[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Have you ever noticed that the people who say "Trust me!" the most are
usually the least trustworthy? How about the cliché of some politician
named "Honest" Joe Smith (or whatever). It seems they get caught with
their hand in the cookie jar more often than not. And the ones who
scream the loudest about "proof" on RAO are seemingly the most prone
to making baseless assertions.

RAO has its very own personification of this. I find it doubtful that
2pid has as much integrity as he claims. He never fails to find fault
with the 'integrity' of people who disagree with him. Yet, as
predictable as an OT 2pid post, 2pid cannot fault the integrity of his
ideological companions. Note how often 2pid will bring up Murtha, who
may have been tempted but never acted, yet leave the name of a
republican, Cunningham, who was tempted AND acted, out of the
"integrity" 'discussion'.

Today we see 2pid call an internal probe at the Department of Justice
"suspect" because one of the students mentioned was a member of an
Islamic-American society. I can't tell if that's an utter lack of
integrity or sheer stupidity. In 2pid's defense, while he claims on a
daily basis to have massive amounts of "integrity", I've never once
seen him claim that he was smart. He may be too "honest" for that. LoL

With the utter lack of integrity shown by 2pid on such an overwhelming
and consistent basis, and with 2pid's constant nattering about it, I
propose we "trust" 2pid at his word and rename him "2pid "Integrity"
Imbecile". "Integrity" and "Honesty" can hang out and fool each
other.

They don't fool me.

Lol

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

They don't fool me.

I was just reading this:

"...is the sort of guy who experiences argument as affront ‹ one of
those forceful but brittle people we¹ve all encountered who, if you tell
them they¹re doing something that drives you crazy, will feel compelled
to double down and do it even harder, just to prove (perhaps to
themselves) that you can¹t tell them what to say or do."

Stephen

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jun 25, 4:27*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

They don't fool me.

I was just reading this:

"...is the sort of guy who experiences argument as affront ‹ one of
those forceful but brittle people we¹ve all encountered who, if you tell
them they¹re doing something that drives you crazy, will feel compelled
to double down and do it even harder, just to prove (perhaps to
themselves) that you can¹t tell them what to say or do."

Are you trying to tell me what to eat?

Your the policy of deprivation.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Jun 25, 4:27*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article
,
*"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

They don't fool me.

I was just reading this:

"...is the sort of guy who experiences argument as affront Ð one of
those forceful but brittle people we1ve all encountered who, if you tell
them they1re doing something that drives you crazy, will feel compelled
to double down and do it even harder, just to prove (perhaps to
themselves) that you can1t tell them what to say or do."

Are you trying to tell me what to eat?

Your the policy of deprivation.

No, you can't water your lawn.

Stephen