts are paradigm know-nothings. Perhaps 20 percent of them are on the ball and aware of the issues and how to resolve them. The remaining 80 percent are jerks. And for now I leave you jerks to your various tempests in teapots. I may drop back in one of these days to again marvel that the same people continue to rant, rave, and carp by banging on their keyboards. Howard Ferstler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Once upon a midnight clear.... | George M. Middius[_4_] | Audio Opinions | 0 | December 19th 08 06:31 PM |
MidNight Adult | [email protected] | Pro Audio | 0 | May 12th 08 03:08 PM |
FS: Audioquest Midnight 10' pair | J. Sun | Marketplace | 0 | November 1st 04 01:51 AM |
AudioQuest Midnight 2 ft pair$35 | Anousack Voravong | Marketplace | 5 | September 3rd 03 06:10 AM |